Skip to content

[PM seat] repo:cloud — 🟢 hotlong · session_01TAUTP6Yky8QWoHUAPDKNJQ (R38) seated 2026-09-15T15:09Z · prev: consolidated seat session_018rzQyhLGC5iVs11V3TzRs5 closed 2026-09-09T06:31Z (that session could not attach cloud; this one can — probed 15:02Z) #6026

Description

@claude

本贴是 repo:cloud(整仓)座位的唯一权威登记。 座位贴协议(维护者 2026-08-06 批准):索引 = label:pm:seat,总入口 #4604。单写手规则:只有在任座位 PM 编辑正文;接管/移交 = 改正文 + 审计评论;动手前重拉正文、时间戳先到先得、写后回读。

当前 PM

🟢 在任hotlong · session session_01TAUTP6Yky8QWoHUAPDKNJQ (R38, seated 2026-09-15T15:09Z).

Lineage R16→R37 is continuous. Between R37 and R38 the seat was held for 4h45m by the forced-consolidation seat session_018rzQyhLGC5iVs11V3TzRs5 (yinlianghui, 2026-09-09T01:46Z → 06:31Z). It drove nothing in this lane — objectstack-ai/cloud could not be attached to it — and it did not edit this body, which is why the body read 🟢 R37 while the title read 🔴 vacant for six days. It takes no round number; its two audit comments (5594512313, 5597107117) are the archive.

⚠️ Account and session are separate identities — the session ID is the only identity criterion. Takeover = rewrite this section + leave an audit comment; earliest timestamp wins.

⚠️ This seat's REST and MCP credential resolves to hotlong, one of the two maintainer-authorised accounts (GET /user and MCP get_me agree, read 2026-09-15T15:02:53Z). Two binding consequences: ⛔ this seat never uses it to approve, merge or otherwise clear a governed-surface PR, and ⛔ a hotlong actor event in this lane's history is NOT by itself evidence of the maintainer's own hand — R37 already mis-attributed one (its self-audit item 16 in 5578658772).

Patrol timer: trig_01QcfFDq2uaTncFwG2LrhxKo — self-bound to this session, cron 23 * * * *, armed 2026-09-15T15:04:41Z.

Both predecessor timers are accounted for by reading, not by assumption: trig_01NaPCcwVnbRZqVPYkEQGvED (R37, the id this body carried) and trig_01VYb6BcxbQCzTzPH4Ys95u2 (the consolidation seat) each answered delete_trigger with not found, and list_triggers with enabled=true over the whole account returns exactly one enabled Routine — an unrelated www.objectos.ai blog slot-day job. ⛔ Neither was taken from memory; R37's own self-audit records two separate failures of exactly that kind (items 1 and 2).

范围

cloud 全仓队列 + objectstack 上带 repo:cloud 的缝卡。执行座位 + 单车道机械三务自理;⛔ 不产 domain:*。⛔ 每轮两仓都读。

继承台账

Nothing in this section is inherited prose. R37's ledger (2026-09-07T06:4xZ) and the consolidation seat's restatement of it are both retired here: every line below is a reading taken at takeover, and the five items the two briefs handed forward were re-read one by one and are listed under Retired inheritance.

cloud board — reconciled, read 2026-09-15T15:03:50Z

92 open issues + 1 open PR = 93, equal to the repo's own open_issues_count (93). One page, enumeration complete by count reconciliation (⛔ not by Link: rel="next", per platform fact below).

bucket n cards
(no state label) 24 #2279 · #2278 · #2274 · #2272 · #2271 · #2265 · #2262 · #2233 · #2224 · #2181 · #2180 · #2177 · #2149 · #2146 · #2073 · #1539 · #1001 · #1000 · #944 · #874 · #845 · #797 · #771 · #621
pm:blocked 16 #2041 · #1995 · #1979 · #1969 · #1876 · #1765 · #1657 · #1595 · #1584 · #1512 · #1452 · #1332 · #1288 · #1241 · #1119 · #799
pm:queue 11 #2263 · #2248 · #2190 · #2130 · #2127 · #2124 · #2118 · #2092 · #2072 · #2059 · #2021
finding 7 #2006 · #2004 · #2000 · #1999 · #1998 · #1997 · #1977
pm:awaiting-maintainer 7 #1874 · #1744 · #1739 · #1738 · #1737 · #1331 · #987
needs-user-decision 5 #2186 · #2182 · #2179 · #2174 · #2172
pm:dispatched 5 #2266 · #2214 · #2158 · #2157 · #2020
pm:epic 5 #2131 · #1955 · #1653 · #1521 · #1472
pm:on-hold 5 #2173 · #1917 · #786 · #673 · #671
finding,pm:on-hold 2 #2093 · #2023
pm:done 2 #2209 · #2195
finding,pm:blocked 1 #1975
needs-user-decision,pm:queue 1 #2249
pm:blocked,pm:epic 1 #2135

Only open PR: #2241 (feat(objectos-ee): add Kubernetes deployment manifests, updated 2026-09-12T04:08Z) — not this seat's, not claimed here.

⚠️ State-machine breakages visible at takeover (to verify before repair, ⛔ not to be repaired blind)

The six states (pm:queue · pm:dispatched · pm:blocked · pm:on-hold · pm:awaiting-maintainer · needs-user-decision) are mutually exclusive, and finding means awaiting first triage — triage removes it. Five rows break that, and R37's warning about #2135 still stands verbatim: ⛔ do not guess which half is right; read the card and its comments first, and when in doubt treat it as awaiting a ruling, because mis-dispatching a card that is waiting on a ruling costs more than dispatching a ruled card late.

objectstack seam cards carrying repo:cloud — read 2026-09-15T16:24:35Z, 7 open (was 11 at takeover)

⛔ All eleven were worked in wave R38-1; none was looked at and put back. Four are closed, and every card still open carries a published reading.

card state what it is waiting on
#13272 pm:dispatched, assignee hotlong PR #18313 enqueuedadded_to_merge_queue confirmed 2026-09-15T16:31:45Z; the 22-consumer reading is 5682851335, the acceptance 5684033585
#13285 pm:queue census closed (5682999570); the disposition is the domain:spec seat's, and it is a different question from the one the card was filed with
#16084 pm:queue unblocked — pin covers 69602e578 (ahead_by 716 / behind_by 0). ⚠️ its target list moved 5 keys → 3 since filing (5683648332)
#17072 pm:queue premise re-confirmed on today's tree; ⚠️ acceptance item 2 needs a live control-plane query channel this seat has not established (5683255225)
#17148 pm:queue answered YES with the evidence that ranks the fork (5683230070); the three-way choice is the domain:engine seat's
#17163 pm:queue 先量 delivered (5683694154); the reduction itself is the domain:skills lane's
#17693 pm:queue not dispatchable as written — its headline premise is falsified and it needs one re-shaping pass (5683756690)

Closed this wave: #15861 · #16852 · #17233 · #17045. Filed this wave: #18304 (agent.tools re-grade, triage's) · #18309 (CLOUD_PROVIDED_OBJECT_NAMES, both directions) · #18314 (a gate script unrunnable from an agent container).

Unblocked elsewhere: #15858 (domain:cli, pm:blocked) — its blocker was a reading this seat could take; delivered as 5683116026. ⛔ Its label transition is that seat's.

Retired inheritance — the five items both briefs handed forward, each re-read 2026-09-15T15:06:16Z

handed forward as actual state now
in flight: cloud#1932 (+#1949) closed completed 2026-09-07T07:14:24Z
awaiting a human merge: PR #2028 → cloud#1962, with R37's D5 point owed PR merged 2026-09-07T07:45:27Z; #1962 closed completed 07:45:28Z. ⚠️ The merged PR still carries needs-user-decision. ⛔ Whether D5's second paragraph was removed before the merge is not verified here and is not claimed either way
serial queue on packages/service-cloud/src/routes/package-install.ts, holder + 2 queued queue retired: cloud#2003 closed completed 2026-09-07T08:39:22Z, objectstack#14034 closed completed 2026-09-07T12:00:13Z, and the holding branch's card is closed
decision box #2118 · #2092 · #1994 · #2135 ⚠️ not a current reading#2118 and #2092 now sit in pm:queue, #2135 in pm:blocked+pm:epic, and #1994 is not open at all. The live decision box is the needs-user-decision bucket above
ruled-but-undispatched #2127 (option 1, strict 3-step order) · #2130 (option B) both still open in pm:queue. ⭐ R37's ordering constraint on #2127 — framework first, cloud never first, or artifact-kernel-factory.ts degrades to 'unnamed-app' and crashes the environment kernel at package install — is a ruling, ⛔ not re-litigable in-seat

热文件串行队

None declared. R37's package-install.ts queue is retired (see above): both queued cards and the holder are closed. The next seat to find two open cards sharing one hot file declares the queue here, file → ordered card list → each card's claimed region.

说明

⛔ 本仓平台事实(接管者先读;【R37】为本班实测)

  1. enable_pr_auto_merge 才是进队动作,唯一可靠读数 = event: merge_group run。队列按顺序逐个合
  2. closing keyword 会静默不生效 ⇒ 合并后逐卡核 state;反向同真(27)
  3. 读 main 与 pin 一律走 API
  4. sanitizer 吃尖括号;反引号代码块内的 <sha>/<path> 存活。
  5. RouteDefinition.permissions 零消费。
  6. cloud 无 dispatch-gates.mjs、无仓级 lint ⇒ 门禁按 diff 从 check:* + test.yml 推导。
  7. blocked 卡的交付常以别的卡号落地 ⇒ 问「交付物在 main 上吗」。
  8. 覆写判据 = 因由是否在同一动作里。
  9. hotcrm 经 add_repo;objectui 不可写 ⇒ 缝卡。
  10. GraphQL 限流时 REST 仍通;/search/issues 403。
  11. 跨座位交接落卡不落贴。 12. pin 选择双向审窗(feat(objectql): opt-in sys_metadata hydration for isolated project kernels #1826)。 13. 读数缝卡按家族折叠。 14. ObjectLogger 是类。
  12. 提示词棘轮 上限已由 epic 车道抬到 60,250(feat(dogfood): in-process runtime regression gate #2020,定过价的例外,⛔ 不继承)。
  13. flow config 开放 record;flow.zod.tsjob.zod.ts id 空间。
  14. run 级 updated_at 不是活性信号,读 job steps。
  15. list_pull_requests.merged 不可信;认 merged_at+closed
  16. 舰队级 529:单独重派是判别实验;保留认领+note。
  17. packages/service-ai-studio/src/skills/ 不是 governed 面。
  18. pnpm --filter PKG typecheck testtest 当参数 ⇒ 分两条命令。
  19. 核验框架/objectui 无需 clone:curl raw.githubusercontent.com/...
  20. JobSchedule 文件头自证事实 16。
  21. 测试接缝没人守 ⇒ 静默死掉而依赖它的测试全绿
  22. 门禁首合取项若是「模型自己的行为」,门就是模型可自行关掉的
  23. MCP 断连静默断掉定时器链;醒来先 list_triggers;送达延迟 0–14 分钟常见。【R37 复现:本班 MCP 掉线一次,重连后继续,无状态损失】
  24. Part of 不保证不关卡 ⇒ 合并后 close-verify 一律读 state。
  25. 剥标/回读类小写动作与触发读数同一批发出
  26. ⛔ 三参旧式 git merge-tree 对 add/add 与内容冲突报 0。 一律 git merge-tree --write-tree --name-only <A> <B>
  27. 解锁扫描读到评论最后一页:先问「有没有裁过没执行的」。
  28. 维护者会在同一分钟用两个授权账号连做多件事
  29. createRequiredist/index.cjs、静态 import 到 dist/index.js = 两份模块实例
  30. 框架文件不在 cloud 里:派发令写文件面前对 cloud 树 find 一次。
  31. body 编辑不撤回 PR 建立时登记的 auto-close 链接
  32. 另一 PM 车道可能不读线程就认领并开 PR;closed_by_pull_requests 是最早信号。
  33. arm 不是终点:队列前面的 PR 落地可让本 PR 静默 dirty。
  34. disable_pr_auto_merge 不出队;代理禁 ref 删除。
  35. settings 两层门是框架设计:托管内核声明 11 个 namespace。
  36. 【R37】容器里的 /home/user/objectstack 是浅 clone(55 commits)。 窗口化 git log / merge-base 在它上面以 exit 0 无警告答错 —— 本班就先拿到过一个假的「未找到」。pin 祖先判定必须先 git fetch --deepen=3000(只加对象,不动 HEAD/工作树,安全)或走 REST compare。⛔ 浅检出上的 merge-base 不是 pin 读数。
  37. 【R37】apps/objectostest = preflight && vitest run,而 test:crm-bundle / test:boot-smoke 等是 tsx 脚本,vitest 不收集它们。 CI 只跑 boot-smoke + cloud#1650 提升的三个 tsx 门(production-flow / billing-flow / cloud-app);test:crm-bundle 无人跑test.yml 自己的注释已记过同类:「it is test:boot-smoke, not test, which is how it sat red for three weeks unnoticed」。⇒ 事实 24 的活体实例,查「这个测试真的在跑吗」。
  38. 【R37】cloud 无 priority:p1 标签(只有 priority:p0)。⛔ 不要凭记忆挂,严重度写进评论正文。
  39. 【R37】dev 开的 PR 作者是 claude[bot],不是席位账号 ⇒ 对 os-zhuang 请审不会触发 author-identity 422,两个授权账号都能正常请审(本班实测两个都进了 requested_reviewers)。
  40. 【R37】MCP update_pull_requestreviewers 时显式传 draft: true 能保住草稿位(回读确认 draft 仍为 true)。⛔ 仍要回读,不认 200。
  41. 【R37】issue/PR 号不可预测:本班在评论里引用了一个尚未创建的卡号并写错(预测 fix(driver-sql): self-heal numeric type fidelity on legacy SQLite columns + extend dogfood matrix #2028,实际 ci: run ESLint in CI to enforce the @objectstack/spec import guard #2029,而 fix(driver-sql): self-heal numeric type fidelity on legacy SQLite columns + extend dogfood matrix #2028 恰好被同批的 PR 占走)。先创建再引用,写错了就公开更正。

⛔ Platform facts added by R38 (English from here down; 存量中文事实 1–44 above are 不追溯改写)

  1. REST is OPEN to BOTH repos from this seat's container, probed 2026-09-15T15:02:53Z: GET /repos/objectstack-ai/cloud/issues → 200, GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/6026 → 200, /rate_limit → core 15000/h (the App-install bucket, so not the MCP user bucket). ⇒ The vacancy reason this post's title carried for six days — "repo not attached" — was an attribute of that session, not of this lane. ⛔ Never inherit a reachability verdict from another session; probe once per session, and ⛔ 仓不可达 is never "checked and clean".

  2. Both container checkouts are shallow, 50 commits each/home/user/cloud at cb8ee7ff and /home/user/objectstack at 827cacbf, read 2026-09-15T15:08:47Z. Platform fact 39 (shallow clones answer merge-base and windowed git log wrongly at exit 0) therefore applies to both repos now, not just objectstack. Deepen (git fetch --deepen=3000) or go through REST compare before any ancestry claim.

  3. create_trigger warns "this trigger stores no MCP connectors" even for a self-bound timer, and for that shape the warning is not a defect: a self-bound firing resumes THIS session, with this session's tools. It is exactly the silent-zero-output failure seat-post-protocol.md names only for a fresh-session Routine. ⛔ Do not read the warning as "the timer is broken", and ⛔ do not read a created id as an armed timer either — read it back.

  4. PUT .../pulls/{n}/ccr/auto_merge IGNORES merge_method. Measured both spellings on PR fix(spec): the 21 confirmed cloud citations in the agent/skill/action liveness ledgers carry a read date and a symbol anchor #18313 at 2026-09-15T16:31:00Z: {"merge_method":"SQUASH"} and {"merge_method":"squash"} each return 200 echoing "merge_method":"merge", and the PR's stored auto_merge.merge_method reads back merge. rest-channel.md documents the SQUASH payload; that value does not stick. ⚠️ Harmless here — the merge QUEUE decides the method, allow_merge_commit is false and origin/main's first-parent history is linear — but ⛔ never read that echo as confirmation that a method was set.

  5. An aggregator job reports FAILURE when its lanes were CANCELLED by a superseding push. TypeScript Type Check and Test Core run no compiler and no test: each reads the jobs named in OS_AGGREGATOR_MEMBERS and fails if any did not conclude success. Measured three times this wave. ⇒ A red aggregator on a superseded head is a supersede artifact, ⛔ not a gate finding — read the members per shard before diagnosing. On 97b17e9e, Test Core (4/6) succeeded and the other five were cancelled; no shard failed at all, yet two checks read failure.

  6. A PR body PATCH re-triggers the PR-metadata gates (Check Changeset, The card this PR closes must claim this branch, Part-of PR must not also close its card, No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path). Budget a body edit like a push, and ⛔ do not spend one late in a run to add a sentence.

  7. ⭐ Two pushes to one PR cost two supersede cascades. This seat sent a dev two follow-ups (anchors, then notes) instead of one batch; each push cancelled an in-flight run and produced a red aggregator on the head it superseded. ⇒ Batch every correction from one review pass into ONE follow-up.

⛔ 长期禁令(跨任期)

不得设 OS_MCP_SERVER_ENABLED;⛔ 永不伪造 Origin / 设 OS_TRUSTED_ORIGINS;⛔ 永不放宽 auth 断言;钉缺陷测试 promote never repair;⛔ positions ?? roles 回退禁;⛔ 永不编辑 content/docs/releases/;governed 面 PR ⛔ 永不自行入队;⛔ 永不弱化 cloud#1265 守卫;⛔ 不删 .changeset/*.md

⛔ Permanent notes(跨任期,判例)

卡面反事实也要实测;零命中必带阳性对照(R37 两次靠它拿到真读数:/api/v1/environments/ 的真零,与浅 clone 的假零);dev 偏离更强则背书,但背书不等于照单全收;本席自己的判断过宽/过错就当场自更正(R37:Blocked-by 前提证伪,已在 #2029 公开更正);hold 只认最近转换条件;停手条款是契约一部分;blocked 解锁 = 交付物在 ref 上,pin 消费的仓再加一问「pin 覆盖了吗」;设计卡 cloud 腿「designed blind」先复核;「enforce」实施前先找接缝;定级时核「spec 里没有」这类前提;门禁类修复的 CI 绿可能什么都不证明;声称「已裁决」缺出处三件即不采信;复核时决定性前提自己再测一遍(R37:ADR-0112 D6 第 99 行逐字核);「正确但靠手抄」是没钉住的缺陷(本仓已开三张同类:#1932 #1949 #1995);收紧前先找反向那一轴;翻 ready 前亲核首行,合并后仍读 state;已裁未执行的裁决,解锁时先执行再谈重判;维护者点名保留的面,⛔ 席内不得代认,哪怕 dev 的论据成立;epic 车道领地内的卡:定级是本席机械义务,派发是它的


迁移注记:本贴自 #4604 迁移(2026-08-06)。R36 于 09-04T07:5xZ 收尾空席;R37 于 09-07T05:41Z 坐席并在首个 wave 边界重写正文,新增平台事实 39–44。
R38 seated in the same stroke that rewrote §1–§3 under 接管压缩, and added platform facts 45–47.


Generated by Claude Code

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

pm:seatPM seat registry issue - single-writer body, index = this label

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions