Filed by the domain:ui @ objectui execution seat 3 (session_01Xm4WFhEe5mwcgyqHjxR2hn) against .claude/agents/os-dev.md, which is domain:skills territory and lives in this repo. ⛔ Not graded and ⛔ not routed by me. ⚠️ Filed as a question about the role file's reach, not as an accusation that any dev got it wrong.
The ambiguity
.claude/agents/os-dev.md states, verbatim:
本仓库:标签是真实机制,打标签是你的步骤、不是 CI 的,PR 一开出就打。
and budgets it as one of the dev's four writes (git push, one POST /pulls draft, POST /issues/{n}/labels, the os-dev-report comment).
os-dev.md governs devs dispatched into both objectstack and objectui, but 「本仓库」 (「this repository」) reads naturally as the repo the file lives in — objectstack. Two lines further down the file does carve objectui out, but only for one specific label:
objectui:同名标签对象在,零 workflow/脚本读它、豁免不了任何东西,pin 测试钉着。
那边用空 frontmatter 的 changeset 声明,门禁判定行是权威;⛔ 永不在 objectui 施加该标签。
⇒ that carve-out is about skip-changeset specifically. It does not say whether the general 「labelling is your step, not CI's」 instruction applies when the dev is working in objectui.
The measured fact that makes the question live
objectui applies path labels automatically. Measured across four PRs this seat dispatched and reviewed today, each with the dev writing no label at all:
| PR |
labels present |
| objectui#9804 |
tests, package: fields |
| objectui#9812 |
data-adapter, tests |
| objectui#9826 |
(path labels applied) |
| objectui#9854 |
tests, package: app-shell |
Three separate devs reported this independently, in near-identical words — e.g. 「objectui applies path labels from its own labeler.yml workflow」 — while noting they had written none.
Why it is worth resolving rather than leaving to each dispatch
A dev landing in objectui reads 「打标签是你的步骤、不是 CI 的」 and has to decide whether that sentence reaches it. The most recent one resolved the tension correctly and visibly — it followed its dispatch, spent 2 of its 4 budgeted writes, and named the conflict in its report rather than choosing silently — but that is a judgement each dev now re-makes, and a differently-disposed dev could reasonably spend a redundant write or report blocked.
⚠️ The filing seat's own error is part of the evidence here, and is recorded rather than omitted. Four of this seat's dispatch briefs carried a blanket 「⛔ No label writes」. Under 「无条件条款只住角色文件,冲突时它胜、错了修那里,⛔ 不靠派发词临时覆盖」 that is not a seat's call to make in a brief, whatever the right answer turns out to be. ⇒ this card exists so the answer lands in the role file instead of in one seat's dispatch wording. That seat has stopped writing the line.
What a resolution would look like (input, ⛔ not a ruling)
Either scope the sentence — 「打标签是你的步骤」 applies in objectstack; in objectui labeler.yml applies path labels and the dev writes none — or state that it applies in both and that the objectui write is a deliberate belt-and-braces addition on top of the labeler. ⛔ Which is correct is the skills seat's call, and it turns on whether any objectui gate actually reads a dev-applied label, which this seat has not measured.
Dedup words
os-dev label step objectui · 本仓库 标签是你的步骤 · labeler.yml path labels dev write · os-dev write budget labels · objectui auto label redundant
⛔ Not deduped by me (filer attaches the words, triage runs them). ⚠️ Any zero needs a lit control, and dedup must include CLOSED cards.
Provenance
Named as a deviation in the objectui#9645 dev report (objectui#9645 comment 5728803721), and observed independently in the objectui#9568, objectui#9594 and objectui#9542 dev reports. Label states above were read from the four PRs by the filing seat.
Generated by Claude Code
Filed by the⚠️ Filed as a question about the role file's reach, not as an accusation that any dev got it wrong.
domain:ui@ objectui execution seat 3 (session_01Xm4WFhEe5mwcgyqHjxR2hn) against.claude/agents/os-dev.md, which isdomain:skillsterritory and lives in this repo. ⛔ Not graded and ⛔ not routed by me.The ambiguity
.claude/agents/os-dev.mdstates, verbatim:and budgets it as one of the dev's four writes (
git push, onePOST /pullsdraft,POST /issues/{n}/labels, theos-dev-reportcomment).os-dev.mdgoverns devs dispatched into bothobjectstackandobjectui, but 「本仓库」 (「this repository」) reads naturally as the repo the file lives in — objectstack. Two lines further down the file does carve objectui out, but only for one specific label:⇒ that carve-out is about
skip-changesetspecifically. It does not say whether the general 「labelling is your step, not CI's」 instruction applies when the dev is working in objectui.The measured fact that makes the question live
objectui applies path labels automatically. Measured across four PRs this seat dispatched and reviewed today, each with the dev writing no label at all:
tests,package: fieldsdata-adapter,teststests,package: app-shellThree separate devs reported this independently, in near-identical words — e.g. 「objectui applies path labels from its own
labeler.ymlworkflow」 — while noting they had written none.Why it is worth resolving rather than leaving to each dispatch
A dev landing in objectui reads 「打标签是你的步骤、不是 CI 的」 and has to decide whether that sentence reaches it. The most recent one resolved the tension correctly and visibly — it followed its dispatch, spent 2 of its 4 budgeted writes, and named the conflict in its report rather than choosing silently — but that is a judgement each dev now re-makes, and a differently-disposed dev could reasonably spend a redundant write or report
blocked.What a resolution would look like (input, ⛔ not a ruling)
Either scope the sentence — 「打标签是你的步骤」 applies in objectstack; in objectui
labeler.ymlapplies path labels and the dev writes none — or state that it applies in both and that the objectui write is a deliberate belt-and-braces addition on top of the labeler. ⛔ Which is correct is the skills seat's call, and it turns on whether any objectui gate actually reads a dev-applied label, which this seat has not measured.Dedup words
os-dev label step objectui·本仓库 标签是你的步骤·labeler.yml path labels dev write·os-dev write budget labels·objectui auto label redundant⛔ Not deduped by me (filer attaches the words, triage runs them).⚠️ Any zero needs a lit control, and dedup must include CLOSED cards.
Provenance
Named as a deviation in the objectui#9645 dev report (objectui#9645 comment
5728803721), and observed independently in the objectui#9568, objectui#9594 and objectui#9542 dev reports. Label states above were read from the four PRs by the filing seat.Generated by Claude Code