docs: document reviewed Experience and Skill workflows - #1334
Open
chenncy wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds new, synchronized English and Chinese documentation that explains and operationalizes the Candidate review workflow plus the Experience / managed Skill lifecycle, while trimming procedure-heavy content from the reference pages and updating site navigation accordingly.
Changes:
- Add new how-to guides for reviewing Candidates, creating/reviewing Experiences, and creating/exporting managed Skills (EN + ZH).
- Add new explanation pages describing the Experience/Skill evidence → Candidate → Revision lifecycle (EN + ZH).
- Update nav + index pages, and refactor reference docs to link to the new how-to pages.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 15 out of 15 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| zensical.toml | Adds the new EN/ZH pages to the documentation navigation. |
| docs/en/docs/index.md | Adds new “Experience/Skill lifecycle” and workflow entry points to the EN docs landing page. |
| docs/zh/docs/index.md | Adds new “Experience/Skill lifecycle” and workflow entry points to the ZH docs landing page. |
| docs/en/docs/reference/interfaces.md | Moves Candidate procedure out; links to the new how-to and lifecycle explanation. |
| docs/zh/docs/reference/interfaces.md | Moves Candidate procedure out; links to the new how-to and lifecycle explanation. |
| docs/en/docs/reference/configuration.md | Refactors incubation guidance to point to the new how-to. |
| docs/zh/docs/reference/configuration.md | Refactors incubation guidance to point to the new how-to. |
| docs/en/docs/how-to/review-candidates.md | New EN how-to: list/inspect/revise/approve/reject Candidates and verify outcomes. |
| docs/zh/docs/how-to/review-candidates.md | New ZH how-to: list/inspect/revise/approve/reject Candidates and verify outcomes. |
| docs/en/docs/how-to/create-and-review-experience.md | New EN how-to: generate Experience Candidates, review, verify, replace, and schedule incubation. |
| docs/zh/docs/how-to/create-and-review-experience.md | New ZH how-to: generate Experience Candidates, review, verify, replace, and schedule incubation. |
| docs/en/docs/how-to/create-and-export-skill.md | New EN how-to: generate/review Skill Candidates, exact reads, export to Codex, and evolve via usage. |
| docs/zh/docs/how-to/create-and-export-skill.md | New ZH how-to: generate/review Skill Candidates, exact reads, export to Codex, and evolve via usage. |
| docs/en/docs/explanation/experience-and-skill-lifecycle.md | New EN explanation: evidence/Candidate/versioning/Revision lifecycle and boundaries. |
| docs/zh/docs/explanation/experience-and-skill-lifecycle.md | New ZH explanation: evidence/Candidate/versioning/Revision lifecycle and boundaries. |
💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
Comment on lines
+114
to
+115
| The `candidate` command group exposes the human Review Inbox. See [Review Candidates](../how-to/review-candidates.md) | ||
| for the ordered list, inspect, revise, approve, and reject workflow. |
Comment on lines
+108
to
+113
| Experience incubation is a separate APScheduler job with its own persisted Source cursor. It requires both the | ||
| Experience interval and generation model settings. Each activation inspects at most 32 Sources and exposes only | ||
| Content Sources whose metadata contains `"kind": "task-outcome"`. The Memory and Experience jobs share the scheduler | ||
| sidecar under `POWERCONTEXT_HOME`, but keep independent job identities and business cursors. Unsetting one interval | ||
| removes only that job. See [Create and review an Experience](../how-to/create-and-review-experience.md) for setup and | ||
| verification steps. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Teingi
reviewed
Aug 24, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #1226
Summary
Validation
.\.venv\Scripts\zensical.exe build -sgit diff --checkAI usage
Used the
documentation-writerandhumanizerskills to draft and edit the documentation. The author manually reviewed the final content.