Skip to content

refactor: Security upgrade express-rate-limit from 8.2.1 to 8.2.2#10155

Open
parseplatformorg wants to merge 1 commit intoalphafrom
snyk-fix-2a3e930b081fd8342d4fa05f103b17b8
Open

refactor: Security upgrade express-rate-limit from 8.2.1 to 8.2.2#10155
parseplatformorg wants to merge 1 commit intoalphafrom
snyk-fix-2a3e930b081fd8342d4fa05f103b17b8

Conversation

@parseplatformorg
Copy link
Contributor

@parseplatformorg parseplatformorg commented Mar 9, 2026

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the package-lock.json, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue
high severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JS-EXPRESSRATELIMIT-15440710

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated express-rate-limit to version 8.2.2 for bug fixes and improvements.

@parse-github-assistant
Copy link

I will reformat the title to use the proper commit message syntax.

@parse-github-assistant
Copy link

🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request! We appreciate your effort in improving the project. Please let us know once your pull request is ready for review.

Note

Please respond to review comments from AI agents just like you would to comments from a human reviewer. Let the reviewer resolve their own comments, unless they have reviewed and accepted your commit, or agreed with your explanation for why the feedback was incorrect.

Caution

Pull requests must be written using an AI agent with human supervision. Pull requests written entirely by a human will likely be rejected, because of lower code quality, higher review effort and the higher risk of introducing bugs. Please note that AI review comments on this pull request alone do not satisfy this requirement.

@parse-github-assistant parse-github-assistant bot changed the title [Snyk] Security upgrade express-rate-limit from 8.2.1 to 8.2.2 refactor: Security upgrade express-rate-limit from 8.2.1 to 8.2.2 Mar 9, 2026
@parseplatformorg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scanner Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 9, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A patch version bump of the express-rate-limit dependency from 8.2.1 to 8.2.2 in package.json. No code modifications, API changes, or behavioral impacts.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency Update
package.json
Bumped express-rate-limit from 8.2.1 to 8.2.2 (patch version).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive The PR description lacks the required template structure including Issue, Approach, and Tasks sections; however it provides useful context about the vulnerability fix and security upgrade. Complete the PR description using the repository template with explicit Issue, Approach, and Tasks sections to improve clarity and maintainability.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main change: a security upgrade of express-rate-limit from version 8.2.1 to 8.2.2.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch snyk-fix-2a3e930b081fd8342d4fa05f103b17b8

Tip

Try Coding Plans. Let us write the prompt for your AI agent so you can ship faster (with fewer bugs).
Share your feedback on Discord.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Line 35: Update the lockfile to match the package change: regenerate
package-lock.json so the "express-rate-limit": "8.2.2" entry in package.json is
reflected in the lockfile (e.g., run npm install or npm install
express-rate-limit@8.2.2 to update package-lock.json), verify the lock now
references 8.2.2 (not 8.2.1), and commit the updated package-lock.json alongside
package.json before merging.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 387d599e-3f9e-44af-a799-92fbe9a10d8b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 00c6c7c and bb3e3ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json

"deepcopy": "2.1.0",
"express": "5.2.1",
"express-rate-limit": "8.2.1",
"express-rate-limit": "8.2.2",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify express-rate-limit 8.2.2 exists and check for any security advisories

# Check if version 8.2.2 exists on npm
echo "Checking npm registry for express-rate-limit 8.2.2..."
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/express-rate-limit/8.2.2 | jq '{name: .name, version: .version}'

# Verify package-lock.json is not updated in this PR
echo ""
echo "Checking if package-lock.json exists and was modified..."
if [ -f "package-lock.json" ]; then
  echo "package-lock.json exists - verify it contains express-rate-limit@8.2.2"
  grep -A1 '"express-rate-limit"' package-lock.json | head -5
else
  echo "package-lock.json not found in repository root"
fi

Repository: parse-community/parse-server

Length of output: 436


Regenerate package-lock.json before merging.

The dependency update to express-rate-limit 8.2.2 is correct for the security fix SNYK-JS-EXPRESSRATELIMIT-15440710, but package-lock.json still contains the old version (8.2.1) and must be regenerated to ensure consistent dependency resolution.

PR Title Suggestion:

fix(security): bump express-rate-limit from 8.2.1 to 8.2.2
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@package.json` at line 35, Update the lockfile to match the package change:
regenerate package-lock.json so the "express-rate-limit": "8.2.2" entry in
package.json is reflected in the lockfile (e.g., run npm install or npm install
express-rate-limit@8.2.2 to update package-lock.json), verify the lock now
references 8.2.2 (not 8.2.1), and commit the updated package-lock.json alongside
package.json before merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants