-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
8364107: [lworld] Revise memory limit in compiler/startup/StartupOutput.java #1749
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back mchevalier! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@marc-chevalier This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 134 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
/touch Trying to see if the bot find the issue this time. |
|
@marc-chevalier The pull request is being re-evaluated and the inactivity timeout has been reset. |
chhagedorn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks reasonable, thanks for the thorough analysis!
|
/integrate Thanks @chhagedorn for review. I've run some tests again to make sure it didn't pass only by chance. Still looks good. |
|
Going to push as commit 0a86ffe.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@marc-chevalier Pushed as commit 0a86ffe. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Let's do a similar job as in #1509 and see what evolved since JDK-8350209: Preserve adapters in AOT cache landed in Valhalla.
For each tick in the list, I give a range that behaves homogeneously, and compare it to a Mainline and/or Valhalla range of #1509
[4, 24] ~ Mainline [4, 28]
[25, 28] ~ Mainline [29, 32] | Valhalla [29, 32]
fatal error: Initial size of CodeCache is too small[29, 1164] ~ Mainline [33, 1112] | Valhalla [33, 1164]
[1165, 1172] ~ Mainline [1117, 1128] | Valhalla [1165, 1172]
fatal error: Initial size of CodeCache is too small[1173, 1176] ~ Valhalla [1225, 1228] (out of order, weird, uh!)
SIGSEGV in
CodeSection::emit_int8(unsigned char)[1177, 1224] ~ Mainline [1129, 1144] | Valhalla [1173, 1220]
assert(_buffer != nullptr) failed: should be initialized[1225, 1228] ~ Mainline [1145, 1148] | Valhalla [1221, 1224]
assert(_no_arg_handler != nullptr && _obj_arg_handler != nullptr && _int_arg_handler != nullptr && _obj_int_arg_handler != nullptr && _obj_obj_arg_handler != nullptr) failed: Initial adapter handlers must be properly created[1229, ~1250] ~ Mainline [1149, ~1700]
Often works, sometimes
[~1250, 1276]
Mostly works
[1277, 1432]
[1433, 1438] ~ Valhalla [1301, 1308]
[1439, ~1600]
works but
Above 1600, compiler shutdown starts to be rare, but again around 2800k Like it was for Valhalla before above 1994k, and we saw it around 3700k.
It used to be:
Overall, the behavior for small amount of memory is similar as in previous Valhalla and mainline. The behavior for larger amounts got much better, more similar to mainline where it mostly works from 1149k, and up, except in some pathological islands.
So, it looks good to reduce the
2000incompiler/startup/StartupOutput.java(was increased from800). So, I just tried... If locally, I could indeed make it run with quite smaller amount of memory, some more testing shows that1300is a better bound: it crashes significantly starting under1200but seems to pass all tests with1300. That is still an increase from800, but less radical than2000.Thanks,
Marc
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1749/head:pull/1749$ git checkout pull/1749Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1749$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1749/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1749View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1749Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1749.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment