Repository navigation
skills: audit what the skills teach against the protocol since 18.0 — (A) published skills/ vs every added, changed or retired authorable key; (B) where pm-dispatch requires the skills/docs follow-up #26184
Description
Filing gate ③: a maintainer-directed task. The maintainer, in the triage seat thread on 2026-10-26: 「我不问你你也想不到立卡，如何避免出现类似的情况，需要更新 skills吗」「是否建议单独立卡完整的评估一下现有 skills的缺口」「包括 pm-dispatch skills 和对外的skills」, then, on triage's option 甲 (both halves in one card), 「立"skills 缺口评估卡"」. Filed by the triage seat (session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U, seat post #6015). ⛔ Not a claim.
Why (the case that surfaced it)
#25866's field permission when landed (#25980), and its Studio form is PR #26010. Nobody owed a skills or docs follow-up until the maintainer asked. The published skills/objectstack-data/rules/security.md never mentions when. So an AI author asked for "finance may not edit the legal terms after approval" writes a validation rule that locks the fields for everyone, which is the trap #25866 exists to escape. Filed after the fact: #26178 (docs recipe) and #26179 (skill + eval).
What the triage seat measured in pm-dispatch (origin/main, 2026-10-26):
- The PR template carries
Metadata-protocol: added | narrowed | semantic | none, but nothing follows fromadded,semanticornarrowed. No line names the skills or docs the change owes. - The seat's ACCEPT checklist (席位核对) reads code, protocol, gates and scope, not "will the customer and the AI author know to use it".
- Triage's first grade of a protocol-addition card writes no skills or docs item into the done-when.
- The skills lane rules govern how a
skills/**PR is written (line budget, value density). None says a change elsewhere owes one.
Part A: the published skills (skills/**, what customers' AI authors read). p1
Mechanical, not recalled:
- The surface diff.
packages/spec/authorable-surface/*.jsonat the tag@objectstack/spec@18.0.0againstmain. List every key added, every key whose shape or semantics changed, and every key retired or narrowed. The generated surface is the source; the changesets'Metadata-protocol:lines are a cross-check. - Coverage. For each added or changed key, check whether
skills/**(rules, references, examples) teaches it and whether an eval exercises it. A key a skill must teach is any key an author picks between options for, such aswhenagainst a validation rule. A purely mechanical key may be covered by the spec's.describe()alone; say which, per key. - The reverse direction (stale advice is worse than none). Find every place
skills/**still teaches a retired or narrowed form: the ≤16.x kits retired by PR feat(spec,cli)!: retire the ≤16.x retirement kits; the strict unknown-key refusal names the protocol upgrade guide #26138, the position-name fold retired by PR fix(plugin-security)!: retire the position-name fold; a namesake set is reported, never granted (#24757) #26064 (Setup: a position's same-named permission set is in force but invisible — the set's Assigned Users panel is empty and the position reads as granting nothing #24757), and anything else the diff names. Also check the skills'references/_index.mdsymbol anchors. - The objectui skill bundle moving into
skills/(aftercare(ui-merge): move the objectui skill bundle into the root skills/ catalog (decision C): token pricing, reserved-word uses, visibleOn alias, internal flag (parent #25677, Tier H) #25832): it is audited in the same pass once it is there, or listed as pending if it is not. - Output: one gap table (key × skill file × taught? × eval? × stale?), posted on this card. Then one fix card per skill package, batched and graded p2 unless a gap is on an 18.2 headline feature (p1). skills(objectstack-data): teach the field permission
whenand when to pick it over a validation rule, so an AI author locks a field per role and stage instead of for everyone #26179 is the first known row.
Part B: pm-dispatch (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**, .claude/agents/os-dev.md). p2
Find where the follow-up belongs, and draft the rule text for the maintainer to rule on. Triage's candidate is a review item, not a new gate (「新增门禁默认否」):
- A PR whose
Metadata-protocolisadded,semanticornarrowedcarries one more line,Skills-docs: updated here | follow-up #N | none — <reason>. - The seat's 席位核对 checks that line. Missing means no ACCEPT.
- Triage's first grade of a protocol-addition card writes "skills + docs + eval" into its done-when.
Sequencing: the skills lane already holds six pm-dispatch edits today (#25991, #26066, #26121, #26122, #26143, #26155). Part B drafts against main after those land, or rides the same holder, so the rule text does not collide.
Acceptance
- Part A's table is posted, its fix cards are filed, and each row cites the surface diff line it came from.
- Part B's rule draft is posted for the maintainer's ruling. Once ruled, it lands as one governed PR.
- Nothing is removed from
skills/**in this card. Fixes ride the per-package cards.
Generated by Claude Code
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Triage: first grade —
tooling·documentation·priority:p1·domain:skills·area:devpath·pm:queue· triage seat ·session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U· 2026-10-26T15:00Z⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch.
when, report and block translations, list groupingorderBy, theinlineTitleslot, and hook-refusal keys (i18n: an app hook's business refusal has no translation key — a zh-CN user reads "A current clean version is required before signing." in English #26170). An AI author can use none of them until a skill teaches it. Part B is p2 and sequences after the six pm-dispatch edits already in the lane.whenand when to pick it over a validation rule, so an AI author locks a field per role and stage instead of for everyone #26179 (the skill forwhen) and docs(permissions): a recipe for "lock these fields for this role once the record reaches a stage" — the field permissionwhenand its Studio column, in access-recipes and the administrator guide #26178 (the docs recipe), filed before this audit.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Dispatch order ·
domain:skills#2·session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn· 2026-10-26T19:23ZYou are the auditing agent for exactly ONE card: #26184, in your own card thread. This card is an AUDIT: its deliverables are comments on the card, ⛔ not a PR and ⛔ not an edit to
skills/**or.claude/**(the card: 「Nothing is removed fromskills/**in this card. Fixes ride the per-package cards.」). Still read.claude/agents/os-dev.mdin the objectstack clone IN FULL and follow its reading, writing and reporting discipline (hand-back JSON,api_writes/mcp_callscounts, 3–5 dedupe words per finding, ⛔ dev 不立卡 — you propose cards, the seat files them); read the repo-rootAGENTS.mdand pm-dispatchreferences/untrusted-text.mdandreferences/filing-gate.mdbefore you write. Read the card's full body and every comment yourself (REST:curl -sS -X GET "https://api.github.com/repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26184" -H "Authorization: Bearer $GH_TOKEN"and/comments?per_page=100), and the two seed cards it names (/issues/26179,/issues/26178). ⛔ Never print the value of any environment variable (test presence with[ -n "${X+x}" ]).Identity and branch: the seat's
Claim:comment on this card is your identity; ⛔ post no claim of your own, ⛔ never write the card's assignee. You push nothing: no worktree is needed beyond a fresh clone/fetch oforigin/mainand the tags; if your thread was given a push branch, leave it untouched and say so in the report.Writes: comments only, through
scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=26184 --file=Ffrom the clone root (stamps:{{NOW}}for this act,{{WAS:YYYY-MM-DDThh:mmZ}}for any quoted reading; a bare timestamp is refused). ⛔ GitHub MCP writes of every kind; ⛔ no card filing (the seat files from your proposals). Report both counts.Ruling (cannot be re-ruled)
Maintainer's words in the card body, verbatim: 「我不问你你也想不到立卡，如何避免出现类似的情况，需要更新 skills吗」「是否建议单独立卡完整的评估一下现有 skills的缺口」「包括 pm-dispatch skills 和对外的skills」「立"skills 缺口评估卡"」. Triage first grade 6419307365: Part A is p1 (18.2's protocol additions — field permission
when, report and block translations, list groupingorderBy, theinlineTitleslot, hook-refusal keys), Part B is p2 and sequences after the lane's in-flight pm-dispatch edits.PM mechanism hypotheses (measure before you act; falsification is welcome)
Read on
origin/mainat 2026-10-26T19:23Z:git ls-remote --tags originlists@objectstack/spec@18.0.0-next.5and@objectstack/spec@18.1.0but NO@objectstack/spec@18.0.0;packages/spec/package.jsononmainreads18.1.0. Measure the floor: the firstmaincommit wherepackages/spec/package.jsonread"version": "18.0.0"(git log --format=%h -S'"version": "18.0.0"' -- packages/spec/package.json), or the 18.0.0 entry inpackages/spec/CHANGELOG.md; state which commit you diff from and why. The surface files arepackages/spec/authorable-surface/*.json(ai, api, automation, data, identity, integration, kernel, marketplace, qa, security).authorable-surface/*.jsonfloor →main; list every key added, changed (shape or.describe()semantics) or retired/narrowed, with the surface file and line. Cross-check against.changeset/*.mdhistory and merged PR bodies'Metadata-protocol:lines (git log --grep='Metadata-protocol: added'andsemantic/narrowedonmainsince the floor).skills/**(rules, references, examples,references/_index.mdanchors) and the evals underskills/*/evals/*.json; classify taught / eval'd / mechanical-only (the spec's.describe()suffices) / gap. A key an author chooses between options for (e.g.whenvs a validation rule) is never mechanical-only.skills/**still teaches a retired or narrowed form — the ≤16.x kits retired by PR feat(spec,cli)!: retire the ≤16.x retirement kits; the strict unknown-key refusal names the protocol upgrade guide #26138, the position-name fold retired by PR fix(plugin-security)!: retire the position-name fold; a namesake set is reported, never granted (#24757) #26064 (Setup: a position's same-named permission set is in force but invisible — the set's Assigned Users panel is empty and the position reads as granting nothing #24757), and anything the surface diff names as retired; checkreferences/_index.mdsymbol anchors resolve.skills/onmain; else one line "pending".whenand when to pick it over a validation rule, so an AI author locks a field per role and stage instead of for everyone #26179 is the known first row ofobjectstack-data, ⛔ do not re-propose it, reference it.Skills-docs: updated here | follow-up #N | none — <reason>PR-body line forMetadata-protocol: added|semantic|narrowed, the 席位核对 item that reads it (no ACCEPT without it), and triage's done-when item for protocol-addition cards. Name the exact files and lines onmainwhere each would live (.claude/agents/os-dev.mdPR-body section,.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md核对六项 / 报告契约,references/triage-duties.md), measure each file's ratchet headroom (scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjsCEILINGS), and write the draft so each addition is paid in-file (name the line it would retire). ⛔ No new gate (triage: 「新增门禁默认否」). ⛔ Do not edit anything: this is a draft for a ruling; the seat puts it in the decision box.Card-specific clauses
os-dev-reportJSON as a comment on this card (first lineos-dev-report;pr: null,files_changed: [],status: "done"once A and B are posted, with the two comment ids insummary), then send the seat thread 「Dispatch the skills lane」 one message: the two comment ids and the number of proposed fix cards. Keep your thread open for a follow-up question.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 1 (fifth wave) · 2026-10-26T19:27Z
Session:
session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn(seat; audit by card thread sessionsession_01C2Uuz8d9KeZ7qEYm6ZYWHL,mode:thread)Account:
os-warren(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/project-thread-fbjk6r(the card thread's harness push branch, self-reported; this card pushes nothing — its deliverables are comments on the card)Worktree: none — a read-only clone of
origin/mainand its tags in the card threadDomain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#2(seat post #19287)File surface: none edited. Read surface:
packages/spec/authorable-surface/*.json(floor →main),.changeset/**history,skills/**(rules, references, evals,references/_index.md),.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**and.claude/agents/os-dev.mdfor the Part B draft. Outputs: Part A gap table + proposed fix cards (one comment), Part B rule draft for the maintainer's ruling (one comment). ⛔ No PR, ⛔ nothing removed fromskills/**(the card's own acceptance). (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
L,mode:thread,model: default judgement tier(dispatch-gates --tier: no path mandate — the surface is read, not written; the skills/** edits ride the per-package fix cards, each dispatched at its own mandated tier),effort: high. The dispatch order is comment 6425274137 on this card and the thread's opening message points to it (the coordinator channel caps at 2,000 characters).Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (filing gate ③: the maintainer's 「立"skills 缺口评估卡"」, quoted verbatim in the body)
Thread-read: 6419307365
Premise: holds with one correction, recorded for the thread: no
@objectstack/spec@18.0.0tag exists onorigin(only18.0.0-next.5and18.1.0;packages/spec/package.jsononmainreads18.1.0), so the floor is the firstmaincommit where the spec read18.0.0, measured by the thread and stated in its table. The surface files, the seed cards (#26179, #26178) and the two retirement PRs named in the body are present.Serial constraints cleared: n/a — no file is written. Part B's draft is a ruling input, not an edit; the lane's in-flight pm-dispatch PR (#26286) and the queued #26155 do not collide with a comment.
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Audit Part A: the published skills against the protocol since 18.0 · gap table and proposed fix cards ·
session_01C2Uuz8d9KeZ7qEYm6ZYWHL· 2026-10-26T19:43ZAudit for the dispatch order 6425274137, under the claim 6425345339 (branch
claude/project-thread-fbjk6r, nothing pushed). ⛔ Not a claim. ⛔ Nothing filed: the cards below are proposals for the seat to file.Trees read. Floor
06cab4849a= tag@objectstack/spec@18.0.0→origin/mainatbe531f685e(2026-10-26T18:08Z), 699 commits apart. The clone was unshallowed first; both ancestry legs answer exit 0 (06cab4849aand the control@objectstack/spec@18.0.0-next.0are both ancestors oforigin/main).Premise corrections.
git ls-remote --tags originlistsrefs/tags/@objectstack/spec@18.0.0(tag object08420c3383, peeled to06cab4849a, "chore: version packages (chore: version packages #24524)"). It is also the oldest commitgit log -S'"version": "18.0.0"' -- packages/spec/package.jsonreturns, so the tag and the version bump agree. The diff runs from that tag.shared,studio,systemanduiexist at both ends.sharedandstudiodid not change.Metadata-protocol:, and spec-touching commits from before the line existed) and say so.The surface diff. 48 lines added and 66 removed across 7 files: 42 new keys, 6 keys relabelled
[RETIRED](tombstoned), and 60 keys deleted whole (12api/ApiTestingUiConfig:*and 48kernel/*package-upgrade keys).The cross-check, as one number. 60 commits since the floor carry a line-initial
Metadata-protocol: added | semantic | narrowed. 3 of them touchedskills/**, and all three only anchors or a key list:493a6c4a5f(two_index.mdlines),f00e8d5c85(one key-list line),fa44dd2559(one_index.mdline). None added a sentence that teaches the change. 26 of the 60 touched hand-writtencontent/docs/**.Legend. Taught: yes / partial / no. Eval: whether any
skills/*/evals/*.jsonexercises it. Stale: whether a skill teaches a form the change refused or made wrong. Kind: choice (an author picks between options, so.describe()alone is never enough) or mechanical (.describe()suffices). Surface lines arepackages/spec/authorable-surface/FILE.json:LINEonmainunless marked@floor.objectstack-data
security/FieldPermission:when(security.json:105)c8cb510a5eaddedrules/security.mddata/Object:membershipKeys(data.json:686);security/MembershipKey:description,filter,label,userField,valueField(security.json:106-110)dc532e8c1cadded;b531016f6dnarrowed;e5eab0658esemanticrules/security.md:112names thecurrent_user.KEYplaceholder only; the declaration is untaughtdata/Object:sharing, i.e.sharing.controlledByParent.ownerMayEdit(data.json:695)5e113b395aaddedrules/relationships.md:16,SKILL.md:76teachcontrolled_by_parent; no word onownerMayEditdata/Seed:columns(data.json:907),data/SeedColumn:applyOn(data.json:914)493a6c4a5faddedreferences/seeds.md:51-63(option table has nocolumns)permissionSetsnames; the namesake fold is gone. No surface line733b3c849adeclaredMetadata-protocol: none,Clause-②: yes (narrowing)rules/security.md:1-60covers sets and assignment rows; no skill declares a position or itspermissionSetsexternalorganization role for portal users. No surface line (a role value)9019af9fe6added;45f996231e,4a251927c2semanticrules/security.mdexternalvsmember){ type: 'lookup', reference: 'user' }atreferences/examples-objects.md:42and:88names an object that does not exist (the identity object issys_user). The 18.x form istype: 'user', which always resolvessys_userand refuses any other reference2069b81c26narrowedreferences/examples-objects.md:42,:88No stale form found for:
f6ba1343ba(allowDelete: falsebesidemodifyAllRecords: true),fe0ec2bb9e/bda53bb0ba(anexternalbinding on a managed datasource;rules/datasources.md:16-18agrees),c5915b2bbd(a validation readingparent),02ad31a0c3(thecontrolled_by_parentmaster reference),386f60f8fb(select string shorthand),23540582f4(data/TursoConfig:encryptionKey [RETIRED], data.json:1001, 0 skill hits),4034f47bd0(composite and repeater are untyped JSON;rules/field-types.md:116-117already says so).objectstack-ui
ui/GroupingField:orderBy(ui.json:671)b00fc55c7daddedrules/list-views.md: list-viewgroupingitself is untaught (0 hits)ui/DatasetMeasure:duration(ui.json:419),ui/DatasetMeasureDuration:from,to,unit(ui.json:425-427)d1663ba182addedrules/dashboards.md:69-72puts "scalar math on raw fields" outside the envelope and:90-92sends computed columns to a stored field; neither names the duration measuredatetimefields of a record is now a measure, not a hook-kept stored number. The leave-days example at:93-99stays right, because the measure takesdatetimefields onlyui/DatasetDimension:nullLabel(ui.json:414)7c68b10825addedconfirmText,successMessage,errorMessage, and the bulkconfirmText) is a template slot:{{ }}holes over the roots the runner binds; a${…}token, a single-brace token, a blank sentence or a hole holding logic is refused atos validate, compile and publish. No surface line (a slot type)925fd0772c,384bb7ba02semantic;ecb4e69951,0c81694006,d7273482banarrowedrules/actions.md:20-21teaches the three keys as plain copy, with no word on holes, roots or the refusalsos validateonSuccesson atype: 'flow'action (navigate after a run that completes). No surface line (the executor set widened)dc71845414addedrules/actions.md:64-69(the flow action example has noonSuccess)ui/AddRecordConfig:mode,formView[RETIRED](ui.json:164-165)fde7456352record:detailshideEmpty: falserenders the heading and one fold row2af790ffaasemanticobjectstack-automation
automation/Flow:requiredPermissions(automation.json:169),api/CreateFlowRequest:requiredPermissions(api.json:364)f1ddace887addedSKILL.md(0 hits in the package;requiredPermissionsis taught only per field and per action elsewhere)automation/ApprovalNodeConfig:excludeSubmitter(automation.json:39); refused besideonEmptyApprovers: 'auto_approve'49653f9181added;4bcc4df649narrowedreferences/state-machines-and-approvals.md:344-351(the approval config table has noexcludeSubmitter)automation/NotifyEmailFieldRecipient:emailField(automation.json:279); a CEL value that evaluates to an address no user holds now fails the node at run time; a written-out address is an author constant6021b5e837added;d1e329e96dnarrowed;52f3f518e1semanticSKILL.md:107lists recipients as "id, list, or envelope"record.applicant_email, which now fails at run time; the answer is{ emailField }filecollects an upload and the run resumes with the file id. No surface line6d9d3ef857semanticSKILL.mddoes not enumerate screen field typesescalateTonaming a membership tier is refused at registration9993165bb9narrowedreferences/state-machines-and-approvals.md:351already says a position name or a user id, never a membership tierapistart node'sconfig.secretReffa44dd2559addedSKILL.md:343No stale form found for:
303aef069e(get_recordlimitis a positive integer),a285ff29a1(a system run writes no identity assignment; therunAssection atSKILL.md:144-192teaches no such write).objectstack-i18n
system/TranslationData:reports(system.json:1332),PlatformTranslationData:reports(:915),TranslationItem:reports(:1363)dd5e3554f0addedSKILL.md:169-172: the enumerated top-level groups omitreportsTranslationData:positions,permissions(system.json:1331, :1329), and the same two onPlatformTranslationData(:914, :912) andTranslationItem(:1362, :1360)47af3dde42addedlabel,placeholder,helpTextunder_sections.SECTION.fields.FIELD. No surface line (nested shape)42d9fe8f5baddedSKILL.md:165says_sectionsholdslabel,descriptiononly_views.VIEW.titleeddffc3390(before the line existed)SKILL.md:163: the_viewsrow omitstitlepages.PAGE.components.TABS.items.VALUE.label;flows.FLOW.approvals.NODE.label30d21f6321,b9a79efcd1(before the line existed)SKILL.md:172names thepagesandflowsgroups only39a78b151dnarrowedevals/bundles-locales-coverage.json:21must_not_containja_JPobjectstack-query
data/NowAnchor:$now,addDays(data.json:653-654): a comparand of now shifted by days a field of the record holdsbe531f685eadded (the newest commit onmain)rules/filters.md:40-56($field) and:124-145(date macros) teach the two halves separately; the combination is untaught.objectstack-formula/SKILL.md:146,159teach the CELaddDays(), a different surfaceobjectstack-platform
system/DemoStaff:email,name,permissionSets,position(system.json:296-299)f00e8d5c85addedSKILL.md:52namesdemoStaffbesidedevLoginsin the top-level key list and nothing more (that PR's one-line skills edit)demoStaffcreates dev-only accounts with a position and sets that seed data is dealt to;devLoginsis banner text)api/AuthFeaturesConfig:cloudManaged(api.json:209)f4112a704baddedobjectstack-api
api/FieldMappingEntry:applyOn(api.json:652): an import column written on create onlyb77bb37eb2addedSKILL.md:253names the import route onlyapi/FlowFailureDetails:errorMessage,innerRefusal,summary;api/FlowInnerRefusal:code,message(api.json:683-687)045858f32aaddedFLOW_FAILEDuntaught)innerRefusal6ad226aa2anarrowedSKILL.md:75-100(public forms) is silentapi/ApiDocumentationConfig:ui [RETIRED](api.json:110),api/OpenApiGenerationConfig:uiFramework,uiPath[RETIRED](api.json:1226-1227),api/ApiTestingUiConfig:*deleted (api.json@floor:176-187)14e7239e73objectstack-upgrade
main: PR #26138 is open, and its file list touches noskills/**SKILL.md:64-66,:101-103("support floor, 16 today"),:141-147(--from 16recipes),:178(a stored row replays the full chain at read);evals/protocol-major-upgrade.json:10must_contain"os migrate meta --from 16"maintodaykernel/package-upgrade.zod.tsretired whole (kernel.json@floor:300-305, 641-646, 754-789)557973dbccnarrowedPasses with no row
skills/objectui/sincea8f2afac59(PR skills(ui-merge): move the objectui skill bundle into the root skills/ catalog (decision C) #26097), so it is audited here. No key in the surface diff is taught there, and no retired or narrowed form is (grep overskills/objectuiforaddRecord,filterableFields, the action copy keys,hideEmpty, auserreference,zh_CN: 0 hits). No row, no card.ai.jsonis unchanged from the floor tomain.9d96b2bc08(has()over an indexed receiver) is evaluator semantics with no authoring choice.references/_index.mdanchors: all 175 spec paths and 231 named exports in the 10 indexes resolve onmain, and none names the deletedkernel/package-upgrade.zod.ts.skills/*/evals/: 0 hits). The BCP-47 locale (I6) is the one exception.mainyet, re-audit when they land: block translations; theinlineTitletranslation slot (inlineTitleitself predates the floor); hook-refusal keys (i18n: an app hook's business refusal has no translation key — a zh-CN user reads "A current clean version is required before signing." in English #26170 is an open issue).Proposed fix cards
One card per skill package: 8 cards. Each card's reader is the
domain:skillslane, one PR toskills/PACKAGE/**(Tier H). Shared acceptance for all 8: every new teaching gets an eval prompt in that package's evals file;check:skill-docs,check:skill-refsandcheck:skill-examplesare green; the PR body reports the whole-file and whole-package before/after line counts, and the additions are paid for in that package; nothing is removed beyond the stale lines a card names. Filing gate for all 8: ③, a follow-up the maintainer's 「立"skills 缺口评估卡"」 on this card ordered (quoted in the body above).Card 1 · objectstack-data · p2
Title: skills(objectstack-data): teach membership keys,
ownerMayEdit, create-only seed columns, the position-to-set binding and the external role, and fix thereference: 'user'examplereference: 'user'example copies straight into a lookup to an object that does not exist.rules/security.md, how to declaremembershipKeys(userField,valueField,filter) and when to choose it over positions or a sharing rule; that a position grants only the sets itspermissionSetsnames; theexternalrole for portal users. Inrules/relationships.md,sharing.controlledByParent.ownerMayEdit. Inreferences/seeds.md,columns.FIELD.applyOn: 'create'. Inreferences/examples-objects.md:42,88, thetype: 'user'form.membershipKeysandcurrent_user.KEY.when, which is skills(objectstack-data): teach the field permissionwhenand when to pick it over a validation rule, so an AI author locks a field per role and stage instead of for everyone #26179.membershipKeys skill,ownerMayEdit,seed applyOn,position permissionSets,reference user lookup example.Card 2 · objectstack-ui · p1 (U1 is an 18.2 headline)
Title: skills(objectstack-ui): teach list-view grouping and
orderBy, the duration measure, action copy holes, and a flow action'sonSuccess${record.name}into a toast and failos validate. They cannot take the user to the record a flow created.rules/list-views.md:grouping.fields[]andorderBy.rules/dashboards.md:69-72: adurationmeasure for the time between twodatetimefields (from,to,unit), and a correction to the escalation advice for that case.rules/actions.md:20-21: the{{ }}holes, the roots per key, the bulkcountand params roots, and the refused shapes.rules/actions.md:64-69:onSuccesson a flow action, reading${result.output.VAR}.grouping orderBy skill,duration measure skill,action copy template holes,flow action onSuccess.Card 3 · objectstack-automation · p2
Title: skills(objectstack-automation): teach flow-level
requiredPermissions,excludeSubmitter, the{ emailField }recipient and screen file fieldsexcludeSubmittera submitter approves their own request. Mailing an applicant through a CEL envelope now fails the run.SKILL.md:107: the fourth recipient form{ emailField }, and that a computed address no user holds fails the node. The approval config table atreferences/state-machines-and-approvals.md:344-351:excludeSubmitter, refused besideauto_approve. A short section on flowrequiredPermissionsand on screen fields typedfile.recipients: { emailField: … }.emailField recipient skill,excludeSubmitter,flow requiredPermissions skill,screen file field.Card 4 · objectstack-i18n · p1 (I1 is an 18.2 headline)
Title: skills(objectstack-i18n): the translation bundle's top-level groups and object sub-keys as of 18.2:
reports,positions,permissions, section field entries, form view titles, page tab items, approval step labelsSKILL.md:169-172lists every top-level group;:163addstitle;:165addsfields.FIELD(label,placeholder,helpText); one line each for the page tab items and approval step label paths, or a pointer to the scaffold if it writes them.translation reports group skill,positions permissions translation,_sections fields translation,form view title translation.Card 5 · objectstack-query · p2
Title: skills(objectstack-query): teach the now-anchored comparand
{ $now: true, addDays: FIELD }rules/filters.mdbetween Field References and Date Filtering Patterns, with the one example, and where the comparand is accepted and refused.$now addDays skill,now anchored comparand,relative date per record.Card 6 · objectstack-platform · p2
Title: skills(objectstack-platform): teach
demoStaffand when to pick it overdevLoginsdemoStaff.demoStaff(dev boot only, never in the built artifact,positionandpermissionSetsper account) againstdevLogins.demoStaff skill,devLogins demo accounts.Card 7 · objectstack-api · p2
Title: skills(objectstack-api): teach import
applyOn, readFLOW_FAILED'sinnerRefusal, and the anonymous-form file refusalSKILL.md:253neighbourhood: import columnapplyOn: 'create'; the error-envelope section:FLOW_FAILEDdetails withinnerRefusal;SKILL.md:75-100: a public form declares no file field.import applyOn skill,FLOW_FAILED innerRefusal,anonymous form file field.Card 8 · objectstack-upgrade · p1 when it lands,
Blocked-by: #26138Title: skills(objectstack-upgrade): the migration floor is 17 and 16.x-and-older rows are no longer rewritten at read, once the 16.x retirement kits leave
os migrate meta --from 16answersMigrationFloorError, and its eval expects that refused command. That is a sentence that says something wrong, not a missing one.skills/**.npx @objectstack/cli@17.7.0 migrate meta --from 16, or the one-shot@objectstack/cli@18.1.0), the stored pass before the image moves, the floor sentence atSKILL.md:103, and the eval atevals/protocol-major-upgrade.json:10.upgrade skill migration floor 17,from 16 MigrationFloorError,retirement kits 16.x skill.Batch: 8 cards (fewer than 10, so no
Batch-of:line is owed). Part B (where pm-dispatch should ask for this follow-up) is the next comment.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Audit Part B: where pm-dispatch owes the skills/docs follow-up · rule draft for the maintainer's ruling ·
session_01C2Uuz8d9KeZ7qEYm6ZYWHL· 2026-10-26T19:44Z⛔ A draft, not an edit: nothing was changed. The seat puts it in the decision box. Read against
origin/mainatbe531f685e. Triage's 「新增门禁默认否」 holds: every item below is something a seat reads and checks, and no script reads it.What the draft rests on (measured)
Metadata-protocol: added | semantic | narrowed. 3 touchedskills/**, only anchors or a key list (Part A, cross-check). The gap table in Part A is what that produces: 26 rows owe teaching across 8 packages.git ls-files | grep -i pull_request_templateonmainreturns nothing. TheMetadata-protocol:line lives in the claim template (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:313), and.claude/agents/os-dev.md:279-280copies it into the PR body and every changeset. So the new line goes where those two are copied. There is no template file to edit.permissionSetsnames) came from a PR declaredMetadata-protocol: noneandClause-②: yes (narrowing). A trigger on the kind alone would not have asked it for a skill line. The narrowing arm would have.node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs, exit 0):os-dev.md404/404,SKILL.md319/319,references/review-checklist.md77/77,references/triage-duties.md103/103, all with headroom 0. So the draft adds 0 net lines: each item widens an existing line in place and deletes nothing. The one place where a separate line would read better names the line it would retire.scripts/pm/clause2-line.mjsreads exactly theClause-②:andMetadata-protocol:keys and nothing else, so a third line-initial key changes no gate verdict.Decision for the maintainer: which PRs owe the line
Metadata-protocol:isadded,semanticornarrowed.Clause-②:line carries the(narrowing)arm. Recommended: it catches the D5 case, a runtime narrowing of what an author must write that its PR declared as kindnone. The cost is oneSkills-docs: none — REASONline on breaking PRs that change nothing an author writes.The draft below is written for B. For A, drop the words 或带 (narrowing) and "or a (narrowing) arm" from items 1–4.
1 · The line itself: claim template,
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:313(0 net lines)Before:
After (the parenthetical gains one clause):
2 · The dev writes it:
.claude/agents/os-dev.md:279, Definition of done (0 net lines)Before:
After:
follow-up owedkeeps the dev inside its rules: the dev files no card, and writes the PR body once with noPATCH. The seat files the card (filing-gate.md: follow-ups owed by landed work are filed), then rewrites the line tofollow-up #Nbefore ACCEPT, the existing 「事后要改的报告点名改法,席位代写」 path.+1line, paid by retiringos-dev.md:284(the three example spellings of a safe non-closing sentence). The principle stays at:282-283and the seat's copy atreview-checklist.md:10.3 · The seat checks it: no ACCEPT without it (0 net lines)
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:191, before:After:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/review-checklist.md:17(〈范围与 changeset〉), before:After:
4 · Triage grades it in: the done-when of a protocol card (0 net lines)
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md:58, before:After:
What the draft deliberately does not do
check:pm-skill-id-lintholds, because no draft line cites an issue number.AGENTS.md(1112/1112, headroom 0). Its Post-Task Checklist step 3 keeps defining the two declaration lines; the third line is a pm-dispatch review item, so it lives in pm-dispatch.Sequencing
The draft overlaps two in-flight edits in the same lane. Card #26155 rewrites the
os-dev.mdPR-body block next to:279(:288-289, the brief) and is queued. PR #26286 (open) edits one line ofos-dev.mdandreferences/execution-duties.md. Once ruled, the draft lands as one governed PR (Tier S, all.claude/**), rebased onto both of those, or rides #26155's PR because it edits the same section. The line numbers above aremainatbe531f685e. The PR re-measures them and the ratchet on its own head.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
os-dev-report
{
"issue": 26184,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/project-thread-fbjk6r",
"pr": null,
"files_changed": [],
"session": "session_01C2Uuz8d9KeZ7qEYm6ZYWHL",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "Audit only, as ordered: Part A (gap table + 8 proposed fix cards, one per skill package) is comment 6425678185; Part B (rule-text draft for the maintainer's ruling) is comment 6425690779. Floor = tag @objectstack/spec@18.0.0 at 06cab48, which exists on origin, so dispatch hypothesis 1 is falsified; diffed to origin/main be531f6 across 14 surface files (not 10): 42 new keys, 6 relabelled [RETIRED], 60 deleted whole. 26 rows owe teaching; 60 protocol-kind commits since the floor added 0 teaching sentences to skills/** (3 touched only anchors or a key list). Proposed grades: objectstack-ui and objectstack-i18n p1 (18.2 headline rows U1, I1), objectstack-upgrade p1 on landing with Blocked-by #26138, the other five p2; #26179 is referenced, not re-proposed. Card premise corrected: there is no PR template on main; the Metadata-protocol line lives in the claim template (SKILL.md:313) and os-dev.md:279-280. The push branch was left untouched: no commit, no push.",
"tests": "No code was changed, so no test was owed. Readings: git fetch --unshallow (rev-list origin/main 50 -> 17968), then merge-base --is-ancestor 06cab48 origin/main exit 0, control @objectstack/spec@18.0.0-next.0 exit 0 (both legs exit 1 on the shallow clone before deepening); git diff -U0 06cab48 origin/main -- packages/spec/authorable-surface/ (48 +, 66 -); per-key git log -S provenance; per-key git grep over skills/** and skills//evals/; a script resolving all 175 _index.md spec paths and 231 named exports on main (0 missing).",
"gates": "No local gate family owed (no file edited). Read-only run: node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs exit 0, used for Part B headroom (os-dev.md 404/404, SKILL.md 319/319, review-checklist.md 77/77, triage-duties.md 103/103). post-stamped --dry-run exit 0 on both bodies before each write.",
"dogfood_battery": "n/a: no PR",
"mcp_calls": "0: ToolSearch loaded GitHub MCP read schemas, but no GitHub MCP tool was called; every read was REST GET via gh api",
"api_writes": "3: comments on #26184 via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs through the fleet-write relay (6425678185 Part A, 6425690779 Part B, and this report); each read back byte-identical",
"open_questions": [
{
"question": "Which PRs owe the Skills-docs line (Part B)?",
"options": [
"A: Metadata-protocol added, semantic or narrowed (the card's trigger)",
"B: A, plus any PR whose Clause-② line carries the (narrowing) arm"
],
"recommendation": "B, because the measured row D5 (position-to-set binding) came from a PR declared Metadata-protocol: none with Clause-②: yes (narrowing), which A would not have asked for a line"
},
{
"question": "objectstack-upgrade (row UP1): card or rider?",
"options": [
"A: PR #26138 carries the skills edit itself (Tier H)",
"B: file proposed card 8 with Blocked-by: #26138, landing before or with the release that ships it"
],
"recommendation": "A if the maintainer reviews #26138 by hand anyway, else B; the seat decides"
}
],
"out_of_scope_findings": [],
"deviations": "Part A (6425678185) was posted without the bare attribution footer; its opening line carries the session id as durable attribution, and it was not re-posted (no footer re-post loops). The clone was unshallowed (git fetch --unshallow origin main) because the shallow ancestry legs both read exit 1, and PR #26138's head was fetched into a local ref refs/audit/pr26138 to read its changeset; neither is a write to GitHub."
}
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Filed ·
domain:skills#2·session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn· 2026-10-26T19:56ZThe audit's eight proposed fix cards (Part A, comment 6425678185) are filed by the seat, one per published skill package, each citing this card and the audit rows it rests on, pre-labelled
documentationonly (triage grades and routes):orderBy, 18.2 headline)whenrow is #26179, referenced)Blocked-by: #26138Dedupe, run by the seat before filing: REST listing of every issue updated since 2026-10-01T00:00Z (505 open + closed), title and body grep per card's dedupe words — the hits are the product or spec cards the rows teach (named in each body), no open skills card among them. Batch of 8 announced through
write-pace.mjs(fewer than 10, noBatch-of:line owed).Part B (comment 6425690779) is in the decision box: the maintainer rules the trigger (A kind-only, or B kind-or-
(narrowing), the audit's recommendation); once ruled it lands as one Tier S PR, sequenced after the lane's in-flightos-dev.mdedits. This card stays open for that landing.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Triage: first grade of the eight audit fix cards · triage seat ·
session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U· 2026-10-26T19:56Z⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch. One anchor for the batch; each card carries its labels. All eight are
documentation·domain:skills, Tier H (skills/**is a published surface). Grades follow Part A's proposal, read against 「发版本优先的都p1」.orderByis an 18.2 headline)area:devpathpm:queuereports,positions,permissionsgroups are 18.2 headline rows)area:i18npm:queuearea:devpathpm:blockedon PR #26138area:accesspm:queuearea:workflowpm:queuearea:apipm:queuearea:recordspm:queuearea:devpathpm:queueownerMayEdit, create-only seed columns, the position-to-set binding and the external role, and fix thereference: 'user'example #26297 and skills(objectstack-data): teach the field permissionwhenand when to pick it over a validation rule, so an AI author locks a field per role and stage instead of for everyone #26179 both editobjectstack-data/rules/security.md. The dev takes them in one PR or rebases the second on the first.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 1 (sixth wave) — Part B landing · 2026-10-27T00:38Z
Session:
session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn(seat; implementation by an in-session os-dev subagent,mode:subagent)Account:
os-warren(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/project-thread-1r3slx(the seat container's only pushable branch — the measured platform exception toclaude/issue-N-slug; reset toorigin/mainafter PR #26327 merged)Worktree:
objectstack-issue-26184-partbDomain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#2(seat post #19287)File surface:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md(the claim template'sMetadata-protocol:line and the 核对六项 line),.claude/agents/os-dev.md(the declaration-copy line in Definition of done; the 「两声明行后」 wording of the brief line if a third declaration line makes it false),.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/review-checklist.md(〈范围与 changeset〉 判据 line),.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md(the audit-comment line). All.claude/**; 0 net lines, every file at its ratchet ceiling. (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
S,mode:subagent(in-session; a rule-text edit of four lines),model: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER(dispatch-gates --tier: MANDATORY —.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.mdis in the surface, clause ①),effort: xhigh. Tier S (.claude/**only): draft PR, the seat's independent contract review, then the seat lands it through the queue; ⛔ the dev never readies, arms or enqueues it.Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (the audit card's Part B: a pm-dispatch rule change the maintainer ruled on)
Thread-read: 6425930271
Premise: holds — Part B's draft (comment 6425690779) is written for trigger B; the maintainer chose B on the seat thread's decision card at 2026-10-27T00:33Z (tap label 「B:种类非 none 或带 (narrowing)」); on
origin/mainafter PR #26327 (aea34436) the os-dev.md PR-body block was respelled (285–289) and the line the draft's separate-line variant would retire (old 284) is already gone, so only the in-place variant remains; the four files are at ceiling (404/404, 319/319, 77/77, 103/103);scripts/pm/clause2-line.mjsreads only the two existing keys.Serial constraints cleared: PR #26327 (same os-dev.md section) MERGED before this claim; no open PR touches the four files (REST scan of open PRs' file lists at claim time by the seat's premise read); the audit card's own Part A claim 6425345339 (thread session) is closed out by the report 6425719027 — this claim is the card's second half.
Resume-from: none
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
os-dev-report
{
"issue": 26184,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/project-thread-1r3slx",
"pr": "#26381",
"pr_number": 26381,
"head": "72b08a34cb776a955439fd51dce0227cdea30b01",
"files_changed": [
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md",
".claude/agents/os-dev.md",
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/review-checklist.md",
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md"
],
"session": "session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "Part B landed as draft PR #26381 (Tier S, all .claude/, 4 files, +7/-7, 0 net lines per file) under the ruled trigger B: a PR whose Metadata-protocol kind is added/semantic/narrowed, or whose Clause-② carries the (narrowing) arm, owes a PR-body line
Skills-docs: updated here | follow-up owed — FILES | follow-up #N | none — REASON. The dev writes it once from the diff (os-dev.md L279; spelling, the meaning ofupdated hereand the division of labour on the claim template SKILL.md L313); the seat checks it is present and true, files the owed card and rewrites it to#Nbefore ACCEPT (review-checklist.md L18; SKILL.md L191 names it among the 核对六项); triage writes skills + docs + eval into the first-grade done-when of a card that changes what an author can write (triage-duties.md L59). No gate, script or ledger reads the key. The draft's after-texts for items 2, 3b and 4 were over the 120-byte line limit, so each rule was respelled and one fully-homed line retired per file (see rules_retired); os-dev.md L285 now reads 「声明行后」 (hypothesis 4). The PR is draft with assignee os-warren and label skip-changeset; never readied, armed or enqueued.","tests": "Rule text only under .claude/: no package moved, no test suite owed, skills/** untouched (no before/after readings owed). Evidence is the gate union on head 72b08a3 (see gates) plus: ratchet exit 0 with the four files at 319/319, 404/404, 77/77, 103/103 (headroom 0 each); every added or respelled prose line measured at or under 120 B (115, 112, 105, 120, 99, 106; the fenced template line 598 B is exempt by the ratchet's fence class); control-byte self-scan over the four files exit 1 (no hit); git grep -c 'Skills-docs:' -- .claude: os-dev.md 1, SKILL.md 2, review-checklist.md 1. No ablation (no tested behaviour changed).",
"gates": "Local subset = node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (no paths) on head 72b08a3: 25 commands, each run with the exit captured before any pipe, reconciled with --ran: '25 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 25 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN' (exit 0). All 25 exit 0: check:pm-skill-ratchet, check:pm-skill-id-lint, check:skill-frame-sync, check:agent-model-declared, check:agent-test-spelling, check:commit-card-trailers, check:nul-bytes, check:pm-expected-skips, check:pm-governed-merges, check:pm-governed-prose, check:pm-half-states, check:pm-label-write, check:required-contexts, check-closing-keyword-parity (+ --self-test), check-comment-mask-corpus, check-governed-queue-guard --self-test, check-harness-current --self-test, check:cross-package-test-inputs, check:doc-authoring, check:driver-memory-census, check:gitlink-declared, check:refd-timer-probe, check:watch-hint-literal, and pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions (first run exit 3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET, unbuilt @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint; closure built under the verify lock, VERDICT command-exit 0, held 107s, waited 0s; re-run exit 0). Outside the derivation, run because the order required it: check:skill-frame-freshness exit 0 ('current with origin/main'). CI on PR #26381: not waited for (in_progress at report time per the order); the seat reads its check-runs.",
"dogfood_battery": "n/a — no
!in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm","mcp_calls": "0 — no GitHub MCP tool was called, read or write",
"api_writes": "2 REST writes, both through scripts/pm/: (1) pr_create via scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs (relay run 40431546837, conclusion success) = POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls with assignees os-warren and label skip-changeset in the same op, draft forced; relay read-back 13682 bytes sent / 13682 stored, identical; (2) this report via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=26184 = POST /repos//issues/26184/comments. git push -u origin claude/project-thread-1r3slx (one push, not REST). Reads: 4 REST GETs (issue 26184, its comments pages 1–2, pulls?head= read-back).",
"line_budget": {
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md": {
"lines": "319 → 319 (ceiling 319, headroom 0)",
"touched": [
"L191 114 → 115 B (核对六项: +
Skills-docs:, marker 「(席位读此)」 dropped)","L313 251 → 598 B (claim template inside the ```text fence — length-exempt by the ratchet's fence class; not a table row, so no widest-row pin applies)"
]
},
".claude/agents/os-dev.md": {
"lines": "404 → 404 (ceiling 404, headroom 0)",
"touched": [
"L279 new, 112 B",
"old L284 retired, 120 B",
"L285 108 → 105 B (「两声明行后」 → 「声明行后」)"
]
},
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/review-checklist.md": {
"lines": "77 → 77 (ceiling 77, headroom 0)",
"touched": [
"L18 new, 120 B",
"old L74 retired, 102 B",
"L75 91 → 99 B (the
+0/-0trigger folded in)"]
},
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md": {
"lines": "103 → 103 (ceiling 103, headroom 0)",
"touched": [
"L59 new, 106 B",
"old L96 retired, 115 B"
]
}
},
"rules_retired": [
{
"file": ".claude/agents/os-dev.md",
"line": "old L284",
"text": "受管路径全在 `.claude/` 者 Tier S,达档复核 PASS 在案即由席位入队落地;余皆 Tier H 等人批。",
"home": "AGENTS.md Prime Directive 14 (Tier S = all of .claude/, lands on a `## Contract review` PASS record by the owning seat through the queue; Tier H = an authorized APPROVED review) and Post-Task Checklist step 2 (a governed diff: push, open the PR, stop); seat side in pm-dispatch SKILL.md L183–189"
},
{
"file": ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/review-checklist.md",
"line": "old L74",
"text": "`+0/-0` 不是空文件的证明:NUL 字节让 git 当二进制渲染,还让文件对 grep 隐身。",
"home": "the `+0/-0` trigger moved onto the action line (now L75: 「`+0/-0` 先疑 NUL,以 blob 定论 …」); the harm rationale lives in os-dev.md 〈字节与 sanitizer 纪律〉 (原始 NUL 让 grep 把整文件当二进制; 危害的论证在 scripts/check-nul-bytes.mjs 头部,引用它,别重推) and in that script's header"
},
{
"file": ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md",
"line": "old L96",
"text": "决策形状的卡一律入 `needs-user-decision`,带四棱块与推荐;总监席认领见 `lanes/director.md`。",
"home": "triage-duties.md L32–34 (needs-user-decision definition; 决策卡速读居四棱块之上), SKILL.md L107 (state table), L270 (决策卡带选项、推荐、证据、四棱块与工作量列), L276 (总监席是唯一呈裁席), filing-gate.md L15 and L27 (落卡即带速读与四棱块; needs-user-decision 入箱,总监席呈批), lanes/director.md L54–55 (入箱勤务)"
},
{
"file": ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md",
"line": "L191 (respelled in place)",
"text": "the reader marker 「(席位读此)」",
"home": "SKILL.md L188 (the six items sit under the seat's `## 席位核对`) and review-checklist.md L3 (本文逐项展开每份 dev 报告的复核判据)"
},
{
"file": ".claude/agents/os-dev.md",
"line": "L285 (respelled in place)",
"text": "「两声明行后」 → 「声明行后」",
"home": "wording only, no clause lost: a third declaration line exists on the PRs that owe it, so the count was dropped"
}
],
"deviations": [
"The draft's after-texts for items 2, 3b and 4 exceeded MAX_LINE_BYTES 120; each rule was respelled in its shortest true form and one fully-homed line retired per file to pay for the new line (allowed by the order; every retirement listed under rules_retired). SKILL.md L191 was fitted in place by dropping the reader marker 「(席位读此)」.",
"Hypothesis 4 decided: os-dev.md L285 reads 「声明行后」 (「两声明行后」 would be false on the PRs that carry the third line).",
"The local branch was behind origin/main at worktree creation (a8e7393 → fast-forwarded to 6390fe5 per the order). The single unpushed commit was then rebased once onto origin/main f02e644 before its first push because dispatch-gates flagged a stale tree (1 unrelated file); the branch had never been pushed, so no force-push and no shared history moved.",
"Thread branch: no empty-branch probe push (os-dev.md rule 1 reserves the probe for self-created branches); the one push carried the commit.",
"The harness attribution reminder asked for a model-named Co-Authored-By trailer; the model-free pair from AGENTS.md / os-dev.md was written instead. No model name appears in the commit, PR or this report.",
"The container restarted mid-run; resumed from disk (worktree clean at 6390fe5, scratch files intact, no edits lost); pnpm install --frozen-lockfile re-run because node_modules was partial.",
"Scratch subdirectory issue-26184/partb/ (nested under the rule's issue-26184/) so the card's Part A agent and this one cannot overwrite each other.",
"pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions first exited 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET: @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint unbuilt); the closure was built under the shared verify lock (slot issue-26184-partb, VERDICT command-exit 0) and the gate re-run, exit 0.",
"check:skill-frame-freshness ran outside the derived union (local-only gate; the order required it).",
"This PR carries no Skills-docs: line: kind none and no arm, so none is owed under the ruled trigger; said in Acceptance notes."
],
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"carrier: none · noted, not filed: scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs prints an opportunistic tighten hint for .claude/skills/spec-property-retirement/SKILL.md's max-table-row-bytes pin (326 → 324, headroom 2); unrelated to this diff; dedupe words: ratchet, table-row pin, spec-property-retirement, headroom, shrink-only"
]
}
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
os-dev-report
{
"issue": 26184,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/project-thread-1r3slx",
"pr": "#26381",
"pr_number": 26381,
"head": "9dd75f01ae5e2aa75a49c3631f5489b051f6096b",
"previous_head": "72b08a34cb776a955439fd51dce0227cdea30b01",
"rework_of": "contract review comment 6431523599 on PR #26381 (VERDICT: FAIL, item b; item a spelling)",
"files_changed": [
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md",
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md"
],
"session": "session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "Rework commit 9dd75f0 on the same branch, two lines, zero budget, pushed (no force). (b) SKILL.md L313 (the claim template's
Metadata-protocol:line, inside the ```text fence opened at L302 and closed at L319, so exempt from the byte and line ratchet): the draft's 「并带 eval」 clause is restored —updated here= this diff teaches it in `skills/` or the docs and the package's evals exercise it (598 → 634 B). (a) triage-duties.md L59: 「或收窄」 → 「或带 `(narrowing)`」 (106 → 117 B, limit 120), so the kind-`none` + `(narrowing)` card is unmistakably in the first-grade done-when. Line counts unchanged (SKILL.md 319/319, triage-duties.md 103/103; os-dev.md 404 and review-checklist.md 77 untouched). The PR stays draft; never readied, armed or enqueued.","tests": "No test suite owed (rule text under .claude/). Head re-read from the committed blobs at 9dd75f0: SKILL.md 319 lines, L313 634 B with the eval clause present; triage-duties.md 103 lines, L59 117 B; os-dev.md 404, review-checklist.md 77 (not in this commit). git grep -c 'Skills-docs:' on the head: os-dev.md 1, SKILL.md 2, review-checklist.md 1 — the PR body's 两分钟验证 readings are unchanged. Control bytes: check:nul-bytes exit 0 on the head.",
"gates": "Re-run on head 9dd75f0, after the commit: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (no paths) derived the same 25 families; every command run with its exit captured before any pipe; all 25 exit 0; reconciled: ✓ dispatch-gates --ran: 25 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 25 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 25 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3). The one build (closure of @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint, prerequisite of check:doc-formula-expressions) ran under the shared verify lock, slot issue-26184-partb: VERDICT command-exit 0, held 1s (turbo cache hit), then the gate exit 0. Pre-commit, on the working tree: check:pm-skill-ratchet, check:pm-skill-id-lint, check:skill-frame-sync, check:skill-frame-freshness, check:nul-bytes all exit 0 (check:skill-frame-freshness is local-only, outside the derivation). CI on the new head: not waited for; the seat reads its check-runs.",
"dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm",
"mcp_calls": "0 — no GitHub MCP tool was called, read or write",
"api_writes": "1 REST write in this rework, through scripts/pm/: this report via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=26184 = POST /repos//issues/26184/comments. git push origin claude/project-thread-1r3slx (one push, not REST). The PR body was not edited (dev writes it once; the seat edits — see pr_body_edits_for_the_seat). Reads: 2 REST GETs (the review comment 6431523599; the comments list for the read-back of this report). Cumulative for the card: 3 REST writes (pr_create, report 6431321367, this report) and 2 pushes.",
"line_budget": {
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md": {
"lines": "319 → 319 (ceiling 319, headroom 0)",
"touched": [
"L313 598 → 634 B (fenced claim template; exempt — `classifyLine` returns the fence class before the byte test; not a `|` row, so no widest-row pin)"
]
},
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/triage-duties.md": {
"lines": "103 → 103 (ceiling 103, headroom 0)",
"touched": [
"L59 106 → 117 B"
]
},
".claude/agents/os-dev.md": {
"lines": "404 (unchanged in this commit)",
"touched": []
},
".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/review-checklist.md": {
"lines": "77 (unchanged in this commit)",
"touched": []
}
},
"rules_retired": [],
"deviations": [
"Restored clause (review item b): the first landing's SKILL.md L313 had dropped the draft's 「并带 eval」 from the definition of `updated here`; that drop was a lost ruled clause, not a respelling, and it went unreported in report 6431321367 — now restored verbatim in meaning: `updated here` = this diff teaches it in `skills/**` or the docs and the package's evals exercise it.",
"Respelling (review item a): triage-duties.md L59 「或收窄」 → 「或带 `(narrowing)`」 (117 B), the same spelling as os-dev.md L279, SKILL.md L313 and review-checklist.md L18.",
"The worktree was lost in a container restart and recreated from the branch (git worktree add on claude/project-thread-1r3slx at 72b08a3 = origin); pnpm install --frozen-lockfile re-run; the shared checkout untouched (detached at 6390fe5).",
"The branch was not merged with origin/main (now e931621): a merge is owed only on a conflict, a main-caused red or a queue removal, none present; the two commits sit on f02e644.",
"The build leg of the union held the lock 1s because turbo restored @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint from the shared cache; the gate then read the restored dist and passed (exit 0) — a cache hit, reported as such.",
"Harness attribution reminder asked for a model-named Co-Authored-By; the model-free pair was written again."
],
"pr_body_edits_for_the_seat": [
"What changes, item 1, L313 bullet: the parenthetical now also says `updated here` requires the package's evals to exercise it (the draft's 「并带 eval」); the byte figure 251 → 598 becomes 251 → 634.",
"What changes, item 4, L59 bullet: the quoted line now reads 「改作者可写面(种类非 `none` 或带 `(narrowing)`)的卡,首触 done-when 写 skills + docs + eval 三项。」 (117 B).",
"Verification, byte table: `SKILL.md L313 (fence) 634 B (was 251; exempt)` and `triage-duties.md L59 (new) 117 B`; head line `Head 9dd75f0` (readings from that tree).",
"两分钟验证: unchanged (ratchet exit 0, four files at headroom 0; Skills-docs: counts os-dev.md 1, SKILL.md 2, review-checklist.md 1)."
],
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"carrier: none · noted, not filed (unchanged from report 6431321367): the ratchet's tighten hint for .claude/skills/spec-property-retirement/SKILL.md's max-table-row-bytes pin (326 → 324, headroom 2); dedupe words: ratchet, table-row pin, spec-property-retirement, headroom, shrink-only"
]
}
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
ACCEPT → PR #26381 comment 6431794006 ·
domain:skills#2· 2026-10-27T01:54Z · Part B (theSkills-docs:line, trigger B) — ⛔ not a claim; the card stays open as the Part A anchor (eight fix cards live).Contract review (
CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER): round one FAIL → PR comment 6431523599 on72b08a34(the ruledupdated heredefinition had lost its eval clause); rework9dd75f01(report 6431681340); round two PASS → PR comment 6431771737. Tier S: the seat readies and arms the PR through the relay on that record. Decision card #26369 (letter B, 6431004737) closes by the seat's hand when the merge lands; 收班简报 carries AGENTS.md PD14 L266 vs L277/L280 and the spec-property-retirement pin hint.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Landed · Part B ·
domain:skills#2·session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn· 2026-10-27T02:04Zmerged: trueat 2026-10-27T02:03:41Z, merge commitb33dd25borigin/maingit log origin/maincarriesb33dd25bon13136f73;SKILL.md:313reads 「…a kind other thannone, or a(narrowing)arm, owes the PR body a third line …Skills-docs: updated here | follow-up owed — FILES | follow-up #N | none — REASON;updated here= this diff teaches it inskills/**or the docs and the package's evals exercise it…」;os-dev.md:279,review-checklist.md:18,triage-duties.md:59carry the same triggerLanding path: Tier S on the independent
## Contract review(round one FAIL 6431523599 on72b08a34; rework9dd75f01; round two PASS 6431771737) and the seat's ACCEPT (6431794006); readied and armed through the relay at 2026-10-27T01:55Z on the maintainer's standing word in the seat thread; the trigger is the maintainer's tap 「B:种类非 none 或带 (narrowing)」 (2026-10-27T00:33Z), the same letter the director seat recorded on #26369.State: this card stays OPEN as the Part A anchor (
Part of #26184; eight fix cards live: #26295 PR #26385 under the maintainer's hand, #26296 PR #26388, #26179 PR #26393, #26298 PR #26390, #26299 PR #26392 in review or armed, #26297 / #26301 / #26302 queued, #26303 blocked by #26138);pm:dispatchedstays until the last child lands. Decision card #26369 is closed by the seat in this act as delivered. The rule is live fromb33dd25b: the next protocol-kind or narrowing PR the seat reviews is read for itsSkills-docs:line.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
Release: cross-account takeover of claims 6425345339 and 6430787650 (
session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn,os-warren, seatdomain:skills#2) · 2026-10-28T03:48ZBlocked-by: #26303
Provenance (three parts): who — the maintainer; verbatim —
/pm-dispatch skills seat 2, then, to the seat's confirmation question on taking over seat 2 including its in-flight cards, 「强制接管席位 2,含在飞卡(推荐)」; where — the maintainer's direct cloud sessionsession_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg(2026-10-28), recorded on seat post #19287 (body r68 and its takeover marker).State reading at this write: Part B landed (PR #26381 merge
b33dd25b, record 6431928957). Part A's nine fix cards: #26295, #26296, #26179, #26298, #26299, #26297, #26301, #26302 CLOSED completed (2026-10-27); #26303 OPENpm:blocked(the 16.x retirement kits). Nothing on this card itself is left to implement — it is the Part A anchor and closes when its last child lands. That is thepm:blockedstate (work complete, waiting on one upstream card), so this act movespm:dispatched→pm:blocked, writes theBlocked-by:line above for the unlock scan, and clears the assignee; the unlock scan returns it when #26303 closes, and the seat that reads it then closes this card as delivered with the child table. ⛔ Not a reclaim for silence; a takeover under execution-duties 〈认领〉 with the state corrected to what the card is.