-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 429
OCPBUGS-76318: pkg/helpers: Print the right error object #2197
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
CheckOAuthDisabledErr prints a wrong error object. This is now fixed.
|
@tchap: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76318, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies error handling in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@tchap: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-76318, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
|
||
| Original error: | ||
| %w`, details.Kind, details.Group, err)) | ||
| %w`, details.Kind, details.Group, originalError)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice catch
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if !sets.New[string](oauthv1.GroupVersion.Group, userv1.GroupVersion.Group).Has(details.Group) { | ||
| if details.Group != oauthv1.GroupVersion.Group && details.Group != userv1.GroupVersion.Group { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason of this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's IMO more readable, but I can change it back 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It works for me. No need to change :)
|
Thank you |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ardaguclu, tchap The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/verified by @tchap |
|
@tchap: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
|
@tchap: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
CheckOAuthDisabledErr prints a wrong error object. This is now fixed.
Also improved readability a bit and fixed some typos.