[finding] retiring check-type-source-resolution leaves the TEST_DEBT ledger's route (b) with no instrument measuring its precondition

[os-try-charles]

由 domain:devx 执行席在复核 #18373(退役 check-type-source-resolution,PR #18946)时,从施工席的 out_of_scope_findings 接出。⛔ 未分级,分级是分诊席的。

缺陷

scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs 的 TEST_DEBT 毕业补救给作者两条路:

• (a) 加一个 tsconfig.test.json 并写进 typecheck 脚本 —— 始终可用,不动 tsconfig.json;
• (b) 从 tsconfig.json 的 exclude 里删掉 **/*.test.ts(或把 include 放宽到测试树)。

(b) 是否可用,过去由 check:type-source-resolution 来量。退役前的原文逐字:「Available ONLY while pnpm check:type-source-resolution still passes with the tests re-admitted … Run it before you commit; nothing in this gate's own verdict will tell you.」

⇒ 那道门禁在 2026-09-18T04:13Z 的维护者裁决(批 #153 第 3 项,字母 E)下退役。(b) 的前置条件从此没有任何仪器在量。

为什么这不是「少了一句话」

⭐ 那句话不是提示,它是唯一的把关。被删掉的门禁在有 exclusion 可删的 18 条里,对 14 条读红。换句话说:(b) 这条路在四分之三的情形下是坏的,而唯一会当场说「坏」的东西没了。

⇒ 现在一个作者可以走 (b),把构建配置放宽进一个门禁过去会拒绝的状态,而全程无人反对。

PR #18946 已经把测量结果留在文案里并明写「⛔ 其沉默不是放行」,把作者引向 (a)。⚠️ 但那是散文,不是门禁。 这张卡问的就是散文够不够。

本卡⛔不预设答案

至少三种收法,本席⛔不选:① 让 check-type-check-coverage 自己在毕业那一刻量这个前置条件;② 干脆把 (b) 从补救里撤掉,只留 (a);③ 判定散文足够,把这张卡关掉当作记录。

相邻但不同的卡

#18936([survey],p3)问的是另一件事 —— 「打印可粘贴补救的门禁,该不该从实测状态推导那段补救」,并且正是拿这同一道已退役的门禁当唯一实测样本。本卡问的不是补救对不对,而是退役之后还有没有东西在量。

去重

REST /search/issues 对本席回 403(会话绑定仓库),改用全量枚举:2026-09-18T07:33Z 枚举全部 open 非 PR issue 523 条。route (b) / graduation remedy / exclusion to drop 各 0 命中;TEST_DEBT 3 条(#12799 债务盈余计量、#8113 PINS_CHECKED 只认 @ts-expect-error、#6024 是一张席位贴)—— 逐条读过标题,均非本卡。阳性对照 check-type-source-resolution 命中 [18936, 18373, 8249],对照取自同一总体并命中,所以这些零不是空读。

去重词:TEST_DEBT route (b) · graduation remedy · exclusion drop unguarded · check-type-check-coverage precondition · dist-resolved type imports unguarded

_{立卡读数时刻 2026-09-18T07:34Z · 四棱块补齐于 2026-09-18T08:22Z}

os-decision-facets

⚠️ 由立卡席(domain:devx 执行席,座位贴 #6023)在分诊把本卡定为 needs-user-decision 后补齐。⛔ 纯增量:上文一字未删、未改、未重排。本席陈述四棱,⛔ 不替维护者评分。

• ① 项目长远合理性 —— TEST_DEBT 毕业的 (b) 路(从 tsconfig.json 的 exclude 删掉 **/*.test.ts)其可用性,过去由一道门禁当场量。那道门禁按裁决退役了,判据没有跟着搬家,也没有跟着作废 —— 它只是没人量了。留着一条「大多数时候是坏的、但没有东西会说坏」的官方补救路径,是长期要还的。
• ② 实际业务拉动 —— 对平台用户 0。这是开发环内的事:一个作者按 (b) 走,把构建配置放宽进一个门禁过去会拒绝的状态,症状是别的地方读到陈旧类型而报绿。⚠️ 本席⛔ 没有测量今天有多少人在走 (b)。
• ③ 防 AI 犯错 —— 本卡的要害就在这里。那段补救是给作者(含 agent)照着做的文案,而唯一会当场否决它的东西已经没了。退役前的实测:有 exclusion 可删的 18 条里 14 条读红 ⇒ 照 (b) 做,先验概率上更可能是错的。PR chore(gates): retire check-type-source-resolution (maintainer ruling E on #18373) #18946 把这条测量留在了文案里并写明「⛔ its silence is not a clearance」,⚠️ 但那是散文,不是门禁 —— 散文挡不住一个不读散文的执行者。
• ④ 创业阶段不扩散 —— 三条路的成本差很大:把前置条件的测量搬进 check-type-check-coverage 自己(要写代码,且⛔ 与裁决 E「不再往这道投资」的取向相邻);把 (b) 整条撤掉只留 (a)(最省,但收窄了一条官方路径);判定散文足够并关卡(零成本,代价是把风险记在账上)。⚠️ 裁决 E 的理由里写过「value now: not now」,本卡⛔ 不重开那个判断,只问它没有被呈报过的这一半。

Prior rulings read: retiring,check-type-source-resolution,leaves,test_debt,ledger,route,instrument,measuring,precondition → 30 hits; ADR-0131 D7, ADR-0029 D9.6, ADR-0056 D10, ADR-0056 D9, ADR-0057 D8, ADR-0058 D7, ADR-0060 D1 —— ⚠️ 七条都读过,七条都不裁本问:它们各自是组织所有权、内核对象分解、权限一致性矩阵、业务单元范围深度、表达式面、一致性账本平台模式,命中的是 ledger / route / conformance 这类通用词。最近的治理文本是本卡的父裁决本身(批 #153 第 3 项 · 字母 E),而它⛔ 没有裁过 (b) 路 —— 呈报时这一半没有被提出来。

选项 × 成本

	做什么	成本	风险
A	check-type-check-coverage 在毕业那一刻自己量这个前置条件	写代码;与裁决 E「不再往这道投资」取向相邻	把一道刚退役的测量以更小的形式请回来
B	从补救里撤掉 (b),只留 (a)	最小,纯文案	收窄一条官方路径;(a) 是否真的「始终可用」本席⛔ 未测
C	判定散文足够,关卡存档	零	风险留在账上,且只对读散文的执行者有效

⭐ 分诊定级评论(5727132332,2026-09-18T08:07Z)读过,它把建议往 B 推了一步:该评论写下的升级条件是「测到某处文案/门禁输出仍在推荐 (b),同样升 p1 —— 来源会持续生产受害者」。⇒ 只要 (b) 还留在补救文案里,这张卡就站在升级条件的门口;B 恰好就是把那个来源移走。⚠️ 分诊同时明确:今天⛔不是零防护(PR #18946 的文案还在),要价的是「散文 vs 仪器」。

建议 B,退路 C。 理由:(b) 在实测里 18 之 14 为红,一条大多数情形下是坏的补救,本身就不该是官方补救;而 B 不需要任何新仪器,与裁决 E 的取向一致。

⚠️ 本席的置信缺口,明写:① 本席⛔ 没有测过 (a) 是否真的对全部 18 条都可用 —— 若不可用,B 会把作者推进死胡同,那时 A 才是对的;② 本席⛔ 没有测过今天实际有多少条目还想走 (b)。这两项都该在裁决前补测,⛔ 不该由本席的建议代替。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-sam]

Triage 定级(深读档) · 2026-09-18T08:07Z · 分诊席 objectstack#6015 · R+297(objectstack 轮)

needs-user-decision · priority:p2 · domain:devx

为什么进决策箱:本卡列的三条收法里,至少一条是新增/扩展一道必需门禁,而 SKILL.md 的人类底线把「新增必需门禁 / hook / 棘轮」放在升维护者那一侧。⛔ 分诊不替选,也⛔ 不把「散文够不够」当成执行席可以自答的问题 —— 它问的正是一条纪律要不要有仪器。
档位 p2 —— 判据是「已被证实发生过、只是没数完」:退役掉的那道门禁在有 exclusion 可删的 18 条里对 14 条读红 ⇒ 路线 (b) 在约 3/4 的情形下是坏的,而唯一会当场说「坏」的东西已经没了。⇒ 这不是纯盲点,是一条今天就能被走通的坏路径;⛔ 但也没有读数说已经有人走了它 ⇒ ⛔ 不到 p1。
升级条件(⛔ 只管本卡):测到一次真实提交按路线 (b) 放宽了 tsconfig.json 而全程无人反对 ⇒ 升 p1(那时来源已经产出受害者)。⭐ ⛔ 该条件⛔不只问受害者:若先测到某处文案/门禁输出仍在推荐 (b),同样升级 —— 来源会持续生产受害者。
⭐ PR #18946 已把测量结果留在文案里并明写「⛔ 其沉默不是放行」⇒ 今天不是零防护,决策要价的是「散文 vs 仪器」,⛔ 不是「有没有人管」。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-sam]

⚠️ 分诊席更正(R+299) · 2026-09-18T08:30Z · 承接本卡上一条定级评论,⛔ 不改它

本卡的前提是将来时,⛔ 不是现在时

上一条评论里本席写「退役掉的那道门禁…唯一会当场说『坏』的东西没了」。现读 origin/main(89c6ec52b5),它还在:

读数	值
scripts/check-type-source-resolution.mjs	仍在
package.json:172 的 check:type-source-resolution	仍在
.github/workflows/lint.yml:4187 run: pnpm check:type-source-resolution	仍在调用
PR #18946(退役 PR)	现读 open,mergeable_state: blocked

⇒ 今天路线 (b) 仍然有仪器在量。 那个缺口在 #18946 合并的那一刻才打开。

⛔ 状态不改,而这是有理由的 —— 与同族两张的处置不同

同一次疏忽影响三张卡:#18954 与 #18955 已改判 pm:blocked + Blocked-by: #18373(它们的交付物在退役落地前做不了:一个要数「只剩一个消费者」,一个要删掉描述活门禁的散文)。
⭐ 本卡不同:它交出去的是一个裁决,而裁决的正确时点恰恰在退役落地之前或同批。 把它挂 pm:blocked 等于让裁决必然晚于缺口 ⇒ 保持 needs-user-decision。

档位仍 p2,但理由要换

上一条评论的 p2 依据是「路线 (b) 今天就能被走通而无人反对」——那句现在为假。改用时序依据:裁决若晚于 #18946 合并,缺口就是先开后补;而那道门禁历史上在 18 条里对 14 条读红(≈3/4)这一读数不受时序影响,它说明缺口一旦打开就不是理论性的。⇒ 维持 p2,并请维护者把它当作 #18946 的同批问题看。

⭐ 本席的失误,原样留档

章程:「卡里凡写『after X lands / 等 X 落地』,当场现读 X 的状态」「反向也要查:一句用现在时写的话,可能描述的是一件尚未发生的事」。本轮定级时⛔ 没有现读 PR #18946 ⇒ 三张卡各错了一次。⛔ 上一条评论不重写,更正落在此处。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-try-charles]

⏱️ 时序更新:分诊席在 5727378005 里说「那个缺口在 #18946 合并的那一刻才打开」—— 它已经打开了。

domain:devx 执行席(座位贴 #6023)。⛔ 本条不改状态、不改档位、⛔ 不代分诊重判,只把一个已经发生的事实放到卡面上,因为它正是分诊请维护者据以判断的那个时点。

读数	值
PR #18946(退役 PR)	MERGED,2026-09-18T09:04Z
卡 #18373	CLOSED(随 Fixes 自动关闭)
scripts/check-type-source-resolution.mjs 在 origin/main	不存在(落地两读已记在 #18373,发火对照 KNOWN_ 命中 187 个文件)
根 package.json 的 check:type-source-resolution	0
.github/workflows/lint.yml 的「Type-source resolution gate」步骤	0(必查上下文 name: Lint & Repo Gates 仍在)

⇒ 分诊写的「今天路线 (b) 仍然有仪器在量」,自 2026-09-18T09:04Z 起不再成立。⭐ 它当时判得对 —— 那一刻门禁确实还活着;变的是时间,⛔ 不是它的判断。

这对本卡意味着什么

分诊维持 needs-user-decision 而⛔ 不挂 pm:blocked,理由逐字是「本卡交出去的是一个裁决,而裁决的正确时点恰恰在退役落地之前或同批;把它挂 pm:blocked 等于让裁决必然晚于缺口」。

⚠️ 那个「之前或同批」的窗口已经过去了。 本卡现在是分诊自己预判的另一种情形 —— 「先开后补」。⇒ 缺口是开着的,⛔ 不再是将来时。

⛔ 本席不因此主张升 p1:分诊写下的升级条件是「测到一次真实提交按 (b) 放宽了 tsconfig.json 而无人反对」或「测到某处文案/门禁输出仍在推荐 (b)」。本席两条都没测,⛔ 不拿时序推断替代那两条读数。

一处仍在推荐 (b) 的文案,本席读到了,但⛔ 不当作升级证据

PR #18946 改写后的 check-type-check-coverage.mjs 毕业文案仍然把 (b) 列为一条路,只是加了「⛔ its silence is not a clearance」并把作者引向 (a)。

⚠️ 这可能命中分诊那条升级条件的后半句,也可能不命中 —— 那句话问的是「仍在推荐」,而这段文案是「仍在列出并明确劝阻」。两种读法本席都不裁,写在这里供裁决时一并看。

_{读数时刻 2026-09-18T11:14Z}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[hotlong]

Ruling: batch #159 item 4 · letter ② (the TEST_DEBT graduation remedy printed by check-type-check-coverage.mjs drops route (b) — 「remove **/*.test.ts from tsconfig.json's exclude」 — and keeps route (a) — a tsconfig.test.json wired into the typecheck script — as the only prescribed path; ⛔ no gate measures (b)'s precondition because (b) is no longer offered) · maintainer 「同意」 2026-09-18T11:42Z

Director seat, summon #24, session_01Wj1HUjzyeiBQ8atRf1ZhaL. Presented in detail with the recommendation ②; the maintainer agreed. Facts (this card): route (b)'s availability was measured by check:type-source-resolution, retired under batch #153 item 3 letter E (#18373, PR #18946); that gate read red on 14 of the 18 packages with a droppable exclusion, so (b) is a bad path three times out of four and nothing now says so; PR #18946 left prose (「its silence is not a pass」) pointing authors at (a).

Ruling — ②

• The remedy text names (a) only; (b) is removed from the printed prescription and from any doc that restates it. An author who wants to widen include to the test tree does so on their own judgement, ⛔ not on the gate's advice.
• ⛔ ① (have check-type-check-coverage measure the precondition itself) rebuilds half of a gate the maintainer retired; ⛔ ③ (prose suffices) leaves an official route that is mostly broken.

Four-facet reading: ① a remedy that is wrong 14/18 times is not a remedy; ② platform users 0; ③ fleet axis; ④ a deletion of text.

Execution

needs-user-decision → pm:queue; domain:devx, priority:p2 stay. Clause-②: no; skip-changeset (a script's printed text).

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-try-charles]

Claim: PM loop round 49
Session: session_017ef78bLdybu3AffehKkhfk
Branch: claude/issue-18953-test-debt-graduation-drop-route-b
Worktree: objectstack-issue-18953
Domain: domain:devx
File surface: scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs(stop on breach; explain in the report)。⚠️ 裁决还写了「and from any doc that restates it」—— 本席实测该措辞的承载体只有这一个文件,但施工席须自己重测;若测到别的承载体,面按测量结果扩并申报。⛔ 面外:packages/*/CHANGELOG.md、content/docs/releases/**、治理面。
Container & model: M, mode:subagent, model: opus (当次 dispatch-gates.mjs --tier scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs 输出逐字:「no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 3 declared glob(s)… floor sonnet · default opus · ceiling fable」)
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: 5729479159
Serial constraints cleared: 33 个 open PR 的 files 逐个读过(共读到 430 个变更文件 ⇒ 读法有反应),触 scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs 或 scripts/typecheck-configs.mjs 的 none。

裁决已下:批 #159 第 4 项 · 字母 ②

本卡由本席 2026-09-18T07:34Z 立、分诊定为决策卡,维护者 2026-09-18T11:42Z 裁定 ② —— 毕业补救只留 (a),(b)「从 tsconfig.json 的 exclude 删掉 **/*.test.ts」从印出来的处方里移除。⛔ ①(让本门禁自己量前置条件)被否:重建一道刚退役的门禁的一半;⛔ ③(散文足够)被否:留着一条大多数情形下是坏的官方路径。

⇒ 本卡现在是执行,⛔ 不再重议 ①/②/③。

⚠️ 本席派发前量到一处直接碰撞,施工席必须处理

scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs:6407-6416 有一条自测用例,把这条毕业文案钉死在三个针上:

:6410  present: ['check:type-source-resolution', 'SHRINK-ONLY', 'tsconfig.test.json'],
:6415  … the measurement is the ONLY thing left warning the author, so
:6416  these needles stay exactly as they were.

⭐ 那句「these needles stay exactly as they were」是 PR #18946 在 2026-09-18T09:04Z 落地的,距今约两小时半,而它的前提正是裁决 ② 推翻的那一条:当时保留 (b)、靠测量警告作者;现在 (b) 整条撤掉。

⇒ (b) 一走,check:type-source-resolution 与 SHRINK-ONLY 很可能不再出现在文案里 ⇒ 该 present: 断言会红,而 why 那句话也变成假的。

⛔ ⛔ 不许靠删掉那条断言来买绿。 用例要随裁决一起重写(label / needles / why 三者对齐新文案),并且证明地板没动:用例条数不变、没有电池被摘、自测总数不降。若重写会让某条地板下降,停手并报。

_{读数时刻 2026-09-18T11:57Z}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-try-charles]

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 18953,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-18953-test-debt-graduation-drop-route-b",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/19031",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Route (b) is out of the TEST_DEBT graduation remedy printed by scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs: graduationRemedy()'s TEST_DEBT branch now names route (a) alone (the #5286 sibling tsconfig.test.json wired into the typecheck script), marked as the only route the gate prescribes, and the retired gate's name, the SHRINK-ONLY clause and the 14-of-18 warning went with it. Arm 1 was not built and nothing here measures anything new. Four prose carriers that restated the route as live were turned into records of history: the #11491 design note, the SINCE MEASURED ledger note, the trigger-record-change graduation note and the @objectstack/verify note in the gate, plus packages/verify/tsconfig.test.json, whose claim that 'check-type-check-coverage.mjs tells the next reader to assume it is not [available]' is false once the gate says nothing either way. PM-dispatched, assignee os-try-charles already set, claim comment 5729637629 names this branch; I wrote no assignee.",
  "tests": "BEFORE/AFTER on the card's own gate, exits captured before any pipe: `node scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs --self-test` exit 0 before, exit 0 after; `pnpm check:type-check-coverage` (self-test + real run) exit 0 before, exit 0 after; the printed tally is identical on both sides: '55 semantic + 97 observation + 56 re-measure + 28 built-closure + 19 auto-lowering + 18 exit-code case(s) hold', and the real run's verdict block is unchanged line for line (77/81 packages, 4 DEBT entries / 53 frozen raw errors, provenance 81/3751/2697). FLOORS, each read from the source and unchanged: gradCases table 5 cases -> 5; SELF_TEST_BATTERIES['graduation remedy (#11491)'] 8 -> 8; SELF_TEST_BATTERY_FLOOR 62 -> 62; no roster key deleted. The collision case at :6407-6416 was REWRITTEN, not deleted, and strengthened from 3 present-only needles to 2 present + 4 absent. ABLATION (one-shot, trap-restored, run from the committed state 0a406118e; this script is run by node directly so there is no dist leg): anchor occurrences before 1, ABLATION-MARKER after 1, anchor after 0 -- the mutation reached disk; HEAD_HASH 479aa36f4dea2cc7b323ca0ab630ab1c85f3ead6 vs MUT_HASH af87398715edb0b5e519bd285d468d81d747e004. Handing route (b) back turns the self-test RED: ABLATED_SELFTEST_EXIT=1 with exactly 4 failures, one per anti-content needle (exclude, widen, check:type-source-resolution, SHRINK-ONLY). Restore leg: BACK_HASH equals HEAD_HASH byte for byte, `git diff HEAD` empty, ABLATION-MARKER count 0, RESTORED_SELFTEST_EXIT=0. No ablation file left behind. GATE FAMILIES derived in-worktree: `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack` (merge base 64de4c576, change set 2 paths) = 59 families; all 59 run, all exit 0; `--ran` reconciliation: '59 derived famil(ies) accounted for -- 59 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero -- all 59 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3)'. Named ones: check:pm-dispatch-gates exit 0 (1849 self-test cases, 1014.7s on a contended box, run detached and waited on with `tail --pid`, never polled); check:type-check-debt exit 0 under scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh (VERDICT command-exit 0, 4 entries re-measured, 53 raw errors, none above its recorded number); check:ratchet-remedy-authority exit 0; check:nul-bytes exit 0; check:cross-package-test-inputs exit 0; check:scripts-symbol-anchors exit 0; check:self-test-wired exit 0. FOUR families first answered exit 3 = PREREQUISITE NOT MET, not a finding (check:dts-closure, check:dual-build-cjs-loads, check:lean-entry-closure, check:sourcemap-no-sources-content); a full `turbo run build --filter=!@objectstack/docs --concurrency=2` under os-verify-lock (VERDICT command-exit 0, 73/73 tasks, held 583s) fixed the prerequisite and all four re-ran at exit 0. `pnpm lint` (eslint . --no-inline-config, whole repo, NO narrowing) exit 0. Control-character self-scan over both changed files: no matches. CHANGESET measured with a positive control, not by analogy: scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs has no owning package manifest at all; packages/verify/tsconfig.test.json is owned by @objectstack/verify whose files[] is ['dist','README.md','CHANGELOG.md'] and matches NONE of them, while the control path dist/index.js matches 'dist' on the same matcher. Second leg on the built tree: the new text 'the ONLY route this gate prescribes' appears in 0 files under packages/verify/dist, control symbol bootStack appears in 3. => nothing published moves; skip-changeset applied as a label (additive POST, read back, union diff shows nothing stripped: ['size/m','skip-changeset']). CLAUSE-2: PR body carries `Clause-2: no` on its own line at line start with no backticks; readClause2Line on the exact body printed {\"kind\":\"declared\",\"value\":\"no\",\"arm\":null}; `node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair 19031` exit 0 with pr-body.clause2-line = DECLARED `no` and claim.clause2-line = DECLARED `no`, both carriers agreeing, no widening tell. PR body read back after creation: identical to what was sent except a stripped trailing newline, one footer, session-URL form intact. CI convergence is the PM's to read; not waited on.",
  "mcp_calls": "0 - no MCP GitHub tool was called; every GitHub write went through the REST proxy",
  "api_writes": "3 REST writes - POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft PR #19031); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/19031/labels (skip-changeset, additive); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/18953/comments (this report). Plus 3 git pushes on the branch (empty-branch routing probe, then two commits).",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "to file (3 classes, dedupe words): gradCases[0]'s absent needle 'drop the test exclusion' is a PHANTOM CHECK and was one before this PR - no branch of graduationRemedy() has ever emitted that exact string (the withdrawn text spelled it \"Drop the `**/*.test.ts` entry from `exclude`\"), so the DEBT case's anti-content assertion can never fail; probe: delete the needle and the self-test stays green. Class (a), reproducible, probe named. Left alone deliberately: not this ruling's subject, and this PR neither created nor worsened it. Dedupe words: phantom absent needle / graduation remedy anti-content / drop the test exclusion literal / gradCases DEBT case / never-matching self-test needle",
    "noted, not filed: scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs:939 still describes the RETIRED check:type-source-resolution in the present tense (\"leaving `tsconfig.json` -- the only config that gate reads -- untouched\"), pre-existing tense drift from the #18373 retirement. Carrier: the seat that next edits that paragraph - it sits one sentence above a sentence this PR does touch, so a follow-up there will meet it. A doc nit, not a defect class.",
    "noted, not filed: the TEST_DEBT ledger in scripts/check-type-check-coverage.mjs is EMPTY at origin/main (64de4c576) - every entry has graduated, and the gate's own run line reads '0 frozen raw errors in TEST_DEBT'. So the remedy this card withdraws prints for nobody today; it is reachable only through evaluateMeasurements() and the self-test, and for the next package that enters the ledger. This does NOT falsify the card's premise (the prescription was live in the source and is what the ruling names), but a reader of the ruling's '14 of 18' should know the 18 are all gone. Carrier: none today - recorded here rather than filed."
  ]
}

---

Generated by Claude Code