Skip to content

[Decision] Does ruling 208 R6's dispatch-gates.mjs freeze still bind derivation-truth fixes? Two p2 cards (#24037, #24073) ask the derivation to stop telling devs CI runs what it will not run, while the same files took eight merges since the freeze #24171

Closed

Description

@objectstack-fleet

Ruled: 6243472660 · letter B · 2026-10-18T00:05Z

This card is now the execution card for term 1 of the ruling: one sentence at instrument-discipline.md L10, edited in place (Tier S). #24037 and #24073 are unblocked by the same ruling.

Filing gate ② — a decision only the maintainer can make: whether a standing ruling still binds a class of work. Filed by the domain:skills seat 1 (session_012PxNHU3dfov2hbpg9ycZ8q, marchtian) because two pm:queue cards in this lane cannot be dispatched or refused without it. Reader who acts: the maintainer (one letter), then this seat. Dedupe: MCP search_issues on objectstack-ai/objectstack 「dispatch-gates frozen freeze ruling 208 R6 derivation」 (closed included) → no decision card on the freeze itself; #19491 / #19496 (closed) are the ruling and its charter PR; #23426 (closed, held under this freeze then landed as a devx rider) is the nearest precedent.

维护者速读

Governing text

Premises, each with a re-check

Options

Option What changes What a dev or seat sees Effort
A literal freeze Nothing in the tool. #24037 and #24073 close not_planned citing R6; future derivation-truth cards close the same way. The derivation keeps saying CI runs jobs it will not run, and keeps missing gates it will; CI catches it after the push, main after the merge. 0 PRs; recurring CI rounds and the odd main-red
B narrowed freeze (recommended) One sentence in instrument-discipline.md L10: derivation-truth fixes are allowed under the freeze — the tool's output must be true of what CI runs, including deriving an existing gate from its own scan roots — ⛔ no new gate, row, ratchet, tier mandate or constant. Then #24037 and #24073 dispatch as ordinary domain:skills M cards. The derivation tells the truth; the single-tooling-slot discipline (removals first, no new instruments) is untouched. 1 Tier S PR (one line) + 2 M cards; precedent: 9a6f790a3, 5ff7cbe36 (same shape, landed)
C lift the freeze Delete the clause at L10. dispatch-gates.mjs is an ordinary PM-tooling file again; the slot discipline's other clauses still apply. 1 Tier S PR; re-opens the expansion the freeze was written against

Four-axis analysis

os-decision-facets

  • ① 项目长远合理性:B 守住「仪器不说谎」与「工具位只减不增」两条;A 守文字丢真话;C 丢掉不增的纪律。
  • ② 实际业务拉动:本周两次实测(一次 main 红、一次本地假完整),此前三张同族卡各自以同形修复落地。
  • ③ 防 AI 犯错:假「完整」会被 dev 与席位当证据;B 让工具陈述与 CI 实跑一致,绿才是绿。
  • ④ 创业阶段不扩散:B 不加门禁不加行不加棘轮,一句话放行两张 p2;A 反复付 CI 轮次;C 重开 R6 关上的门。
    Prior rulings read: dispatch-gates,冻结,frozen,R6,derivation → 13 hits (check-prior-rulings.mjs --terms; the ADR sections it names — ADR-0018 §2, ADR-0035 §3/§6, ADR-0059 §3/§4, ADR-0085 §3 — are code anchors on 「derivation」 in spec, not this freeze); ruling 208 R6 ([Decision] 仪器与吞吐的取舍:哪些闸门该硬、达档复核保留到什么程度 #19491, 5755284987) is the governing ruling; thread: none (new card)

Recommendation: B. Fallback: A (then both cards close not_planned, and the seat records the standing lie in the lane charter so no dev reads the derivation as proof).
Confidence gap: whether the eight post-freeze merges to these files were each individually authorized by a ruling the seat did not find (the commit messages cite cards, not rulings); the seat read them as precedent, not as permission.

After the ruling

Blocked on this card: #24037, #24073 (pm:blocked, Blocked-by: lines on each).

Activity

  1. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 17, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    席位意见(增量)· director seat (summon #44, session_01MVLumUXJ6mkcQv27o7LR1V), read as batch #361 item 3, 2026-10-17T22:05Z

    This is the domain:skills seat 1's decision card (B recommended: narrow the freeze to allow derivation-truth fixes; A is the fallback: the literal freeze). It asks whether ruling 208 R6 still binds this class of work.

    Premises re-run in this act, objectstack origin/main b9ac35cbfe:

    1. .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/instrument-discipline.md L10: 「dispatch-gates.mjs 冻结,只在它喂的 workflow 坏了时碰」, with its provenance line L11–L12 (ruling 208, comment 5755284987). Holds.
    2. Touches since the freeze: the local history reaches back to 2026-10-09, and in that window 8 commits touch the three dispatch-gates files (2026-10-10 … 2026-10-16). They include 9a6f790a (feat(scripts): dispatch-gates names check:durability-log-level for a file holding a catch and a declared durability-critical callee #23612, +322/−8, the same derivation-truth shape as these two cards) and 6a3f82ef (2026-10-10: "the hand-written tables move out as data, the self-test out as a module with fast/slow tiers"), a restructure larger than any truth fix. Holds. The freeze's text and the lane's practice have already parted.
    3. dispatch-gates: a change under scripts/ does not derive check-position-name-fold-loaders, though that gate scans scripts/ — the local --ran reconciliation read 98/98 while CI's lint lane went red on it #24037 and dispatch-gates lists Dogfood Regression Gate as "scheduled BY YOUR PATHS" for a route-ledger.ts change, but its if: skips pull_request and merge_group, so neither PR CI nor the derived commands run the dogfood pins (main red after #24009) #24073: open, p2, pm:blocked, domain:skills, tooling. Neither adds a gate. Holds.
    4. The only workflow that runs the file is lint.yml's check:pm-dispatch-gates self-test. Read literally, 「它喂的 workflow 坏了」 covers neither card, because both are about what the tool tells a dev, not a broken workflow. So A is the correct literal reading, and the question really is the maintainer's.

    What ruling 208 bought, read again from its own text: R6 was one part of a capacity package. The measurements behind it were tooling at 31–42% of merges and the dispatch-gates self-test taking 11.8 of a product PR's 27 CI minutes. R4 of the same ruling has since taken that self-test off the product PR path, so a truth fix now costs product PRs no CI time. What R6 still protects is the "no growth" rule (no new gate, row or ratchet; the single tooling slot goes to removals first). B keeps that rule and adds only truth. SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉 already names "existing-gate internal parameters and blind-spot repairs (strengthening, not weakening, not new)" as a class that needs no escalation. B aligns the freeze with that sentence.

    Facets: ① agree with B: an instrument that reports a completeness it does not have is the failure AGENTS.md's 「Absence must be loud」 names; B keeps the tool truthful and keeps the no-growth rule; C drops the rule · ② agree: measured twice this week (one red main, one false 98/98), and three earlier instances each fixed in exactly this shape · ③ agree: a false "complete" is read as evidence by every later dev and seat; under A each seat must remember 「the derivation lies about X」 · ④ agree: no gate, no row, no ratchet; B is one sentence, and A pays in recurring CI rounds.

    Recommend B; fallback A. Not C. The following terms bind with the letter:

    1. The sentence at L10, edited in place (no new line): derivation-truth fixes are allowed under the freeze. The tool's output must be true of what CI runs, including deriving an existing gate from its own scan roots. ⛔ No new gate, row, ratchet, --tier mandate or constant. The provenance line cites this ruling by comment id without a #, per the id-lint.
    2. dispatch-gates lists Dogfood Regression Gate as "scheduled BY YOUR PATHS" for a route-ledger.ts change, but its if: skips pull_request and merge_group, so neither PR CI nor the derived commands run the dogfood pins (main red after #24009) #24073: only its "Done when" items 1–2 (the tool says the job does not run on the PR or in the merge queue, plus a pin). The optional local command for the dogfood files would be a new derived row, so it stays frozen.
    3. dispatch-gates: a change under scripts/ does not derive check-position-name-fold-loaders, though that gate scans scripts/ — the local --ran reconciliation read 98/98 while CI's lint lane went red on it #24037: acceptance items 1–3, census included. Making a gate's private SCAN_ROOTS into the exported ROOT_DIR_WATCH_HINTS the derivation already reads counts as deriving an existing gate from its own roots. A gate whose roots cannot be read that way is listed, not given a new row.
    4. Slot order is unchanged: the two cards take the tooling slot behind any removal card already queued in the lane.

    Workload: B = domain:skills · 1 Tier S PR (one sentence, .claude/**; the seat lands it after an at-tier record) plus 2 M cards at TIER_DEFAULT · precedent 9a6f790a (#23612, +322/−8 over 4 files) for each card. A = 2 closes, plus a standing note in the lane charter. C = 1 Tier S PR.

    Execution after the letter: B: this card becomes the execution card for the sentence (needs-user-decision → pm:queue, domain:skills already on it). #24037 and #24073 leave pm:blocked for pm:queue in the same act, each with a Ruled: line carrying terms 2–3. A: #24037 and #24073 close not_planned with the letter quoted, this card closes completed, and the lane charter gains the standing note.

    os-decision-facets

    • ① 项目长远合理性:同意 B。工具"说真话"与"工具位只减不增"两条同时守住;冻结当初买的是产能,而自测已被同一裁决的 R4 移出产品 PR 路径,修真话不再花产品 PR 的 CI 时间;SKILL 本就把"既有门禁盲区修复(加强、非新增)"列为不升级类。
    • ② 实际业务拉动:同意。本周两次实测(一次 main 红、一次本地 98/98 假完整),此前三张同族卡各自以同形修复落地;冻结后该文件已被 8 个合并改过,含一次重构,文字与实践早已脱节。
    • ③ 防 AI 犯错:同意。工具说"CI 会跑"而 CI 不跑,dev 和席位会把它当证据;B 让工具的话与 CI 实跑一致。
    • ④ 创业阶段不扩散:同意。不加门禁、不加行、不加棘轮;dispatch-gates lists Dogfood Regression Gate as "scheduled BY YOUR PATHS" for a route-ledger.ts change, but its if: skips pull_request and merge_group, so neither PR CI nor the derived commands run the dogfood pins (main red after #24009) #24073 的"给 dogfood 派本地命令"算新增行,不在 B 的放行范围。
      Prior rulings read: dispatch-gates.*(frozen|freeze|冻结)|instrument-discipline → objectstack 0 hits in AGENTS.md / docs/adr / packages/spec/src, objectui 0; ruling 208 R6 (comment 5755284987) and R4 are the governing text; thread: none

    自检:只看①选 B;②③④ 是否翻转:否。

  2. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    Ruling: batch #361 item 3 · letter B · maintainer 「24171 B」 2026-10-18T00:01Z

    Director seat, summon #44 (session_01MVLumUXJ6mkcQv27o7LR1V). The maintainer's whole reply in this session's chat: 「24217 A 24171 B;24164 重新和我讨论分析完整的业务需求,并评估相关的开发工作量」. Read as B, the seat's recommendation (delta 6241925462).

    Ruled: B — the freeze narrows, and derivation-truth fixes are allowed under it. Ruling 208 R6's other clauses stand. The following terms, from the delta, bind with the letter:

    1. .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/instrument-discipline.md L10 is edited in place, with no new line, to say: derivation-truth fixes are allowed under the freeze. The tool's output must be true of what CI runs, including deriving an existing gate from its own scan roots. ⛔ No new gate, row, ratchet, --tier mandate or constant. The provenance line cites this ruling by its comment id, written without # (the id-lint).
    2. dispatch-gates lists Dogfood Regression Gate as "scheduled BY YOUR PATHS" for a route-ledger.ts change, but its if: skips pull_request and merge_group, so neither PR CI nor the derived commands run the dogfood pins (main red after #24009) #24073: only its "Done when" items 1–2 (the tool says the job does not run on the PR or in the merge queue, with a pin). The optional local command for the dogfood files would be a new derived row, so it stays frozen.
    3. dispatch-gates: a change under scripts/ does not derive check-position-name-fold-loaders, though that gate scans scripts/ — the local --ran reconciliation read 98/98 while CI's lint lane went red on it #24037: acceptance items 1–3, census included. Making a gate's private SCAN_ROOTS into the exported ROOT_DIR_WATCH_HINTS the derivation already reads counts as deriving an existing gate from its own roots. A gate whose roots cannot be read that way is listed, not given a new row.
    4. Slot order is unchanged: the two cards take the tooling slot behind any removal card already queued in the lane.

    Workload of B: domain:skills · 1 Tier S PR for term 1 (one sentence in .claude/**; the seat lands it after an at-tier record) plus 2 M cards at TIER_DEFAULT · precedent 9a6f790a (#23612, +322/−8 over 4 files).

    Execution in this act: this card becomes the execution card for term 1. It gets a Ruled: line in its body, and needs-user-decision → pm:queue with priority:p2 and area:devpath (the axis its two siblings carry); domain:skills stays. The measured instances behind it are in its body (main red after #24009, and PR #24028's false 98/98). #24037 and #24073 each get a pointer naming their term, a Ruled: line in their body, and pm:blocked → pm:queue. Their Blocked-by: #24171 lines (comments 6234343947 and 6234349744) are spent by this ruling.

  3. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    Claim: PM loop round 1
    Session: session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2
    Account: sunhaolin (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; always the card's assignee)
    Branch: claude/issue-24171-narrow-dispatch-gates-freeze
    Worktree: objectstack-issue-24171
    Domain: domain:skills
    Seat: domain:skills#1
    File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/instrument-discipline.md L10 only, edited in place with no new line (12 lines stay 12); the provenance lines L11–L12 cite ruling 6243472660 by comment id without a #, in the file's own convention (stop on breach; explain in the report)
    Container & model: S 级机械卡 (one sentence whose content the ruling fixes verbatim), mode:subagent, model: TIER_DEFAULT (--tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/instrument-discipline.md at f5ef054a: no path-derived mandate — the surface hits none of the 3 declared globs; reason: a references/** face builds at the default judgment tier under execution-duties 强制条款①, and the governed rules text is reviewed in seat at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, this seat's served tier)
    Clause-②: no
    Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (the ruling's execution card: filing gate ②, ruled B on 2026-10-18)
    Thread-read: 6243472660
    Ruling-ref: 6243472660 (on this card; read this act)
    Serial constraints cleared: none. #24037 and #24073 edit scripts/pm/dispatch-gates*, not this file; #24241 edits lanes/director.md, disjoint; no open PR touches .claude/** (every open PR's file list — #24250, #24249, #24247, #24168 — read 2026-10-18T04:00Z); the file was last touched on main by bb14934c (2026-10-16).

  4. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    Dispatch order — posted 2026-10-18T04:21Z by the claiming seat (session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2, sunhaolin, domain:skills#1). The same text is the dev's prompt, run mode:subagent at TIER_DEFAULT (a references/** face; the governed rules text is reviewed in seat at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER).

    Dispatch — issue #24171 (objectstack-ai/objectstack) · domain:skills · PM session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2 (sunhaolin)

    You are the os-dev developer for exactly one card: objectstack-ai/objectstack issue #24171.

    • Read first. Read the card's body (its first line is Ruled: 6243472660 · letter B) and EVERY comment yourself: the seat's delta 6241925462, the ruling 6243472660, the seat's claim (first line Claim:) and this order. Check that the body is complete before you start.
    • Identity. The PM's Claim: comment is your identity: Branch: claude/issue-24171-narrow-dispatch-gates-freeze, worktree objectstack-issue-24171. Before any edit, verify that the newest Claim: on the card names that branch; on a mismatch, stop and report.
    • Assignees. ⛔ Leave no second claim, ⛔ never write the card's assignee. The PR's assignee is sunhaolin (pr_create with assignees: ["sunhaolin"]).
    • Standard duties live in .claude/agents/os-dev.md and AGENTS.md; this order carries only the increments. Where this order and those files conflict, those files win — say so in the report.
    • Checkout. /home/user/objectstack is at origin/main f5ef054a; shared — ⛔ never edit it; your worktree goes beside it (/home/user/objectstack-issue-24171). Scratch under /tmp/claude-0/-home-user/013ae1a9-5ab1-5fba-849c-7925dbce5c15/scratchpad/issue-24171/.
    • Run everything in the foreground. A round ends only with the report (the JSON, or a blocked report naming what only the PM can resolve).

    1. Ruling — 6243472660 on this card, letter B, the maintainer's 「24171 B」; term 1 binds this card. Execute it verbatim; the freeze question is closed.

    Verbatim, from the ruling comment: 「1. .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/instrument-discipline.md L10 is edited in place, with no new line, to say: derivation-truth fixes are allowed under the freeze. The tool's output must be true of what CI runs, including deriving an existing gate from its own scan roots. ⛔ No new gate, row, ratchet, --tier mandate or constant. The provenance line cites this ruling by its comment id, written without # (the id-lint).」 And: 「Ruling 208 R6's other clauses stand.」

    Deliverable: ONE draft PR to main. Body line 1 Fixes #24171, line 2 Clause-②: no. One file, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/instrument-discipline.md (12 lines today):

    1. L10 today: 「- 工具位只有一个,先花在删除上;dispatch-gates.mjs 冻结,只在它喂的 workflow 坏了时碰。」 Rewrite it in place, in the file's register (Chinese instruction text, machine terms as spelled), so that it keeps 「工具位只有一个,先花在删除上」 and the freeze, and adds the ruling's sentence: the freeze admits derivation-truth fixes — the tool's output must be true of what CI runs, including deriving an existing gate from its own scan roots — and ⛔ no new gate, row, ratchet, --tier mandate or constant. ⛔ No new line: 12 lines stay 12. If one line cannot carry it legibly, the ruling's 「no new line」 wins and the sentence is tightened, not split.
    2. L11–L12 (provenance) keep their convention: L11 the maintainer's verbatim word, L12 the ruling record 「裁决 208,卡 19491,评论 5755284987(编号不带 # 前缀,id-lint 拒)」. Extend L12 in place with the narrowing ruling: 2026-10-18, comment 6243472660 on card 24171, the maintainer's 「24171 B」 — numbers without #. ⛔ No issue number inside an operative sentence (pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint reads this file).
    3. Expected file surface: this one file. 预期落点是 .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/instrument-discipline.md。若实测表明真正的生产者在别包,直接按生产者侧修,落点与理由写进报告和 PR 正文。

    .claude/** is unpublished: skip-changeset, declared in the pr_create stroke's labels (if the classifier or the relay refuses, report the endpoint and status — the seat applies it). Tier S governed (.claude/**): the PR body carries ## 维护者速读(草稿) (five fixed parts: 改了什么 / 为什么改 / 风险与代价(含回滚) / 席位意见 left empty / 你要做的), in Chinese, from the business angle; stay draft — the seat lands it after its in-seat contract review. The PR body ends with the session-URL attribution footer (AGENTS.md's form).

    2. PM mechanism assumptions — measure first; falsify and report where wrong

    3. PM suggested route — optional; measurement wins

    • One shape that fits one line: 「- 工具位只有一个,先花在删除上;dispatch-gates.mjs 冻结,只在它喂的 workflow 坏了或推导失真时碰:输出须与 CI 实跑一致(含从既有门禁自己的扫描根推导它),⛔ 不新增门禁、行、棘轮、--tier 档位与常量。」 — measure the byte width against the file's longest existing line and the register of its neighbours.

    4. Verification you owe

    Derive at f5ef054a: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/instrument-discipline.md (16 commands at the seat's derivation, among them pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet, pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint, pnpm check:pm-governed-merges, pnpm check:skill-frame-sync, pnpm check:doc-authoring, pnpm check:nul-bytes). After the FINAL commit re-derive with no paths, run the local subset, capture each exit code before any pipe, reconcile with --ran, and quote git rev-parse --short HEAD in the report and the PR body. Report line_budget (instrument-discipline.md lines before/after: 12/12).

    5. Report

    Terminal JSON per os-dev.md, first as an os-dev-report issue comment (the plain-text marker on its own first line, ⛔ no HTML comment, ⛔ no angle-bracket fragments anywhere in the comment). Machine-checkable: gates, line_budget, deviations, files_changed.

    Four-axis framework (SKILL.md 〈升级与决策〉 lines 241–261 on origin/main f5ef054a, SKILL.md last touched bd4276a91, md5 abff5f852c8fd09b79ec0623439aa4f0) — pasted verbatim; use it for any open_questions

    每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴分析,这是决策分析的核心原则,不是可选项:

    • 实际业务需求 — 它服务的是真实存在的业务场景,
      还是投机性能力面?判据要求实测(谁在写这个键、谁在读、
      示例应用与真实部署的用法),「读起来像有用」不作数。这条轴会改变结论,不是陪衬。
    • 项目长远合理性 — 哪个方案符合北极星方向与可持续架构(no workarounds、
      contract-first),临时补丁式选项要明说长期代价。
    • 防 AI 写代码犯错,尤其是防 AI 写元数据 app 犯错 — 哪个方案让 AI 在结构上更难写错:
      契约收紧(严格 schema、publish 时响亮拒绝)优于消费端宽容(?? 回退、静默容错)——
      宽容恰是 AI 批量犯错被掩盖的温床;声明即强制,绝不让 AI 声明一个运行时不兑现的能力。
    • 创业阶段不扩散需求 — 创业阶段聚焦原则:创业项目先专注核心能力,能力扩张默认
      从紧,无拉动的声明面按 implementation-first 处置,已发布零消费能力不因沉没成本豁免。
      过渡也从紧 —— 创业阶段不渐进:废弃别名/拼写与能力退役默认立即退休,无分阶段
      窗口、无双拼写宽限;staged 仅凭具名外部用户证据方可荐。新增门禁默认否:门禁是只减
      不增的零件,例外只有维护者点名;荐新增门禁须引其点名原话,否则荐「不加」。

    基本裁决原则:spec 声明 > 实现 > 文档面;声明而未兑现是实现缺口,补实现或退役,
    ⛔ 不在消费端收窄;未声明键随实现,文档随之。「声明即强制」只及 spec 与元数据契约、
    运行时能力,⛔ 不及 AGENTS.md 这类给 agent 读的约定 —— 那些的读者是 agent,不是门禁。
    推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由;四轴冲突时如实呈现权衡,
    交维护者拍板。


    Generated by Claude Code

  5. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    os-dev-report
    {
    "issue": 24171,
    "status": "done",
    "branch": "claude/issue-24171-narrow-dispatch-gates-freeze",
    "pr": "#24258",
    "session": "session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2 — mode:subagent, so this is the parent's harness-stamped id; the commit's Claude-Session trailer and the relay envelope carry the same id",
    "premise_still_valid": true,
    "summary": "Executed term 1 of ruling 6243472660 (letter B, the maintainer's 「24171 B」). I rewrote instrument-discipline.md L10 in place: 「- 工具位只有一个,先花在删除上;dispatch-gates.mjs 冻结,只在它喂的 workflow 坏了或推导失真时碰:输出须与 CI 实跑一致(含从既有门禁自己的扫描根推导它),⛔ 不新增门禁、推导行、棘轮、--tier 强制档或常量。」 L12 now records the narrowing ruling beside ruling 208 (「2026-10-18 收窄裁决:维护者逐字「24171 B」,卡 24171,评论 6243472660」), with no hash prefix. The file stays 12 lines, the diff is one file with +2/-2, and the commit is 50b11c7. Draft PR 24258 is assigned to sunhaolin with the skip-changeset label; its body was read back byte-identical (8101/8101). The Tier S landing waits for the seat's contract review.",
    "tests": "No package is touched, so no dependency-closure build (step 1) and no package test or typecheck (step 2) is owed. No tested behaviour changed (a one-file .md edit under .claude), so there was no ablation or reverse verification. One gate needed a prerequisite build: pnpm exec turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint --concurrency=2 under scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh (VERDICT command-exit 0, held the lock 2s, waited 33s). On-disk checks of the edited file at 50b11c7: 12 lines. The control-byte scan (grep -naP over the C0 range minus tab, LF and CR, plus DEL) found nothing (exit 1). The pattern hash followed by 3+ digits found nothing (exit 1). Counts: 冻结 1, 工具位 2, 收窄裁决 1. Bytes: L10 273, L12 172. The derived-gate union ran after the final commit, at HEAD 50b11c7.",
    "gates": "Local subset at HEAD 50b11c7, derived by node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack with no paths. The change set came from merge base f5ef054 (1 path, +2/-2), and the list is identical to the path-derived one at f5ef054. All 16 ran, each exit code captured before any pipe: node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs 0 · node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test 0 · node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs 0 · node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test 0 · pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions 0 (first run exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET, re-run after the prerequisite build) · pnpm check:agent-test-spelling 0 · pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs 0 · pnpm check:doc-authoring 0 · pnpm check:driver-memory-census 0 · pnpm check:gitlink-declared 0 · pnpm check:nul-bytes 0 · pnpm check:pm-governed-merges 0 · pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint 0 ('87 file(s) clean') · pnpm check:refd-timer-probe 0 · pnpm check:skill-frame-sync 0 · pnpm check:watch-hint-literal 0. The --ran reconciliation with the exit-coded record printed: '16 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 16 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 16 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3)'. Outside the derivation, pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet exited 0 and names this file 0 times. I read CI check-runs on 50b11c7 once at report time and did not re-run or wait for them. success (17): Auto Label, Check Changeset, Check Documentation Links, Check PR Size, Dogfood Regression Gate, Governed Surface Queue Guard, Lint · scoped · query-options erasure, Lint · scoped · slot lookup & corpus, Lint · scoped · tooling self-tests, No other open PR may claim the same issue, No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path, Part-of PR must not also close its card, Test Core, The card this PR closes must claim this branch, Type Check · debt ledger, Type Check · workspace, filter. in_progress (7): Lint · CI, release & engine gates, Lint · ESLint, Lint · PM dispatch-gates, Lint · docs & code guards, Lint · repo & tooling gates, Type Check · consumer gates, Type Check · source gates. skipped by selector: Build Core, Build Docs, Console Pin Gate, Dogfood Verify CLI, Packed-tarball smoke, Temporal Conformance, Test Core and Dogfood shards.",
    "line_budget": "instrument-discipline.md 12 → 12 lines. L10 111 → 273 bytes and L12 91 → 172 bytes. The file has no CEILINGS row, so no ceiling moved.",
    "files_changed": [
    ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/instrument-discipline.md (+2/-2; L10 and L12 edited in place)"
    ],
    "deviations": [
    "git push ran twice, not once: first the empty-branch push before any edit (os-dev.md rule 1's write-route probe), then the push that carried 50b11c7. Apart from that count, I found no conflict between the dispatch order and os-dev.md or AGENTS.md.",
    "Dispatch order §4 and assumption (a) put pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet among the derived commands. It is in neither the derivation at f5ef054 nor the one at 50b11c7. I ran it anyway (exit 0) as the order asked, and --ran lists it as outside the derivation.",
    "The card's premise control says grep -c 工具位 gives 1. At origin/main f5ef054 it already gives 2 (L3 and L10). After the edit, 冻结 = 1 and 工具位 = 2, and this PR does not change the 工具位 count. To keep 冻结 at 1, L12 says 收窄裁决 rather than 冻结收窄.",
    "L10 is 273 bytes, against 111 bytes for the widest line before. The ruling's 「no new line」 outranks the file's habit of keeping lines at 120 bytes or less, so I tightened the sentence instead of splitting it. No gate reads this file's line width, because it has no CEILINGS row.",
    "Wording choices in L10: the ruling's 'row' is written 推导行 (derived row, the sense of terms 2 and 3) so nobody reads it as a text line, and '--tier mandate' is written 强制档 (the MANDATORY_TIER_GLOB_ROWS sense). Together these are 9 bytes more than the PM's suggested spelling (264 bytes).",
    "Commit trailer: I used the model-free pair AGENTS.md requires (Claude-Session plus Co-authored-by: Claude) instead of the harness reminder's model-named line. The PR body ends with AGENTS.md's session-URL footer instead of the harness reminder's footer. Both follow the precedence os-dev.md states.",
    "test:repo was not run locally: the diff changes no repo-project test, and the derivation does not name it. CI's Test Core runs it. The local-only families check:dev-prereqs and check:skill-frame-freshness were not run either: the diff touches neither packages/spec nor the decision-frame copy in SKILL.md."
    ],
    "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called",
    "api_writes": "2 REST proxy writes, both POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches (HTTP 204) to the fleet-write relay, which executes as objectstack-fleet[bot]. Stroke 1 (run 39097899779, conclusion success) sent POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft), POST /repos//issues/24258/assignees and POST /repos//issues/24258/labels (skip-changeset). The label landing is shown by the run's success, since the executor fails an action whose label is missing, and by a REST GET of the pull listing skip-changeset. Stroke 2 sent POST /repos//issues/24171/comments (this report). Not REST: two git pushes. Reads only: GET of the issue, its comments, the pull, and check-runs (twice).",
    "open_questions": [],
    "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "carrier: 承接者:无 · noted in Acceptance notes only, not filed (observation, outside classes a/b/c). The header of scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs says CEILINGS covers 'the pm-dispatch surface (SKILL.md, its references/, the per-lane job descriptions)', and its self-test comment calls compile-surfaces.md 'the last uncovered pm-dispatch references file'. Yet references/instrument-discipline.md and references/external-contributions.md have no row at f5ef054. The same header says absence is 'a fact to check, not an oversight to infer', so this is prose drifting from the map. Dedupe words: line ratchet CEILINGS uncovered references external-contributions.",
    "carrier: the claiming seat's contract review (sunhaolin, session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2) · noted, not filed. The Chinese option B in the card body (shown in the 速读) reads 「不动 --tier 档位表与常量」 (do not touch), while the ruling record's term 1 reads 'No new ... --tier mandate or constant'. The PR follows the ruling record word for word, as the order requires."
    ]
    }


    Generated by Claude Code

  6. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    ACCEPT → PR #24258 comment 6245838569

    Seat domain:skills#1 · session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2 (sunhaolin) · 2026-10-18T04:55Z · head 50b11c7f · in-seat contract review PASS 6245800774 (CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER) · Tier S: the seat lands it through the queue (relay pr_ready + automerge_enable this act); the probe-table landing comment follows at MERGED. Wording note for the record: the card's option B reads 「不动 --tier 档位表与常量」 while the ruling record's term 1 reads "No new … --tier mandate or constant"; the PR follows the record, and the gap is immaterial for the two cards the ruling unblocks (24037, 24073).


    Generated by Claude Code

  7. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 18, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    Landed — PR #24258 merged by the queue at 2026-10-18T05:06Z (squash commit ef9557c615f1b5c4716072869b19813b055ebf00, 1 parent; merged_by is the relay identity that enqueued it). Probe table, read 2026-10-18T05:08Z by the seat (domain:skills#1, session_01QBcLjVCmcWbZEk6qhYMib2):

    probe reading
    queue branch gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-24258-* absent — git ls-remote origin 'refs/heads/gh-readonly-queue/*' lists no ref
    origin/main by content tip fb6fb24e; .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/instrument-discipline.md carries 「推导失真」 ×1 and is 12 lines; the squash commit is in git log origin/main
    card closed completed by the PR's Fixes line at 2026-10-18T05:06Z; the lane's closed-since-04:00Z set is this card and card 24241 only — both expected, no stray closing keyword
    harness shared checkout fast-forwarded to fb6fb24e; check-harness-current.mjs CURRENT

    State change this act: pm:dispatched removed in the next stroke (read back); domain:skills, priority:p2, area:devpath stay (ownership, not state); the subscribe_pr_activity watch on PR #24258 ended at the merge. Ruling 6243472660 term 1 is on main; terms 2 and 3 proceed on cards 24073 and 24037.


    Generated by Claude Code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

area:devpathThe road — create, dev, verify, publish/install, connect an agent, iteratedomain:skillspriority:p2Medium: important, M3

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions