[REF] website: move address autocomplete to General + update#17627
[REF] website: move address autocomplete to General + update#17627
Conversation
task-6062545 task-5194557
|
|
mcsi-odoo
left a comment
mcsi-odoo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @lman-odoo ! This looks so much better than the old version 🤩 Take a look at my comments and suggestions and let me know if you'd like to discuss anything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't see a redirection for this in the 19.0.txt redirects file in PyCharm (and we'll want to create one so the old content/applications/websites/website/configuration/address_autocomplete rst/url redirects to the new content/applications/general/integrations/address_autocomplete one)
Are you familiar with how to do that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You are totally right!!! I totally forgot the redirection. I will add it. Sorry about that
| Odoo provides a feature to automatically complete contact address information using the Google | ||
| Places API. This service allows developers to retrieve detailed place information via HTTP requests. | ||
| As you begin typing an address, the system suggests a list of matching locations to simplify | ||
| data entry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Odoo provides a feature to automatically complete contact address information using the Google | |
| Places API. This service allows developers to retrieve detailed place information via HTTP requests. | |
| As you begin typing an address, the system suggests a list of matching locations to simplify | |
| data entry. | |
| Odoo integrates with the Google Places API to allow the autocompletion of addresses. As you begin typing an address, the system provides a list of suggested locations, reducing manual errors and saving time. |
I think the first sentence could be a little more direct, so I made a suggestion.
Also, since this documentation is aimed at regular users, I think we could probably drop the sentence about HTTP requests ... what do you think? And if we remove it, we should probably remove the link to the developers documentation too.
(Or ... maybe, for some reason, it would make sense to have a little admonition only for developers? I don't understand this well enough to know why a developer might be reading about this here. Maybe you have a better understanding about that?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You are right! I guess we can remove it. I kept it because I thought it must have been added for some reason, but as you said, our documentation is aimed at regular users. Thank you!
|
|
||
| .. seealso:: | ||
| - `Google Maps Platform <https://mapsplatform.google.com/maps-products>`_ | ||
| - `Google Developers Documentation: Google Places API |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - `Google Developers Documentation: Google Places API | |
| - `Google developer documentation: Google Places API |
If we do keep this: (see previous comment):
- should we be linking to this instead https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/places/web-service/overview? The current link seems to go to documentation about 'Place Autocomplete (Legacy)', rather than Places API documentation.
- from some Googling, this seems to be more often called just ' ... developer documentation', e.g.,
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can remove the HTTP request information from your previous comment. But I would still add this link as I think it could be useful.
| #. In the upper-left corner, click :guilabel:`Select a project` or the selected project's name if | ||
| you have already created one. In the :guilabel:`Select a resource` pop-up, select a project, or | ||
| create a :guilabel:`New Project`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we take a look at this together? (at the two scenarios: no project created & with one already there) I wonder if we need to edit this slightly as it confused me a bit (as I was doing it in an account where there was already a project).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sure, let's discuss it!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Only commenting here because I'm a bit confused as to why we're seeing this, and I want to ask @auva-odoo about it. Because I guess you completely deleted the old image ... and here it's showing that you renamed it. So I'm just wondering why that shows here.
3 participants
task-6062545
task-5194557