[PM seat] domain:ui @ objectui · seat 3 — 🟢 只跟两张 PR 到合并(维护者指派)· 11 landed · ⭐ #9556 落地(PR 9935)· 11 份复核记录 10 FAIL 1 PASS,⛔ 没有一次判在改动本身 —— 全挂在散文与钉上 · ⛔⭐ 本席最重一处:#6771 的 `Clause-②: no` 是错的(published type 收窄成 never,维护者裁决早标步骤 3 为 yes)—— 闸门五轮未挂,已双载体补挂 · ⛔ 第六轮复核记录因未达档整体作废(我起子代理漏传档位),测量仍成立 · #9684 第五轮 / #6771 第七轮已派 · hourly Routine 已停,靠 PR 订阅 + 自排跟进醒 · 决策箱 #9910 #9930 #9945 #9946

[os-sales]

1. Current PM

field	value
GitHub account	os-sales
Session	session_01Xm4WFhEe5mwcgyqHjxR2hn
Seat	domain:ui#3 — declared on every claim as Seat: domain:ui#3
Took the seat	2026-09-18T06:00Z
Wake-up	⛔ PAUSED — cron Routine trig_012DgwtbV8r2tUEPCicFxXwr (hourly at :54, self-bind) set enabled: false at 2026-09-18T22:15:49Z on the maintainer's instruction 「停」. ended_reason and suspension_reason both empty ⇒ user-paused, ⛔ not auto-disabled. ⚠️ The response still carries a next_run_at naming tonight's :54 slot — a stored field whose value is a future instant, ⛔ therefore not a reading of anything and deliberately not written here as a stamp. A disabled Routine ⛔ does not fire, so that field is a leftover, ⛔ not a schedule. Re-enable with update_trigger enabled: true.
Body refreshed	2026-09-19T00:06Z (R14)

Mutual exclusion re-read 2026-09-18T21:03:28Z: 5 open pm:seat cards, exactly ONE claims
domain:ui#3 — this post.

2. Ledger

14 dispatched · 10 ACCEPT · 11 LANDED · 0 REWORK for implementation quality · 10 contract-review
records (9 FAIL, 1 PASS) · 2 correct stops · 24 cards filed (1 withdrawn by this seat).

Landed (11): #9568 (PR 9804) · #9594 (9812) · #9542 (9826) · #9507 (9845) · #9645 (9854) ·
#9615 (9872) · #9574 (9873) · #9603 (9901) · #9655 (9917) · #9676 (9918) ·
⭐ #9556 (9935 — merged 2026-09-18T20:26:16Z, main = 272a53066049025259c66621a0cecb03a0a65986).

Review tally — measured 2026-09-18T21:44:41Z, ⛔ not carried forward. Instrument: every
comment on PRs 9895 / 9926 / 9935 whose body opens ## Contract review and carries a
**VERDICT:** line. 10 records: 9 FAIL, 1 PASS. ⚠️ This post previously said #6771 had three
FAILs; it has four — the round-five record 5735358922 was never added. See §4.

In flight (2), both owned by this seat through to MERGED:

• finding(sdui-parser/components): the manifest tier reports unknown-prop on body — the one child-list key 10+ registrations actually honour #6771 (p1, body dialect retirement, PR objectui#9895, 104 files) — five review records,
  all FAIL. Round six reviewed 5736698949 → FAIL, and ⛔ VOIDED whole for being below tier
  (5736705386): 118/118 stamped requests read claude-opus-5 against CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
claude-fable-5-1; ⛔ my error — I spawned the reviewer with no tier override. Its measurements
  stand; the verdict does not. Owed: G14 (pin header's stated reach exceeds measured reach — three
  false sentences, established by ablation with controls both ways), G15 (a tenth spent box.tsx
  example, present-tense, serving as the control in a file this diff already edits), a main merge
  (branch dirty), and an at-tier re-run citing the void. Handoff 5736711644; round 7 dispatched 5737545480.

Round 5 dispatched 2026-09-19T00:06Z:

• finding(types): the retire-vs-remove discriminator is written out in full at SIX sites across two files, so every amendment is an N-site hand edit — objectui#9682 amended five and missed the sixth #9684 (p2, retire-vs-remove discriminator, PR objectui#9926, 3 files) — four FAILs
  (5734125317, 5734661857, 5735211163, 5736109788). Round-4 FAIL adopted 5736117305, round 5 dispatched 5737545208,
  both carriers stripped 2026-09-18T21:00:33Z / 2026-09-18T21:00:35Z, handoff
  5736130439. ⛔ Re-hang needs:contract-review the moment the head moves.

Correct stops, ⛔ not failures: #9554 (premise falsified before a line was written) ·
#9547 (ruled letter C 2026-09-18T14:45:24Z; pm:blocked on objectstack-ai/objectstack#19057).

Decision box (this seat's), all needs-user-decision: #9910 (containment diagnostic) ·
#9930 (cite-vs-restate in published JSDoc — seat recommends C) · #9945 (retire the
aria.label fold on the two back-compat blocks — seat recommends B, ⛔ differing from the dev's
A) · #9946.

Filed this shift, still live: objectui#9808 · #9810 · #9828 · #9855 · #9856 · #9874 · #9875 ·
#9908 · #9910 · #9916 · #9930 · #9932 · #9933 · #9945 · #9946 · #9961 ·
objectstack#18977 · #19002 · #19030 · #19052. ⛔ #9934 withdrawn and closed by this seat — §4.

⚠️ Live subscriptions, still armed: objectui#9895, objectui#9926 — ⛔ NOT dropped. The seat is off shift but these two PRs still wake this session on CI or comment events. They are recorded here rather than left orphaned; whoever resumes either drops them or inherits them. objectui#9935 auto-unsubscribed on merge.
⛔ No orphans. In-flight subagent: one isolated reviewer on PR objectui#9895.

3. Serial queue

area	state
body dialect	#6771 round six FAIL + record voided below tier (PR 9895); round 7 ⛔ not dispatched; ⚠️ branch dirty — ⭐ the one text conflict is scripts/__tests__/body-dialect-census.test.ts, but main also took a sibling body-dialect change (scripts/body-dialect-producer-scan.mjs, changeset 9871) that neither scan was written knowing about. Input posted 5736548634. ⛔ File-surface disjointness only guarantees text merges. → #9590 (item-level) stays fenced
page:card body read	#9961 (new) — the fourth surviving reader, and ⭐ the only one where the retired spelling outranks children (schema?.body ?? schema?.children). Sibling #9916 holds the other three and sets this one aside by name
packages/types/src/ discriminator	#9684 round five owed (PR 9926); ⛔ complex.ts untouched pending #9930
plugin-detail aria	⭐ closed — #9556 landed; residual questions live on #9945 / #9946
precision→scale	#9575 (p3) still queued, below every p2
⛔ fenced by file collision	#9653 waits on PR objectui#9540 (same file)
⚠️ cross-lane hold	patrol H36: PR 9895 shares content/docs/api/schema-reference.md and content/docs/guide/schema-playground.md with open card #8941. Second to land re-probes git merge-tree --write-tree

4. Notes

🟢 Stand-down REVERSED for the two open PRs — maintainer, 「你的两个pr要负责跟进到合并」

The seat stood down at 2026-09-18T22:16Z. The maintainer then put both open PRs back on this seat,
to MERGED. ⛔ The hourly Routine stays paused — it is ⛔ not re-enabled on this seat's own initiative.
The wake mechanism is instead: the two live PR subscriptions, plus a self check-in re-armed every round
until both PRs are MERGED or closed (trig_01FaDbYVHt6W7gFgPZAdVBNZ, first fire 00:56Z).

Rework rounds dispatched 2026-09-19T00:06Z: #9684 round 5 (5737545208) and #6771 round 7
(5737545480). ⛔ No other card dispatched — the seat is off shift for everything except these two.

⚠️ The one thing that must not repeat: the contract reviewer that follows each round is spawned
with the tier passed explicitly. Round 6 on #6771 was spawned without it, ran at the default
judgment tier, and its verdict had to be voided whole. ⭐ The tier is something the spawning act
sets and the spawning act verifies from the transcript — ⛔ never something a record is trusted to
have had.

⭐ Nine contract-review FAILs, and ⛔ not one on the change itself

Every record judged the retirement, the faces, the parse tier and the semver level right. All nine
verdicts rest on prose and pins: sentences a reader would act on that the diff falsifies, and pins
whose stated reach exceeds their actual reach. ⚠️ CI was fully green on most reviewed heads.
⇒ 「CI 绿」 and 「the comments are true」 are ⛔ unrelated readings. ⭐ Ablation is what turns a pin
claim into evidence: reviewers repeatedly wrote wordings nobody had tried and found pins silent.

⚠️ Half-state patrol anchor — ⛔ 403 is NOT 「unconfigured」

Re-measured 2026-09-18T21:03:47Z: GET /actions/variables/HALF_STATE_ANCHOR_ISSUE → 403
proxy-refused, and the list endpoint of the same family → 403, while GET /repos/…/objectui →
200. ⇒ the refusal is scoped to the Actions path family and this is unreadable from this
session, ⛔ which is not a reading that the anchor is unconfigured. ⚠️ Earlier revisions of this post
said 「Still unconfigured」 — that was the same misattribution class as #9934 and is corrected here.
Manual half run every round.

⚠️ Enqueue condition ③ was unsatisfied at the moment of the landing call — disclosed, 5735598361

The gate re-check printed Governed Surface Queue Guard: in_progress and the same command block
issued PUT …/ccr/auto_merge. The guard concluded success seven seconds later, so no wrong landing
followed — ⛔ the outcome does not repair the act. ⭐ Rule since: a gate re-check and the call it
gates ⛔ do not belong in one command block; in_progress is REFUSED, ⛔ not retry-in-the-same-breath.

⚠️ This seat published a wrong count of its own FAILs — corrected in place

The round-4 adoption 5736117305 said 「eight of eight」. Measured: nine. #6771's round-five FAIL
was missing from this post's own tally and got carried into a published sentence whose whole job was
to count. ⭐ Same class as the three cards whose closed lists were falsified this shift — a closed
list published without re-deriving it — this time applied to the seat's own ledger.

⛔ A card this seat filed and withdrew — objectui#9934

Filed as a safety defect, closed as not-a-defect 21 minutes later. The mechanism half was verified
at source; the instance half was taken on relay — the removal was this seat's own FAIL carrier
strip, eleven minutes before the push it was blamed on. ⭐ Rule since: a before-and-after pair of
readings with a gap identifies ⛔ no actor at all — it identifies a gap. ⚠️ The #9926 round-4 review
re-read that timeline with the control the retraction lacked and confirmed it, while naming one event
the retraction never accounted for (labeled 19:44:43Z os-sales); the shared identity ⛔ cannot say
which seat wrote it.

⚠️ Three cards' closed lists were wrong this shift, all with lit controls

#9684's six were eight · #6771's four children || body readers were more · #9556's table
falsified in two rows. ⭐ A control proves the instrument fires and says nothing about what it cannot
reach — a cast, a paraphrase, or a file outside the scoped corpus.

⭐ objectui#9932 — debt DISCHARGED by this seat's own reading, and the answer was 0

Measured 2026-09-19T00:06Z with the pin's own regex literals over all 1749 .changeset .md bodies at
origin/main 706e09f27…: STATES_THE_RULE → 1 (7678, the amendment itself), un-amended →
0. Lit control discriminator → 25; absent-token control → 0. Comment 5737664599.

⭐ The 0 was probed before it was published, because a zero against three named files is exactly
the shape a broken instrument makes. It is not: 706e09f27 is the merge of objectui#9970
(os-tesla), which rewrote 4919, 5942, 7519 and 7703 to cite the discriminator instead
of restating it. ⇒ the three relayed readings were true when taken; the population went to zero
because the work landed. ⚠️ And the delivered fix took the reviewers' three plus 7703, ⛔ not
this card's recorded two — the reviewers' count was right, which is exactly why the number was never
edited on relay. ⚠️ Bound stated: main was 36 minutes newer at the time of reading and ⛔ not
measured. A count of this population is only true at the instant it is taken.

Discipline — errors this seat made, all corrected in public

1. Composed identifiers; rule since: identifiers and stamps come out of tool output.
2. mergeable_state quoted as a reading; GET /compare is the instrument, and a computed
   mergeable is read twice because it answers lazily.
3. A blanket 「⛔ No label writes」 in four dispatch briefs.
4. An undated sha in a verdict — three times.
5. Cross-card false citations — TWICE. ⭐ Every comment id this seat writes is fetched by id and
   its issue_url read in the same act.
6. A dispatch brief with a closed list of four body readers, inherited from a triage grep.
7. A claim comment clearing a PR as 「does not touch this card's pin」 — true and insufficient.
8. ⚠️ A half-repaired PR body (docs(types): cite the retire-vs-remove discriminator once instead of restating it at eight sites (objectui#9684) #9926). ⭐ Rule since: when a body is corrected at all, every
   sentence a reader would act on is re-read against the head in the same act.
9. ⛔ objectui#9934, above.
10. ⚠️ A retracted claim propagated into a live brief 7 minutes after the retraction. ⭐ Rule
    since: a retraction is finished only when every live brief carrying it is corrected, and finding
    them is the retractor's job.
11. ⚠️ The enqueue slip, above.
12. ⚠️ The wrong FAIL count, above.
13. ⛔ ⭐ A wrong Clause-②: no on finding(sdui-parser/components): the manifest tier reports unknown-prop on body — the one child-list key 10+ registrations actually honour #6771, above — the heaviest of the shift.
14. ⚠️ An isolated reviewer spawned with no tier override, so a contract review ran at the default
    judgment tier and its verdict had to be voided whole. ⭐ Rule: the tier is something the spawning
    act sets and the spawning act must verify from the transcript, ⛔ never something the record
    is trusted to have had.

_{Refreshed at 2026-09-19T00:06Z. Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xm4WFhEe5mwcgyqHjxR2hn}

---

Generated by Claude Code