Conversation
…cluster On AWS clusters with only private subnets, an internet-facing LB cannot be provisioned, so the test's external Service of type LoadBalancer never comes up. Detect the internal-scoped default IngressController and request an internal LB (aws-load-balancer-internal) for the test's service too.
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: automatic mode |
openshift-ci-robot
added
jira/valid-reference
|
@tthvo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-126793, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 12 included reviews per hour; 11 remain after this review. WalkthroughThe test now checks the default IngressController on AWS. If its load-balancer scope is internal, the test applies the AWS internal-load-balancer annotation to the created service. ChangesAWS ingress load balancer handling
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~15 minutes Change: Bug fix Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The test correctly requests an internal AWS load balancer when ingress is private, with no identified merge-blocking risk. Caution Pre-merge checks failedPlease resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional.
❌ Failed checks (1 error, 1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (13 passed)
Full details: Ote Binary Stdout ContractExplanation The pull request adds a fifth Resolution Configure klog to write to stderr before monitor setup runs, for example with
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
@tthvo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-126793, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tthvo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@coderabbitai This change won't break OTE contract. AFAICT, the openshift-tests entry point configures the default Thus, we can skip the reported failed pre-flight check. For docstring warning, I added a comment for the new function and would like not to touch other existing ones. |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
printf '%s\n' '== Locate openshift-tests entry point and klog configuration =='
rg -n -C 5 --type go 'LogToStderr\s*\(\s*true\s*\)|logtostderr|klog\.InitFlags|FlagSet' .
printf '%s\n' '== Locate monitoring-test uses of klog.LogToStderr =='
rg -n -C 6 --type go 'klog\.LogToStderr\s*\(\s*true\s*\)' pkg/monitortests
printf '%s\n' '== Map changed monitoring test file =='
ast-grep outline pkg/monitortests/network/disruptionserviceloadbalancer/monitortest.go --items all
sed -n '1,260p' pkg/monitortests/network/disruptionserviceloadbalancer/monitortest.goLength of output: 201295 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
printf '%s\n' '== openshift-tests candidates =='
fd -t f -e go 'openshift-tests|openshift_tests' . | head -50
printf '%s\n' '== Direct klog LogToStderr calls in monitoring sources =='
rg -n --type go -g '!**/testdata/**' -g '!**/vendor/**' \
'klog\.LogToStderr\s*\(\s*true\s*\)' pkg/monitortests || true
printf '%s\n' '== Updated load-balancer monitoring test =='
sed -n '1,260p' pkg/monitortests/network/disruptionserviceloadbalancer/monitortest.go
printf '%s\n' '== klog flag initialization in command sources =='
rg -n --type go -g '!**/testdata/**' -g '!**/vendor/**' -C 4 \
'klog\.InitFlags|logtostderr' cmd test/extended 2>/dev/null || trueLength of output: 11297
The OpenShift Tests Extension entry point sets The new
You are interacting with an AI system. |
|
@coderabbitai re-run your pre-merge check and update your review. |
🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo="openshift/origin"
pr="31662"
printf '%s\n' '== Pull request metadata and checks =='
gh pr view "$pr" --repo "$repo" --json number,title,state,mergeable,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup,headRefOid,baseRefName \
--jq '{number,title,state,mergeable,reviewDecision,baseRefName,headRefOid,statusCheckRollup:[.statusCheckRollup[]? | {name,conclusion,status,detailsUrl}]}'
printf '%s\n' '== Changed files =='
gh pr diff "$pr" --repo "$repo" --name-only
printf '%s\n' '== Pull request diff =='
gh pr diff "$pr" --repo "$repo" -- pkg/monitortests/network/disruptionserviceloadbalancer/monitortest.go
printf '%s\n' '== Relevant source map and implementation =='
ast-grep outline pkg/monitortests/network/disruptionserviceloadbalancer/monitortest.go --items all
sed -n '1,300p' pkg/monitortests/network/disruptionserviceloadbalancer/monitortest.go
printf '%s\n' '== Operator-client patterns for IngressController scope =='
rg -n --type go -C 4 'IngressController|LoadBalancerScope|aws-load-balancer-internal' pkg test/extended | head -500Length of output: 3018 🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo="openshift/origin"
pr="31662"
printf '%s\n' '== Pull request checks =='
gh pr checks "$pr" --repo "$repo" --json name,state,bucket,workflow,link \
--jq '.[] | {name,state,bucket,workflow,link}' || true
printf '%s\n' '== Pull request patch =='
gh pr diff "$pr" --repo "$repo"
printf '%s\n' '== Relevant source map =='
ast-grep outline pkg/monitortests/network/disruptionserviceloadbalancer/monitortest.go --items all
printf '%s\n' '== Relevant source =='
sed -n '1,320p' pkg/monitortests/network/disruptionserviceloadbalancer/monitortest.go
printf '%s\n' '== Scope and annotation usage patterns =='
rg -n --type go -C 5 'LoadBalancerScopeInternal|IngressController|aws-load-balancer-internal' \
pkg/monitortests pkg/cli test/extended 2>/dev/null | head -500 || trueLength of output: 66953
I found no remaining actionable findings. The change only applies on AWS. It reads the default The completed The prior
|
|
Scheduling tests matching the |
|
@coderabbitai you still have a stale "Requested changes" in the PR. If you have other reviews, let me know. If not, remove it. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: #!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
repo="openshift/origin"
pr="31662"
printf '%s\n' '== Pull request review decision =='
gh pr view "$pr" --repo "$repo" --json reviewDecision,reviews \
--jq '{reviewDecision, reviews: [.reviews[] | {author: .author.login, state, submittedAt, body}]}'
printf '%s\n' '== CodeRabbit review comments and resolution state =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/pulls/$pr/comments?per_page=100" \
--jq '.[] | select(.user.login == "coderabbitai[bot]" or .user.login == "coderabbitai") | {id, path, line, side, body, created_at}' || true
printf '%s\n' '== CodeRabbit-authored issue comments =='
gh api --paginate "repos/$repo/issues/$pr/comments?per_page=100" \
--jq '.[] | select(.user.login == "coderabbitai[bot]" or .user.login == "coderabbitai") | {id, created_at, body}' || trueLength of output: 27516
I will replace the stale requested-changes review with an approval. ✅ Action performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
ready-for-human-review
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-5.1-e2e-aws-ovn-installer-dualstack-ipv6-primary |
|
@tthvo: trigger 2 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/225094e0-b3a8-11f1-9574-9e6675537c07-0 |
|
/override-sticky ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes. Job classification: Eligible long-running presubmit e2e/integration job. If you disagree with this assessment, rerun the current job with AI-generated. Review for accuracy. |
|
@redhat-chai-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of redhat-chai-bot: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade These overrides will persist across retests on the current HEAD SHA. Pushing a new commit will clear them. Use DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/override-sticky ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes. Job classification: Eligible long-running generated presubmit e2e/integration job. The job uses the Revision check: Run SHA Execution status: Tests executed in Completed supporting jobs: Fleet-wide failure rate: This exact job passed 73.6% over 14 days and 78.3% over 7 days. Representative exact failing-test rates for the current 5.1 view were: Open regressions: No separate Component Readiness regression record was retrieved for the remaining failure groups. The conntrack failure is explicitly covered by the open regression tracked in Linked bugs: Overlap assessment: The PR changes only Missing-coverage risk: Low for this failure decision. The job's failed coverage is unrelated to the AWS-only code path, and the remaining completed AWS/GCP e2e jobs plus unit/lint/verify/images checks are green. The metal IPv6 job remains a useful platform signal, but its broad infrastructure failure does not provide meaningful evidence against this change. Prior bot activity on this SHA: One Rationale: The job is an eligible long-running e2e/integration job, the revision matches, tests ran, and fleet/platform evidence shows the observed failures are pre-existing systemic IPv6-metal/infrastructure failures rather than regressions in this AWS-only monitor-test change. A Prow controller-manager If you disagree with this assessment, rerun the current job with AI-generated. Review for accuracy. |
|
@redhat-chai-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of redhat-chai-bot: ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 These overrides will persist across retests on the current HEAD SHA. Pushing a new commit will clear them. Use DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@tthvo: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
3 participants
Descriptions
On AWS clusters with only private subnets, an internet-facing LB cannot be provisioned, so the test's external Service of type LoadBalancer never comes up. Detect the internal-scoped default
IngressControllerand request an internal LB (aws-load-balancer-internal) for the test's service too.For reference: openshift/release#65357 (review)
Summary by CodeRabbit