Skip to content

OCPBUGS-105478: [release-4.22] OCPBUGS-83799: Fix Workloads sidebar ordering when DeploymentConfig is unavailable - #16928

Open
kchawlani19 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.22from
kchawlani19:backport-16642-workloads-nav-order
Open

OCPBUGS-105478: [release-4.22] OCPBUGS-83799: Fix Workloads sidebar ordering when DeploymentConfig is unavailable#16928
kchawlani19 wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:release-4.22from
kchawlani19:backport-16642-workloads-nav-order

Conversation

@kchawlani19

@kchawlani19 kchawlani19 commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Test plan

  • On an OpenShift cluster with DeploymentConfigs available: Workloads order remains Topology → Pods → Deployments → DeploymentConfigs → StatefulSets → …
  • On vanilla Kubernetes (or with DeploymentConfig capability disabled): Workloads order is Topology → Pods → Deployments → StatefulSets → Secrets → ConfigMaps → …
  • Unit tests in nav/__tests__/utils.spec.ts cover the workloads insertAfter fallback scenario

…s unavailable

StatefulSets used insertAfter: "deploymentconfigs" only, which breaks the
nav chain on vanilla Kubernetes / when DeploymentConfigs are disabled and
pushes Topology, Pods, and Deployments to the bottom of Workloads.

Add "deployments" as a fallback insertAfter target (backport of openshift#16351).
Also covers openshift#16642.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. labels Aug 10, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kchawlani19: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-83799, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.22." or "openshift-4.22.", but it targets "5.0.0" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Verified instead
  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-83799 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 5.0.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Test plan

  • On an OpenShift cluster with DeploymentConfigs available: Workloads order remains Topology → Pods → Deployments → DeploymentConfigs → StatefulSets → …
  • On vanilla Kubernetes (or with DeploymentConfig capability disabled): Workloads order is Topology → Pods → Deployments → StatefulSets → Secrets → ConfigMaps → …
  • Unit tests in nav/__tests__/utils.spec.ts cover the workloads insertAfter fallback scenario

Made with Cursor

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 10, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the component/core Related to console core functionality label Aug 10, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kchawlani19
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jhadvig for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kchawlani19

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-83799

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kchawlani19: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-83799 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-105478. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle OCPBUGS-105478: [release-4.22] OCPBUGS-83799: Fix Workloads sidebar ordering when DeploymentConfig is unavailable

Details

In response to this:

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-83799

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title [release-4.22] OCPBUGS-83799: Fix Workloads sidebar ordering when DeploymentConfig is unavailable OCPBUGS-105478: [release-4.22] OCPBUGS-83799: Fix Workloads sidebar ordering when DeploymentConfig is unavailable Aug 10, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kchawlani19: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-105478, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Test plan

  • On an OpenShift cluster with DeploymentConfigs available: Workloads order remains Topology → Pods → Deployments → DeploymentConfigs → StatefulSets → …
  • On vanilla Kubernetes (or with DeploymentConfig capability disabled): Workloads order is Topology → Pods → Deployments → StatefulSets → Secrets → ConfigMaps → …
  • Unit tests in nav/__tests__/utils.spec.ts cover the workloads insertAfter fallback scenario

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kchawlani19: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/backend 5cae3db link true /test backend

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

component/core Related to console core functionality jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants