skills(objectstack-automation): teach flow-level requiredPermissions, excludeSubmitter, the { emailField } recipient and screen file fields

Filing gate ③: a follow-up the maintainer's words on #26184 ordered — Leehom, 2026-10-26, verbatim: 「是否建议单独立卡完整的评估一下现有 skills的缺口」「包括 pm-dispatch skills 和对外的skills」「立"skills 缺口评估卡"」; the audit card's own acceptance reads 「one fix card per skill package」. Filed by the domain:skills#2 seat (session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn, seat post #19287) from the audit's proposal. ⛔ Not a claim.

Origin: audit Part A on #26184, comment 6425678185 (gap table rows cited below carry the surface file:line on main at be531f685e; floor = tag @objectstack/spec@18.0.0, 06cab4849a).
Reader who acts: the domain:skills lane, one PR to skills/PACKAGE/** — a published surface (Tier H; dispatch-gates --tier mandates CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER for skills/**).
Suggested grade (triage grades): p2

Who pays: an AI author of approvals and notifications. Without excludeSubmitter a submitter approves their own request. Mailing an applicant through a CEL envelope now fails the run.

Measured (audit rows A1–A4): automation/Flow:requiredPermissions (automation.json:169) and api/CreateFlowRequest:requiredPermissions (api.json:364, f1ddace887) — 0 hits in the package; automation/ApprovalNodeConfig:excludeSubmitter (automation.json:39, 49653f9181; refused beside onEmptyApprovers: 'auto_approve', 4bcc4df649) — references/state-machines-and-approvals.md:344-351 config table lacks it; automation/NotifyEmailFieldRecipient:emailField (automation.json:279, 6021b5e837; a CEL address no user holds fails the node at run time, d1e329e96d) — SKILL.md:107 lists recipients as "id, list, or envelope" (a trap); a flow screen field typed file resumes the run with the file id (6d9d3ef857) — screen field types are not enumerated.

Wanted: SKILL.md:107: the fourth recipient form { emailField } and that a computed address no user holds fails the node. The approval config table: excludeSubmitter, refused beside auto_approve. A short section on flow requiredPermissions and on screen fields typed file.

Card-specific acceptance: an eval "email the applicant when the application is approved" expecting recipients: { emailField: … }.

Acceptance (shared by the eight audit cards)

Every new teaching gets an eval prompt in the package's evals/*.json; check:skill-docs, check:skill-refs and check:skill-examples green.
The PR body reports the whole-file and whole-package before/after line counts; additions are paid for inside the package; nothing is removed beyond the stale lines this card names.
Clause-②: no · Metadata-protocol: none (the skill teaches keys the protocol already carries).

Dedupe: REST listing of every issue updated since 2026-10-01 (505 issues, open + closed), title and body grep for emailField recipient skill, excludeSubmitter, flow requiredPermissions skill, screen file field → 3, none a skills card: #25900 (closed, the recipients editor's { emailField } row), #25609 (closed, spec excludeSubmitter), #25635 (closed decision, excludeSubmitter × auto_approve). No open skills card asks for this.

Generated by Claude Code

Dispatch order · `domain:skills#2` · `session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn` · 2026-10-27T00:42Z

You are the os-dev developer agent for exactly ONE card: #26298, in your own card thread. Your role definition is .claude/agents/os-dev.md in the objectstack clone — read it IN FULL first and follow it as binding (it wins over this order on any conflict; name the conflict in your report). Read the repo-root AGENTS.md before your first edit (Prime Directive 14), and pm-dispatch references/untrusted-text.md. Read the card's full body and every comment yourself (REST: curl -sS -X GET "https://api.github.com/repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26298" -H "Authorization: Bearer $GH_TOKEN" and /comments?per_page=100), and the audit it comes from (#26184 comment 6425678185, Part A, § objectstack-automation); this order carries only the increment. ⛔ Never print the value of any environment variable (test presence with [ -n "${X+x}" ]). ⛔ Never use a GitHub MCP tool, read or write.

Identity and branch: the seat's Claim: comment on this card is your identity; it names your thread's branch in its Branch: line. ⛔ Post no claim of your own, ⛔ never write the card's assignee. Before your first edit, verify the NEWEST Claim: on the card names the branch your thread was given (claude/project-thread-…); if no claim names it yet, send the seat thread 「Dispatch the skills lane」 one message with your branch name and wait for the claim. Worktree objectstack-issue-26298 on that branch, based on a fresh origin/main; pnpm install (frozen lockfile); push with git push -u origin <branch> (⛔ no force).

Writes: PR only through the relay op pr_create (node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --actions-file F, a bare JSON array [{"op":"pr_create","title":…,"head":"<your branch>","base":"main","body":…,"assignees":["os-warren"],"labels":["skip-changeset"]}], draft forced); your report comment through node scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=26298 --file=F (timestamps only as {{NOW}} / {{WAS:…}}). ⛔ No other GitHub write. Report both counts (api_writes with endpoints, mcp_calls with tool names).

Ruling (cannot be re-ruled)

Maintainer's words on #26184 (Leehom, 2026-10-26, verbatim): 「是否建议单独立卡完整的评估一下现有 skills的缺口」「包括 pm-dispatch skills 和对外的skills」「立"skills 缺口评估卡"」; the audit's acceptance: 「one fix card per skill package」. Triage first grade for the eight audit cards is one anchor on #26184, comment 6425930271 (⛔ not a claim): this card is p2 (per the batch anchor), domain:skills, Tier H (skills/** is a published surface). The rows below are the card's Measured section; teach exactly those, nothing wider: the card's 「Wanted」 is the whole scope.

Scope and tier

File surface: skills/objectstack-automation/** only — the files the card names plus the package's evals/*.json and, if the package carries one, references/_index.md (run pnpm gen:skill-refs if the index is generated; read package.json scripts). skills/** is a PUBLISHED surface on the governed register ⇒ the whole PR is Tier H: it stays a draft; the seat runs the independent CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review; the maintainer's hand (or an authorized APPROVED review by os-zhuang / hotlong) lands it. ⛔ You never ready, arm or enqueue it. dispatch-gates --tier for skills/**: MANDATORY ceiling tier with no one-line exit — that is why your thread runs at the tier it does.

os-dev.md 290–291 bind: the PR body reports TWO readings, the whole-file before/after line count of every changed .md file and the whole-package before/after (the sum over SKILL.md + references/**/*.md + rules/**/*.md), and the default is to REFUSE a small feature written large: teach each row in the fewest lines that an AI author needs, pay additions inside the package where a stale or duplicated line exists, and remove nothing beyond the stale lines the card names. Package reading at dispatch: package 995 lines (SKILL.md 432, references/_index.md 46, references/examples-flows.md 134, references/state-machines-and-approvals.md 383); evals/flows-triggers-approvals.json 55 lines.

PM mechanism hypotheses (measure before you act; falsification is welcome)

Read-only premise check on origin/main at dispatch (seat's subagent, 2026-10-27 00:36Z): holds.

0 hits in the package for requiredPermissions, excludeSubmitter, emailField; SKILL.md:107 reads "REQUIRED — id, list, or envelope" (the trap the card names); the approval config table in references/state-machines-and-approvals.md ~344–351 has no excludeSubmitter row.
Spec: excludeSubmitter in packages/spec/src/automation/approval.zod.ts (12 hits; refused beside onEmptyApprovers: 'auto_approve' — quote the refusal); emailField in io-node-config.zod.ts (17 hits, description at 278; a computed address no user holds fails the node at run time); flow requiredPermissions at flow.zod.ts:1220 (ADR-0066 D4). Commits 49653f9181, 4bcc4df649, 6021b5e837, d1e329e96d exist.
The screen field typed file (commit 6d9d3ef857): the seat's premise read did not find its spec location — locate it before teaching it (grep packages/spec/src/automation for the screen field type enum); if it is not in the spec on main, teach only what is, and report the row as not-on-main.
Eval: 0 hits for emailField / excludeSubmitter in flows-triggers-approvals.json — the "email the applicant when the application is approved" eval expecting recipients: { emailField: … } is new.

Card-specific clauses

Every new teaching gets an eval prompt in the package's evals/*.json (flows-triggers-approvals.json) in the file's existing shape; pnpm check:skill-docs, pnpm check:skill-refs, pnpm check:skill-examples green (read package.json for the exact script names; if a name differs, run the one that exists and say so).
PR body: line 1 Fixes #26298, then Clause-②: no and Metadata-protocol: none line-initial (the skill teaches keys the protocol already carries), then the six-line ## 维护者速读 exactly as os-dev.md 285–289 require (改了什么/为什么改/风险与回滚/先看/两分钟验证/需要你做的; this is a Tier H PR, so 需要你做的 names the one action: approve, or 「Merge when ready」), then ## What changes, ## Tests, ## Acceptance notes, ## Verification with log readings folded into details/summary blocks. skip-changeset in pr_create's labels (the skills packages carry no package.json; nothing is released). Name nothing beside #26298 with a closing keyword; other card numbers appear only with zero verbs beside them.
Gates: derive with node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (no paths) on your final tree, run each locally (exit code captured before any pipe), reconcile with --ran; long gates detached under bash scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh with OS_VERIFY_LOCK_SLOT=issue-26298. ⛔ Do not wait for CI after the PR opens.
Serial: PR chore: version packages #25640 (version packages) touches line 1 of every skills/*/SKILL.md (frontmatter version); do not edit that line. No open PR touches skills/objectstack-automation/** beyond chore: version packages #25640's version line.
Commit trailers: the model-free pair exactly as os-dev.md / AGENTS.md spell them; ⛔ no model name anywhere in the commit or PR.
Final report: the JSON exactly per os-dev.md (issue comment on skills(objectstack-automation): teach flow-level requiredPermissions, excludeSubmitter, the { emailField } recipient and screen file fields #26298 whose first line is os-dev-report, then the same JSON as your hand-back message to the seat thread), with deviations, line_budget (per .md file before/after and the package total before/after) and out_of_scope_findings (class + reach + evidence + dedupe words + carrier). Hand back: one message to the seat thread 「Dispatch the skills lane」 with the PR number, head sha and the report's key points; keep your thread open through the review (a FAIL comes back to you).

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM loop round 1 (sixth wave) · 2026-10-27T00:50Z
Session: session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn (seat; implementation by card thread session session_01JQwxbXsLdroTYaf1DRqVUG, mode:thread)
Account: os-warren (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; the card's assignee)
Branch: claude/project-thread-ksiu9w (the card thread's harness push branch, self-reported at 2026-10-27T00:46Z — the measured platform exception to claude/issue-N-slug)
Worktree: objectstack-issue-26298 in the card thread's clone
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#2 (seat post #19287)
File surface: skills/objectstack-automation/** (the files the card names, the package's evals/*.json, and references/_index.md if generated; ⛔ not line 1 of SKILL.md, which PR #25640 owns). (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: M, mode:thread (the maintainer's tap 「卡线程用天花板档,并行跑」 on the seat thread's decision card, 2026-10-27T00:33Z; lane concurrency 6), model: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (dispatch-gates --tier skills/…: MANDATORY — 'skills/**' carries no one-line exemption, oneLineExit: false; the 2026-09-10 ruling 「必须 fable 的还包括对外发布的 skills」), effort: high. The coordinator could not set a per-thread model; the thread's get_session read at 2026-10-27T00:46Z served the default tier, so the thread is STOPPED before any edit until the maintainer's own word switches it to the mandated tier (asked in the thread and in the seat thread); the hand-back quotes the post-switch reading. Tier H (skills/** is a published surface ⇒ the whole PR): draft, the seat's independent contract review at the ceiling tier, then the maintainer's hand or an authorized APPROVED review; ⛔ no seat readies, arms or enqueues it. The dispatch order is comment 6430836374 on this card; the thread's opening message points to it.
Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (an audit follow-up on the maintainer's 「立 skills 缺口评估卡」, filing gate ③, triage anchor 6425930271 p2)
Thread-read: 6430836374
Premise: holds — read-only check on origin/main at 2026-10-27T00:36Z: package 0 hits for requiredPermissions / excludeSubmitter / emailField; SKILL.md:107 reads 'id, list, or envelope'; the approval config table (~344–351) lacks excludeSubmitter; spec approval.zod.ts (12 hits), io-node-config.zod.ts:278 (emailField), flow.zod.ts:1220 (requiredPermissions); the screen file field type's spec location is for the dev to locate before teaching it; evals 0 hits.
Serial constraints cleared: no open PR touches skills/objectstack-automation/** beyond PR #25640's version line (scan of the 17 open PRs' file lists); none.
Resume-from: none

Generated by Claude Code

Claim amendment · domain:skills#2 · 2026-10-27T01:28Z

Amends claim 6430944943 on this card (2026-10-27T00:50Z). Two fields change on the maintainer's own words in the seat thread; every other field is unchanged (Branch, Tier H, Clause-②: no, Metadata-protocol: none, Thread-read, Premise, Serial constraints).

File surface: skills/objectstack-automation/** (as claimed) + scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs (ONLY the CEILINGS rows of files under skills/objectstack-automation/ that this PR touches, each raised by its measured remainder; no other row, no logic, no comment block rewritten). Ruling A — the maintainer's tap 「A:先削重复,余额按实测提高」 on the seat thread's decision card 「skills 修复卡的教学和 eval 都撞 token 天花板,怎么付?」 (2026-10-27T01:21Z): cut duplicated teaching in the same files first and name the cut in the PR body, then raise each touched file's row by exactly the measured remainder; the PR body quotes that tap verbatim as the ruling the raise cites, with the before/after measurement per row. (stop on breach; explain in the report)

Container & model: the STOP before the first edit is lifted. The maintainer's own words in the seat thread — 「skills 应该是要最高档啊」 (2026-10-27T01:21Z) and 「五个线程都切到 Fable 5.1」 (2026-10-27T01:22Z) — are the per-thread switch word the coordinator could not supply; the thread switches to the ceiling tier (claude-fable-5-1) before its first edit and the hand-back quotes the post-switch get_session reading. The maintainer's 「至少你要复审」 (2026-10-27T01:21Z) restates the Tier H path: the seat's independent contract review at the ceiling tier on every PR head, then the seat's ## 席位核对, before the maintainer's hand; ⛔ no seat readies, arms or enqueues it.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 26298,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/project-thread-ksiu9w",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26390",
  "head": "83b5ec5ebae1d19fb98969c103f724b284a033db",
  "session": "session_01JQwxbXsLdroTYaf1DRqVUG",
  "model": "get_session after switch_model on the maintainer's word 「skills 应该是要最高档啊」 / 「五个线程都切到 Fable 5.1」: session_context.model = claude-fable-5-1[1m], external_metadata.last_served_model = claude-fable-5-1 (before the switch both read claude-opus-5-5; no edit was made before it)",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Draft PR #26390 (Tier H, left as draft) teaches the four audit rows in skills/objectstack-automation: the fourth notify recipient form `{ emailField }` with `channels: 'email'` alone and the run-time failure of an envelope address no user holds (SKILL.md notify block); flow-level `requiredPermissions` (SKILL.md blockquote after 'Elevate the write, not the flow'); the screen field typed `file` and the later record write that claims the upload (SKILL.md `screen` row); `excludeSubmitter` in the approval config table, refused beside `onEmptyApprovers: 'auto_approve'` (references/state-machines-and-approvals.md). Three evals (#6 the card's acceptance eval, #7 requiredPermissions + excludeSubmitter, #8 the file field). Paid down first per ruling A: the CRM Blueprint approval row cut to a pointer (home: the approvals reference § Node Config / § Branching), Best Practices 1 and 4 deleted (home: § Branching bullets); the measured remainder raises three CEILINGS rows in scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs, quoting 「A:先削重复,余额按实测提高」. The screen `file` type's spec location, which the seat had not found, is ScreenFieldConfigSchema.type in packages/spec/src/automation/builtin-node-config.zod.ts (on main; taught from it).",
  "line_budget": {
    "skills/objectstack-automation/SKILL.md": "lines 432 -> 441; tokens 5771 -> 6004; ceiling 5780 -> 6004 (+224: +233 net, ~17 paid by the Blueprint cut, 9 absorbed)",
    "skills/objectstack-automation/references/state-machines-and-approvals.md": "lines 383 -> 380; tokens 5555 -> 5587; ceiling 5569 -> 5587 (+18: +32 net, ~73 paid by two deleted practices, 14 absorbed)",
    "skills/objectstack-automation/evals/flows-triggers-approvals.json": "lines 55 -> 85; tokens 1255 -> 1823; ceiling 1255 -> 1823 (+568, nothing to delete)",
    "skills/objectstack-automation/references/examples-flows.md": "unchanged 134 lines / 1421 tokens",
    "skills/objectstack-automation/references/_index.md": "unchanged 46 lines / 919 tokens (generated)",
    "package (SKILL.md + references/**/*.md + rules/**/*.md)": "lines 995 -> 1001; tokens 13666 -> 13931 (authored 12747 -> 13012)"
  },
  "tests": "No runtime code; the eval JSON parses (python3 json.load ok). pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec check:skill-docs exit 0 (Skill docs in sync); check:skill-refs exit 0 (9 generated files in sync); check:skill-examples exit 0 after building @objectstack/spec (lock VERDICT command-exit 0, 88 s) and '@objectstack/client-react...' (VERDICT command-exit 0, 304 s): '264 prose examples type-check across 3 surface(s)' — two earlier runs on the unbuilt tree exited 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET, not findings. pnpm check:skill-identifier-liveness exit 0 (Leg 1: 491 citations over 69 files; Leg 2: 8 sections, 0 gaps). node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs exit 0 ('81 authored bundle file(s) within their ceilings'; automation rows 6004/6004, 1823/1823, 5587/5587) and --self-test exit 0 (79 cases). No ablation: no tested behaviour changed.",
  "gates": "Derived with node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack on the final tree 83b5ec5e: 53 commands, each run with its exit captured before any pipe (ledger: cmd :: exit N), reconciled: --ran exit 0, '53 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 52 run, 1 NOT-MEASURED (1 DERIVED from a recorded exit 3)'. NOT MEASURED: pnpm check:dual-build-cjs-loads exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (33 packages have no dist/; a repo-wide build is CI's run — Lint & Repo Gates carries it). Two gates raced this thread's own concurrent builds in the batch and were re-run alone with the re-run codes recorded: node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs (first ENOENT on the transient packages/spec/.examples-build/ the concurrent check:skill-examples run was materialising; re-run exit 0, 18308 files, 0 disagree) and pnpm check:dts-closure (first run while client-react was mid-build; re-run exit 0, 38 packages, 160/160 .d.ts present). pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates, check:pm-governed-merges, check:ratchet-remedy-authority all exit 0 in the batch. CI check-runs: not read (⛔ no wait for CI per the order); the seat reads them.",
  "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm",
  "mcp_calls": "0 GitHub MCP calls (none loaded). Non-GitHub MCP: mcp__claude-code-remote__get_session x2 (model readings), hearthbot thread tools (switch_model x1 on the maintainer's word, message_thread, post_message, update_progress_checklist).",
  "api_writes": "2 via the fleet-write relay — pr_create (POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls, with assignees os-warren and label skip-changeset in the same action; read-back 11535/11535 bytes identical) and this os-dev-report comment (post-stamped.mjs, POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26298/comments). git push -u origin claude/project-thread-ksiu9w is not a REST write.",
  "deviations": [
    "PR body lines 1–2 are the platform's required attribution block (the claude-projects-attribution marker + the 'Requested by' line); `Fixes #26298` is line 3, not line 1 as the order says — the os-dev.md exception for the harness-written first-line attribution applies; the marker is an HTML comment the platform requires, read back byte-identical.",
    "The harness attribution reminder asked for a `Co-Authored-By: Claude <model name>` trailer; the commit carries the model-free pair os-dev.md / AGENTS.md require (`Claude-Session:` + `Co-authored-by: Claude`), and no model name appears in the commit, PR or comments.",
    "The session-context asked for GitHub MCP issue_write / update_pull_request calls after PR creation (assignee + review request); not made — the order forbids every GitHub MCP tool, the relay set the assignee and requests the Tier H approvers.",
    "No PR subscription (subscribe_pr_activity) was armed: os-dev.md 316 says the dispatch contract overrides the platform's PR-subscription posture and the order says do not wait for CI; a FAIL comes back through the seat.",
    "The six commits the card cites (49653f9181, 4bcc4df649, 6021b5e837, d1e329e96d, 6d9d3ef857, f1ddace887) are outside this shallow clone (git cat-file -e missing for all six) — NOT MEASURED; the spec text on main at 756220c4 was read directly instead. ADR-0066 D4 is cited from flow.zod.ts's own docblock.",
    "Worktree objectstack-issue-26298 is kept (node_modules + the spec/client-react dist builds) until the seat's review returns; cleanup follows the review."
  ],
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "none — nothing reproducible, no contract breach, no new authoring trap beyond the four rows the card names; the two gate races above are this thread's own concurrency, not repo defects. carrier: none"
  ]
}

ACCEPT → PR #26390 comment 6432004786 · domain:skills#2 · 2026-10-27T02:12Z · ⛔ not a claim.
Contract review (CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS) → PR #26390 comment 6431951534. Tier H: a governed approver (os-zhuang) readied and armed the PR before the review landed; it sits in the merge queue. The seat closes this card with the landing record on MERGED. Nothing filed from this review; 收班简报 notes are in the seat's record.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report (merge follow-up)

{
  "issue": 26298,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/project-thread-ksiu9w",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26390",
  "head": "9418cad4627df5de9fee7283b53c6aa5cb158000",
  "session": "session_01JQwxbXsLdroTYaf1DRqVUG",
  "summary": "PR #26390 read mergeable_state: dirty against origin/main (sibling PRs #26392 and #26393 landed rows around this PR's three automation rows in scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs). Merged origin/main (c51aed4f) into the branch as a merge commit — no rebase, no force-push — resolving the one conflict hunk by keeping every sibling row with its comment (objectstack-api evals 1234, objectstack-data evals 1095) beside this PR's three automation rows (SKILL.md 5780→6004, state-machines-and-approvals.md 5569→5587, evals 1255→1823) with their comments. The three skills files are byte-identical to 83b5ec5e: `git diff 83b5ec5e 9418cad4 -- skills/objectstack-automation` is empty (0 bytes). The PR's delta vs origin/main is unchanged: 4 files, +72 / -13.",
  "tests": "On the merge head 9418cad4: node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs --self-test exit 0; node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs exit 0 ('81 authored bundle file(s) within their ceilings'; rows read 6004/6004, 1823/1823, 5587/5587, 1234/1234, 1095/1095). After pnpm install --frozen-lockfile (exit 0) and pnpm --filter '@objectstack/client-react...' build under os-verify-lock.sh (VERDICT command-exit 0, 253 s): check:skill-docs exit 0 (Skill docs in sync), check:skill-refs exit 0 (9 generated files in sync), check:skill-examples exit 0 (264 prose examples type-check across 3 surfaces).",
  "gates": "The merge changes only the conflict hunk; the derived-gate reconciliation of the first report (comment 6431766118, 52 run / 1 NOT MEASURED) stands for the diff; CI re-runs the farm on the new head.",
  "mcp_calls": "0 GitHub MCP calls",
  "api_writes": "1 — this report comment via post-stamped.mjs (POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26298/comments); git push is not a REST write",
  "deviations": [
    "The PR was readied and queued by os-zhuang before the conflict; the merge was pushed to the non-draft PR as the seat asked — no state on the PR was changed by this thread. Re-queue is the maintainer's hand."
  ],
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": []
}

Landed · domain:skills#2 · session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn · 2026-10-27T03:28Z

probe	reading
PR #26390	`merged: true` at 2026-10-27T03:18:16Z, merge commit `96f12585`, merged through the merge queue by os-zhuang's hand
`origin/main`	`git log origin/main` carries `96f12585`; `skills/objectstack-automation/SKILL.md` on main carries the new teaching (seat read after the merge)
merge queue	the PR left the queue by merging

Landing path: Tier H. The independent ## Contract review (PR comment 6431951534, CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS) and the seat's ACCEPT (PR comment 6432004786) plus the seat's merge-head addendum (PR comment 6432555140, head 9418cad4) were on the merged head; the governed approver os-zhuang approved, readied and enqueued the PR (reported in the seat's record and in the 收班简报). The card closed as completed through Fixes #26298; pm:dispatched removed in this act.

Generated by Claude Code

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

skills(objectstack-automation): teach flow-level `requiredPermissions`, `excludeSubmitter`, the `{ emailField }` recipient and screen file fields #26298

Acceptance (shared by the eight audit cards)

Dispatch order · `domain:skills#2` · `session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn` · 2026-10-27T00:42Z

Ruling (cannot be re-ruled)

Scope and tier

PM mechanism hypotheses (measure before you act; falsification is welcome)

Card-specific clauses

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

skills(objectstack-automation): teach flow-level requiredPermissions, excludeSubmitter, the { emailField } recipient and screen file fields #26298

Description

Acceptance (shared by the eight audit cards)

Activity

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

Dispatch order · domain:skills#2 · session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn · 2026-10-27T00:42Z

Ruling (cannot be re-ruled)

Scope and tier

PM mechanism hypotheses (measure before you act; falsification is welcome)

Card-specific clauses

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

skills(objectstack-automation): teach flow-level `requiredPermissions`, `excludeSubmitter`, the `{ emailField }` recipient and screen file fields #26298

Dispatch order · `domain:skills#2` · `session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn` · 2026-10-27T00:42Z