[PM seat] domain:spec · seat 4 — 🟢 session_01AmH9bKvGoLjiY86Q4Z3og2 · R10 在轮 · 在飞 2(#18670 交付中 PR #19137 已 ready/契约复审 PASS/等签字 · #19099 施工中)· 退回队列 1(#19086 串行于 PR #19024)· 决策箱本席 4(#17518 · #18177 · #18605 · #19071)

[os-steve]

os-pm-seat-post — domain:spec seat 4.

Seat post = the seat. Body is authoritative and edited only by the sitting PM; title and assignee are derived views. Current values live here, never in references/lanes/spec.md.

Current PM

• Session session_01AmH9bKvGoLjiY86Q4Z3og2 · seat domain:spec#4 · R1 open at 2026-09-18T05:45Z.
• Seated on the maintainer's explicit summons (「你是本车道第4个项目经理」) — arbitration, so no predecessor brief was owed for this seat number.
• Round-open mutual exclusion: CLEAR. Seat 4 has no prior post, no shift brief, no open-round marker, and zero Claim: comments bearing Seat: domain:spec#4. Seats 1 ([PM seat] domain:spec — 🟢 REOPENED by the maintainer (fix them all, THEN merge, THEN off) · 5 landed (+#18942 cleared main's OSV red) · #18889 at-tier PASS + enqueued · #18688 and #18638 UNPARKED — both rulings had already landed #6017), 2 ([PM seat] domain:spec · seat 2 — 🟢 os-bill · session_01JbZnqu8bt6YqfJsr9vaFb3 · R43 在轮 · dev 在跑 3(#19049 · #18972 · #18731)· 队列中 2(PR #19074 · PR #19078)· 受管待批 1(#19022)· 本班已落地 62 #18549) and 3 ([PM seat] domain:spec · seat 3 — ⏳ 座位空缺 · 前任 session_019srGWGCBBCBHqcDoRZpQRh 奉维护者令收班 · 收班简报 5737570951 · 本班已落地 20 · 队列 0 · 待维护者 3 #18883) are other seat numbers — their claims never evict this seat.
• Harness currency: CURRENT — scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs at seating: every harness-loaded .claude/** path on origin/main is in the shared HEAD 031e5fbfa3, content identical to origin/main. Charter touch 6427ee2480 (touches SKILL.md + references/core-rules.md). No session swap owed.
  • ⚠️ scripts/pm/git-history.mjs touch REFUSED on all three charters ("window or touch not provably complete") — this is a shallow clone. The harness-current reading above is the stronger substitute and is what this seat recorded. ⛔ Do not read the refusal as a clean zero.
• Model: default judgment tier (opus). Contract-review tier NOT measured at this seat yet ⇒ Clause-② cards are not self-reviewed here; an at-tier isolated subagent review is owed before any Clause-② card is queued.
• REST channel: probed once this session — GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack → 200; /rate_limit core 15000/15000 remaining at seating.

Inherited ledger

• Nothing inherited: new seat number, no predecessor, no parked cards, no in-flight work adopted.
• Landed this shift: 0. Filed: 0. Closed: 0.

Hot-file serial queue

The packages/spec/src/** source surface and the regenerated spec artefacts are saturated by seats 1–3; this seat deliberately works the gate/tooling surface instead. Declared surfaces read from the in-flight claim comments at 2026-09-18T05:40Z:

Holder	Card	Declared surface (region level)
seat 1 (session_01LvwGpp…)	#15811	packages/spec/src/shared/expression.zod.ts + census positions across packages/spec/src/{data,ui,security,kernel,system,automation}/**, their tests, ADR-0087 entry, major changeset, regenerated surfaces — widest surface in the lane; PR #18638 open
seat 1	#18058	packages/spec/src/api/package-api.zod.ts, contracts/package-service.ts
seat 2 (session_01JbZnqu…)	#18612	packages/spec/src/data/analytics.zod.ts + packages/services/service-analytics/src/dataset-compiler.ts
seat 2	#18512	packages/spec/scripts/check-duration-unit-keys.ts (single file)
seat 2	#18488	scripts/pm/check-widening-tells.mjs (single file)
seat 2	#18842	.changeset/18318-evalcontext-no-query-api.md
seat 3 (session_019srGWG…)	#18406	packages/spec/src/ui/view.zod.ts, ui/component.zod.ts + their generated artefacts
seat 3	#18102	packages/spec/src/automation/control-flow.zod.ts
seat 3	#18166	scripts/git-env.mjs, scripts/check-regen-pending.mjs, scripts/git-merge-regen.mjs
—	#18056, #17534, #17080, #18063	surfaces partly undeclared; #17534 has PR #18319 open (manifest + generated)

Serialised by this seat, with the reason recorded on each card:

• finding(spec): zod z.record() SILENTLY DROPS a __proto__ key from its parse OUTPUT while reporting success — ObjectSchema accepts the document and hands back a different one #17852 (z.record() drops __proto__) — nominal top of the total order (live Blocked-by: recompute makes it pm:blocking, fanout 1 → [finding] AssignmentConfigSchema.assignments is keyed by author-named flow VARIABLE names, so a variable named __proto__ is silently dropped from the parsed flow config — the #17852 shape, one slot over and fenced out of that round #18847), but its fix lands in packages/spec/src/**, intersecting spec: the evaluated-slot rule of #15430 reaches only the flow-node ledger — every other ExpressionInputSchema slot an engine evaluates (formula expression, validation / hook / sharing condition, visibleWhen…) still accepts an ast-only or blank-source envelope #15811's census surface. Waits on PR feat(spec)!: every engine-evaluated expression slot requires a non-blank source #18638. ⛔ Not shelved — queued behind a named PR.
• [finding] check-widening-tells 的反方向漏报:把一个键**改成** z.unknown() 是真实扩大,却被 #16943 的替换预算无声付账 —— 实测在 #18626 前后皆然 #18629 (check-widening-tells reverse-direction miss) — same file as seat 2's in-flight check-widening-tells: matchingCloser answers -1 for unreadable and for open alike, so a closed retiredKey() call with a regex literal reads as open and the tombstone decline swallows a live key #18488. Serial behind it.
• [finding] check:duration-unit-keys judges the new JSDoc-divergence rule on isDurationShaped() alone while its census also admits keyUnits — two rows of the ruled shape (latencyMs, frequencyHours) escape the zero #18075 (check:duration-unit-keys JSDoc-divergence) — same file as seat 2's in-flight check-duration-unit-keys has no self-test battery floor: emptying its vocabulary DE-REGISTERS two cases, shrinking the battery 103 to 101 while the printed count stays non-zero #18512. Serial behind it.
• [finding] check-clause2-carriers' correction remedy prints a HARDCODED comment id in the imperative — copying it as printed silently voids the correction, in the one field that carries the whole fix #18376 (check-clause2-carriers hardcoded comment id) — [finding] scripts/check-single-claim-paths.mjs cannot be run from an agent container — it 401s because node's fetch ignores HTTPS_PROXY, while three sibling scripts already carry the re-exec fix #18314's remedy reads that file as the donor pattern. Read-vs-write only, but serialised behind [finding] scripts/check-single-claim-paths.mjs cannot be run from an agent container — it 401s because node's fetch ignores HTTPS_PROXY, while three sibling scripts already carry the re-exec fix #18314 rather than gambling on it.
• check-adr-0087-registration: a compound-noun label (**Schema Migration FROM → TO:**) reads as a MENTION and is admitted with no rewrite #18494 + check-adr-0087-registration: findMigrationPrescription still reads a MENTION as a label through an identifier tail and across a hard wrap #18493 (check-adr-0087-registration MENTION/label discriminator) — a genuine five-gate fold candidate (one file, one discriminator, both graded, each independently checkable). Held to R2 because both may touch docs/adr/**, which [finding] check-adr-symbol-anchors 打印「0 line anchors survive」,而 #13556 无过渡期删掉的那一类,以两种它词汇表外的形状幸存了下来(ADR-0096 的裸 :626 续行、ADR-0020 的 #L198 链接片段) #18899 is in flight on this round.

Notes

• H17 restart-trigger index from patrol anchor [Half-state patrol] check-half-states live sweep — generated view (please pin) #9857 (swept 2026-09-18T01:57Z), intersected against every dispatch this round: Studio metadata coverage gaps: surface remaining types + promote un-typed concepts #2657 (spec/src/automation/webhook.zod.ts, integration/connector.zod.ts, kernel/metadata-plugin.zod.ts, kernel/metadata-type-schemas.ts, security/sharing.zod.ts) · currency: no exchange-rate / home-currency conversion — dynamic multi-currency amounts cannot be reconciled or aggregated across currencies #8345 (data/currency-fraction-digits.ts, data/field.zod.ts, service-analytics) · export: PDF / print document generation — re-planned for v18, superseding the #1301 NOT_PLANNED closure #8346 (ui/view.zod.ts, docs/PLATFORM_GAPS_FROM_TEMPLATES.md) · manifest.integrity declares per-file artifact digests the spec says the runtime re-verifies at unpack — nothing computes them and nothing checks them #11331 (cli/src/utils/osplugin.ts, core/src/security/plugin-artifact-integrity.ts). R1 intersection: EMPTY — all three dispatched surfaces are scripts/** + docs/adr/**.
• Patrol rows naming this lane, judged at seating: two H26 transitive-wait rows (manifest.permissions is live on its LEGACY string[] arm only — the structured PluginPermissionsSchema (services / hooks / network / fs) has zero readers, and new code is told to prefer it #11333 → Phase 2 of #11333: retire the legacy string[] arm of manifest.permissions (major, standard retirement route) #13458, The Clone dialog for a permission set now offers five raw JSON blobs as editable inputs — defaultFromRow has no non-editable carry-over #11753 → objectui#7611) — informational, both cards legitimately pm:blocked. Two dead-citation rows: issue 18021 (404, de-linked deliberately) cited by my 14 ADR-0049 tombstones tell authors a key was removed in @objectstack/spec 18 — an npm version that does not exist and, under the 2026-09-13 level ruling, will not be the carrier #18048 (folded into that card's scope, not filed separately); issue 17921 (404, de-linked deliberately) cited by [finding] ManifestSchema.id is a bare z.string() whose reverse-domain shape lives only in TSDoc, while its sibling PackageSchema.manifestId enforces that shape with a regex — one identifier, two declarations, only one of them machine-readable #17534 + PR feat(spec)!: manifest.id enforces the reverse-domain rule its registry face already had #18319 — another seat's in-flight card, hands off, reported to the maintainer instead.
• Lane enumeration at seating reconciled: MCP totalCount 166 = 164 open issues + 2 lane-labelled PRs (feat(spec)!: every engine-evaluated expression slot requires a non-blank source #18638, feat(spec)!: manifest.id enforces the reverse-domain rule its registry face already had #18319). ⛔ The 164-vs-166 gap was explained before the count was used, not after.
• Cross-lane: [finding] the unreadable-ownership-record population is 16 open cards, not the 4 that #18831 names — 12 further OPEN cards carry a Claimed / Claiming / ## Claim / ## Released / **Claim — line that no marker tool reads and no Claim: / Release: line anywhere in the thread (board census 2026-09-18T04:31Z, 459 threads at 0b31d90fb) #18914 (open) measures the unreadable-ownership-record population at 16 open cards, not the 4 of [finding] four open cards carry a real claim in a spelling the identity record's own contract does not permit — a ## Claim heading, Claiming the producer half, ## Claim + dispatch — so every marker-reading tool reads them as UNCLAIMED; the writers drifted off AGENTS.md :394–:395, not the reader #18831, with PR feat(pm): name the two measured claim near-miss forms so the sweep sounds on the unreadable claims #18911 open on the sweep's near-miss forms. This seat's Request for the domain:spec seat: #14512's only claim is the prose 「Claiming the producer half」 (2026-09-03, branch empty, no Release: since) while the card sits in the dispatchable pool — close or renew the record in the contract's spelling (row 2 of #18831) #18887 work is bounded to A multi-package artifact serializes its metadata twice — the flattened top level and every packages[i] body carry the same definitions #14512 and is discharged independently of that widening.
• Verify lock at seating: free, queue empty, arrival depth 0 (LOCK_DEPTH_HOLD = 2 not reached).
• Wake-up: self-bound cron Routine — id recorded below once created.
• Routine id trig_01Ma23bvLjaU5ZyPMx96v73S — self-bind, own_followup, cron 48 * * * * (server-anchored to the creation minute), first fire 2026-09-18T06:48Z. This is the seat's default wake; send_later is only an accelerator and is never the sole wake.
  • ⚠️ Recorded defect in this seat's own wake mechanism: the Routine stores no MCP connectors, so every session it fires runs without mcp__* tools — no GitHub MCP, no list_triggers, no SendMessage. The REST-proxy channel (curl + scripts/pm/*) is unaffected and is this seat's primary channel, but dev liveness probes via SendMessage would be unavailable in a fired session. Remedy named by the tool: create the Routine from a session that holds connector grants, or have the maintainer create it in the claude.ai Routines UI. ⛔ Do not read a fired session's inability to probe as a dev being dead. Reported to the maintainer in the R1 round report.

---

Addendum 2026-09-18T08:52Z — two corrections by this seat, both to things this seat itself said or did.

1. ⭐ Patrol anchor [Half-state patrol] check-half-states live sweep — generated view (please pin) #9857 is NOT stalled — my 07:48Z "possibly stalled" flag was a FALSE ALARM, and I am closing it out rather than leaving the suspicion on the record. At 07:48Z I read Swept 01:57:40Z · next by 07:37Z and called it 11 minutes overdue. The resolution: the scheduled run fired at 07:44:33Z and completed success (run 35320894629), writing the anchor at 07:51:40Z — so when I read it, its producer was mid-run. The anchor now reads Swept 07:51:29Z · next by 13:37Z.
   ⇒ Generalisable: ⛔ never judge a generated view stalled from its own updated_at alone — read its producer's run history (/actions/workflows/<file>/runs). A view is stale for the whole duration of the run that is about to refresh it. ⭐ My 11-minute caution ("⛔ 本席不据此判它死") was the right call and is why this cost nothing.
2. ⚠️ A feedback loop I created: the 07:51Z sweep lists this seat post as a referrer of both dead issue numbers, because I wrote them as #NNNNN while reporting them. Writing a dead issue number in reference form mints a fresh reference to it, which the patrol then reports. Both mentions above are now de-linked. ⛔ Not filed as a card — the remedy is one sentence of convention and there is no carrier beyond this post; recorded here so the next seat does not repeat it.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

Open-round marker — R1. Seat domain:spec#4.

• Session session_01AmH9bKvGoLjiY86Q4Z3og2 · fire 2026-09-18T05:45Z · charter touch 6427ee2480 (.claude/skills/**, proven in shared HEAD 031e5fbfa3, content identical to origin/main).
• ⛔ Not a re-read round: seat 4 has no previous open-round marker to differ from. First marker for this seat number.
• Mutual exclusion CLEAR at fire: no seat-4 shift brief, no seat-4 marker, zero Claim: comments bearing Seat: domain:spec#4, and no seat-4 session id on a recently-closed lane card. Seats 1–3 are other seat numbers and never evict this one.

Dispatched this round — 3 devs in flight, mode:subagent, all at default judgment tier (opus)

Card	Branch	Surface	Clause-②	Claim
#18314	claude/issue-18314-single-claim-paths-proxy-reexec	scripts/check-single-claim-paths.mjs	no	5725782443
#18899	claude/issue-18899-adr-symbol-anchors-blind-forms	scripts/check-adr-symbol-anchors.mjs (+ 2 ADR files if the prescription is removal) — ⚠️ governed	no	5725787294
#18375	claude/issue-18375-skip-changeset-deliberate-correction	scripts/check-empty-changeset.mjs	no	5725787397

Tier cited from this round's own dispatch-gates --tier runs at 05:47Z: "no path-derived mandate … floor sonnet · default opus · ceiling fable" for all three surfaces. Each raised off the floor deliberately and the reason is on the claim.

Why the gate/tooling surface and not the lane's top-ranked cards: packages/spec/src/** and the regenerated spec artefacts are saturated by seats 1–3 (see the seat post's serial queue). This seat bought parallel authoring on an uncontended surface rather than parallel landing on a contended one.

Seat work completed this round (no dev)

• Request for the domain:spec seat: #14512's only claim is the prose 「Claiming the producer half」 (2026-09-03, branch empty, no Release: since) while the card sits in the dispatchable pool — close or renew the record in the contract's spelling (row 2 of #18831) #18887 closed completed — discharged by Release: comment 5725812243 on A multi-package artifact serializes its metadata twice — the flattened top level and every packages[i] body carry the same definitions #14512. Readings re-taken at 05:47Z, ⛔ not inherited: first-line Claim: = 0, Release: = 0, compare = ahead_by 0 / behind_by 1857, instrument lit by the prose-claim control. Death leg done on the timeline (93 events, 47 cross-refs) — ⛔ not a closes-list, and ⛔ not read as "nothing landed": feat(cli+spec): compile a project of N packages into one packages[] artifact, with the assembled package body declared (ADR-0130 D4 producer, #14242 B) #14513 and others did land, what did not land is the specific producer-half work on the claimed branch.
• 4 deferral notes posted with re-check conditions and the "easier / harder / unnecessary / unaffected" question owed at re-pricing: finding(spec): zod z.record() SILENTLY DROPS a __proto__ key from its parse OUTPUT while reporting success — ObjectSchema accepts the document and hands back a different one #17852 (behind PR feat(spec)!: every engine-evaluated expression slot requires a non-blank source #18638), [finding] check-widening-tells 的反方向漏报:把一个键**改成** z.unknown() 是真实扩大,却被 #16943 的替换预算无声付账 —— 实测在 #18626 前后皆然 #18629 (behind check-widening-tells: matchingCloser answers -1 for unreadable and for open alike, so a closed retiredKey() call with a regex literal reads as open and the tombstone decline swallows a live key #18488), [finding] check:duration-unit-keys judges the new JSDoc-divergence rule on isDurationShaped() alone while its census also admits keyUnits — two rows of the ruled shape (latencyMs, frequencyHours) escape the zero #18075 (behind check-duration-unit-keys has no self-test battery floor: emptying its vocabulary DE-REGISTERS two cases, shrinking the battery 103 to 101 while the printed count stays non-zero #18512), [finding] check-clause2-carriers' correction remedy prints a HARDCODED comment id in the imperative — copying it as printed silently voids the correction, in the one field that carries the whole fix #18376 (behind [finding] scripts/check-single-claim-paths.mjs cannot be run from an agent container — it 401s because node's fetch ignores HTTPS_PROXY, while three sibling scripts already carry the re-exec fix #18314).

H17 intersection — EMPTY

Anchor #9857 trigger-file index (#2657 · #8345 · #8346 · #11331) names only packages/spec/**, packages/cli|core/**, packages/services/** and docs/PLATFORM_GAPS_FROM_TEMPLATES.md. All three dispatched surfaces are scripts/** (+ docs/adr/** on #18899). No H17 trigger file is under docs/adr/**. Intersection empty, checked per-dispatch rather than once.

Wake

Routine trig_01Ma23bvLjaU5ZyPMx96v73S, cron 48 * * * *, next fire 2026-09-18T06:48Z. ⚠️ It stores no MCP connectors — a fired session gets no mcp__* tools, so SendMessage dev probes are unavailable there while the REST-proxy channel is unaffected. ⛔ A fired session's inability to probe must not be read as a dev being dead. No send_later accelerator armed: these devs are harness-tracked in-process subagents whose completion re-invokes this session automatically, so a short poll would buy nothing the notification does not; the cron is the stall fallback.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

R1 · #18375 结算 — ESCALATE. 06:16Z。

needs-user-decision 挂上、pm:dispatched 摘掉、assignee 清空,一笔 replace;回读六态唯一,无半状态。分析、四棱块、Governing text 与两个问题全部锚在 #18375 评论 5725995545,⛔ 本贴不复制第二份。

• 判决依据:补救面 .github/workflows/pr-automation.yml 在围栏外(dev 按「越界停手」正确停手),且路线 C 的 runner 成本触人工地板(算力/配额形态),问题② 触同意机制地板 ⇒ 代裁置信门四条不全立,⛔ 不自裁。
• 我公开作废了自己的派发令 Zone 3 路线建议(「只让这一条拒绝不再认标签」),它被实测证伪:job 级 if: 跳整个 job,且不动 L3。已在卡上记为 measured-insufficient。这正是机制假设分区存在的理由。
• 我修正了 dev 的一个读数:fix(changeset): date the pending client entry's closing register — all three 'not addressed here' clauses had been answered #18765 已于 06:04:29Z 合并 ⇒ 今天开放面爆炸半径 0(我 06:12Z 重量:23 开放 PR / 11 带标签 / 0 碰别人 changeset)。同时 dev 用来论证「p1 条件未满足」的那个零刚刚翻了 —— fix(changeset): date the pending client entry's closing register — all three 'not addressed here' clauses had been answered #18765 就是那个 1。⛔ 我没据此单方提级:是否算活违反取决于问题②。
• L3 并入本卡、⛔ 不立孪生卡;dev 另三条 noted, not filed 核为补救 PR 作者的承接项。
• 空探针分支 claude/issue-18375-… 留在 0 commits ahead,可被下一任复用。
• 配额:mcp_calls 0 · REST 写 1(dev)· core 15000/15000。

在飞剩 2:#18314 · #18899。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

R1 · #18899 结算 — ACCEPT,governed 终局四件套已交付。 06:41Z。

PR #18925(docs/adr/** ⇒ 受管面)。⛔ 本席不合它。

件	状态
① 复核结论写在卡上	✅ #18899 评论 5726213164(英文,清单结论 + 抽查读数 + 偏差)
② PR 看得见地悬着	✅ needs-user-decision 已挂 PR(回读 4 标签 MATCHES)+ 终稿「维护者速读」评论已贴
③ 两个授权账户请审	✅ hotlong · os-zhuang 同时请到,HTTP 201;⭐ 走 REST 专用路,draft 位未被翻动(回读 draft: true)
④ 轮报单列 awaiting a human merge	✅ 本轮报告已列

• Clause-② 入队闸门:路径肢未命中(diff 内 0 个 packages/spec/src/**),声明肢 no ⇒ 不欠契约复核,⛔ 无 needs:contract-review 可挂。路径面取自 /pulls/18925/files,⛔ 非报告自述。
• 抽查自核(⛔ 不采信自述):record-validator.ts:198 是 ValidationError 构造器注释而 validateRecord 在 :1185(差 987 行);security-plugin.ts:626 是日志 sink 接口的 JSDoc 收尾 */。⇒ 删除是对的处方。指针数我从 diff 重数:ADR-0020 6 + ADR-0096 3 = 9。自测 floor 17→22(+5 断言 / 3 个 case,(b) 是点亮控制腿)。
• ⚠️ CI 未收敛:06:27Z 读 17 绿 · 11 skipped · 5 在跑 · 0 红;Governed Surface Queue Guard 绿。已在速读里写明全绿之后再合。
• 偏差判定:写预算 3 vs 我批的 2 —— 是我的错不是 dev 的。 os-dev 角色文件已把打标签列为 dev 步骤并把该端点写进预算,角色文件的无条件条款胜过派发词;我的 Writes: 行不该与它冲突。⇒ 修在我的派发模板,⛔ 不记 dev 偏差。
• 承接:[finding] #13556 无过渡期删掉的那一类行锚点还有 6 个活在围栏之外 —— ADR-0021(engine.ts L806+L961)、ADR-0034(L1811 / sql-driver.ts L561-563 / L548-600)、ADR-0077(~L3217),6/6 已抽样指向今天无关的代码 #18932 已立(围栏外 6 个同类指针,6/6 抽样已做,finding bare)。ADR-0047 两个端口刻意不另立卡(该语料开关是关的 ⇒ 潜伏、无读者),记在 [finding] #13556 无过渡期删掉的那一类行锚点还有 6 个活在围栏之外 —— ADR-0021(engine.ts L806+L961)、ADR-0034(L1811 / sql-driver.ts L561-563 / L548-600)、ADR-0077(~L3217),6/6 已抽样指向今天无关的代码 #18932 上 —— 那才是未来扩词汇表的人会读到的地方;⛔ 不采纳 dev 的 (c) 类归类。

在飞剩 1:#18314。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

R1 · #18314 结算 — ACCEPT,PR #18935,走普通落地路径(非受管面)。 06:52Z。

复核结论:#18314 评论 5726275950。路径面取自 /pulls/18935/files:1 个文件 scripts/check-single-claim-paths.mjs,无 governed 路径 ⇒ ready → 合并队列,⛔ 不走终局四件套。Clause-② 路径肢未命中、声明 no。

• ⏸ 尚未入队:06:52Z 读 21 绿 · 11 skipped · 2 在跑(Test Core (1/6) · Lint & Repo Gates)· 0 红 ⇒ 入队资格(每 check 绿或预期 skip)未满足,本席不带未完成的 check 入队。跟到 MERGED 为止。
• ⚠️ scripts/pm/check-expected-skips.mjs 在本检出跑不起来(ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND: 'yaml',依赖未安装)⇒ skipped 集的名单核对这一步记为 prerequisite-not-met / NOT MEASURED,⛔ 不读作干净。入队前补。

⭐ 我的 Zone 3 第二次被实测改正

我把路线框成「第 4 份逐字拷贝 vs 抽取共享 helper」,并问了 ESM 引导顺序的顾虑 —— 两个角都是错的。本席独立自核:proxyRearmPlan 恰有 13 个 importer,且 scripts/check-issue-citations.mjs:154 已经在 scripts/pm/ 之外、从树上这个位置逐字 import { EXIT_PREREQUISITE_NOT_MET, PROXY_FLAG, proxyRearmPlan } from './pm/check-half-states.mjs'。⇒ 「导入决策、只保留本地执行者」本来就是既有习语,不是新发明;引导顺序顾虑不成立。

⛔ 记为 Zone 3 measured-wrong,本轮第二次(前一次是 #18375 的路线 A)。⛔ 我的 donor 计数表也不该被再用:表里三个文件都不是 donor,只有目标的 0 与 donor 的 4 被重新求导过。

立卡 2(均 finding bare,定级归分诊)

• [finding] 共享 re-exec 守卫名互相压制:一个继承来的 OS_HALF_STATES_PROXY_REARMED=1 让兄弟工具静默不走代理并回 401 —— 评论 5715705458 记的那次「凭据死了」1 小时事故,可被一个变量机械复现 #18939 —— ⭐ 本席自己 A/B 复现:共享守卫名互相压制。控制 → banner 命中 1、exit 0;OS_HALF_STATES_PROXY_REARMED=1 → banner 0、401 Bad credentials、exit 3。⇒ 评论 5715705458 记的那次「凭据死了」约 1 小时事故,可由一个继承变量机械造出。⛔ 两处与报告不一致已照实写在卡上(check-clause2-carriers.mjs 本席读到 0 个本地守卫名;env: process.env 那一半本席控制未点亮故记 NOT MEASURED)。
• [finding] check-single-claim-paths 违反自己声明的两条契约:传输失败走 exit 1(该文件把 1 定义为「指控」),且 self-test 握手旗标在异步结论块之前同步置位 ⇒ 永远报不出「没走到结论」 #18940 —— 同文件两条自违契约:传输失败走 exit 1(该文件 :121 把 1 定义为「指控」),与 selfTestReachedVerdict 在异步结论块之前同步置位(:693 紧邻 return (async () => {)⇒ 永远报不出「没走到结论」,违反 AGENTS.md:1039 逐字契约。已注明分诊可拆。

偏差判定

写入 4 次 vs 我批的 2 次:其中两次是同一逻辑写(首次 POST /pulls 因缺 Content-Type 被 415 拒、未创建任何东西,补头后 201),打标签一次由角色文件覆盖。⭐ 与 #18899 同一个错,仍然是我的:派发模板的 Writes: 行不该与角色文件冲突。本轮两次重复同一错误 ⇒ 模板必须改,⛔ 不再逐卡道歉。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

R2 开轮 + PR #18935 已入队。 07:00Z。

落地

PR #18935(#18314):ready 06:56:16Z → added_to_merge_queue 06:56:18Z ✅。跟到 MERGED 为止。

⭐ 一条平台读数,差点被我读反,记下来防止下一席重蹈:PUT .../pulls/{n}/ccr/auto_merge 回 {"enabled":true,"merge_method":"squash"} + HTTP 200,而 PR 对象上 auto_merge 读回是 None。按「API 200 不等于落地正确」我判它没挂上 —— 错了。权威信号是 timeline 的 added_to_merge_queue 事件,它在;姊妹 PR #18920 同形(ready → added_to_merge_queue → merged,全程无 auto_merge_enabled 事件)。⇒ 在启用合并队列的仓里,auto_merge: None 不是挂载失败的证据;⛔ 不要据该字段判失败,读 timeline。(references/rest-channel.md 已经写了「答案来自尝试动作,不来自属性字段」——本次是那句话的一个活标本。)

⚠️ 另一条:mergeable_state 在 ready 翻转后短暂从 clean 变 blocked 再回 clean。⛔ 翻转后立刻取的那一次读数不可用作判据。

⚠️ 入队前的 expected-skips 名单核对记为 NOT MEASURED:本检出根本没有 node_modules(依赖从未安装),scripts/pm/check-expected-skips.mjs 抛 ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND: 'yaml'。⛔ 我没有用自己的推理替代那份名单权威;11 个 skip 全部可解释(路径过滤 / skip-changeset / opt-in / 未展开的矩阵占位符),0 非绿,且队列本身会拦住未满足的必查项 —— 这是我据以入队的理由,连同这条缺口一并记账。

PR #18925(#18899,受管面)现已全绿(24 绿 · 15 skipped · 0 在跑 · 0 非绿,mergeable_state: clean),仍是 draft、两个批准账户请审在案。⛔ 本席不合、也不翻 ready:按协议,授权批准在案后才由席位落地,否则由维护者亲手合。已在 PR 上贴出「全绿」更新,把我自己设的那个等待条件报销掉。

R2 派发 2(在飞)

卡	分支	面	档
#18629	claude/issue-18629-widening-tells-reverse-direction	scripts/pm/check-widening-tells.mjs	默认判断档
#18075	claude/issue-18075-duration-unit-keys-census-binding	packages/spec/scripts/check-duration-unit-keys.ts	默认判断档

两张都是本轮解锁后重新定价才派的,定价答案与证据落在各自卡上(#18629 = UNAFFECTED,但文件 +165 行 ⇒ 坐标失效;#18075 = 前提可能已死,派发令把证伪列为第一件事,premise_still_valid: false 是受欢迎的交付)。

串行队更新

• ✅ [finding] check-widening-tells 的反方向漏报:把一个键**改成** z.unknown() 是真实扩大,却被 #16943 的替换预算无声付账 —— 实测在 #18626 前后皆然 #18629 解锁 —— check-widening-tells: matchingCloser answers -1 for unreadable and for open alike, so a closed retiredKey() call with a regex literal reads as open and the tombstone decline swallows a live key #18488 已 closed completed(merged PR fix(pm): check-widening-tells separates "cannot read" from "still open" in the tombstone decline #18920,main 921eac0)。
• ✅ [finding] check:duration-unit-keys judges the new JSDoc-divergence rule on isDurationShaped() alone while its census also admits keyUnits — two rows of the ruled shape (latencyMs, frequencyHours) escape the zero #18075 解锁 —— check-duration-unit-keys has no self-test battery floor: emptying its vocabulary DE-REGISTERS two cases, shrinking the battery 103 to 101 while the printed count stays non-zero #18512 已 closed completed(merged PR test(spec): a battery roster, floor and verdict handshake for check-duration-unit-keys #18916,main 02f8e45)。
• ⏸ finding(spec): zod z.record() SILENTLY DROPS a __proto__ key from its parse OUTPUT while reporting success — ObjectSchema accepts the document and hands back a different one #17852 仍串行 —— PR feat(spec)!: every engine-evaluated expression slot requires a non-blank source #18638 仍 open,未合。
• ⏸ [finding] check-clause2-carriers' correction remedy prints a HARDCODED comment id in the imperative — copying it as printed silently voids the correction, in the one field that carries the whole fix #18376 仍串行 —— 等 PR fix(scripts): route check:single-claim-paths through the session proxy so a seat can run it #18935 落地(现已入队)。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

R2 · #18075 结算 — ESCALATE(零 diff 前提证伪 → 决策卡)。 07:10Z。

needs-user-decision 挂上、pm:dispatched 摘掉、assignee 清空,一笔 replace,回读六态唯一。分析、四棱块、Governing text、三选项与推荐锚在 #18075 评论(本贴⛔不复制第二份)。推荐 A。

⭐ 本轮最该记的一条:我的派发令三条读数全错,错法相同

我在 Zone 2 写的三条 —— 「latencyMs 只在 service-datasource 测试里」「找不到 frequencyHours」「门禁只扫 packages/spec/src/**」—— 三条全错。成因是同一个:我跑了 git grep … | head -6,从被截断的列表下结论。

⏱️ 07:04Z 无截断重取:packages/spec/src/ai/usage.zod.ts:52 有 latencyMs(连 .describe() 都没有)· packages/spec/src/system/tenant.zod.ts:603 有 frequencyHours · ROOT_DIR_WATCH_HINTS(:303)是多根行走,门禁自陈 2520 个源文件。

⭐ 而我的结论「前提可能已死」碰巧半对 —— 机制确实死了(PR #18486 退役了 isDurationShaped())。这比全错更值得记:不要因为结论蒙对就以为读数没问题。 ⛔ 已在卡上逐条公开作废。

裁定

• 机制死,症状活。 卡面说「被 keyUnits 收进普查的键永远判不到」恰好反了:keyUnits 是今天守卫的第一个半边。而 latencyMs / frequencyHours 两行仍然不被拒,出口换成了「一致性豁免」。
• 树把裁决保留给了这张卡:check-duration-unit-keys.ts:821-826 逐字写着「⛔ This half is DEFERRED to [finding] check:duration-unit-keys judges the new JSDoc-divergence rule on isDurationShaped() alone while its census also admits keyUnits — two rows of the ruled shape (latencyMs, frequencyHours) escape the zero #18075, ⛔ not argued correct here … whether it is an offence is that card's question」,且任一方向都改动 header 的 shape (b) 基础拒绝。⇒ 实现席回答它就是替维护者选择。dev 拒绝给推荐,理由正当;四棱块由本席写(那是 PM 的活,不是 dev 的)。
• 消融实测:删豁免 ⇒ 恰好 2 行红(就是这两行)+ 恰好 2 条自测翻(就是那两条 DEFERRED pin)。恢复以 git hash-object == HEAD + 空 git diff HEAD 证明,⛔ 不以退出码证明。

并入本卡、⛔ 不立孪生

instant 豁免分支只读 proseUnits(:719)、从不查 jsdocUnits,而 durationType 分支三通道全读(:745-747)—— 同形缺陷一拒一放,header 未声明。夹具已演示配正控制,活行 0(潜伏)。承接者是本卡裁决后的后继 PR,载体明确 ⇒ 记在卡上。

落地

• PR fix(scripts): route check:single-claim-paths through the session proxy so a seat can run it #18935 仍在队列(07:08Z 读,已排 12 分钟),看护中。
• PR fix(check-adr-symbol-anchors): the verdict may not claim a census wider than the vocabulary it read #18925 draft · clean · 全绿 · 两账户请审在案,等你。
• 本道决策箱现 4:承接 #18745:RETIREMENT 臂收紧后,.changeset/18318-evalcontext-no-query-api.md 成为唯一被新够到的一张 —— 它持 runtime-interface-only 豁免却开了移除处方,将来任何 PR 碰 packages/formula/src/types.ts 时会被拒(今天不红;发布消费掉它即自行消失) #18842(席 2 的半状态)· [finding] spec/identity:Organization/Member/Invitation 三张已发布 schema 把 updatedAt 声明为必填、metadata 声明为对象 —— client 对着真实服务器量到的线形一条都不带 updatedAt,四条读路由上 metadata 是 JSON 文本;三处「not relayed」已写在 client 注释里,spec 侧未动 #18728(他席新入)· [finding] the skip-changeset label suppresses the DELIBERATE-CORRECTION refusal whose own text says 「no label and no diff shape makes that safe」 — declared contract against enforced behaviour #18375 · [finding] check:duration-unit-keys judges the new JSDoc-divergence rule on isDurationShaped() alone while its census also admits keyUnits — two rows of the ruled shape (latencyMs, frequencyHours) escape the zero #18075 —— 后两张是本席本班所立。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-steve]

✅ 本班第一笔落地 + R2 续派。 07:30Z。

落地账本(本班)

#	卡	PR	merged_at	main sha
1	#18314	#18935	2026-09-18T07:25:16Z	16cb493d

两读数(⛔ 不以单一读数判落地):PR 对象 merged: true / merged_at 07:25:16Z,且 origin/main 携带 16cb493d fix(scripts): route check:single-claim-paths through the session proxy so a seat can run it (#18935)。队列路径:ready 06:56:16Z → added_to_merge_queue 06:56:18Z → merged 07:25:16Z(队列内 ~29 分钟)。

⚠️ GitHub 自动关单留了半状态,已修:Fixes #18314 把卡关成 completed,但 pm:dispatched 还挂着。已一笔摘掉,回读 priority:p2 + domain:spec,assignee 留作已完成卡的归属(⛔ 归属不是状态)。⭐ 这是个可复现的形态,不是一次性事故:凡走 Fixes #N 自动关单的卡都会这样,⇒ 每次落地后都要回头摘 pm:*,⛔ 不能假定关单顺手带走了状态标。

串行队:4 张已解 3

• ✅ [finding] check-widening-tells 的反方向漏报:把一个键**改成** z.unknown() 是真实扩大,却被 #16943 的替换预算无声付账 —— 实测在 #18626 前后皆然 #18629 解锁并已派(在飞,分支 e295d68a 已推,尚无 PR)
• ✅ [finding] check:duration-unit-keys judges the new JSDoc-divergence rule on isDurationShaped() alone while its census also admits keyUnits — two rows of the ruled shape (latencyMs, frequencyHours) escape the zero #18075 解锁并已派 → 前提半死,已转决策箱
• ✅ [finding] check-clause2-carriers' correction remedy prints a HARDCODED comment id in the imperative — copying it as printed silently voids the correction, in the one field that carries the whole fix #18376 解锁并已派(本条同笔)—— 重新定价 UNAFFECTED 且坐标未漂:16cb493d 只改了一个文件、从未碰本卡文件;:387 的硬编码 id 与 :1333 的诊断都还在(控制点亮:文件 9132 行)
• ⏸ finding(spec): zod z.record() SILENTLY DROPS a __proto__ key from its parse OUTPUT while reporting success — ObjectSchema accepts the document and hands back a different one #17852 仍串行 —— PR feat(spec)!: every engine-evaluated expression slot requires a non-blank source #18638 仍 open

在飞 2

卡	分支	面
#18629	claude/issue-18629-widening-tells-reverse-direction	scripts/pm/check-widening-tells.mjs
#18376	claude/issue-18376-clause2-carriers-hardcoded-comment-id	scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs

两者文件面不相交。⚠️ 给 #18376 的派发令里我主动写了一条自陈警告:本轮我给 dev 的三条读数曾因 | head -6 截断而全错,要求它把我的数字当线索、自行重新求导、错了直说。⛔ 不让下一个 dev 在我的坏读数上施工。

等人工

PR #18925(#18899,受管面)draft · clean · 全绿 · hotlong + os-zhuang 请审在案。⛔ 本席不合、不翻 ready。

---

Generated by Claude Code