[PM seat] domain:spec @ objectui — 🟢 os-warren (session_01Jmxdo7bmeqCQHLSfmLVX9w, since 2026-09-09T23:45Z) · concurrency 3

[os-sam]

Seat registration post for the domain:spec @ objectstack-ai/objectui lane. Body is authoritative; title and assignee are derived views. Single writer: the sitting seat PM; comments are audit only. Position description lives in references/lanes/spec.md (objectstack) — this post carries state only.

⚠️ Refreshed 2026-09-10T11:58Z, stamped against GitHub's Date response header (container clock agrees to the second); scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs is absent from this container's stale objectstack checkout, so the stamp is measured and said to be. This revision measures ~11.8 KB; the previous measured 7,140 B — it GREW, ⛔ measured rather than declared, because this post's own warning is about exactly that claim. The growth is four in-flight cards where there were three, plus §4's charter-staleness lesson, which is load-bearing. Next refresh should cut §4, not §2.

1 · 🟢 seated — os-warren, session session_01Jmxdo7bmeqCQHLSfmLVX9w

Registered 2026-09-10T11:58Z by maintainer ruling; operating this lane since 2026-09-09T23:45:04Z (earliest measured act, 5610343710; the page before it carries zero). Identity from get_me, ⛔ not asserted.

⭐ This post previously registered os-bill — a mis-registration, not a takeover. Maintainer, verbatim: 「bill 负责的是 spec@objectstack」. The overlap, its liveness readings, the governed-merge audit and the full charter-sha block are archived at 5618257416. ⚠️ objectstack#6017 still reads 🔴 vacant for its holder — raised there, ⛔ not mine to edit.

Round marker · session_01Jmxdo7bmeqCQHLSfmLVX9w · 2026-09-10T11:58Z · RE-READ. Charter touches at objectstack origin/main 776d64cd3, read in a fresh clone: SKILL.md + core-rules.md → d9b97afd9 (2026-09-10T10:16:36Z); lanes/spec.md → 46e626513, byte-identical to the stale copy. ⛔ The container checkout d64bcb637 is behind three protocol PRs (#17373 / #17349 / #17294); reading it shipped two wrong rules in public this round (see §4).

Tier — MEASURED

get_session: configured_model / session_context.model / last_served_model all claude-opus-5 ⇒ NOT CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER. ⛔ This seat never clears a clause-② carrier by self-judgement. Every ceiling review is a subagent with model passed explicitly, adopted only after transcript verification (all stamps claude-fable-5-1, zero residue, positive control). One off-tier stamp voids a verdict whole. ⛔ Co-Authored-By: is a signature constant, never tier evidence.

⭐ Current text: clause ② = default-tier construction + ceiling review at the spec seat; 强制条款① 语义面 is a file surface (SKILL.md, decision-framework copies, .claude/agents/os-dev.md, skills/**) ⛔ not "product semantics".

Standing maintainer instructions

• ⭐ 「以 objectstack 协议为准,文档应该以实际实现为准。协议不正确的应该先修改协议」 — source at record:chatter.feed / record:discussion.feed 宣称「same shape as record:activity」，但其中的过滤成员（types / limit / showCompleted / unifiedTimeline）在这条路径上被静默丢弃 #8934 5617613810. The lane's arbiter: when two objectui faces disagree, the one matching the protocol wins; going NARROWER than the protocol is forbidden; a wrong protocol needs a spec card first. Already overturned one route ruling (record:chatter.feed / record:discussion.feed 宣称「same shape as record:activity」，但其中的过滤成员（types / limit / showCompleted / unifiedTimeline）在这条路径上被静默丢弃 #8934) and unblocked one card without a ruling (types(plugin-kanban): restore lane/card judging on object-kanban — declare columns: KanbanColumn[], the one thing the retired kanban arm judged that nothing else does #8913).
• 「并发保持 3」 — cap 3 in-flight devs (batch default 3, maintainer ceiling 5).
• Enqueue bar: 「契约卡无同形复核记录 PASS ⛔ 禁止入队」 + every check green, ⛔ not a required subset.

Clause-② FAIL rate (mandated report item)

Post-reform (built at default tier, reviewed at the ceiling — since objectstack#16915): previous shift, cited from the prior revision ⛔ not re-measured — #8221 PASS · #7562 PASS · #8499 FAIL · #7917 PASS. This shift, measured — #8962 FAIL · #8960 FAIL · #8967 in flight. ⇒ 3 FAIL / 6, vs the pre-reform ceiling-built 2 FAIL / 5 carried forward. Mechanically crossed; ⛔ six is not a rate, and the maintainer has the reading directly rather than through a card filed on n=6. ⭐ Both FAILs were contract sentences false on the tree, not implementation defects.

2 · ledger

Landed this shift — verified BY CONTENT (git merge-base --is-ancestor rc 0 in a fresh clone, reversed probe rc 1 as negative control), ⛔ never the merged field: #8872 · #8933 · #8935 · #8942 · #8955 (#8071 s5–s8 + #7924) · #8865 · #8916 · #8930. ⚠️ Fixes closes the card, never its labels — #8802 / #8257 / #8008 auto-closed on #8865 still carry pm:dispatched, left as the record.

Live — all four are subagent devs of this session; per «⛔ 不取在飞卡,由原认领者跟完» this session follows them to completion regardless of any later seat change.

card	PR	branch	state
#8071 s9	—	claude/issue-8071-member-pins-slice-9	in flight — object-metric.trend / .drillDown
#8934	#8962 bc34acac	claude/issue-8934-chatter-feed-affordance-only	review FAIL 5617990272; repair in flight, route changed to 1. ⛔ draft, carriers stripped
#8767	#8960 76a9ead4	claude/issue-8767-object-grid-refuses-string-sort	review FAIL 5618090408; repair in flight, 2 bounded items. All 33 checks green. ⛔ draft, carriers stripped
#7963	#8967	claude/issue-7963-alert-dialog-footer-keys-retire	delivered; ceiling review in flight

Plus a read-only protocol sweep of the ruling backlog (#7759 · #7997 · #5435 · #8572 · #8755 · #7719 · #4631 · #8932) — ⛔ writes nothing.

Owed / parked

• objectui#8068 的过渡背书：58 个 array/object 类 input 仍无 per-block 成员 pin（逐条转 pin，删豁免） #8071: 33 exemptions (AST on 2c208d5bb) — object-grid. 15 · object-form. 7 · object-master-detail-form. 6 · object-kanban. 2 · object-metric. 2 · record:related_list. 1. Ceiling 33 :2908, MEMBER_PINS 57. ⚠️ record:related_list.actions is the only NO_READ_SITE_TO_PIN — ⛔ not the same debt.
• types(plugin-kanban): restore lane/card judging on object-kanban — declare columns: KanbanColumn[], the one thing the retired kanban arm judged that nothing else does #8913 → pm:blocked → pm:queue: the widening premise is falsified, the protocol declares object-kanban.columns (component.zod.ts:2670). ⚠️ Its describe is a union — { id, title } or bare strings — so a KanbanColumn[] must admit both arms. Also: object-kanban.dataSource is not a block member, it is the stripped component-level binding.
• finding(spec): CollapsibleSchema.open is LIVE through the rest-spread — it overrides defaultOpen and leaves the trigger frozen (this card's original "read by no renderer" premise is REFUTED) #8236 → body corrected: CollapsibleSchema.open is LIVE through the rest-spread and beats defaultOpen; the "read by no renderer" premise is refuted. Still a contract decision.
• finding(plugin-detail): filterMode and enableMentions stay unread on the chatter path even after objectui#8934 — the protocol declares them, the renderer never looks #8968 (filed then self-corrected this shift) → pm:blocked on record:chatter.feed / record:discussion.feed 宣称「same shape as record:activity」，但其中的过滤成员（types / limit / showCompleted / unifiedTimeline）在这条路径上被静默丢弃 #8934. finding(plugin-grid): after #8767 the header arrow still reads the retired string sort spelling the fetch path now refuses — parseSchemaSort is wider than the wire #8961 (filed by finding(plugin-grid): object-grid lowers schema.sort with its OWN private code, so a bare grid still honours the retired string clause that object-view now refuses — the per-block divergence the #8221 ruling rejected by name #8767's dev) → pm:blocked, two conditions.
• Decision box: decision(plugin-kanban): KanbanEnhanced.tsx is published source with zero importers and a subpath that never resolved — delete it, or give it a real export? #8932 · ChatbotSchema.body accepts more than the declared contract #8572 · normalizeListViewSchema manufactures userActions.group / hideFields / rowColor — three keys ListViewSchema refuses BY NAME, so the fold's own output fails the view save gate #5435 · contract: should shortcut become authorable on AppAction.items? — the one capability question left after #6854's B2 ruling #7719 · DetailViewSchema.related[].columns is typed TableColumn[], but RelatedList deliberately accepts bare strings — the type and the runtime disagree #7997 · A component type has THREE declared surfaces that disagree (TS schema type / registry meta inputs / renderer prop reads), and nothing reconciles or enforces them #4631 · 27 keys across 18 pairs have a zod mirror that ACCEPTS a spelling its TypeScript declaration refuses — each needs a narrow-the-mirror / widen-the-declaration ruling #7759 · finding(plugin-grid): BulkActionDialog is the third surface gated by CASCADE_OPTION_WIDGET_TYPES — and its spec twin BulkActionParamSchema is not strict, so its "accept" of dependsOn proves nothing #8755 — the sweep may convert several to measurements.

3 · hot-file serial queue

⭐ FILE-BOUND, ⛔ not capacity-bound; measured from git diff --name-only on live branches, ⛔ never from prose or prediction.

surface	held by	serialises
apps/console/src/__tests__/registry-inputs-spec-parity.test.ts	#8071 s9	every remaining #8071 slice — ledger, ceiling and exemption table are one file, so the slices are strictly serial
packages/plugin-detail/src/**	#8962	#8968
packages/plugin-grid/src/ObjectGrid.tsx · __tests__/serverSorting.test.tsx	#8960	#8961
packages/types/src/overlay.ts · zod/overlay.zod.ts	#8967	other packages/types retirements

⚠️ ⛔ Do not over-apply it — a predecessor deferred #7759 (p2, first in order) twice on a predicted collision measurement then refuted (5596053904). An occurrence count is not a reading of what a file measures.

4 · notes

⭐ Standing reference is TWO comments — 5593530582 and its addendum 5594362585 (the corrected auto-merge fact is in the addendum). ⛔ Carry both pointers forward on every refresh.

⛔ Discipline that must not regress

• ⭐ Read the charter from origin/main in a fresh clone every round — the container checkout is stale and reading it shipped two wrong rules publicly today (both PRs told needs:contract-review "stays hung" through a REWORK, when the text is «FAIL 同 PASS 剥双载体»; corrected on finding(plugin-grid): object-grid lowers schema.sort with its OWN private code, so a bare grid still honours the retired string clause that object-view now refuses — the per-block divergence the #8221 ruling rejected by name #8767 / record:chatter.feed / record:discussion.feed 宣称「same shape as record:activity」，但其中的过滤成员（types / limit / showCompleted / unifiedTimeline）在这条路径上被静默丢弃 #8934).
• ⭐ Re-read the card between dispatch and ACCEPT — record:chatter.feed / record:discussion.feed 宣称「same shape as record:activity」，但其中的过滤成员（types / limit / showCompleted / unifiedTimeline）在这条路径上被静默丢弃 #8934's route was re-ruled on the card 8 minutes before its PR opened; the seat missed it, so the dev's premise_still_valid: true was false. The seat's defect, ⛔ not the dev's.
• A green PR head is NOT a green merge candidate: the queue rebuilds on current main and ejects on a red rebuild — invisible to mergeable_state, which is computed against the stale base (measured on feat(types,plugin-kanban,plugin-gantt)!: retire the bare kanban / gantt node keys and the kanban-ui / kanban-enhanced registrations #8865).
• The queue is SLOW, and slow is not broken: merges show a 16–54 min gap between commit date and merged_at. This seat called an enqueue a no-op at 40 min; it merged at 54, retraction public. ⇒ report enqueues NOT VERIFIED and wait.
• Four GitHub readings are unreliable, each measured: enable_pr_auto_merge returns a content-free string; merged reads false for PRs on main; merged_at disagreed with commit dates by 17m / 18m15s; mergeable_state uses the stale base. ⇒ landing is established by git merge-base --is-ancestor, never by a field.
• ⭐ AST is primary on the parity ledger — regexes misread it in four distinct ways with an unstable bias direction (under-counting 45-vs-46, 43-vs-46; later over-counting 38-and-34 vs a true 30). An instrument right by accident on today's revision is not an instrument.
• Name WHICH ROWS are blind, not the file — "that suite won't catch it" measured half false: one anti-vacuity row does redden; the it.each rows are the blind spot.
• ⭐ A mechanism that explains an observation is not a measurement; a declared file surface is not a measured one. ⛔ Never write a predicted issue or comment id.
• ⭐ Zone-2 "falsify my assumptions" is this lane's highest-yield dispatch instrument — devs corrected something upstream of them on nearly every card this shift, and every correction held.
• PM_SWEEP_REPO=objectstack-ai/objectui is required for check-clause2-carriers.mjs, else it answers about the framework repo and exits 2 = UNJUDGED.
• check-governed-merges.mjs refuses stale checkouts rather than under-reporting; its named remedy (fetch in the shared checkout) is forbidden here ⇒ run it with --repo-root <id>=<fresh clone>. 3 of 5 governed repos are out of this session's scope ⇒ every sweep is INCOMPLETE, ⛔ not clean (fix(types): retire VectorFieldMetadata.indexed and .distance_metric #4690).

⛔ Container hazards & standing prohibitions

/home/user/objectui is SHALLOW with a stale origin/main — ⛔ never fetch/checkout there; a worktree cut from it is both stale and shallow. /home/user/objectstack is a shared primary checkout, behind its remote — ⛔ read-only.

⛔ Never touch #8225 (hotlong). ⛔ Never git stash (shared refs/stash; a pop takes another agent's entry and reports success). ⛔ Never kill by name. ⛔ Worktree-first, one per task per repo. ⛔ Never mutate node_modules. ⛔ Never edit content/docs/releases/ in a code PR. ⛔ Never approve or hand-merge a governed PR. ⛔ Never touch the framework chunk ceiling or its baseline. ⛔ Never auto-adjudicate — «代裁只由维护者召唤的总监席产出».

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-sam]

Round-open marker — R2, 2026-08-23T04:4xZ, session session_01E7snar5mwF7qoXJazqKhys. Audit only; §1 of the body still reads "R1 closed / standby" and is refreshed at the R2 boundary, per the write-side rule. Mid-round state is carried by the Claim: comments on the cards, not here.

Why the seat came out of standby: the 04:38Z standby sweep found the lane refilled. The maintainer directed a bulk triage of objectui's unlabelled backlog this session (verbatim, recorded on #5741: 「objectui 有 79 张卡在车道视图之外（占该仓 35%），你帮我分批处理」·「继续 批 2 批 3」), and it routed six cards into domain:spec — including all three R1 follow-ups.

Unlock sweep: no unlock. objectstack#11195 is still open (pm:queue, unassigned), so #5435 stays pm:blocked. Reminder for the next sweep: it is blocked twice — #11195 landing and the spec pin bump that #5716 holds at 17.1.0. Releasing one is not enough.

In flight (2, batch capped at 3, both mode:subagent, both clause-② no):

• Migrate the remaining ListView legacy vocabulary to spec-canonical keys, and audit ObjectView/DetailView (#2231 phases 4–5) #2890 — opus, branch claude/issue-2890-objectview-drift-guard. pm:blocking, so first by the lane's selection order. Scope is the triage-limited one (ObjectViewSchema drift guard + four phase-3 alias folds), not the card body's much larger project; A6 / viewType / conditionalFormatting / exportOptions are excluded as upstream packages/spec faces.
• Row-predicate deprecation is missing its Phase 0: docs and example apps may still teach the bare shorthand / data.* spellings the new warning now flags #5738 — opus, branch claude/issue-5738-row-predicate-phase0. Phase 0 of the row-predicate deprecation, the sibling of R1's [Decision] Row-predicate spelling contract: does the canon narrow to record.*, or do the bare shorthand and data.* spellings stay? (the uncarried "#4075 step 3" question) #5330.

Hot-file serial queue (R2):

surface	held by
packages/types/src/__tests__/ · packages/core/src/utils/normalize-list-view.ts	#2890
content/docs/** · example apps · schema-catalog · plugin READMEs	#5738

Serialised behind #2890 — packages/types is one package, and batch independence is per-package, not per-file: #5740 (view: 'agenda' residue) and #5494 (ReferenceRailEntry extra icon key). Both dispatchable the moment #2890's PR merges. fold-or-serial answered: serial — #5740 and #2890 fail gate ① of the five (different defect shapes: a value-level enum residue vs a declaration-drift guard), so they do not fold.

Also queued, not yet dispatched: #5741 (Phase 2 survey carrier). Triage graded it pm:queue with the note that establishing the data source is the first deliverable, and returning pm:blocked with the access channel named is the correct outcome if none exists — ⛔ explicitly not "guess a population and call it sized". That resolves the routing question this seat raised at R1 close; it does not need the maintainer.

#2890 assignee provenance, checked before claiming: cleared 02:36Z by the skills seat under maintainer ruling objectstack#11196 as assignee-field residue from the 07-28 filing session (shared agent identity, no Claim: comment, no branch). Not a live claim; claimable by protocol.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-sam]

⛔ CORRECTION to §3's standing lane constraint — the pin blocker has lifted. Audit comment; the body still carries the stale text and is corrected at the R2 boundary.

§3 currently reads: "any card whose fix is 'align objectui on the spec pin' is blocked twice — on the spec-side change landing in objectstack, and on the pin bump, which #5716 holds at 17.1.0."

The second half is no longer true. #5716 closed completed 04:57:58Z via merged PR #5752 (c9327c9), taking the Localize branch — objectui now owns Theme / ThemeMode / ColorPalette rather than re-exporting them from the retired @objectstack/spec/ui surface. #5716's own body stated the consequence it was gating: "any objectui spec-pin refresh past the retirement breaks @object-ui/types and @object-ui/providers builds." That is what localization removes.

Consequence for this lane: #5435 is now single-blocked, on objectstack#11195 alone (still open, pm:queue, unassigned). When #11195 lands, the next unlock sweep should find only one condition to satisfy, not two.

⚠️ Do not over-read this. What is established is that #5716's blocker is discharged — by its own closure and merged PR. I have not measured that a pin refresh now succeeds end-to-end, and the manifests still declare the range ^17.0.0, which 17.1.0 already satisfies. Whether a bump past 17.x is clean is a separate, unmeasured question, and #5716's body names related guards designed to trip at exactly that moment (the ThemeModeSchema deny-list row in spec-ui-schema-reexports.test.ts). The unlock sweep re-verifies on the merged ref rather than trusting this note.

R2 landing so far: #5738 → PR #5758 merged 702c48a (17 success + 3 skipped, zero red, zero pending). #2890 still in flight.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-sam]

R3 interrupted by the 5-hour usage wall, and resumed. Audit comment; §1 of the body still reads "R2 closed / ready for R3" and is refreshed at the R3 boundary.

What happened. Both R3 devs — #5740 and #5741, dispatched ~05:45Z — were terminated mid-task at ~05:50Z by an account-level session limit, with the reset time carried in the failure itself: 07:00Z. Per the seat's own discipline, the authoritative wall signal is the failure report, and the reset moment is available at that instant and not afterwards, so it is recorded here.

Neither card was withdrawn, and that was the deliberate call:

• finding(types/plugin-calendar): view: 'agenda' is declared by CalendarViewMode and the zod enum but the calendar-view renderer silently falls back to 'month' #5740 — its dev had pushed a branch before dying: claude/issue-5740-calendar-view-mode-agenda at 1f94b4c9, verified on the remote. The reclaim rule is explicit that a claim carrying a live branch with commits is never reclaimed, so withdrawing would have discarded real work.
• Carrier for Phase 2 of the row-predicate deprecation: the stored-metadata survey that must size the removal window before any spelling retires #5741 — no branch, but the interrupted-dev protocol is resume-first and withdraw only if resumption is unavailable.

Both were resumed via SendMessage at ~07:55Z, after the wall lifted. The original briefs stand; each resume message re-stated only the load-bearing constraints rather than re-issuing the brief.

A finding salvaged from #5740's dying words, verified before passing it back. Its last output was "More surface than the card cites — objectql.ts, i18n locales." Spot-checked on origin/main: CalendarViewMode appears in packages/types/src/complex.ts, packages/types/src/index.ts, packages/types/src/zod/complex.zod.ts and packages/types/src/zod/index.zod.ts — re-exported through both barrels, wider than the card's two cited files. The objectql.ts and i18n-locale legs are not confirmed and were handed back as the dev's to establish.

This matters because it feeds the card's load-bearing question directly: if CalendarViewMode has consumers beyond CalendarViewSchema.view, narrowing the shared enum is too wide a cut, and the correct fix may be narrowing CalendarViewSchema.view alone. That was already Zone 2 item 3 of the dispatch; the dev's own measurement is now evidence for it rather than a hypothetical.

Standing note for the next wall: a killed subagent is not a dead claim when it has pushed commits. Check git ls-remote --heads origin 'refs/heads/claude/issue-<n>*' before deciding between resume and withdraw — the two paths differ by whether work exists to lose.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-sam]

AUDIT (R6 standby) — did R1–R3's five PRs also merge ahead of their test shards?

Audit only; carries no state. Closes the open question §4 flagged as "unaudited" after #5794.

Method: merge time taken from the merge commit itself (git show -s --format=%cI on each squash sha, so it is main's own record, not a PR field), compared against each Test (shard n/4) completed_at read by name from the PR head's check runs.

PR	merged	last shard to finish	margin
#5737 d1ab06f	03:23:48	shard 2/4 @ 03:23:03	+45 s
#5739 065bba7	03:30:56	shard 2/4 @ 03:26:12	+4 m 44 s
#5758 702c48a	05:06:05	shard 3/4 @ 05:01:23	+4 m 42 s
#5760 af3861f	05:34:56	shard 1/4 @ 05:34:21	+35 s
#5782 b55a346	08:38:38	shard 2/4 @ 08:29:13	+9 m 25 s
#5794 —	09:27:58	shard 2/4 @ 09:33-ish	⛔ merged first
#5806 bec062d5	12:05:47	shard 2/4 @ 12:04:49	+58 s (farm read first, then armed)

Verdict: all five R1–R3 PRs merged AFTER their four shards reported. #5794 is the only instance.

So no PR beyond #5794 landed on incomplete shard evidence, and nothing needs revisiting on main.

⚠️ But "five were clean" is the wrong lesson to take

Two of the five cleared by 35 and 45 seconds. That is not a margin produced by any decision I made — it is merge-queue latency happening to exceed the tail of the test farm.

What I can state as measured: the six PRs' outcomes differ. What I cannot state as measured, and am flagging as inference rather than fact: I do not have arming timestamps for those five, so I cannot prove the arming practice was identical across them. It very likely was — same seat, same round, no rule changed between them — but that is reasoning from consistency, not a reading.

If the inference holds, the honest summary is: the practice was the same in all six and only the timing differed. A 35-second margin is a near miss, not a control. It would be self-serving to read this audit as "the pattern was fine five times out of six" when the mechanism that made it fine was not under the seat's control.

The corrective stands unchanged and is now the seat's practice (demonstrated on #5806): read the full farm by name, then arm. Under that rule the margin stops being luck.

Two side-readings worth keeping

• Build Docs failed for real on feat(types,plugin-calendar): converge CalendarViewSchema on the calendar-view renderer's read set #5739 (3 m 52 s) and feat(types): retire 'agenda' from CalendarViewMode and the zod enum #5782 (3 m 43 s) and both merged anyway — independent confirmation that it does not gate the queue, and that its real failures run ~3–4 min against the ~10 s cached greens. Consistent with §4.
• Test shards can themselves be cache hits. On docs(plugin-form): Phase 0 of the row-predicate deprecation — stop teaching the bare shorthand (#5738) #5758 (docs-only) all four shards completed in 11–13 seconds. Legitimate there — nothing in the test graph changed — but it means the "implausible duration" rule in §4 is not specific to Build Docs: a shard green can also be a cache hit rather than a run. Worth knowing before using one PR's shard timing as a control for another's.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[yinlianghui]

Round-open marker — R1 of a new shift, fire 2026-09-02T01:45Z, session session_01V3hPr7riucnMfhcHY86Msd, summoned interactively as /pm-dispatch spec@objectui. Audit only; the body (§1 still reads "离岗 2026-08-24") is refreshed at the round boundary.

Mutex readings taken before this write: (1) newest shift-end brief = the 2026-08-24T09:50Z body edit (vacancy notice — a release marker); (2) no round-open marker later than it; (3) zero pm:dispatched cards in domain:spec @ objectui; (4) newest CLOSED lane card (#6140, 08-31T20:36Z) claims session session_01PBjwYLS6BciTQW3c9xQiD2, more than a round old. Sibling seat objectstack#6017 (domain:spec @ objectstack, seated 00:42Z today) lists no objectui cards in its ledger — disjoint territory.

Lane inventory at fire (17 open): pm:queue #2731 · #6153 (assignee residue, ruled 09-01) · #6650 (pm:retriage, skipped by rule) · pm:blocked ×4 · pm:on-hold ×6 · pm:awaiting-maintainer #5741 · finding #7200 #7023 (triage's) · tracking #4043. In flight 0. Unlock/restart scan running.

---

Generated by Claude Code