[objectstack-fleet]

Requested by Sales · project thread

Fixes #25253

Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none

What

Adds one end-to-end suite, packages/runtime/src/sharing-rule-declared-name.data-door.pin.test.ts. It boots the composition bootStack mirrors (ObjectQL, sqlite-wasm in memory, Hono, the app, platform objects, auth, security, sharing, REST, dispatcher). The application declares two sharing rules through its own sharingRules. A signed-in administrator then drives the generic /data door over HTTP:

• POST /api/v1/data/sys_sharing_rule under a declared rule's name answers 409 with code: RESOURCE_CONFLICT, and no row lands.
• PATCH /api/v1/data/sys_sharing_rule/:id renaming an authored row onto a declared rule's name answers 409 with code: RESOURCE_CONFLICT, and the row keeps its name.
• Control: the same POST under a name no declaration holds answers 2xx and the row lands. So the 409 comes from the guard and not from the rig.
• Precondition: the sharing-rule service the guard asks (declaredRuleNamed) reads both declared rules, and neither has a row.

This is test-only. No production file changed and there is no behaviour change. Today the door does answer 409 RESOURCE_CONFLICT on both paths, so content/docs/permissions/sharing-rules.mdx (regime C) is accurate.

Wire shape, measured rather than assumed. The /data door answers its flat envelope: { error: "SENTENCE", code: "RESOURCE_CONFLICT", object: "sys_sharing_rule" }. code sits at the top level (mapDataError, @objectstack/types), and the pin reads it there. It does not use a fallback that would also accept a nested error.code. The first run asserted the nested spelling and went red on exactly that.

Why each refusal has its own declared rule. sys_sharing_rule's unique constraint on the name also answers 409, as UNIQUE_VIOLATION. My first draft used one declared name for both cases. Under ablation the create landed, and the rename then answered 409 UNIQUE_VIOLATION, so a status-only pin would have read that 409 as the guard's. Now each case targets its own declared rule and stays independent under ablation. code is asserted beside status.

Lane: runtime, not plugin-sharing (deviation from the claim's file surface)

The claim's file surface was packages/plugins/plugin-sharing/src/** test files, based on the assumption that business-unit-parent-delete-restrict.test.ts is an HTTP rig. I measured it, and it is not. It drives engine.delete on a real ObjectQL + SqlDriver, and /api/v1/data/... appears only in a comment. plugin-sharing has no @objectstack/rest, @objectstack/plugin-hono-server or @objectstack/runtime dependency. @objectstack/runtime depends on plugin-sharing, so adding runtime as a dev dependency would create a workspace cycle. An HTTP pin in plugin-sharing would therefore need new dependencies and a hand-built door. The card names "plugin-sharing or runtime" as the lane, and runtime already carries every piece: its full-composition pins (unresolved-object-name.actions-door.pin.test.ts, hook-handler-package-scope.pin.test.ts) use the same boot. So the suite lives there. It adds no new testkit or helper file.

Evidence (head a949814)

• pnpm --filter @objectstack/runtime exec vitest run --maxWorkers=2 src/sharing-rule-declared-name.data-door.pin.test.ts gave Test Files 1 passed (1), Tests 4 passed (4).
• pnpm --filter @objectstack/runtime exec vitest run --project local --maxWorkers=2 gave Test Files 436 passed (436), Tests 6889 passed | 19 skipped. The lock reported VERDICT command-exit 0.
• pnpm --filter @objectstack/runtime typecheck exited 0. The pin is in the tsconfig.test.json program (--listFilesOnly count 1) and carries no ledger entry, so it compiles with zero errors.
• Ablation, one round, guard disabled. The runtime suite resolves @objectstack/plugin-sharing through dist/, so each leg rebuilt it.
  • node scripts/ablation-replace.mjs replaced the bindDeclaredRuleNameGuard throw (if (declared) throw new DeclaredSharingRuleNameConflictError(...)) with a marker assignment. On disk: anchor x1 to x0, blob 26f18e1e7c30 to d5199123b3f6.
  • pnpm --filter @objectstack/plugin-sharing build ran, then ablation-dist-preflight.mjs @objectstack/plugin-sharing __ABLATION_25253 reported the marker present in 2 built files.
  • The pin then went 2 failed | 2 passed. The create case read expected 201 to be 409 and the rename case read expected 200 to be 409. The precondition and the control stayed green, as predicted.
  • Restore: blob back to the HEAD blob 26f18e1e7c30, and git diff HEAD was empty. I rebuilt, and --absent reported the marker absent from all 6 built files, with the tree clean against HEAD. The pin went back to 4 passed (4).

Changeset

None. This PR carries skip-changeset because it publishes nothing. packages/runtime's files[] is dist, README.md and CHANGELOG.md. After a runtime build, the pin's own fixture name pin_amber_projects_declared has 0 hits there, and the positive control createDispatcherPlugin has 4 hits in dist/.

Gates

node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands derived 53 families for this diff. I ran each one under the verify lock and recorded its exit code. --ran reports: 53 accounted for, 52 run (all exit 0), 1 NOT MEASURED. The NOT MEASURED one is pnpm check:dual-build-cjs-loads, which exited 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET) because it reads every package's dist/ and this checkout built only runtime's closure. This diff changes no built output. CI runs it.

Acceptance notes

• File wall. One run of this file reads Duration 15.6–16.8 s, of which import is about 14 s and tests about 2 s. That is over the 10 s file line, and the cost is the full-composition boot, the same one the sibling runtime pins pay. I declared no budget line: none of the three ruled classes fits. This note is for the shard-timings refresh, which reports and never reds.
• Envelope dialects. The sharing-rule route (POST /sharing/rules) answers this refusal in the nested envelope (error.code), while the /data door answers it flat (code). This is not a defect for this card. It is the known two-dialect split, recorded here so nobody asserts the wrong spelling on the wrong door.

---

Generated by Claude Code

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_016g7nYP9wdNx1GDa5XDr7Uy

[github-actions]

📓 Docs Drift Check

Nothing in this diff resolved to a documentable surface (no symbol, route or SDK anchor derived from 0 changed package(s)), so this run has no opinion about the docs.

What this run could not see

• a page that states a rule by its inputs shares no identifier with the emitter that implements the rule, so an emitter-only diff cannot list it — not on this run and not on any run. Measured on fix(driver-sql): emit varchar(maxLength) for a text field a declared index keys on #11430: content/docs/protocol/objectql/types.mdx documents the text-family column mapping by the ObjectQL type names it maps FROM (text / textarea / html) while the diff changed createColumn; it went unlisted, and it was the page that diff falsified, in four places. No shared token exists to detect this on, so a rule your change carries has to be re-read by hand in the pages that restate it.
• a key NAME is not a key, so the hand re-read the line above prescribes can land on the wrong schema. The same spelling is authorable on one governed type and a [REMOVED] tombstone on another for each of active, aria, joins, objects, template, tools and version (censused on [finding] tools is a key on BOTH AgentSchema (tombstoned, dead) and SkillSchema (live, cloud-attested), so a name-based search attributes skill examples to the agent key — it produced a false stop-the-line alarm on PR #19059 #19093 over the liveness ledger's governed types, top-level keys); nothing in a search result distinguishes the two, so a grep hit on a LIVE example reads as evidence about the DEAD key. Measured on fix(spec): the agent.tools liveness row says dead — it claimed live on a key the schema tombstoned #19059: content/docs/ai/agents.mdx was reported as contradicting the agent.tools tombstone over its tools: example at :161, which is inside the defineSkill({ block opened at :155 — the page was already correct. Settle ownership by PARSING the value against both schemas, never by the name: that literal PASSES SkillSchema, and as an AgentSchema it FAILS at tools with the tombstone prescription. ⛔ These names are not the whole class — a key retired through a .strict() guidance map leaves no tombstone in the walked shape and none of them here (tool.category, live as AIToolDefinition.category).

Coarse fallback — 0 page(s) merely mention a changed package (the pre-#9192 predicate, kept for the deliberately-wide backstop): node scripts/docs-audit/affected-docs.mjs --json 1eb1afae071530f66f4d93d416e7f452ceab3de3 → packageMentionDocs.

[objectstack-fleet]

席位核对 · ACCEPT · 2026-10-22T20:53Z

domain:services seat 1 (seat post #6021) · os-sales · session_016g7nYP9wdNx1GDa5XDr7Uy · card #25253 (claim 6349511837; in-seat S, dev branch claude/issue-25253-declared-rule-409-http) · reviewed head a949814796f17649115a64a440521b0bfdc8da75

• Shape: test-only. One end-to-end pin drives the generic /data door over HTTP on a full composition: a create under a declared sharing-rule name and a rename onto one each answer 409 with code: RESOURCE_CONFLICT and land nothing; a control create under an undeclared name lands. 1 file, +221 / −0, no production file, no changeset.
• Docs: the door answers as content/docs/permissions/sharing-rules.mdx says, so the page stands.
• Ablation: the guard's throw disabled through dist/ turned the two refusal cases red (201 and 200 where 409 was expected) with the precondition and control green; restored byte-identical and back to 4 / 4.
• Declarations: Clause-②: no, Metadata-protocol: none, Fixes #25253, skip-changeset.
• Gates: dispatch-gates --ran 53 derived, 52 run, 1 NOT MEASURED locally (check:dual-build-cjs-loads, exit 3 for want of every package's dist/; CI ran it); runtime 436 files / 6889 pass; every check-run on this head success or an expected skip.
• Accepted deviation: the claim named plugin-sharing tests; the pin lives in packages/runtime (cli lane, which this project also seats), because the named rig does not drive HTTP and plugin-sharing cannot reach the door without a workspace cycle. The card names runtime as a valid home.
• PR body: the seat added the attribution block and footer and requested the reviewer.
• Landing: not governed (check-governed-merges --pr 25289). Ready + auto-merge through the relay.

---

Generated by Claude Code