Uwuify markdown files for issue #6

[devwif]

This PR uwuifies all markdown files in the repository as requested in issue #6.

Repository Statistics 📊

Here are some interesting insights about this repository:

• Total Files: 1059
• Markdown Files: 56 (5% of total)
• Total Markdown Size: 661.92 KB
• Average Markdown File Size: 11.82 KB
• Largest Markdown File: ideless/plan-phase1.md (35.32 KB)
• Contributors: 2
• Last Updated: April 13, 2025
• Top Languages: Rust (343.55 KB), TypeScript (132.67 KB), HTML (58.08 KB)

Top Contributors by Merged PRs 👥

1. 0xrinegade - 2 merged PRs

These statistics were generated at the time of uwuification.

Changes

• Uwuified all markdown files in the repository using the Rust binary implementation
• Created by @uwularpy bot

[sourcery-ai]

We failed to fetch the diff for pull request #7

You can try again by commenting this pull request with @sourcery-ai review, or contact us for help.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for lessvm ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	d35364a
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/lessvm/deploys/67feedc68b5a060008ec8be8
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-7--lessvm.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[0xrinegade]

@l r

[devwif]

The code changes consist of markdown files with detailed project planning, implementation, testing, and documentation guidelines. Here are observations for quality, security, and style:

1. Clarity and Consistency:

   • The markdown files are well-structured and include clear sections like objectives, steps, dependencies, milestones, etc.
   • The instructions and plans are detailed and follow a logical flow.
   • No obvious issues with language inconsistencies; most files use standard markdown formatting.

2. Security:

   • These are documentation files outlining development plans and do not contain executable code, secrets, or sensitive data.
   • No security issues detected.

3. Style and Formatting:

   • The markdown syntax is correctly used throughout.
   • Code snippets are formatted properly with triple backticks and comments.
   • The details are verbose, which is beneficial for thorough guidance, though could be trimmed for conciseness in leaner documentation.

4. Potential Improvements:

   • Some sections are very extensive (e.g., component plans). Consider breaking large documents into smaller, modular files for easier management.
   • Consistent formatting for headings (e.g., use of #, ##, ###) is good; ensure headings are appropriately leveled.
   • Check for typos and spelling issues:
     • For example, in "wequiwements" (should be "wequiwements"), "w-wowkfwow" (should be "wowkfwow"), etc.
   • In some parts, the markdown includes unnecessary characters or formatting artifacts (e.g., extra spaces in markdown headings). Cleaning these up can improve readability.
   • The content involves project planning; ensure that the timeline and milestones are feasible and clearly aligned with developer capacity.

5. No security concerns:

   • These are purely planning and documentation files without raw credentials or sensitive information.

Summary: The documents are detailed and well-structured, suitable for guiding development. Minor typos and formatting cleanups are recommended but there are no significant quality, security, or style issues.

Recommendation:

• Correct typos (e.g., "wequiwements" → "wequiwements")
• Consider splitting large component plans into separate files
• Remove any trailing or unnecessary whitespace characters
• Ensure all headings are properly leveled and consistent

Overall, the content provides a solid development roadmap with no security concerns.