Filed by the domain:devx @ objectui execution seat (session_013VGeMu3p6qEFWR6K6GGLaW, R59), as the governed half objectui#9502 deliberately fenced out of PR objectui#9518. Raised there as an open question by that card's dev; ruled and filed here with the reading the question was missing.
⚠️ Filed under the triage stand-in clause (triage seat objectstack#6015 read 🔴 空缺 at 2026-09-14T16:58Z). ⛔ Landing point is governed surface — see the fences at the bottom.
Dedupe words: AGENTS.md 338 · 从仓内读不到 · bypass actors · required checks 清单 · ruleset 11776024
The sentence
AGENTS.md:338:
- ruleset 的具体配置(谁可绕过、required checks 清单)本文不写 —— 从仓内读不到,别照抄任何推断。上面几条写的都是实测到的可观测行为。
objectui#9502 repaired four sibling sentences that made the same "cannot be read" claim. ⛔ This one was left standing, on purpose, and PR objectui#9518 records that decision in scripts/check-required-check-set.mjs's inventory docblock rather than leaving it undocumented.
⭐ Why it is not simply the fifth instance — the measurement
Its parenthetical names two things, and they do not have the same answer.
| leg |
readable from here? |
instrument |
required checks 清单 |
⭐ YES |
GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/rules/branches/main → 200 with the nine contexts; pnpm check:required-check-set reads it on a schedule |
谁可绕过 (bypass actors) |
⛔ NO |
see below |
The bypass reading, taken by this seat 2026-09-14T17:0xZ:
| call |
result |
GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/rulesets/11776024 |
200. Keys: _links · conditions · created_at · current_user_can_bypass · enforcement · id · name · node_id · rules · source · source_type · target · updated_at. ⛔ No bypass_actors key. |
GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/rules/branches/main |
5 entries; union of keys parameters · ruleset_id · ruleset_source · ruleset_source_type · type. ⛔ No bypass key. |
CONTROL — same endpoint family, one argument changed: GET /rulesets/99999999 |
404 ⇒ the endpoint discriminates, so a missing key is a reading and ⛔ not a reader that returns nothing for everything |
⇒ ⭐ current_user_can_bypass answers "can I", ⛔ never "who can". The bypass-actors roster is genuinely unreadable from this token.
⇒ The sentence is HALF TRUE, on precisely the leg it names FIRST
- True of
谁可绕过 — and that is the first item in its own parenthetical.
- False of
required checks 清单 — readable, and read on a schedule by a gate that lives in this repository.
⭐ This is why it is a different card and not a rider. Deleting it would erase a true claim; leaving it whole keeps a false one; and ⛔ ruling "the bypass leg makes the whole sentence true" was offered as an option and is refuted above. The repair is the same shape objectui#9502 used on its four siblings — split the conjunction — but the two halves here divide along a different axis (read vs write there; which contexts vs which actors here).
What the repair looks like
Roughly: the bypass-actors half keeps its claim, and the required-checks half stops claiming unreadability and points at the instrument (pnpm check:required-check-set / .github/workflows/required-check-set-patrol.yml) instead of restating any membership. ⚠️ Per commandment #9 and objectui#9502's own ruling: ⛔ do not write the nine context names into AGENTS.md — that would recreate this card one edit later. Point at the gate; ⛔ do not copy its answer.
⛔ The closing sentence — 「上面几条写的都是实测到的可观测行为」 — is ⛔ not in scope and is not challenged here.
⛔ Fences
- ⛔
AGENTS.md is GOVERNED surface: draft PR only, request review from os-zhuang and hotlong with draft: true in the same update_pull_request call, ⛔ never ready / enqueued / auto-merged / approved / merged by any seat.
- ⛔ Do not change the ruleset. It is correct, and it is maintainer-only (
GET /branches/main/protection → 403 Resource not accessible by integration).
- ⛔ Do not re-open objectui#9502's four sentences. They are repaired and landed separately.
- Every zero carries a control proven able to return non-zero in the same command; name the population in words.
Blocked-by: the governed-surface queue on AGENTS.md, currently headed by PR objectui#9466 (awaiting an authorised approval). ⛔ 同文件串行 — this must not open a second concurrent AGENTS.md PR.
Refs: objectui#9502 / PR objectui#9518 (the four siblings, and the docblock that records this one as deliberately left standing) · objectui#9422 (the off-repo-settings gap) · objectui#4959 (the 2026-08-17 measurement all five sentences were derived from) · this repo's AGENTS.md commandment #9.
Generated by Claude Code
Filed by the
domain:devx@ objectui execution seat (session_013VGeMu3p6qEFWR6K6GGLaW, R59), as the governed half objectui#9502 deliberately fenced out of PR objectui#9518. Raised there as an open question by that card's dev; ruled and filed here with the reading the question was missing.Dedupe words:
AGENTS.md 338·从仓内读不到·bypass actors·required checks 清单·ruleset 11776024The sentence
AGENTS.md:338:objectui#9502 repaired four sibling sentences that made the same "cannot be read" claim. ⛔ This one was left standing, on purpose, and PR objectui#9518 records that decision in
scripts/check-required-check-set.mjs's inventory docblock rather than leaving it undocumented.⭐ Why it is not simply the fifth instance — the measurement
Its parenthetical names two things, and they do not have the same answer.
required checks 清单GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/rules/branches/main→ 200 with the nine contexts;pnpm check:required-check-setreads it on a schedule谁可绕过(bypass actors)The bypass reading, taken by this seat 2026-09-14T17:0xZ:
GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/rulesets/11776024_links · conditions · created_at · current_user_can_bypass · enforcement · id · name · node_id · rules · source · source_type · target · updated_at. ⛔ Nobypass_actorskey.GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui/rules/branches/mainparameters · ruleset_id · ruleset_source · ruleset_source_type · type. ⛔ No bypass key.GET /rulesets/99999999⇒ ⭐
current_user_can_bypassanswers "can I", ⛔ never "who can". The bypass-actors roster is genuinely unreadable from this token.⇒ The sentence is HALF TRUE, on precisely the leg it names FIRST
谁可绕过— and that is the first item in its own parenthetical.required checks 清单— readable, and read on a schedule by a gate that lives in this repository.⭐ This is why it is a different card and not a rider. Deleting it would erase a true claim; leaving it whole keeps a false one; and ⛔ ruling "the bypass leg makes the whole sentence true" was offered as an option and is refuted above. The repair is the same shape objectui#9502 used on its four siblings — split the conjunction — but the two halves here divide along a different axis (
readvswritethere;which contextsvswhich actorshere).What the repair looks like
Roughly: the bypass-actors half keeps its claim, and the required-checks half stops claiming unreadability and points at the instrument (⚠️ Per commandment #9 and objectui#9502's own ruling: ⛔ do not write the nine context names into
pnpm check:required-check-set/.github/workflows/required-check-set-patrol.yml) instead of restating any membership.AGENTS.md— that would recreate this card one edit later. Point at the gate; ⛔ do not copy its answer.⛔ The closing sentence — 「上面几条写的都是实测到的可观测行为」 — is ⛔ not in scope and is not challenged here.
⛔ Fences
AGENTS.mdis GOVERNED surface: draft PR only, request review fromos-zhuangandhotlongwithdraft: truein the sameupdate_pull_requestcall, ⛔ never ready / enqueued / auto-merged / approved / merged by any seat.GET /branches/main/protection→ 403Resource not accessible by integration).Blocked-by: the governed-surface queue on
AGENTS.md, currently headed by PR objectui#9466 (awaiting an authorised approval). ⛔ 同文件串行 — this must not open a second concurrentAGENTS.mdPR.Refs: objectui#9502 / PR objectui#9518 (the four siblings, and the docblock that records this one as deliberately left standing) · objectui#9422 (the off-repo-settings gap) · objectui#4959 (the 2026-08-17 measurement all five sentences were derived from) · this repo's
AGENTS.mdcommandment #9.Generated by Claude Code