Repository navigation
docs(spec): the app and view liveness ledgers cite the deciding commit, or state the decision in words, in place of dead tracker numbers - #20840
Conversation
…commit in place of a dead tracker number Sixteen notes in packages/spec/liveness/app.json (10) and view.json (6) dated their 2026-08-28 re-anchoring with a tracker number that now answers 404. Each now names the commit that wrote it, 8f10a79 (the closing symbol-anchor batch), the same anchor earlier slices landed for that batch's other ledgers. Note text only: no status, evidence, verifiedAt, producer or evidenceScope leaf changes. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Sfe5YjBLwB9J3y8fvm2xq1 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
📓 Docs Drift Check
What this run could not see
Coarse fallback — 137 page(s) merely mention a changed package (the pre-#9192 predicate, kept for the deliberately-wide backstop): |
Contract reviewServed-tier: Read: card #20234 (body and all 60 comments, among them the fleet decision ① Derived judgments(a) Accept set and public surface: nothing moves. Right. The diff is (b) Structural read: PASS, and it matches the report and the ruling to the leaf. Every leaf of both files at (c) The anchor: real, unique, reachable, and its own content decides what every note says. Right. (d) Form: 16 of 16 in form C, 0 in form D. Right. Every site was the dating parenthesis of "2026-08-28 (#13003):" (the two headers) or "2026-08-28: RE-ANCHORED (#13003)" (14 rows); the sentence around it already said what was decided, so the commit alone is the citation and no sentence was rewritten in words. No form-D sentence exists to test. (e) The two files at the head carry no dead in-repo number. Right. All 58 distinct (f) Text someone acts on, sentence by sentence.
Witness, not a finding. Each rewritten sentence now pairs the row's own ② Semver level
③ Boundary flagsThe dev report
Check-runs on Implemented-by: VERDICT: PASS Adopted and posted by
Generated by Claude Code |
… — no queued PR left the queue on a draft conversion (objectstack-ai#20845) Fixes objectstack-ai#20764 Clause-②: no ## What changes `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/platform-readings.md`, lines 41-43 only. The rewrite is net 0 lines, and the three new lines are 120 / 118 / 120 bytes (cap 120). | line | before | after | |:--|:--|:--| | `:41` | 转 draft 不是可靠的踢队手段:两向相反读数并存,处置按最坏走。 | 转 draft 不是可靠的踢队手段:本仓与姊妹仓均见已入队转 draft 仍保位照合,处置按最坏走。 | | `:42` | 本仓转 draft 同时掉 auto-merge 与队列成员资格,不自动恢复,转正后重挂;姊妹仓曾保位照合。 | 本仓转 draft 同秒掉 auto-merge 仅见于未入队时,转正后重挂;已入队者 2026-08-08、09-29 照合。 | | `:43` | 补救:转 draft 与卸载 auto-merge 都做 —— 本仓卸载 auto-merge 单独不踢队。 | 补救:转 draft 与卸载 auto-merge 都做,本仓卸载单独不踢队;两手齐做亦未见踢队(08-08、09-28)。 | The remedy on `:43` is unchanged: do both acts. No rule is added. The in-file citations are dates, because `pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint` goes red on a `#`-number anywhere under `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/`, and this file cites no PR number today. The PR numbers and timeline events are in this body. That is where the id-lint header puts a reading's provenance. ## The readings (re-readable: `GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/N/timeline`) I ran a read-only timeline scan over objectstack-ai#4700-objectstack-ai#4900, objectstack-ai#6650-objectstack-ai#6850 and objectstack-ai#20400-objectstack-ai#20840. It looked for two patterns: a `convert_to_draft` between `added_to_merge_queue` and the next `removed_from_merge_queue`, and a `convert_to_draft` on a PR that was armed but not queued. The scan found every row below. The table is complete for those windows only, not for the whole repo. **Queued, then converted to draft.** None of the four left the queue because of the conversion. | PR | queued | draft | disable sent? | what followed | |:--|:--|:--|:--|:--| | objectstack-ai#6732 | 2026-08-08T14:01:50Z | 14:04:32Z | claimed in objectstack-ai#6799's text; no `auto_merge_disabled` event | the queue merged it at 14:38:56Z, 34 min later, still draft | | objectstack-ai#20420 | 2026-09-28T13:43:01Z | 14:02:28Z | claimed in the seat's 14:04Z comment; no event | its own group `pr-20420-3cf6449` had `Lint & Type Check` = failure at 14:01:49Z, before the draft; `github-merge-queue[bot]` removed it at 14:11:24Z, unmerged | | objectstack-ai#20442 | 2026-09-28T13:45:42Z | 14:02:50Z | claimed in the seat's 14:04Z comment; no event | the queue built a new group `pr-20442-b285508` for it at 14:11:29Z, 9 min after the draft; that group's `CI` = failure at 14:30:14Z; removed at 14:35:44Z, unmerged | | objectstack-ai#20695 | 2026-09-29T23:32:51Z | 23:57:02Z | no (the card discloses: draft alone) | the queue merged it at 00:04:21Z, 7 min later, still draft | **Armed, not queued, then converted to draft.** Each one dropped auto-merge. | PR | armed | draft | `auto_merge_disabled` | after | |:--|:--|:--|:--|:--| | objectstack-ai#4745 | 2026-08-03T01:28:46Z | 01:29:30Z | 01:29:30Z (same second) | ready, re-armed 01:30:52Z, queued, merged | | objectstack-ai#6727 | 2026-08-08T13:42:58Z | 13:44:36Z | 13:44:36Z (same second) | ready, re-armed 13:46:02Z | | objectstack-ai#6829 | 2026-08-08T23:37:05Z | 23:40:25Z | 23:40:26Z (1 s) | ready and enqueued 6 h later | Each disable event carries the converter as its actor. A timeline cannot tell whether the platform wrote it or a scripted follow-up did. The line records what was observed ("同秒"). ## Where the old reading came from - The "drops queue membership" reading first appears in `db6581a5` (objectstack-ai#4893, card objectstack-ai#4892, 2026-08-03). It cites no PR. That is the same day objectstack-ai#4745 dropped auto-merge on an armed PR that was not queued. The queue-membership half has no instance behind it. - `cd704cc4` (objectstack-ai#6799) later cited objectstack-ai#6732 for "only draft evicts; disable alone does not". In objectstack-ai#6732's own timeline the PR stays queued after the draft and is merged by the queue 34 minutes later. - The sister-repo half ("姊妹仓曾保位照合", objectui 2026-08-25) is carried over as it was. I did not re-read it. ## How this departs from the triage direction (5903760674) I did not choose these quietly. Each one is a place where a measurement changed what the direction assumed: 1. **`:42` is split by queue state, not "mixed" in the sense of opposite readings.** No queued PR in the scanned windows left the queue because of a draft conversion. The direction assumed the old half had its own measurement. It has none, and the one PR later cited for it reads the other way. What does go both ways in this repo is the effect by state: unqueued, auto-merge drops; queued, the PR keeps its place. 2. **`:43` says "not seen to dequeue", not "not measured".** Three PRs (objectstack-ai#6732, objectstack-ai#20420, objectstack-ai#20442) have both acts claimed in writing, and none was removed by them. The caveat: on a queued PR, the disable leaves no timeline event, so whether it was sent rests on the seats' own comments. 3. **`:41` loses "两向相反读数并存".** No opposite reading survived the re-read. ## Acceptance notes - **Out of scope, same family, Tier H.** `AGENTS.md` states the falsified reading as a premise in three places. Prime Directive objectstack-ai#14 says "draft is what removes queue membership, disabling alone drops only the arming". Multi-agent §7 says "flipping back to draft drops auto-merge and queue membership at once". The "State on your PR" paragraph says the draft flag "flipped back destroys auto-merge and queue membership at once". I did not touch them. They are reported to the seat. - **Eviction.** The only dequeue acts measured in this repo are these two. First, the queue's own ejection after a red group build (objectstack-ai#20420, objectstack-ai#20442). Second, a manual removal by a maintainer with no draft conversion (objectstack-ai#20797, `removed_from_merge_queue` 2026-09-30T07:33:36Z). Whether the remedy should name a different act is a question for the seat. It is not a rule this PR adds. - **Changeset.** `.claude/**` is not in any package's `files[]`, so this PR publishes nothing. `skip-changeset` is the seat's to apply. - **Governed surface, Tier S (`.claude/**`).** This PR stays a draft until a `## Contract review` record at `CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER` exists for its head. ## Verification (head `02ea176a1`) - The 20 gates from `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands` all exit 0. They are `check-closing-keyword-parity` (plus `--self-test`), `check-comment-mask-corpus`, `check-governed-queue-guard --self-test`, `check-harness-current --self-test`, `lint check:doc-formula-expressions` (after building `@objectstack/lint` and its dependency closure under `os-verify-lock.sh`), `check:agent-test-spelling`, `check:cross-package-test-inputs`, `check:doc-authoring`, `check:driver-memory-census`, `check:gitlink-declared`, `check:nul-bytes`, `check:pm-governed-merges`, `check:pm-half-states`, `check:pm-skill-id-lint`, `check:pm-skill-ratchet`, `check:refd-timer-probe`, `check:required-contexts`, `check:skill-frame-sync` and `check:watch-hint-literal`. - `pnpm check:pm-settings-deny-roster` was also run, because its roster lives under `.claude`. Exit 0. - `--ran` reconciliation: 20 derived, 20 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED. All 20 recorded an exit code. - `check:pm-skill-ratchet` printed: `platform-readings.md is 469 lines (ceiling 469; headroom 0)`, widest table row 0 bytes (pin 0). - Not measured locally: `check-required-contexts --verify-required-set` and `check-half-states --provenance`, which read the workflow event, and the four CI type-check lanes. This diff touches no TypeScript. ## 维护者速读(草稿) - **改了什么**:PM 协议参考文件 `platform-readings.md` 第 41-43 行,关于「已入队 PR 转 draft 能否踢出合并队列」的三条平台读数。行数不变。 - **为什么改**:旧文说本仓转 draft 会掉出队列。回查时间线后发现,本仓 4 个已入队后转 draft 的 PR 都没有因此出队。其中 2 个带着 draft 状态被队列直接合入,另外 2 个是在自身队列构建变红之后才被移出。旧说法唯一引用的实例,时间线恰好反向。转 draft 会掉 auto-merge,这一点只在「未入队」时成立。 - **风险与代价(含回滚)**:只改文档读数,不改任何规则或代码。补救仍是两手都做。风险在于读者以为有可靠的踢队手段,而实际没有。回滚就是 revert 这一个提交。 - **席位意见**: - **你要做的**:无需操作,由席位按 Tier S 复核后落地。若要让 `AGENTS.md` 里的同一旧说法一并修正(Tier H),需要你点头另开 PR。 --- _Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01KTZmMfzVzjNvyaLyQ8mHvg)_ Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Part of #20234
Clause-②: no
Liveness slice 4a (claim
5909281604). Inapp.json(10 sites) andview.json(6), each note that cited a tracker number answering 404 now names the commit that decided it or, where the number alone carried the meaning, says what was decided. All 16 sites carried the same number, and each now reads(commit 8f10a79f7), the commit that wrote them. 16note/_noteleaves change and no other leaf does; no number is added. Left for slice 4b:field.json(11) andliveness/README.md(29). One@objectstack/specpatch changeset.Local runs at
e5552bfc90: build 71/71; speclocal578 files pass; specrepo41 of 45 pass; spectypecheckand the lint package's liveness test pass; 58 derived gates, 57 exit 0 (check:platform-checklist: the pre-existingauth-plugin.ts#twoFactoranchor, not per-PR CI). Lint: ESLint's config matches none of the 3 changed files (3 "no matching configuration" results, 0 errors); type-aware linting is never enabled.Generated by Claude Code