Filed by the domain:spec 执行席 2(座位帖 #18549,会话 session_01JbZnqu8bt6YqfJsr9vaFb3)⏱️ x, discharging the H52 patrol row on card #18932.
⚠️ Why a new card and ⛔ not a re-hung label on #18932. H52's own remedy orders it: a question raised while EXECUTING a ruling the card already carries is a RESIDUAL, and re-hanging needs-user-decision on the executing card would leave the inbox unable to say WHICH question is open, and would take the question's only visibility away when that card closes. ⇒ the question moves here, linked back.
The question
#13556's class removal emptied docs/adr/** of the path-less L-pin spelling — PR #19022 (card #18932) closes the last six — but the ADR corpus still declares pathlessLineCitations: false, so nothing stops the class regrowing there silently, exactly as those six regrew after #13556.
Turn the declaration on?
- A. Leave it off. Costs nothing today; the class can regrow unseen.
- B. Turn it on in a follow-up that FIRST settles the measured blocker — the two dev-server ports at
docs/adr/0047-object-ui-run-modes.md lines 48-49, which the shared pathlessLineCitations grammar would read as line citations — by porting the negative controls scripts/check-platform-checklist.mjs already pins for its own ports, status codes, URLs and clock times.
- C. Turn it on and hand authors the maintainer-only anchor-exempt marker for the two ports.
⭐ The executing dev recommended B, and its reason is measurable rather than aesthetic: the blocker is real and already re-measured (#18925: 17 findings across 6 records, 2 of them those ports), and the negative-control solution already exists in a sibling corpus, so B is porting rather than inventing. Its stated objection to C is that it hands every author a red they cannot clear themselves.
⛔ This seat does not grade the options. Turning a corpus-wide ratchet on is a floor decision.
⚠️ A SECOND question, adjacent and ⛔ NOT the same one
The same path-less L-pin shape lives outside docs/adr/**: docs/audits/2026-08-partial-retirement-annotation-signal.md (6 hits) and docs/launch-readiness.md (3 hits). Does #13556's class removal reach them?
⚠️ This one is not ready for a ruling, and saying so is the honest state. The dev measured those two files only as light-on controls and did not sample whether their pointers have rotted — so there is no evidence in either direction, and #18932 itself recorded that corpora outside docs/adr/** were NOT measured. ⇒ the first act here is a measurement, ⛔ not a decision. Recorded here so it is not lost; ⛔ it should not be folded into the A/B/C above, which is a different subject with a different first act.
Provenance and limits
查重词
pathlessLineCitations ADR corpus · path-less L-pin class regrowth · 0047 dev-server ports line citation · negative controls ported from check-platform-checklist · L-pin outside docs/adr
⛔ 本席按章程不查重(「立卡者不查重、只附 3–5 查重词」);以上是查重词,不是查重结论。
Generated by Claude Code
Filed by the
domain:spec执行席 2(座位帖 #18549,会话session_01JbZnqu8bt6YqfJsr9vaFb3)⏱️ x, discharging the H52 patrol row on card #18932.needs-user-decisionon the executing card would leave the inbox unable to say WHICH question is open, and would take the question's only visibility away when that card closes. ⇒ the question moves here, linked back.The question
#13556's class removal emptied
docs/adr/**of the path-less L-pin spelling — PR #19022 (card #18932) closes the last six — but the ADR corpus still declarespathlessLineCitations: false, so nothing stops the class regrowing there silently, exactly as those six regrew after #13556.Turn the declaration on?
docs/adr/0047-object-ui-run-modes.mdlines 48-49, which the sharedpathlessLineCitationsgrammar would read as line citations — by porting the negative controlsscripts/check-platform-checklist.mjsalready pins for its own ports, status codes, URLs and clock times.⭐ The executing dev recommended B, and its reason is measurable rather than aesthetic: the blocker is real and already re-measured (#18925: 17 findings across 6 records, 2 of them those ports), and the negative-control solution already exists in a sibling corpus, so B is porting rather than inventing. Its stated objection to C is that it hands every author a red they cannot clear themselves.
⛔ This seat does not grade the options. Turning a corpus-wide ratchet on is a floor decision.
The same path-less L-pin shape lives outside
docs/adr/**:docs/audits/2026-08-partial-retirement-annotation-signal.md(6 hits) anddocs/launch-readiness.md(3 hits). Does #13556's class removal reach them?docs/adr/**were NOT measured. ⇒ the first act here is a measurement, ⛔ not a decision. Recorded here so it is not lost; ⛔ it should not be folded into the A/B/C above, which is a different subject with a different first act.Provenance and limits
os-devreport on card [finding] #13556 无过渡期删掉的那一类行锚点还有 6 个活在围栏之外 —— ADR-0021(engine.ts L806+L961)、ADR-0034(L1811 / sql-driver.ts L561-563 / L548-600)、ADR-0077(~L3217),6/6 已抽样指向今天无关的代码 #18932 (comment5729740372). ⛔ This seat re-ran none of those measurements — they are relayed and attributed, and the numbers above (17 findings / 6 records / 6 hits / 3 hits / lines 48-49) are the dev's readings, not this seat's.sql-driver.tshave rotted — 4 of 4 sampled resolve to unrelated code, and the ADRs read as if they still point at the mechanism they name #13556 (the class removal) · fix(check-adr-symbol-anchors): the verdict may not claim a census wider than the vocabulary it read #18925 (the re-measurement) · PR docs(adr): delete the six stale line pointers left outside the #13556 fence #19022 (the delivery, a governed-surface PR awaitingGOVERNED_APPROVERS).查重词
pathlessLineCitations ADR corpus·path-less L-pin class regrowth·0047 dev-server ports line citation·negative controls ported from check-platform-checklist·L-pin outside docs/adr⛔ 本席按章程不查重(「立卡者不查重、只附 3–5 查重词」);以上是查重词,不是查重结论。
Generated by Claude Code