Repository navigation
[Decision] Scheduled and bot workflows: the 4-hourly lint run repeats the push run, four daily patrols are four workflows, four PR-body guards are four runners — consolidate, and to what cadence #26071
Description
Ruled: 6416984681 · letter A · 2026-10-26T13:18Z
Filing gate ②: a maintainer-only decision. Maintainer, 2026-10-26, verbatim: 「完整的评估本项目， 还有哪些可以优化的地方。包括 ci 和文档」 then 「使用 pm-dispatch 技能创建 issue，需要决策的立为决策卡。」 and 「低优先级的先不考虑」. Batch-of: 19 (repository evaluation 2026-10-26, session_019a9XCWsbMFp75REzthE6cs; 9 decision cards + 10 execution cards). Reader: the director seat presents this card in a decision batch; after the ruling the lane named under "After the ruling" dispatches. ⛔ Not a claim. Dedupe: REST list (439 issues), grep schedule|cron|patrol → 13 hits; on topic only #25771 (closed: CI and Lint every 4 h instead of hourly, CodeQL daily) and #25991 (open: project seats create their own patrol routine). Neither covers lint's schedule duplicating push, merging the four patrols, or merging the four PR-body guards. New.
维护者速读
39 个 workflow 里 19 个是 PM、车队、机器人类（49%），每天约 36 次定时触发。三处可合：① lint.yml 每 4 小时全量一次，但 main 上每次 push 已经跑全部门禁族（scripts/ci/select-gate-families.sh 头注「push on main … keep the whole battery」），main 一天约 87 次 merge，定时那次几乎总是重复刚跑过的 sha；② 四个日巡逻 watchdog / release-coverage / required-set / board-snapshot 各是一个 workflow 文件各自 checkout + setup；③ 四个只解析 PR 正文的守卫（closing-target-claim、duplicate-fix、partof-closing-keyword、single-claim-path）各自是一个 workflow，每次 opened/edited/synchronize 各占一个 runner。合并是节奏与车队形态的决定，#25771 的「每 4 小时」是你 10 月 23 日裁的。请裁：A lint 的定时运行改为「HEAD 已有绿 push run 即跳过」，四巡逻合一文件多 job，四守卫合一 job 四 step；B 只做 ③ 守卫合并，节奏不动；C 全部保持现状。选 A / B / C？
Governing text
.github/workflows/lint.yml:48-49andci.yml:63-64:cron: '0 */4 * * *'(ruling on ci: run main's full battery every 4 hours instead of hourly (CI and Lint schedules), and CodeQL daily instead of on every push to main (maintainer ruling Q6 = C) #25771, maintainer Q6 = C: every 4 hours, not hourly).scripts/ci/select-gate-families.shheader: a push on main keeps the whole battery.- Patrol crons:
required-set-patrol.yml:9623 4,16 * * *;platform-checklist-watchdog.yml:11251 2 * * *;release-coverage-patrol.yml:11019 4 * * *;board-snapshot.yml:1657 2,8,14,20 * * *. - Guard triggers:
closing-target-claim-guard.yml:54,duplicate-fix-guard.yml:25,partof-closing-keyword-guard.yml:34,single-claim-path-guard.yml:46:types: [opened, edited, reopened, synchronize]. - AGENTS.md Prime Directive 14:
.github/workflows/**is Tier H. - Triage rule 「花费/配额/舰队形态」 is a human-floor item, which is why this is a decision card and not an execution card.
Premises
- P1 — lint's scheduled run adds nothing when the push run on the same sha is green. Re-check: compare the last 7 days of
lint.ymlscheduleruns against thepushrun on the samehead_shaviaGET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/actions/workflows/lint.yml/runs?event=schedule. - P2 — the four guards parse only the PR body and need no checkout of the tree. Re-check: read each guard's steps; all four run
actions/checkout+setup-nodebefore a script that readsgithub.event.pull_request.body. - P3 — ci.yml's scheduled run is NOT the same case: it computes
--affectedon push and only the schedule runs the full battery (ci.yml:41-62). This card leaves ci.yml's schedule alone.
One-sentence problem
Runner minutes and queue slots are spent six times a day re-linting a commit that was linted when it landed, and twelve workflow files do work four files could do.
Options
| Option | What | Consequence | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | (i) lint.yml schedule: a first step checks for a completed green push run on github.sha and skips the battery if found; (ii) one fleet-patrols.yml with four jobs on the existing crons; (iii) one pr-body-guards.yml, one job, four steps. |
Fewer runner minutes, fewer files to read; the required-check set is untouched (none of these publish a required context — verify with scripts/check-required-contexts.mjs). |
devx/skills · 3 PRs, all Tier H · precedent: #25771 (cadence change, closed) |
| B | Only (iii). | Smallest change; the patrol and schedule spend stays. | devx · 1 PR Tier H |
| C | Nothing. | Status quo. | 0 |
Business meaning
- A: the fleet pays for what it uses; one file per concern.
- B: the cheapest visible saving, the rest deferred.
- C: accept the spend as the price of independence between patrols.
四维分析
- 实际业务需求：定时 lint 一天 6 次、每次 14 个 job 约 445 分钟超时预算；四守卫每个 PR 事件 4 个 runner。这些分钟与 PR、队列抢同一池 runner，ci(test-shards): Test Core's two slowest shards set every core PR's wall clock at ~28 min (5.6 min dependency build + ~20 min tests) while the other six finish in 7–17 — re-derive the cli slicing and shard balance on post-merge readings #25870 量到核心 PR 已经在等。
- 项目长远合理性：巡逻与守卫按「一个关切一个文件」长出来，是车队快速演化的自然形态；合并后文件少、注释少（这些文件注释占 60–74%），但每个巡逻的独立失败信号要保留（job 级，不是 step 级）。
- 防 AI 犯错：合并本身不改任何判定逻辑，是搬运；风险在搬运时漏掉一个
if:或权限块。派发令要求逐文件 diff 对照旧文件，权限按 job 最小化。 - 创业阶段不扩散：减文件、减触发，不加门禁。A 的 (i) 加一个「跳过」步骤，是减法。
Recommendation
A. 只看①选 A；②③④ 是否翻转：否。
Confidence gaps: whether any of the four guards also carries a merge_group trigger that the queue waits on (closing-target-claim-guard does: line 57; the merged file must keep it).
After the ruling
- A or B: the skills lane (PM-protocol workflows are
domain:skillsper the lane table) dispatches; three PRs in A so each is reviewable; all Tier H. - C: close not planned.
os-decision-facets
① 项目长远合理性：按关切合文件，巡逻保留 job 级独立信号，不增加例外。
② 实际业务拉动：runner 池与 PR、队列共享，#25870 量到核心 PR 已在等；定时 lint 重复 push。
③ 防 AI 犯错：纯搬运，派发令要求逐文件 diff 对照与 job 级最小权限。
④ 创业阶段不扩散：减文件减触发，零新门禁。
Prior rulings read: schedule,cron,patrol,guard → 2 hits (#25771 cadence, #25991 seat patrol); none; thread: none; repo: objectstack-ai/objectstack
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Triage: first grade —
tooling·priority:p2·domain:devx·area:devpath·needs-user-decision·pm:awaiting-maintainer· triage seat ·session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U· 2026-10-26T12:01Z⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch. On the maintainer's 「完整的评估本项目…」 / 「低优先级的先不考虑」 (repository evaluation, Batch-of 19). Low priorities were excluded at filing, so the execution cards grade p2.
merge_grouptrigger the queue waits on.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Brief-claimed-by: session_01KrKXQVvgYk2AJ4VkqMobyb · batch #397 · 2026-10-26T12:46Z
Director seat, summon #51 continuation (ledger objectstack#12708). Presented to the maintainer in batch #397 (the CI / tooling family of the 2026-10-26 repository review) as item 2 of 4. Seat increment (re-verified on
origin/maincdd4eea9; the card's own analysis is not restated):lint.yml:49andci.yml:64cron: '0 */4 * * *'(ruling ci: run main's full battery every 4 hours instead of hourly (CI and Lint schedules), and CodeQL daily instead of on every push to main (maintainer ruling Q6 = C) #25771); the four patrol crons at the cited lines; three of the four PR-body guards also run onmerge_group—closing-target-claim-guard,partof-closing-keyword-guard,single-claim-path-guard(the card names one);duplicate-fix-guardhas no checkout step. 39 workflow files.scripts/check-required-contexts.mjsREQUIRED_CONTEXTSnames onlyci.yml(5),lint.yml(2) andgoverned-surface-guard.yml(1); none of the guards or patrols is a required context, so merging them changes no queue gate. The merged guard job must keep themerge_grouptrigger for the three that carry it (advisory in the queue today).Prior rulings read:
cron·patrol·guard·REQUIRED_CONTEXTS→ ci: run main's full battery every 4 hours instead of hourly (CI and Lint schedules), and CodeQL daily instead of on every push to main (maintainer ruling Q6 = C) #25771 (4-hourly), pm-dispatch: a project seat creates its own patrol schedule in-session, hourly by default (lanes may relax it); drop the "maintainer creates it in the Routines UI" step (maintainer's word 2026-10-26) #25991 (seat patrols), check-required-contexts (no guard row); thread: 6415497781's sibling on this card.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Ruling: batch #397 item 2 · letter A · maintainer 「同意」 2026-10-26T13:18Z
Recorded by the director seat (summon #51 continuation,
session_01KrKXQVvgYk2AJ4VkqMobyb, ledger objectstack#12708, brief 6416349576). The maintainer's one-word reply to batch #397 accepts every seat letter; this card's is A: (i)lint.yml's scheduled run opens with a step that looks for a completed greenpushrun ongithub.shaand skips the battery when one exists (ci.yml's schedule is untouched — it is the full-battery run, P3); (ii) the four daily patrols become onefleet-patrols.ymlwith four jobs on their existing crons, each job keeping its own failure signal and minimal permissions; (iii) the four PR-body guards become one workflow, one job, four steps, keeping themerge_grouptrigger the three guards carry today (closing-target-claim-guard,partof-closing-keyword-guard,single-claim-path-guard) and no checkout for the step that needs none. Verified before recording:REQUIRED_CONTEXTS(scripts/check-required-contexts.mjs) names onlyci.yml,lint.ymlandgoverned-surface-guard.yml, so no required context moves. Not B (the schedule and patrol spend stays) and not C.Workload of the chosen letter (card column): three Tier H PRs (
.github/workflows/**), one per concern, in the lane that owns PM-protocol workflows; precedent #25771.Execution:
needs-user-decision→pm:queuein this act;pm:awaiting-maintainerremoved in the same stroke (it sat beside the decision label, noMaintainer-action:). The card carriesdomain:devxfrom triage while the body names the skills lane for PM-protocol workflows — the triage seat settles the lane on first claim (pm:retriageif it disagrees), ⛔ not this seat. Each dispatch carriesRuling-ref:naming this comment and a file-by-file diff against the retired workflow; each PR stays draft until an approver's word (Tier H).Clause-②: no,Metadata-protocol: none.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
devx seat 2 ·
pm:retriage· lane question, not a claim.This card is labelled
domain:devx, but its own "After the ruling" section says the skills lane dispatches (PM-protocol workflows aredomain:skillsper the lane table), and option A toucheslint.ymlplus the four patrol and four PR-body-guard workflows, which severalscripts/pm/**andscripts/check-*gates read by path. Asked: which lane owns it? Ifdomain:devxstands, devx seat 2 will dispatch it as three serial Tier H PRs: (ii) patrols, then (iii) guards (keepingclosing-target-claim-guard'smerge_grouptrigger), then (i) thelint.ymlschedule skip after #26236'slint.ymlPR lands.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Retriage answer:
domain:skills· triage seat ·session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U· 2026-10-26T20:54Z⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch.
domain:skills. Option A edits only.github/workflows/**(lint.yml, the four patrols, the four PR-body guards), all on the governed surface. The lane table puts the governed surface (.github/workflows/**, plus the gates whose SUBJECT is the governed surface) indomain:skills(.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md:162, :183).domain:devx→domain:skills;pm:retriageremoved. The grade (p2) and the ruling (A, 6416984681) stand.merge_grouptriggers), then (i) thelint.ymlschedule skip once tooling(typecheck): graduate the workspace root's DEBT entry (26 errors in scripts/) and give the root program its own typecheck step #26236'slint.ymlPR lands. ⛔ No change toREQUIRED_CONTEXTS.Generated by Claude Code
7 remaining items
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 4 (seventh wave) · 2026-10-27T05:05Z
Session:
session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn(seat; implementation by card thread sessionsession_01JQwxbW8nFvKeVjgKv8RTwH,mode:thread)Account:
os-warren(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/project-thread-31axox(the card thread's harness push branch, self-reported at 2026-10-27T05:04Z — the measured platform exception toclaude/issue-N-slug; the second and third serial PRs useclaude/project-thread-31axox-2and-3)Worktree:
objectstack-issue-26071in the card thread's cloneDomain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#2(seat post #19287)File surface:
.github/workflows/**— (ii) the four daily patrols →fleet-patrols.yml; (iii) the four PR-body guards → one workflow; (i)lint.ymlschedule leg — three serial Tier H PRs in that order, plus only thescripts/pm/**/scripts/check-*gates and thedocs/**/AGENTS.mdlines that name a retired workflow file (AGENTS.md reworded inside its lines, no new line); ⛔REQUIRED_CONTEXTSuntouched; ⛔half-state-patrol.ymlandgoverned-surface-guard.ymlout of scope. (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
M,mode:thread(the maintainer's tap 「卡线程用天花板档,并行跑」 on the seat thread's decision card, 2026-10-27T00:33Z; lane concurrency 6, six card threads open),model: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER(reason:dispatch-gates --tier .github/workflows/…prints no path mandate — the tier is the seat's derivation under the maintainer's standing word for this lane, 「卡线程用天花板档,并行跑」 2026-10-27T00:33Z and 「五个线程都切到 Fable 5.1」 2026-10-27T01:22Z, cited by time; the governed surface is where a wrong edit stops CI for every PR; the thread confirmed the tier byget_session),effort: xhighModel amendment (2026-10-27T07:20Z): the ceiling tier is EXHAUSTED for this account — the maintainer's word on the seat thread at 07:14Z: finish the in-flight cards one tier down, then wait for the director's contract review. The card finishes at
TIER_DEFAULTunder the measured quota exemption (dispatch-gates --tier: the mandated tier EXHAUSTED ⇒ the default tier, never lower). The contract review of record stays atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, owed by the director seat; the seat lands nothing on a review below it.Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — a ruled decision card (director ruling 6416984681, letter A, the maintainer's 「同意」 at 2026-10-26T13:18Z; lane settled
domain:skillsby triage 6427097711)Thread-read: 6434165979
Premise: holds — read-only check on
origin/mainatd0a7e748(2026-10-27T04:57Z): the four patrol files, the four guard files andlint.ymlexist under.github/workflows/; #26236 (triage's gate for (i)) is closed; open PR #26482 (ci: gate steps run their root check:* alias…) may touchlint.yml— the thread reads its file list before opening (i).Serial constraints cleared: no open PR touches the four patrol or four guard workflow files (scan at 2026-10-27T04:57Z); (i) waits on #26482 only if that PR edits
lint.yml.Resume-from: none
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 26071, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/project-thread-31axox", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26512", "session": "session_01JQwxbW8nFvKeVjgKv8RTwH", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "PR 1 of 3 for letter A, part (ii): the four daily patrols (required-set-patrol, platform-checklist-watchdog, release-coverage-patrol, board-snapshot) are now four jobs of .github/workflows/fleet-patrols.yml; the four files are deleted. Each job carries the retired file's steps, permissions, concurrency group and env unchanged (a yaml-parsed deep comparison against git show d0a7e748:FILE reports every job IDENTICAL), gains one job-level if that keys it to its own cron via github.event.schedule and to a new workflow_dispatch input `patrol` (all | one job id), and keeps its display name so check-run names are unchanged; job ids are the retired file stems. The pull_request trigger is the union of the four retired filters. Gates that read those files by name follow: check-required-contexts PATROL_WORKFLOW = fleet-patrols.yml; the watchdog pin's WORKFLOW_REL and its clause-4 allowed path list, now the frozen six-entry union compared as a set (one self-test case added). The anchor renderer's published preamble, the archiver's adopt list and two docs/qa/platform-checklist lines name the new file. Premise re-checked on origin/main d0a7e748: the four patrol files, the four guard files and lint.yml exist; half-state-patrol.yml and governed-surface-guard.yml untouched; REQUIRED_CONTEXTS untouched. Hypotheses: 1 holds (job-level grants/concurrency/env only, nothing widened to workflow level); 2 holds with a reading — check-expected-skips' roster names no patrol job, so nothing to re-point, and the display names were kept rather than renamed so the Checks tab reads as before; 4 answered in the PR body (GitHub keeps a deleted workflow's runs; Fleet Patrols lists one job per patrol). Head b33a7996. PR stays draft (Tier H); the seat lands it after the approver's word.", "tests": "Transport proof: scratchpad node script (yaml package) deep-compares each merged job with the retired file at git show d0a7e748:FILE — steps, permissions, concurrency, env, name, runs-on, timeout-minutes all equal for all four; pull_request.paths equals the union of the four retired filters; crons 4 of 4; workflow-level permissions absent; verdict TRANSPORT CHECK OK. node scripts/check-platform-checklist-watchdog.mjs --self-test exit 0 (43 assertions across 8 floored batteries); the gate exit 0 (OK .github/workflows/fleet-patrols.yml ...). Reverse verification on the live file after committing: injecting docs/qa/platform-checklist/** into on.pull_request.paths (1 line on disk, parse shows 7 entries) turns the gate to exit 1 (`whose paths: filter also names docs/qa/platform-checklist/**`); restored with git checkout HEAD -- FILE, git hash-object equal, git diff HEAD empty, gate exit 0 again. A first attempt appended the line at end of file, which YAML read as a step rather than a path (gate stayed 0) — discarded as a no-op, stated in the PR body. pnpm check:required-contexts exit 0 (wiring battery reads fleet-patrols.yml). node scripts/render-release-coverage-anchor.mjs --self-test exit 0 (17 assertions); node scripts/pm/board-snapshot.mjs --self-test exit 0 (169 cases, 13 batteries). No package test/typecheck owed (no package source touched); test:repo, pnpm lint and whole-tree scans are CI's. No ablation (no tested behaviour changed).", "gates": "Derived: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack on head b33a7996 (11 paths vs merge base d0a7e748, 2905 changed lines, under 3000) = 62 families. All 62 run in the worktree, exit code captured before any pipe into ran.list; node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --ran ran.list --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack exit 0: `62 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 62 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED`. Notable: pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates exit 0 (fast tier, 1935 cases, 352 s); node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs exit 0 (154 s); pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions first exit 3 (formula/lint not built), re-run exit 0 after `pnpm exec turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint` under scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh slot issue-26071 (VERDICT command-exit 0, held 97 s). actionlint: not wired in the repo. CI on PR #26512: in_progress at report time (the order forbids waiting); the seat reads the check-runs. Full list with exit codes in the PR body's Verification details block.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm", "mcp_calls": "0 — no GitHub MCP tool was called, read or write", "api_writes": "2 — POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches (relay pr_create fw-20261027T060505Z-e76d4f, run 40458996360, read-back 21139 bytes sent = 21139 stored, identical) → PR #26512 draft with assignee os-warren and label skip-changeset; POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26071/comments via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs (this report, run once). git push -u origin claude/project-thread-31axox is not a REST write.", "open_questions": [], "deviations": [ "File surface widened by two lines the order did not name, both declared in the PR body for the seat's claim amendment: scripts/render-release-coverage-anchor.mjs (its published anchor preamble named the retired file; the rename made it false, os-dev's falsified-published-text rule) and scripts/pm/board-snapshot.mjs (the adopt list's workflow entry, which the header forbids shortening from memory).", "Spelling: the PR body opens `Part of #26071` (os-dev.md definition of done and the partof guard's recogniser), not the order's `Part-of #26071`; os-dev.md wins on conflict per the order's own rule.", "PR body line 1 is the platform attribution HTML comment the session context requires, line 2 its Requested-by line, `Part of #26071` on line 3 — the os-dev exception (harness-written attribution reported, not a dev-written comment). The PR template's What changes / Why / Verification headings and the two declaration lines are folded into the os-dev section order; its Human Minimum checklist is not reproduced.", "Commit trailer pair is the model-free pair AGENTS.md spells (Claude-Session URL + Co-authored-by: Claude); the harness reminder's model-named Co-Authored-By form was not used (the pre-push hook refuses a model identifier).", "The session context's MCP assignee/reviewer step was skipped (GitHub MCP banned); the relay set the assignee (read back: os-warren) and requests the Tier H approvers on drafts.", "One addition beyond pure transport: a workflow_dispatch `patrol` choice input (default all) so one patrol can be fired by hand as each retired file allowed; each job's if reads it. A reviewer may strike it; the four jobs' cron gating does not depend on it.", "Hypothesis 2's `name the job after the retired file`: applied to the job ids (retired file stems); the job display names — the check-run names — were kept unchanged so the Checks tab and any reader keyed on them read as before.", "The watchdog job now also runs on pull requests that edit a sibling patrol's script (one pull_request trigger per file; the union); stated in the PR body's Acceptance notes with why it blocks nothing and why a fifth routing job was not added." ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "class: none (stale prose, not a defect) · reach: none · evidence: comment-only mentions of the retired file names remain at .github/workflows/lint.yml:2505 (the checklist NOTE, which also still says the watchdog's filter names the watchdog file ALONE), merged-branch-reaper.yml:238, shard-timings-refresh.yml:217, test-nightly-tiers.yml:44, scripts/check-platform-checklist.mjs:88,488, scripts/check-stall-guard-budget.mjs:457 (a measured job-id-reuse reading that this PR makes stale), scripts/ci/board-snapshot-r2-upload.sh:4, scripts/import-prerequisite.mjs:235, scripts/sync-release-index-currency.mjs:50, scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs:329,1840-1842, scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.self-test.mjs:672,1044; docs/audits/gate-census-2026-09.md left as a dated census · dedupe words: fleet-patrols stale mention retired workflow name · carrier: none — noted in the PR's Acceptance notes, not filed (polish; the lint.yml lines are governed and PR 3's surface is its schedule leg only).", "class: none (pre-existing stale header, fixed in this PR as part of the edited header) · reach: none · evidence: scripts/check-platform-checklist-watchdog.mjs's `Why the workflow itself cannot hold this` section said the watchdog carries no pull_request trigger by clause 3, contradicting clause 4 since the 2026-09-06 ruling; reworded to clause 4's reality · dedupe words: watchdog pin header clause 3 pull_request · carrier: PR #26512." ] }objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Landed · step (ii) of letter A ·
domain:skills#2·session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn· 2026-10-27T06:46Zmerged: trueat 2026-10-27T06:36:20Z, merge commit3fcafcd3,merged_by: os-zhuang; added to the merge queue at 2026-10-27T06:20Z, merged on its first passorigin/maingit log origin/maincarries3fcafcd3(ci: fold the four daily patrols into one fleet-patrols.yml workflow (1 of 3));.github/workflows/fleet-patrols.ymlexists on main with the four jobs, andrequired-set-patrol.yml,platform-checklist-watchdog.yml,release-coverage-patrol.yml,board-snapshot.ymlare gone (seat read after the merge)b33a7996## Contract review(PR comment 6435281545,CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS) and the seat's ACCEPT (PR comment 6435309467); os-zhuang APPROVED (review 5662933749) at 2026-10-27T06:10Z, readied and armed the PR himselfLanding path: Tier H (
.github/workflows/**, governed surface) — the maintainer's hand on a draft the seat never readied, armed or enqueued. This PR carriedPart of #26071, so the card stays open and keepspm:dispatched: letter A has two serial PRs left from the same card thread, (iii) the four PR-body guards → one workflow, then (i) thelint.ymlschedule skip, each on a freshorigin/main; the card closes with the last one. Filed from this review, outside the ruling's scope: #26525 (prose that still names the retired workflow files) and #26526 (no self-test pins each job'sif:cron to itson.scheduletwin).Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 26071, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/project-thread-31axox-2", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26570", "session": "session_01JQwxbW8nFvKeVjgKv8RTwH", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "PR 2 of 3 for letter A, part (iii): the four PR-body guards (closing-target-claim-guard, duplicate-fix-guard, partof-closing-keyword-guard, single-claim-path-guard) are now four gate steps of one job in .github/workflows/pr-body-guards.yml; the four files are deleted. Each gate step is the retired step verbatim except its name (now the retired job's display name, which was its check-run name) and an inserted if; every gate step runs under !cancelled() so one run still shows four verdicts. The duplicate-fix github-script step runs FIRST, before the single checkout + setup-node pair the three script-backed steps share (no checkout for the step that needs none). merge_group is kept and only the closing-target step runs on it; the other three steps are gated to pull_request. Permissions are the union of the four retired grants, all read; one concurrency group per PR; timeout-minutes 10 (the largest retired value). The five gates that read the files by name follow: WIRING_WORKFLOW in check-closing-target-claim, check-partof-closing-keyword and check-single-claim-paths (plus single-claim's sibling read), the keyword-parity PARSERS entry (file + job) and its X2 mutation anchor, and the dispatch-gates self-test's live env-carried specimen. Two step-name pins (closing-target CHECK_CONTEXT_NAME, single-claim's sibling string) now read the comment-stripped file: the new header quotes every step name in prose, and a rename mutation stayed green until they did. Premise re-checked on origin/main 3fcafcd3 and again at ab3c776a: the four guard files exist and are unchanged; REQUIRED_CONTEXTS untouched; no open PR touches the guard files or their pins. Premise holds with one correction: only closing-target-claim-guard.yml carries merge_group today, not three (see deviations). Head 9d3c1566 (rebased onto ab3c776a after main moved; all gates re-run on the rebased head). PR stays draft (Tier H); the seat lands it after the approver's word. Per the maintainer's word this session, PR 3 (the lint.yml schedule skip, i) is NOT started by this thread; it goes back to the seat for a fresh dispatch after this PR merges.", "tests": "Transport proof: scratchpad node script (yaml package) deep-compares pr-body-guards.yml against each retired file at git show 9d3c1566~1 (= ab3c776a; blobs identical to 3fcafcd3): every retired gate step equals its merged step minus if and with its own name restored, in the retired key order; the three retired checkout and setup-node steps each equal the shared pair minus if; pull_request types equal in all four; merge_group carried from closing-target only; no paths filter either side; permissions exactly the union, all read; runs-on equal; timeout covers each retired value; duplicate-fix step precedes checkout; the six if strings as designed — verdict `✓ guards transport: 60 checks pass, 0 fail`. node scripts/check-closing-target-claim.mjs --self-test exit 0 (121 cases); check-partof-closing-keyword --self-test exit 0 (45); check-single-claim-paths --self-test exit 0 (93); check-closing-keyword-parity --self-test exit 0 (40 assertions, 5 mutations to red) and the bare gate exit 0 (3 parsers agree; sweep 6 files over 21437 tracked, all registered; the sweep reads git ls-files, so the new file had to be staged first — untracked it read as 'registered but no longer matches'). Reverse verification on the live file, six sed mutations each restored by git checkout from the index with git hash-object equality: closing-target step renamed → closing-target self-test exit 1; duplicate-fix step renamed → single-claim self-test exit 1; merge_group line deleted → closing-target exit 1; edited dropped from types → partof exit 1; const KEYWORDS narrowed in the github-script step → parity gate exit 1; pull-requests read → none → single-claim exit 1. The two rename mutations first stayed exit 0 (raw-text reads satisfied by the header's prose quotes); both pins were changed to read comment-stripped text and then red. dispatch-gates --commands .github/workflows/pr-body-guards.yml exit 0: the three env-carried scripts are NOT MEASURED on stderr and not offered bare on stdout, their pnpm check: forms listed. The PR body was run through check-closing-keyword-parity --body and the Part-of guard before sending: one sentence quoting the third PR's future closing line in backticks was still bound by two parsers and would have closed the card on merge; reworded, both parsers then OK. No package test/typecheck owed (no package source touched).", "gates": "Derived: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack = 51 families (10 paths, 1082 changed lines, under 3000). Run once on base 3fcafcd3 (51/51 exit 0), then origin/main moved 280 files (lint.yml, package.json, dispatch-gates.data.mjs, one non-overlapping hunk of dispatch-gates.self-test.mjs among them); the commit was rebased onto ab3c776a, re-derived (identical 51 commands) and all 51 re-run on head 9d3c1566 under scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh slot issue-26071 (VERDICT command-exit 0, held 1135 s), exit captured before any pipe into ran.list; dispatch-gates --ran ran.list --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack exit 0: `51 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 51 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED`. Notable: pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates exit 0 (fast tier, 1935 cases, 441 s on the shared box); check-comment-mask-corpus exit 0 (180 s); check-self-test-workflow-commands exit 0 (134 s). actionlint: not wired in the repo. CI on PR #26570: not waited for (the order forbids it); the seat reads the check-runs. Full list with exit codes in the PR body's Verification details block.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm", "mcp_calls": "0 — no GitHub MCP tool was called, read or write", "api_writes": "2 — POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches (relay pr_create fw-20261027T084057Z-3f59ce, run 40475214504, read-back 22482 bytes sent = 22482 stored, identical) → PR #26570 draft with assignee os-warren and label skip-changeset, reviewers hotlong and os-zhuang requested by the relay; POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26071/comments via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs (this report, run once). git push -u origin claude/project-thread-31axox-2 is not a REST write.", "open_questions": [], "deviations": [ "Premise correction: the ruling and the order say the merged workflow keeps the merge_group trigger 'the three guards carry today (closing-target-claim-guard, partof-closing-keyword-guard, single-claim-path-guard)'. On origin/main (d0a7e748, 3fcafcd3 and ab3c776a alike) only closing-target-claim-guard.yml carries merge_group; the partof and single-claim files state in their headers that they take no queue leg because a merge-queue event carries no pull request. The letter is kept: the workflow subscribes merge_group, the closing-target step runs on queue builds, and the three steps whose retired files never ran there are gated to pull_request by if. No guard gains or loses a leg.", "Failure signal: the ruling's 'one job, four steps' collapses four check-run names into one (`PR-body guards (claim · duplicate · Part-of · single-writer path)`); each guard's verdict is its step, named as the retired job was, and every step runs under !cancelled(). None of the four was a required context and check-expected-skips' roster has no guard row (its MEASURED_* arrays are dated fixtures), so nothing re-points.", "Two self-test assertions changed beyond the file-name re-point, both inside the order's surface (gates that read the files by name): closing-target's step-name pin and single-claim's sibling-string pin now read comment-stripped text, because the one-file header quotes every step name in prose and a raw-text read stayed green under a rename mutation (measured). check-closing-target-claim's CHECK_CONTEXT_NAME docblock reworded to say the literal is now the gate STEP's name; the value is unchanged.", "Permissions are the union of the four retired grants (contents, issues, pull-requests — all read), so the partof step's token gains issues: read and pull-requests: read and the single-claim and duplicate-fix steps gain issues: read. No write scope anywhere.", "Commit rebased onto origin/main ab3c776a after the first gate run on 3fcafcd3, since main moved 280 files including lint.yml and dispatch-gates files; every derived gate re-run on the rebased head.", "Spelling: the PR body opens `Part of #26071` (os-dev.md and the partof guard's recogniser), not the order's `Part-of #26071`; os-dev.md wins on conflict.", "PR body line 1 is the platform attribution HTML comment, line 2 its Requested-by line, `Part of #26071` on line 3 — the os-dev exception; the PR template's headings are folded into the os-dev section order.", "Commit trailer pair is the model-free pair AGENTS.md spells (Claude-Session URL + Co-authored-by: Claude); the harness reminder's model-named Co-Authored-By form was not used.", "The session context's MCP assignee/reviewer step was skipped (GitHub MCP banned); the relay set the assignee (read back: os-warren) and requested hotlong and os-zhuang.", "Scope stop by the maintainer's word this morning (relayed by the coordinator): this thread finishes PR 2, waits for its contract review and then stops. PR 3, step (i) the lint.yml schedule skip on branch claude/project-thread-31axox-3, is not started; open PRs #26503 and #26511 edit lint.yml today and must be read before it opens. The card stays Part-of until then." ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "class: none (stale prose, not a defect) · reach: none · evidence: comment-only mentions of the retired guard file names remain at .github/workflows/pr-automation.yml:18-19, cross-repo-issue-closer.yml:216,227, .github/actions/setup-workspace/action.yml:85, scripts/check-changeset-no-major.mjs:1047, scripts/check-cross-repo-closer-outcome.mjs:1105, scripts/check-pnpm-acquisition.mjs:65, scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs:6272, scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs:935,4379; lint.yml:1076,1082 are step ids, not file names; scripts/check-empty-changeset.mjs:42 names a changeset · dedupe words: fleet-patrols stale mention retired workflow name · carrier: the seat's stale-name sweep card from #26512 (same class) — noted in the PR's Acceptance notes, not filed.", "class: process (claim wording) · reach: PR 3 · evidence: the seat's claim 6434226733 names the third branch only by its `-3` suffix; the closing-target claim guard, which PR 3 (the PR carrying the card's closing keyword) will face, reads the newest Claim: for the full head branch name · dedupe words: claim branch suffix -3 closing-target · carrier: hand-back to the seat (a claim line naming claude/project-thread-31axox-3 in full before PR 3 opens)." ] }objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Landed · step (iii) of letter A ·
domain:skills#2·session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn· 2026-10-27T10:09Zmerged: trueat 2026-10-27T10:05:40Z, merge commit9bfd6a62,merged_by: os-zhuang; added to the merge queue at 2026-10-27T09:50Zorigin/maingit log origin/maincarries9bfd6a62(ci: fold the four PR-body guards into one pr-body-guards.yml job (2 of 3));.github/workflows/pr-body-guards.ymlis on main andclosing-target-claim-guard.yml,duplicate-fix-guard.yml,partof-closing-keyword-guard.yml,single-claim-path-guard.ymlare gone; the five gates that read them by name follow (seat read after the merge)9d3c1566## Contract reviewand no seat## 席位核对were posted before the mergeLanding path: Tier H (
.github/workflows/**, governed surface) — the maintainer's hand on his own APPROVED review; the seat readied, armed and enqueued nothing. The contract review was owed by the director seat under the maintainer's word of 2026-10-27T07:14Z and did not land before the merge. Premise correction from the dev's report, recorded here: on main onlyclosing-target-claim-guard.ymlcarriedmerge_group, not three; the merged workflow keeps that one leg and gates the other three steps topull_request, so no guard gained or lost a leg.State: this PR carried
Part of #26071; the card stays open and keepspm:dispatched. Step (i), thelint.ymlschedule skip, is NOT started: it waits for a fresh dispatch on a later shift, with a claim naming its full head branch (the closing-target guard reads it). Open PRs that editlint.ymlat this reading: #26503, #26511.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Post-merge contract review ·
domain:skills#2·session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn· 2026-10-27T10:42Z — the director seat's## Contract reviewon PR #26570 (comment 6439741369,CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, head9d3c1566, the merged head) reads PASS, no must-fix; it names the one exposure (the new file'smerge_groupleg first runs on a queue build after landing; the script body on that path is byte-identical to the retired one). The step (iii) landing record (6439087515) stands with this record added. Step (i) remains undispatched.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
Release: cross-account takeover of claim 6434226733 (
session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn,os-warren, seatdomain:skills#2) · 2026-10-28T03:46ZProvenance (three parts): who — the maintainer; verbatim —
/pm-dispatch skills seat 2, then, to the seat's confirmation question on taking over seat 2 including its in-flight cards, 「强制接管席位 2,含在飞卡(推荐)」; where — the maintainer's direct cloud sessionsession_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg(2026-10-28), recorded on seat post #19287 (body r68 and its takeover marker).Handover record: steps (ii) and (iii) of letter A are landed (PR #26512 merge
3fcafcd3; PR #26570 merge9bfd6a62; records 6435627446, 6439087515, 6439889626). Step (i), thelint.ymlschedule skip, was never started — no branch, no PR, nothing to resume (the previous thread's branchesclaude/project-thread-31axoxand-2carried (ii) and (iii) only). The assignee movesos-warren→os-justinin the same act;pm:dispatchedstays — the card remains in flight under the new seat session, whoseClaim:follows this comment. This is a takeover under execution-duties 〈认领〉 ①–④, ⛔ not a reclaim for silence.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 1 (takeover shift) · step (i) of letter A · 2026-10-28T03:54Z
Session:
session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg(seat; implementation by anos-devsubagent of this session,mode:subagent— same session ID, identity by branch)Account:
os-justin(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; the card's assignee since the takeover stroke, relay run 40628657191)Branch:
claude/issue-26071-lint-schedule-skipWorktree:
objectstack-issue-26071Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#2(seat post #19287)File surface:
.github/workflows/lint.yml— theon.scheduleleg and the skip step/condition it needs, nothing else in the file; plus ONLY a gate underscripts/**that reads that leg by name, if one exists (the dev measures withgit grep); ⛔ci.yml's schedule untouched; ⛔REQUIRED_CONTEXTSuntouched; ⛔ no edit to the typecheck job region (#27067's hunks). Tier H, one draft PR,Fixes #26071. (stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
M,mode:subagent,model: TIER_DEFAULT(reason:dispatch-gates --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .github/workflows/lint.ymlat3230bdbfprints "no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 4 declared glob(s) … floor sonnet · default opus · ceiling fable"; a ruled implementation with design judgement in a workflow condition ⇒ the default judgement tier; no standing ceiling order applies to this direct session),effort: highClause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — a ruled decision card (director ruling 6416984681, letter A, the maintainer's 「同意」; lane settled
domain:skillsby triage 6427097711)Thread-read: 6460147581
Premise: holds — read-only check on
origin/main3230bdbf(2026-10-28T03:35Z):lint.ymlstill carriesschedule: - cron: '0 */4 * * *'andworkflow_dispatch:in itson:block;fleet-patrols.ymlandpr-body-guards.ymlare on main (steps (ii) and (iii) landed); P1 re-checked (2026-10-28T03:49Z): every one of the 12 newestscheduleruns oflint.yml(2026-10-26T06:25Z → 2026-10-28T00:33Z) has apushrun on the samehead_shawithconclusion: successthat completed before it — 12 of 12 duplicated a green push run; the card's gate PR #26236 is closed; #26503 and #26511 (the openlint.ymlPRs at the previous reading) merged 2026-10-27.Serial constraints cleared: one open PR touches
lint.yml— #27067 (draft, Tier H,claude/issue-26957-prune-turbo-seeds, headb782ee2d5), whose twolint.ymlhunks sit in the typecheck job (the twoturbo run typecheck … --summarizelines and the prune/save cache steps, file lines ~5584–5640), a region this card does not touch (on:block, lines 1–56, plus a new step/condition); region-disjoint ⇒ parallel authoring, the merge queue arbitrates; the dev mergesorigin/mainbefore opening the PR. Scan: 44 open PRs' file lists at 2026-10-28T03:49Z, control #26570's 10 files. No sibling card pins the schedule leg's behaviour. #26525 (prose naming retired workflow files, p3) queues behind this PR, as seat 1 and seat 2 agreed on #7623.Resume-from: none (step (i) was never started; no branch, no PR)
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 26071, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-26071-lint-schedule-skip", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/27085", "head": "8fd56eab", "session": "session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Step (i) of ruling 6416984681 letter A, the last of the card's three serial PRs (PR says Fixes #26071). lint.yml gains a first job schedule-gate (if: github.event_name == 'schedule', permissions actions: read, no checkout, timeout 10). It reads GET repos/REPO/actions/workflows/lint.yml/runs?event=push&branch=main&head_sha=SHA&status=completed and outputs skip=true only for a completed push run on github.sha that concluded success; any read failure, 403, unparseable body, red, absent or still-running push run leaves skip=false. The step has no set -e, and a crash leaves the output empty, which also runs the lanes. All 12 lanes gain the identical pair needs: [schedule-gate] + if: ${{ !cancelled() && needs.schedule-gate.outputs.skip != 'true' }} (ci.yml's filter idiom), so on push/pull_request/merge_group/workflow_dispatch the skipped gate's empty output runs every lane as before. Both required aggregates keep always() plus one schedule-only conjunct, !(github.event_name == 'schedule' && contains(needs.*.result, 'skipped')); their needs and rosters are unchanged. A yaml-parsed comparison against HEAD shows no job body changed apart from needs/if, and on, on.schedule and concurrency are byte-identical. The on: comment block now describes the skip. Hypothesis 2 measured: every lane needs an if:, and all 12 are identical. One gate followed: check:required-contexts reds any job-level if: on the lane hosting its pin (lint-ci-engine), so its wiring predicate (pinLanesCarryNoArrangeableIf) now admits exactly the whole skip shape (byte-exact lane if, needs on schedule-gate, a gate job whose if is byte-exactly schedule-only) and still refuses everything else. It has 6 new self-test cases, the battery floor goes 13 to 23 (measured count), and REQUIRED_CONTEXTS is untouched. P1 correction, measured on the 13 newest scheduled runs (run 40279715127 through run 40631190515): all 13 shas did get a green push run, but only 4 of 13 (f708cf22, 6390fe52, f143cd88, 05f7758f) had it COMPLETED when the scheduled run started. In the other 9 the push run finished 8 to 18 minutes later. So the ruled mechanism skips about 4 in 13 and the rest run the battery as today (see open_questions). Hypothesis 5: check-expected-skips derives the new job as an expected skip ('non-pr-event schedule; derived') with no edit; no other gate asserts on the changed shape (61-family union green). PR #27085 is draft, label skip-changeset, assignee os-justin, governed reviewers hotlong and os-zhuang requested by the relay.", "tests": "Head 8fd56eab. Reverse verification on the live files after committing, via node scripts/ablation-replace.mjs (anchor 1 to 0, blob changed) under an EXIT INT TERM trap restoring with git checkout HEAD -- ABSPATH. Leg A: schedule-gate if widened to github.event_name != 'merge_group' gave check-required-contexts --self-test exit 1 ('wiring: the lane hosting the required-context pin must carry NO job-level if: other than the scheduled-run skip'). Leg B: pin-lane if respelled skip == 'false' gave exit 1, same finding. Leg C: battery floor 999 gave 'registered 23 case(s), below its pinned floor of 999', so the 6 new cases register. Restore: git hash-object of both files equals the HEAD blob, git diff HEAD and git status empty, self-test exit 0. The gate step's run: body was extracted from the parsed YAML and driven with a fake gh applying the real --jq via jq: green on the sha gives skip=true (picked past a cancelled run on the same sha); red, other sha, empty, HTTP 403 and non-JSON all give skip=false; exit 0 in all 6. Live: the exact query on the 3 newest scheduled shas gives total_count=1 with one green push run each; an all-zero sha gives total_count 0. YAML parses with no errors. actionlint NOT MEASURED, reason: not on PATH. ui/scripts/__tests__/merge-queue-reporting.test.ts (the only test file naming the edited script, in prose) under the verify lock: Test Files 1 passed (1), Tests 4 passed (4), VERDICT command-exit 0. git merge-tree --write-tree with #27067's head b782ee2d gave exit 0 with a tree id (region-disjoint; lint.yml not driver-routed). No package touched: no closure build, no package test/typecheck owed; test:repo, pnpm lint and whole-tree scans are CI's. No ablation of package behaviour (workflow/script config only).", "gates": "Local union on final head 8fd56eab (after git merge origin/main 5cba8fc2): node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (no paths; 2 paths vs merge base 5cba8fc2f, 186 changed lines) derived 61 commands. All 61 ran, exit captured before any pipe, all exit 0, among them check:required-contexts, check:workflow-status-functions (58 job-level if:, 29 reading needs outputs, all with a status function), check:pm-expected-skips (206 cases), check:aggregator-roster, check:ci-filter-parity, check:shard-attestation, check:select-gate-families, scheduled-full-run.mjs --self-test, check:nul-bytes and check:pm-dispatch-gates (fast tier, 1935 cases, 365.5s). Reconciliation: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --ran FILE --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack exit 0, '61 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 61 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 61 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3)'. The first derivation on the lint.yml-only commit 16387995 (42 families) had 41 at exit 0 and check:required-contexts at exit 1, which led to the gate change. PR check-runs: in_progress at report time (not waited on, per contract).", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm", "files_changed": [".github/workflows/lint.yml", "scripts/check-required-contexts.mjs"], "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool used, read or write", "api_writes": "2 — (1) fleet-write relay pr_create, request fw-20261028T044412Z-acc79b, relay run 40633986423 success (the relay's POST to the workflow dispatches endpoint; inside its run POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls plus assignee and label writes on #27085; read-back identical 12318 bytes, assignees os-justin; label skip-changeset confirmed by REST GET /pulls/27085); (2) post-stamped POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26071/comments (this report). git push is not a REST write (5 pushes of the branch, none forced).", "deviations": [ "scripts/check-required-contexts.mjs is edited outside the claim's literal file surface ('a gate under scripts/** that reads that leg by name'): its wiring assertion reads the pin lane's job-level if:, not the schedule leg. The edit follows the dispatch's hypothesis 5 ('re-point only what asserts on the shape you change, with its self-test proving the read'). Only the wiring predicate and its self-test changed; REQUIRED_CONTEXTS is untouched. Named here instead of stopping, because the claim's own 'skip the battery' cannot be met with the pin lane exempt.", "Commit trailers use AGENTS.md's model-free pair (Claude-Session + Co-authored-by: Claude), not the harness reminder's model-named Co-Authored-By; the PR body ends with AGENTS.md's session-URL footer, not the harness's emoji line (os-dev.md: harness attribution yields).", "The WHERE A GATE LIVES comment block in lint.yml ('every job runs on every PR, queue build and main run') was left unedited per the scope fence; the schedule-gate header states the exception." ], "open_questions": [ { "question": "The ruled mechanism (skip on a COMPLETED green push run, checked at scheduled-run start) would have skipped 4 of the 13 newest scheduled runs. In the other 9 the same-sha push run was still in flight and went green 8 to 18 minutes later. Should the gate wait for an in-flight push run on the sha?", "options": [ "A — keep as ruled and landed here: zero added runner time, about 4 of 13 scheduled runs skipped, the rest run the full battery exactly as today", "B — a follow-up PR: when a push run on github.sha is in progress, the gate polls it (bounded, e.g. 25 minutes, under the job wall) and skips only if it completes success; it fails closed to running on timeout, red or cancel. That would have skipped 13 of 13, at the cost of one small runner held up to about 20 minutes per scheduled run and a later battery start on the 9; it is a runner-spend shape the ruling did not name" ], "recommendation": "A now, B only on the maintainer's word: the card is a 花费/舰队形态 human-floor decision, and B changes the spend profile the ruling recorded, so it is a new decision rather than a mechanism detail" } ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "none filed. Observation only (Acceptance notes): a skipped scheduled run is expected to conclude success; the first post-merge scheduled run is that measurement · carrier: none" ] }Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
ACCEPT → PR #27085 comment 6461052607 ·
domain:skills#2· 2026-10-28T04:58Z — step (i) of letter A, the card's last PR (Fixes #26071). ⛔ Not a claim. Tier H: the PR stays draft until aGOVERNED_APPROVERSapproval (hotlong, os-zhuang requested by the relay); the seat lands it on that record. Premise P1 corrected on the record: the seat's claim 6460249301 read 「12 of 12 duplicated a green push run that completed before it」; measured by the dev on the 13 newest scheduled runs, every sha's push run ended green but only 4 of 13 had COMPLETED when the scheduled run started — the seat compared conclusions, not completion times. The ruled mechanism therefore skips about 4 in 13 today; whether the gate should WAIT for an in-flight push run is a new spend-shape question put to the maintainer in the seat's session, ⛔ not decided here.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 28, 2026
Landed · step (i) of letter A — the card's last PR ·
domain:skills#2·session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg· 2026-10-28T05:45Zmerged: true, merge commita26776da2(added to the merge queue byos-zhuangat 2026-10-28T04:59Z on his own APPROVED review 5677977857, readied by his hand; the seat readied, armed and enqueued nothing)origin/maina26776da2(git merge-base --is-ancestorexit 0);.github/workflows/lint.ymlon main namesschedule-gate;scripts/check-required-contexts.mjscarries the wiring predicate for the skip shape8fd56eabLanding path: Tier H (
.github/workflows/**) — the maintainer's hand on an authorized approval. Letter A is complete: (ii) PR #265123fcafcd3, (iii) PR #265709bfd6a62, (i) PR #27085a26776da2.Fixes #26071closed the card;pm:dispatchedstripped in this act. Open follow-up left with the maintainer (not a card until the word): whether the gate should wait for an in-flight push run on the sha (today it skips only on a COMPLETED green run, about 4 in 13). The first post-merge scheduled run oflint.ymlis the measurement of the skip itself. Queued behind this PR: #26525 (prose naming the retired workflow files) is now unblocked.