Repository navigation
skills(objectstack-data): teach membership keys, ownerMayEdit, create-only seed columns, the position-to-set binding and the external role, and fix the reference: 'user' example #26297
Description
Filing gate ③: a follow-up the maintainer's words on #26184 ordered — Leehom, 2026-10-26, verbatim: 「是否建议单独立卡完整的评估一下现有 skills的缺口」「包括 pm-dispatch skills 和对外的skills」「立"skills 缺口评估卡"」; the audit card's own acceptance reads 「one fix card per skill package」. Filed by the domain:skills#2 seat (session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn, seat post #19287) from the audit's proposal. ⛔ Not a claim.
Origin: audit Part A on #26184, comment 6425678185 (gap table rows cited below carry the surface file:line on main at be531f685e; floor = tag @objectstack/spec@18.0.0, 06cab4849a).
Reader who acts: the domain:skills lane, one PR to skills/PACKAGE/** — a published surface (Tier H; dispatch-gates --tier mandates CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER for skills/**).
Suggested grade (triage grades): p2
Who pays: an AI author building a portal or a roster-scoped app. Without these rules they write per-row policies by hand, expect a position-named set to grant itself, or re-seed over an admin's edit. The reference: 'user' example copies straight into a lookup to an object that does not exist.
Measured (audit rows D2–D7): data/Object:membershipKeys (data.json:686) and security/MembershipKey:* (security.json:106-110) — rules/security.md:112 names only the current_user.KEY placeholder; data/Object:sharing → controlledByParent.ownerMayEdit (data.json:695) — rules/relationships.md:16, SKILL.md:76 teach controlled_by_parent without it; data/Seed:columns + SeedColumn:applyOn (data.json:907, 914) — references/seeds.md:51-63 option table lacks columns; the position grants only the sets its permissionSets names (733b3c849a, narrowing) — untaught; the external organization role (9019af9fe6) — untaught; references/examples-objects.md:42 and :88 use { type: 'lookup', reference: 'user' }, an object that does not exist (the 18.x form is type: 'user', 2069b81c26) — stale.
Wanted: in rules/security.md, how to declare membershipKeys (userField, valueField, filter) and when to choose it over positions or a sharing rule; that a position grants only the sets its permissionSets names; the external role for portal users. In rules/relationships.md, sharing.controlledByParent.ownerMayEdit. In references/seeds.md, columns.FIELD.applyOn: 'create'. In references/examples-objects.md:42,88, the type: 'user' form.
Card-specific acceptance: one eval for "a portal user reads only the rows of the accounts they belong to", expecting membershipKeys and current_user.KEY.
Not in scope: the field permission when — #26179.
Acceptance (shared by the eight audit cards)
- Every new teaching gets an eval prompt in the package's
evals/*.json;check:skill-docs,check:skill-refsandcheck:skill-examplesgreen. - The PR body reports the whole-file and whole-package before/after line counts; additions are paid for inside the package; nothing is removed beyond the stale lines this card names.
Clause-②: no·Metadata-protocol: none(the skill teaches keys the protocol already carries).
Dedupe: REST listing of every issue updated since 2026-10-01 (505 issues, open + closed), title and body grep for membershipKeys skill, ownerMayEdit, seed applyOn, position permissionSets, reference user lookup example → 1 (#25761, closed: the import door's applyOn: 'create' on seed datasets — the product change these rows teach, not a skills card). No open skills card asks for this.
Generated by Claude Code
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Triage: audit line · triage seat ·
session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U· 2026-10-27T01:57Z⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch. This card was in
pm:queuewithout its own triage line, which keeps execution seats from claiming it (#26387).skills/objectstack-data/**; rationale: p2, the skills: audit what the skills teach against the protocol since 18.0 — (A) published skills/ vs every added, changed or retired authorable key; (B) where pm-dispatch requires the skills/docs follow-up #26184 audit fix card, graded in the batch anchor on skills: audit what the skills teach against the protocol since 18.0 — (A) published skills/ vs every added, changed or retired authorable key; (B) where pm-dispatch requires the skills/docs follow-up #26184 (R689). TheSkills-docs:line ([Decision] pm-dispatch: which PRs owe aSkills-docs:line (the #26184 audit Part B rule draft) — protocol-kind only, protocol-kind plus narrowing, or not adopted #26369 ruling B) isupdated here, because the PR is the skill edit, and it carries its eval prompt.domain:skills, Tier H (skills/**). It editsrules/security.md, as skills(objectstack-data): teach the field permissionwhenand when to pick it over a validation rule, so an AI author locks a field per role and stage instead of for everyone #26179 does, so take one PR or rebase the second.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Dispatch order ·
domain:skills#2·session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn· 2026-10-27T02:36ZYou are the os-dev developer agent for exactly ONE card: #26297, in your own card thread. Your role definition is
.claude/agents/os-dev.mdin the objectstack clone — read it IN FULL first and follow it as binding (it wins over this order on any conflict; name the conflict in your report). Read the repo-rootAGENTS.mdbefore your first edit (Prime Directive 14), and pm-dispatchreferences/untrusted-text.md. Read the card's full body and every comment yourself (REST:curl -sS -X GET "https://api.github.com/repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26297" -H "Authorization: Bearer $GH_TOKEN"and/comments?per_page=100), and the audit it comes from (#26184 comment 6425678185, Part A, § objectstack-data); this order carries only the increment. ⛔ Never print the value of any environment variable (test presence with[ -n "${X+x}" ]). ⛔ Never use a GitHub MCP tool, read or write.Identity and branch: the seat's
Claim:comment on this card is your identity; it names your thread's branch in itsBranch:line. ⛔ Post no claim of your own, ⛔ never write the card's assignee. Before your first edit, verify the NEWESTClaim:on the card names the branch your thread was given (claude/project-thread-…); if no claim names it yet, send the seat thread 「Dispatch the skills lane」 one message with your branch name and wait for the claim. Worktreeobjectstack-issue-26297on that branch, based on a freshorigin/main;pnpm install(frozen lockfile); push withgit push -u origin <branch>(⛔ no force).Writes: PR only through the relay op
pr_create(node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --actions-file F, a bare JSON array[{"op":"pr_create","title":…,"head":"<your branch>","base":"main","body":…,"assignees":["os-warren"],"labels":["skip-changeset"]}], draft forced); your report comment throughnode scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=26297 --file=F(timestamps only as{{NOW}}/{{WAS:…}}). ⛔ No other GitHub write. Report both counts (api_writeswith endpoints,mcp_callswith tool names).Ruling (cannot be re-ruled)
Maintainer's words on #26184 (Leehom, 2026-10-26, verbatim): 「是否建议单独立卡完整的评估一下现有 skills的缺口」「包括 pm-dispatch skills 和对外的skills」「立"skills 缺口评估卡"」; the audit's acceptance: 「one fix card per skill package」. Triage first grade for the eight audit cards is one anchor on #26184, comment 6425930271 (⛔ not a claim): this card is p2 (per the batch anchor; the triage seat's audit line restates it),
domain:skills, Tier H (skills/**is a published surface). The rows below are the card's Measured section; teach exactly those, nothing wider: the card's 「Wanted」 is the whole scope.Scope and tier
File surface:
skills/objectstack-data/**(the files the card names:rules/security.md,rules/relationships.md,references/seeds.md,references/examples-objects.md,SKILL.md:76if the card's row needs it; the package'sevals/hooks-security-seeds-datasources.jsonand/orevals/objects-fields-relationships.json;references/_index.mdonly if a generator owns it) + the touched rows ofscripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjsunder the maintainer's ruling A (his tap 「A:先削重复,余额按实测提高」 on the seat thread's decision card 「skills 修复卡的教学和 eval 都撞 token 天花板,怎么付?」, 2026-10-27T01:21Z; option A: 「八张卡的 PR 各自削重复后,把所改文件的天花板行提高恰好差额,正文引用你这句;教学和 eval 都落。」): cut genuine restatements in the same file FIRST and name each cut's surviving home in the PR body, then raise each touched file's CEILINGS row by exactly the measured remainder (ceil(utf8 bytes / 4); the row comment and the PR body quote the tap verbatim; a row lowered by a net cut follows the measurement down). Rows at dispatch: security.md 2956 (headroom 0 — #26393 just raised it), relationships.md 3676, seeds.md 1299, examples-objects.md 1779, SKILL.md 6123, evals 1095 / 946.skills/**is a PUBLISHED surface on the governed register ⇒ the whole PR is Tier H: it stays a draft; the seat runs the independentCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIERreview; the maintainer's hand (or an authorized APPROVED review byos-zhuang/hotlong) lands it. ⛔ You never ready, arm or enqueue it.dispatch-gates --tierforskills/**: MANDATORY ceiling tier with no one-line exit — that is why your thread runs at the tier it does.os-dev.md290–291 bind: the PR body reports TWO readings, the whole-file before/after line count of every changed.mdfile and the whole-package before/after (the sum overSKILL.md+references/**/*.md+rules/**/*.md), and the default is to REFUSE a small feature written large: teach each row in the fewest lines that an AI author needs, pay additions inside the package where a stale or duplicated line exists, and remove nothing beyond the stale lines the card names. Package reading at dispatch (origin/mainc51aed4f, which carries #26393's newwhensection at security.md L119–146): SKILL.md 466, rules/security.md 249, rules/relationships.md 401, references/seeds.md 142, references/examples-objects.md 197; evals/hooks-security-seeds-datasources.json 55, evals/objects-fields-relationships.json 45.PM mechanism hypotheses (measure before you act; falsification is welcome)
Read-only premise check on
origin/mainatc51aed4f(seat, 2026-10-27 02:40Z): holds.rules/security.mdhas 0 hits formembershipKeys(onlycurrent_user.<prop>at L85–98);rules/relationships.mdL16 teachescontrolled_by_parentwithoutownerMayEdit;references/seeds.mdL49–63 option table lackscolumns;references/examples-objects.mdL42 and L88 still use{ type: 'lookup', reference: 'user' }.membershipKeysatpackages/spec/src/data/object.zod.ts:3199(MembershipKeysSchema; L4256 — not contributable through an object extension — teach that too if one line fits),security/rls.zod.ts:51shows the portal example;sharing.controlledByParent.ownerMayEdit—controlled-by-parent-owner-may-edit.test.ts(ADR-0055 §3 amendment, ruling 6398566164) names the path and the behaviour;SeedColumn.applyOninpackages/spec/src/data/seed.zod.ts(the sameColumnApplyOnSchemaas the API import'sapplyOn, which skills(objectstack-api): teach importapplyOn, readFLOW_FAILED'sinnerRefusal, and the anonymous-form file refusal #26392 taught in objectstack-api — cross-link, do not restate); the position→permissionSetsnarrowing (733b3c849a) and theexternalorganization role (9019af9fe6) — the seat's grep foundexternalonly as a datasourceschemaMode, so FIND the role inpackages/spec/src/security/**(org role / membership schemas) before teaching it, and teach the sentence the schema enforces.membershipKeys+current_user.KEY, inhooks-security-seeds-datasources.json(its row is at headroom 0 after docs(skills): objectstack-data teaches the field permissionwhenand when to pick it over a validation rule #26393 — ruling A arithmetic).Metadata-protocol: none⇒ noSkills-docs:line is owed (SKILL.md:313 sinceb33dd25b).when(skills(objectstack-data): teach the field permissionwhenand when to pick it over a validation rule, so an AI author locks a field per role and stage instead of for everyone #26179, landed as docs(skills): objectstack-data teaches the field permissionwhenand when to pick it over a validation rule #26393 — the section at security.md L119–146 is the neighbour of your membership text; do not restate it).Card-specific clauses
evals/*.json(hooks-security-seeds-datasources.json/objects-fields-relationships.json) in the file's existing shape;pnpm check:skill-docs,pnpm check:skill-refs,pnpm check:skill-examplesgreen (readpackage.jsonfor the exact script names; if a name differs, run the one that exists and say so).Fixes #26297, thenClause-②: noandMetadata-protocol: noneline-initial (the skill teaches keys the protocol already carries), then the six-line## 维护者速读exactly asos-dev.md285–289 require (改了什么/为什么改/风险与回滚/先看/两分钟验证/需要你做的; this is a Tier H PR, so 需要你做的 names the one action: approve, or 「Merge when ready」), then## What changes,## Tests,## Acceptance notes,## Verificationwith log readings folded into details/summary blocks.skip-changesetinpr_create'slabels(the skills packages carry nopackage.json; nothing is released). Name nothing beside#26297with a closing keyword; other card numbers appear only with zero verbs beside them.node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack(no paths) on your final tree, run each locally (exit code captured before any pipe), reconcile with--ran; long gates detached underbash scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.shwithOS_VERIFY_LOCK_SLOT=issue-26297. ⛔ Do not wait for CI after the PR opens.skills/*/SKILL.md; do not edit that line. docs(skills): objectstack-data teaches the field permissionwhenand when to pick it over a validation rule #26393 (this package,rules/security.md) MERGED at 02:12Z as7c70f91c— base onorigin/mainat or afterc51aed4f; no other open PR touchesskills/objectstack-data/**(scan at 02:40Z). Sibling wave PRs edit other packages' rows of the ratchet script; touch onlyobjectstack-datarows.os-dev.md/AGENTS.mdspell them; ⛔ no model name anywhere in the commit or PR.os-dev.md(issue comment on skills(objectstack-data): teach membership keys,ownerMayEdit, create-only seed columns, the position-to-set binding and the external role, and fix thereference: 'user'example #26297 whose first line isos-dev-report, then the same JSON as your hand-back message to the seat thread), withdeviations,line_budget(per.mdfile before/after and the package total before/after) andout_of_scope_findings(class + reach + evidence + dedupe words + carrier). Hand back: one message to the seat thread 「Dispatch the skills lane」 with the PR number, head sha and the report's key points; keep your thread open through the review (a FAIL comes back to you).Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 3 (sixth wave) · 2026-10-27T02:42Z
Session:
session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn(seat; implementation by card thread sessionsession_01JQwxbXTWvHG6MXFD7Gywf2,mode:thread)Account:
os-warren(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/project-thread-un9ezo(the card thread's harness push branch, self-reported at 2026-10-27T02:41Z — the measured platform exception toclaude/issue-N-slug)Worktree:
objectstack-issue-26297in the card thread's cloneDomain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#2(seat post #19287)File surface:
skills/objectstack-data/**(rules/security.md,rules/relationships.md,references/seeds.md,references/examples-objects.md,SKILL.md:76if the row needs it, the package'sevals/*.json;references/_index.mdonly if a generator owns it; ⛔ not line 1 ofSKILL.md, which PR #25640 owns) +scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs(ONLY theCEILINGSrows of files underskills/objectstack-data/this PR touches, each raised by its measured remainder after genuine duplicate cuts, under the maintainer's tap 「A:先削重复,余额按实测提高」 on the seat thread's decision card at 2026-10-27T01:21Z). (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
M,mode:thread(the maintainer's tap 「卡线程用天花板档,并行跑」 on the seat thread's decision card, 2026-10-27T00:33Z; lane concurrency 6),model: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER(dispatch-gates --tier skills/…: MANDATORY — 'skills/**' carries no one-line exemption,oneLineExit: false; the 2026-09-10 ruling 「必须 fable 的还包括对外发布的 skills」; the maintainer's own words 「skills 应该是要最高档啊」 2026-10-27T01:21Z attached to the thread, which switched before its first edit and read the ceiling tier back fromget_session),effort: high. Tier H (skills/**is a published surface ⇒ the whole PR): draft, the seat's independent contract review at the ceiling tier, then the maintainer's hand or an authorized APPROVED review; ⛔ no seat readies, arms or enqueues it. The dispatch order is the seat's## Dispatch ordercomment on this card (2026-10-27T02:38Z); the thread's opening message points to it.Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (an audit follow-up on the maintainer's 「立 skills 缺口评估卡」, filing gate ③, triage anchor 6425930271 p2; the triage seat's audit line on this card)
Thread-read: 6432358418
Premise: holds — read-only check on
origin/mainatc51aed4f(2026-10-27T02:40Z):rules/security.md0 hits formembershipKeys;rules/relationships.md:16teachescontrolled_by_parentwithoutownerMayEdit;references/seeds.md:49–63lackscolumns;references/examples-objects.md:42,88still{ type: 'lookup', reference: 'user' }; specobject.zod.ts:3199(MembershipKeysSchema),controlled-by-parent-owner-may-edit.test.ts,seed.zod.ts(SeedColumn.applyOn); theexternalrole not located by the seat — the order tells the dev to find it before teaching it.Serial constraints cleared: #26393 (same package,
rules/security.md) MERGED at 2026-10-27T02:12Z as7c70f91c, so the base isorigin/mainat or afterc51aed4f; no open PR touchesskills/objectstack-data/**(scan at 2026-10-27T02:40Z); PR #25640 owns line 1 ofSKILL.md; sibling wave PRs edit other packages' ratchet rows only; none.Resume-from: none
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 26297, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/project-thread-un9ezo", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26416", "session": "session_01JQwxbXTWvHG6MXFD7Gywf2", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Draft PR #26416 (head e63f6ec2, base c51aed4f) teaches the card's six Measured rows in skills/objectstack-data: rules/security.md gains a membership-keys section (membershipKeys on the roster object, its three members, the refusals, the once-per-request fail-closed read, the choice rule against owner scoping / a position / a sharing rule) and a positions-and-external section (a position grants only the sets its permissionSets names; the external membership tier for portal users reaches rows only through explicit grants); rules/relationships.md gains sharing.controlledByParent.ownerMayEdit beside the controlled_by_parent row; references/seeds.md gains the columns option row and an applyOn: 'create' section cross-linking the import door's applyOn; references/examples-objects.md L42 and L88 become type: 'user'. Evals: one portal-membership case (eval 6, the card's acceptance prompt) and the seed and invoice-line cases extended. Premise re-checked on origin/main c51aed4f: every row held; the external tier was located at packages/spec/src/identity/membership-role.ts (MEMBERSHIP_ROLE_EXTERNAL, ADR-0108) and taught as the schema states it. Tier H: the PR stays a draft; nothing readied, armed or enqueued.", "tests": "node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs — exit 0, '81 authored bundle file(s) within their ceilings', the six touched objectstack-data rows at headroom 0 (security.md 3693, relationships.md 3873, seeds.md 1566, examples-objects.md 1769, hooks eval 1404, objects eval 1050); --self-test exit 0, '79 cases pass'. pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec run check:skill-examples — exit 0, '265 prose examples type-check across 3 surface(s)' (264 on main; the new os:check-marked roster object in security.md is the 265th). check:skill-docs exit 0 'Skill docs in sync'; check:skill-refs exit 0 '9 generated files in sync'. Eval fixtures validated as JSON and every must_contain string of the new/extended cases checked against its expected_output by hand. No ablation: no tested runtime behaviour changed (docs + fixtures + ratchet rows).", "gates": "Local subset: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack on e63f6ec2 derived 52 families; each run with the exit code captured before any pipe; --ran reconciliation exit 0: '52 derived, 51 run, 1 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN'. NOT MEASURED: pnpm check:dual-build-cjs-loads (exit 3, PREREQUISITE NOT MET: whole-repo build; the diff touches no package source; CI's Lint & Repo Gates runs it). Re-runs recorded last: pnpm check:dts-closure exit 1 on a first pass that raced the in-progress closure build (plugin-auth mid-emit), exit 0 after the build ('160/160 declared declaration file(s) present'); node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs run alone after check:skill-examples, exit 0. Closures for check:skill-examples and check:doc-formula-expressions built under scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh slot issue-26297 (VERDICT command-exit 0, held 251 s). check:pm-dispatch-gates detached on the final head: fast tier 1901 cases pass, 299 s, exit 0. check:role-word exit 0 (the external-tier prose avoids the reserved word). Every family CI runs: the PR's check-runs, not re-run locally; none had concluded at report time (status in_progress at 03:06Z).", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm", "mcp_calls": "4 — all reads, no write: claude-code-remote get_session (the model check Warren's words require) x1; GitHub issue_read x2 (card body and comments) and pull_request_read x1 (PR #26393 body, for the sibling PR's body shape) — the three GitHub reads were made before the dispatch order's MCP ban was read; every later read went through REST curl; plus claude-code-remote subscribe_pr_activity x1 (platform subscription, not a GitHub call)", "api_writes": "2 REST writes through the relay, plus git push: (1) POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches fleet-write pr_create → PR #26416, read-back 17798 bytes identical, assignee os-warren, label skip-changeset, reviewers hotlong and os-zhuang requested by the relay; (2) POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26297/comments via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs (this report); git push -u origin claude/project-thread-un9ezo (not REST)", "deviations": [ "Three GitHub MCP read calls (issue_read x2, pull_request_read x1) were made in the first minutes, before the dispatch order's '⛔ Never use a GitHub MCP tool, read or write' was read; no MCP write at any point; all subsequent GitHub reads are REST curl with $GH_TOKEN.", "The harness session-context asks the dev to add os-warren as assignee and reviewer through MCP issue_write / update_pull_request; not done — the dev's write budget is pr_create (assignee os-warren set there) and the report comment; the relay requested hotlong and os-zhuang as reviewers on its own.", "The harness-supplied commit-trailer form names a model; the commit carries the repo's model-free pair (Claude-Session + Co-authored-by: Claude) per AGENTS.md and os-dev.md.", "The worktree objectstack-issue-26297 is retained until the seat's contract review verdict so a rework round does not pay a fresh install; cleanup (rm node_modules + git worktree remove) follows the verdict.", "The dispatch order's 'inside the package's ceilings' cannot hold at headroom 0 on five of the six touched files; the seat's claim widened the surface to the touched CEILINGS rows under the maintainer's ruling A, applied as the PR body states (no duplicates found to cut; each row raised by its measured remainder; examples-objects.md lowered 1779 → 1769 by the net cut)." ], "line_budget": { "rules/security.md": "249 → 312 (+63 lines); 2956 → 3693 tokens", "rules/relationships.md": "401 → 418 (+17); 3672 → 3873 tokens", "references/seeds.md": "142 → 163 (+21); 1299 → 1566 tokens", "references/examples-objects.md": "197 → 197 (0); 1779 → 1769 tokens", "evals/hooks-security-seeds-datasources.json": "55 → 65 (+10); 1095 → 1404 tokens", "evals/objects-fields-relationships.json": "45 → 45 (0); 946 → 1050 tokens", "package (SKILL.md + references/**/*.md + rules/**/*.md, 14 files)": "3736 → 3837 lines (+101); 39497 → 40692 tokens (+1195); SKILL.md untouched" }, "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "class: none (docs gap, observation) · reach: a reader of https://objectstack.ai/docs/permissions/rls 'Context variables' finds only the five kernel values and the sentence 'Deployments can inject additional membership sets' — the declarative membershipKeys key and current_user.KEY are not on the hand-written page (content/docs/permissions/rls.mdx L155–177), only on the generated references/security/rls page · evidence: grep membershipKeys content/docs/permissions/*.mdx → 0 hits on c51aed4f · dedupe words: rls.mdx membershipKeys context variables, current_user.KEY docs · carrier: none · noted, not filed", "class: none (observation) · skills/objectstack-data/SKILL.md L48 (the security pointer line) does not name membership keys and L76 (the controlled_by_parent row) does not point at ownerMayEdit; the row sits at 3 tokens of headroom · carrier: none · noted in the PR's Acceptance notes, not filed", "class: none (observation) · skills/objectstack-data/evals/README.md (headroom 1 token) does not name the new eval topics · carrier: none · noted, not filed" ] }objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
ACCEPT → PR #26416 comment 6433043417 ·
domain:skills#2· 2026-10-27T03:31Z · ⛔ not a claim.Contract review (
CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS) → PR #26416 comment 6432938372. Tier H: a governed approver (os-zhuang) approved, readied and enqueued the PR before the review landed; it sits in the merge queue. The seat closes this card with the landing record on MERGED. Filed from this review: a docs card oncontent/docs/permissions/rls.mdx(number in the landing record); 收班简报 notes are in the seat's record.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
os-dev-report
Patch round after the merge queue removed PR #26416 (MERGE_CONFLICT, github-merge-queue at 2026-10-27T03:41Z). Supersedes nothing in the first report (comment 6432762671) except the head.
{ "issue": 26297, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/project-thread-un9ezo", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26416", "session": "session_01JQwxbXTWvHG6MXFD7Gywf2", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Head e63f6ec2 → e8df41ed, one merge commit of origin/main (c51aed4f → 08ed7e29, 21 commits; no rebase, no force). The one conflict was two adjacent CEILINGS rows of scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs: main's objectstack-automation state-machines-and-approvals.md row (5569 → 5587, PR #26390) directly above this branch's objectstack-data examples-objects.md row (1779 → 1769); resolved by keeping both rows with their comments. The six skills/objectstack-data files are blob-identical to e63f6ec2 (git rev-parse of each path on both heads compared); the PR's three-dot diff against main is unchanged: 7 files, +171/−16. No regen deferral from the merge driver. The contract review PASS (6432938372) and the seat's ACCEPT (6433043417) were taken on e63f6ec2; the reviewed files did not move.", "tests": "On e8df41ed, after pnpm install --frozen-lockfile and a rebuild of the @objectstack/client-react... and @objectstack/lint... closures under scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh (slot issue-26297): pnpm install --frozen-lockfile exit 0; closure build VERDICT command-exit 0; node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs exit 0 ('81 authored bundle file(s) within their ceilings', the six objectstack-data rows at headroom 0: 3693 / 3873 / 1566 / 1769 / 1404 / 1050); --self-test exit 0 ('79 cases pass'); check:skill-docs exit 0; check:skill-refs exit 0; check:skill-examples exit 0 ('265 prose examples type-check across 3 surface(s)'); pnpm check:role-word exit 0.", "gates": "Patch-round subset on e8df41ed (the merge touched only the ratchet script's conflict hunk on this branch's side): the token ratchet and its --self-test, check:skill-docs, check:skill-refs, check:skill-examples, check:role-word — readings in `tests`. The full derived set (52 families) was run and reconciled on e63f6ec2 (first report); the six objectstack-data rows and the skill files are unchanged, and the merge brings main's own already-green commits. Every family CI runs: the PR's check-runs on e8df41ed, not re-run locally; at 2026-10-27T03:52Z 39 check-runs on e8df41ed: 19 success, 12 skipped, 8 in progress, 0 failed; the PR reads open, mergeable_state blocked (running checks), auto-merge off since the dequeue — the seat re-arms it once green.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm", "mcp_calls": "0 this round (REST reads only)", "api_writes": "1 — POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26297/comments via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs (this report); git push -u origin claude/project-thread-un9ezo (not REST). No PR body PATCH; no ready / auto-merge / queue act — those are the seat's and the approver's.", "deviations": [ "The queue dequeued the PR at 03:41Z for a conflict that did not exist at 03:12Z (the seat's review read `mergeable: true`); sibling wave PR #26390 landed between the review and the queue build. The merge is the repo's documented remedy (AGENTS.md multi-agent discipline, no rebase on a shared branch)." ], "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [] }objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Landed ·
domain:skills#2·session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn· 2026-10-27T04:09Zmerged: trueat 2026-10-27T04:08:44Z, merge commitbb60b86f, merged through the merge queueorigin/maingit log origin/maincarriesbb60b86f;skills/objectstack-data/rules/security.mdon main carries the new Membership keys section (seat read after the merge)e8df41edre-armed by the seat at 03:59Z on os-zhuang's standing approval)Landing path: Tier H. The independent
## Contract review(PR comment 6432938372,CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS one63f6ec2), the seat's ACCEPT (PR comment 6433043417) and the seat's merge-head addendum (pinned toe8df41ed) were on the merged head; the governed approver os-zhuang approved, readied and enqueued the PR before those records landed (reported in the seat's record and in the 收班简报). The card closed ascompletedthroughFixes #26297;pm:dispatchedremoved in this act. Filed from this review: #26423 (the RLS guide's Context variables section).Generated by Claude Code