[finding] 两份已落在 main 上的 ADR 仍写着 `Status: Proposed — awaiting the maintainer's hand-merge, which is itself the acceptance act`(0132 / 0133),而同约定的 0130 / 0131 落地后都改成了 Accepted

[os-try-charles]

两份已经落在 main 上的 ADR 仍然写着「Status: Proposed —— 等待维护者手工合并,而那次合并本身就是接受行为」,并且紧跟一句「⛔ Nothing below is settled until this record merges」。它们已经合并了。 ⇒ 记录按它自己的规则读是已接受,而它的 Status 字段说未接受。

⚠️ 这不是措辞洁癖:每一处引用这两份 ADR 当作既定法的地方(本轮卡 #17379 的普查就整篇建立在 ADR-0132 之上),读者一旦回去查源文件,看到的是 Proposed。

读数(origin/main 工作树 1e496f9796126b0398c026c96fb8d240f1982e91)

① 两个实例,各自的落地是查得到的

ADR	Status 字段当刻原文	它实际落地于
docs/adr/0132-multi-organization-runtime-is-open-core.md	「Proposed (2026-09-06) — awaiting the maintainer's hand-merge, which is itself the acceptance act for a governed surface (Prime Directive #14). ⛔ Nothing below is settled until this record merges.」	c677cda816 · 2026-09-07T05:30:13Z · PR #16215 · committer Jack Zhuang <…hotlong@users.noreply.github.com>
docs/adr/0133-org-management-open-basics.md	「Proposed (2026-09-06) — awaiting the maintainer's hand-merge, which is the acceptance act for a governed surface (Prime Directive #14).」	13c08356ab · 2026-09-07T07:19:25Z · PR #16267

⭐ ADR-0132 那一行尤其硬:它的落地提交的 committer 就是维护者本人 ⇒ 它自己所说的「acceptance act」确实发生过,只是没有人回去改那一行。

② 阳性对照 —— 同一套约定,改过状态的长这样

0130-release-artifact-as-co-ownership-boundary.md
  **Status**: Accepted (2026-09-01) — accepted by the merge that landed it on `main` (#14151)
0131-total-organization-ownership-no-null-organization-id.md
  **Status**: Accepted (2026-09-04) — accepted by the merge that landed it on `main` (#14976)

⇒ 这两份同样带着 acceptance act 那句话(各出现 2 次 / 1 次),而它们的 Status 在落地后被改成了 Accepted 并回指落地 PR。所以这不是"本仓没有这个约定",是这两份漏了那一步。

③ 总体与它的边界,⛔ 不夸大

docs/adr/*.md 总数                                  139        ← 发火对照
  Status 读作 Accepted                               92
  Status 读作 Proposed                               20
  其中带 `acceptance act` 那句话的                      7
    …其中 Status 仍是 Proposed 的                      3  →  0132 / 0133 / 0134

⚠️ 0134 要排除,并且理由要写出来,⛔ 不能凑数:0134-env-side-scim-provisioning.md 的 Proposed 是自解释且正确的 —— 它自陈是 cloud ADR-0071 的镜像,而那份在 cloud 侧也是 Proposed「founder to accept」。⇒ 它的 Proposed 说的是被镜像那一份还没被接受,不是这一份没落地。

⇒ 真实实例是 2 个,⛔ 不是 20 个,也 ⛔ 不是 7 个。

⛔ 我没量的部分,不许当读数用

• ⛔ 没量另外 17 份 Proposed(不带 acceptance act 那句话的)是不是也该改 —— 它们用的可能是别的约定,也可能真的还没被接受。本卡只主张带那句话的两份自相矛盾。
• ⛔ 没量 ADR-0133 的落地是否构成它所说的那次「hand-merge」:它的落地提交 committer 不是维护者(PR docs(adr): ADR-0133 — organization management, the open basics; mirroring cloud ADR-0081 D1/D3/D4 with Provenance #16267)。⇒ 若结论是"它确实还没被接受",那 ADR-0133 的问题就不是文字过时,而是一份未被接受的治理记录已经在 main 上被当作法引用——那比本卡主张的严重一档。这一条必须由能读到该 PR 合并路径的人裁,⛔ 本席不裁。
• ⛔ 没量有多少处代码/文档把这两份当既定法引用(本轮只知道卡 Sweep the remaining @objectstack/organizations enterprise/cloud-private spellings that #16718's pattern could not see #17379 的普查是其中之一)。

为什么值得一张卡

docs/adr/** 是治理面。一份治理记录的 Status 字段是它唯一的机器可读的效力声明;而这两份的 Status 与它们自己写下的接受规则直接冲突。⇒ 任何按 Status 判断"这条能不能引"的人或工具,今天会得到错误答案,而正文却在要求读者「Nothing below is settled until this record merges」。

⚠️ 失效方向是沉默的:没有任何门禁会因此变红(实测:两份都在 main 上,CI 全绿)。

验收(⛔ 不规定实现)

1. ⭐ 先裁 ADR-0133 那条(见上「没量的部分」第 2 条):是"文字过时"还是"未被接受却已被引用"。⛔ 两种结论的修法相反 —— 前者改一行,后者要补一次接受行为。
2. ADR-0132 若按文字过时处理:照 0130/0131 的既有拼法改(Accepted (日期) — accepted by the merge that landed it on \main` (feat(organizations): bring the multi-organization runtime back to open core — the org-scoping registrar ships open, the licence gate stays in cloud (ADR-0132) #16215)`),⛔ 不要发明第三种拼法。
3. ⛔ 不要顺手把另外 17 份 Proposed 一起改 —— 本卡没量它们,批量改会把一个没量过的总体当成量过的。
4. ⚠️ docs/adr/** 是治理面 ⇒ 落地走维护者路径;本席对该面的 auto-merge 恒 422。

查重

⛔ REST /search/issues 在本通道不服务(卡 #16233 已记),所以按完整枚举查:拉全部 538 个 open 非 PR issue(537 带正文)本地 grep。

'ADR-0132'          → 1   (#17379,本轮的普查卡,引用而非同题)
'Status: Proposed'  → 2   (#16140 谈 ADR-0026 的 manifest 例子,顺带提到它是 Proposed;#18477 是一张"去写一份 Proposed 形态新 ADR"的卡)
'acceptance act'    → 0
'hand-merge'        → 1   (#17193,已读,非同题)
'ADR status'        → 1   (#16140,同上)
'organizations'     → 17  ← 发火对照

⇒ 两处疑似都逐条读过,均非同题。发火对照 17 命中 ⇒ 那些零是读数。

来源

卡 #17379(@objectstack/organizations 措辞普查)的 dev 在 out_of_scope_findings 里交回 ADR-0132 那一条(class b);⭐ 它没有自己立卡(dev 席不 POST issue),交回给了派发席。本席据此重取了全部读数,并把它的单实例扩成有对照、有排除理由的总体:它只报了 0132,实测同形的是 0132 与 0133,而 0134 看着同形但必须排除。

⛔ 未定级、未指派、未定车道 —— 那是分诊的活。

_{domain:devx 执行席 · 座位贴 #6023 · session session_017ef78bLdybu3AffehKkhfk · 读数取自 origin/main 的一次性 worktree}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-sam]

Triage 定级(常规档) · 2026-09-17T14:04Z · 分诊席 objectstack#6015 · R+273

• 判据 (b) —— 两份已经落在 main 上的 ADR 仍写着「Status: Proposed —— 等待维护者手工合并,而那次合并本身就是接受行为」,后面还跟着「⛔ Nothing below is settled until this record merges」。它们已经合并了。 ⇒ 记录按它自己的规则读是「已接受」,而它的 Status 字段说「未接受」。
• ✅ 两个实例各自的落地都查得到(0132 → c677cda816 / PR feat(organizations): bring the multi-organization runtime back to open core — the org-scoping registrar ships open, the licence gate stays in cloud (ADR-0132) #16215;0133 → 13c08356ab / PR docs(adr): ADR-0133 — organization management, the open basics; mirroring cloud ADR-0081 D1/D3/D4 with Provenance #16267),⭐ 而 ADR-0132 那一行尤其硬:它的落地提交的 committer 就是维护者本人 ⇒ 它自己所说的 acceptance act 确实发生过,只是没人回去改那一行。✅ 阳性对照:同一套约定的 0130 / 0131 落地后都改成了 Accepted。
• 车道 domain:skills(受管面 docs/adr/**)· priority:p2 · type Task。
• ⭐ 为什么不是 p3「只是个状态字段」:每一处把这两份 ADR 当既定法引用的地方,读者回查源文件看到的都是 Proposed。本轮的卡 Sweep the remaining @objectstack/organizations enterprise/cloud-private spellings that #16718's pattern could not see #17379 的普查整篇建立在 ADR-0132 之上 —— ⇒ 一份写着「未定」的既定法,会让引用它的人怀疑自己的整条依据。
• ⚠️ 受管面 ⇒ 单独 PR、维护者合。

⛔ 不认领、不派发。
_{本评论来自分诊座位}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-justin]

Claim: PM loop round 1
Session: session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu
Branch: claude/issue-18532-adr-0132-0133-status-accepted
Worktree: objectstack-issue-18532
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#1
File surface: docs/adr/0132-multi-organization-runtime-is-open-core.md + docs/adr/0133-org-management-open-basics.md only (both landed on main — 0132 by PR #16215, squash c677cda816, merged 2026-09-07T06:15:26Z by os-zhuang; 0133 by PR #16267, squash 13c08356ab, merged 2026-09-07T07:37:31Z by os-zhuang — while their :3 **Status** lines still read 「Proposed (2026-09-06) — awaiting the maintainer's hand-merge, which is (itself) the acceptance act …」 followed by 「⛔ Nothing … is settled until this record merges」; the positive controls 0130 :3 / 0131 :3 read 「Accepted (date) — accepted by the merge that landed it on main (#PR, commit sha)」; deliverable = the two Status lines in the 0130/0131 form with their own PR and commit, the 「nothing is settled until this record merges」 sentence removed or turned past tense, ⛔ nothing else in either file moves, ⛔ 0134 untouched — its Proposed mirrors cloud ADR-0071's own state; the card's unmeasured worry about 0133's merge path is answered: merged_by os-zhuang, the authorized approver, so the acceptance act it names did occur); governed docs/adr/** ⇒ draft, skip-changeset, the seat's four-piece, the maintainer's hand lands it
Container & model: M(治理记录状态行回填,两文件各一行), mode:subagent, model: claude-opus-5 — node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack docs/adr/0131-x.md at 2026-09-17T15:50Z on the fast-forwarded tree (f8eaf6704): 「Model tier — no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 3 declared glob(s)」; default tier taken; the seat's contract-tier review at delivery
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: 5715688084
Serial constraints cleared: 22 open PRs' file lists read at 2026-09-17T15:50Z — none touches docs/adr/0132-* or docs/adr/0133-*; os-verify-lock.sh --status at 2026-09-17T15:50Z: no holder; shared checkout at origin/main f8eaf6704. Slot: slot 2 of 3 this round (slot 1 #18673; slot 3 reserved for #18461 after PR #18689 lands). Total order at 2026-09-17T15:50Z: as recorded on #18673's claim — p2 Tasks by age after #18461: this card (09-16 21:06) precedes #18536 (09-16 21:16, SKILL.md serial queue) and #18543 (post-stamped serial queue).
Ruling-ref: 5715688084

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-justin]

os-dev-report

{
"issue": 18532,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-18532-adr-0132-0133-status-accepted",
"pr": "#18711",
"head_sha": "a937609f6cbfdb498360ff5111aa777d0686f933",
"files": [
"docs/adr/0132-multi-organization-runtime-is-open-core.md",
"docs/adr/0133-org-management-open-basics.md"
],
"diff_stat": "2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) — 0132 is 3 physical lines (a wrapped bullet) before and after; 0133 is 1.",
"session": "session_01Gqi43smmqjJ5sUrhfoPeKu — subagent, parent's harness-stamped id",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"premise_note": "Re-verified on the tip, not on the card's 1e496f9. On origin/main f8eaf67 both Status lines still read Proposed exactly as the card quoted them, and both records were on main. Two SUB-premises in the dispatch text did NOT hold and are reported below; neither changed the deliverable.",
"summary": "ADR-0132 and ADR-0133 both landed on main on 2026-09-07 while their :3 Status lines still read 'Proposed — awaiting the maintainer's hand-merge, which is (itself) the acceptance act'. Each line now takes the form the positive controls 0130 :3 / 0131 :3 already use — 'Accepted (2026-09-07) — accepted by the merge that landed it on main (#PR, commit sha), which is (itself) the acceptance act for a governed surface (Prime Directive #14)' — with that record's OWN landing facts (0132: #16215 / c677cda; 0133: #16267 / 13c0835). Each file keeps its own local form: 0132 stays a wrapped bullet under a list dash and keeps 'which is itself', 0133 stays one unwrapped line and keeps 'which is the'. 0132's trailing 'Nothing below is settled until this record merges' sentence is dropped, which is what 0130 and 0131 did with theirs (neither control carries such a clause). 0133's trailing sentence is a DIFFERENT one and is preserved byte-for-byte. Nothing else in either file moves; ADR-0134 and the other 17 Proposed records are untouched.",
"status_lines_before_after": {
"measured_on": "origin/main f8eaf67 (this branch's base); the card's readings were taken on 1e496f9",
"0130_control_unchanged": "Status: Accepted (2026-09-01) — accepted by the merge that landed it on main (#14151, commit 682d03ba7), which is itself the acceptance act for a governed surface (Prime Directive #14).",
"0131_control_unchanged": "Status: Accepted (2026-09-04) — accepted by the merge that landed it on main (#14976, commit 0ed271574), which is itself the acceptance act for a governed surface (Prime Directive #14). Execution is paused under #15193 and the maintainer's standing instruction; that pause is carried there, not by this status line.",
"0132_before": "- Status: Proposed (2026-09-06) — awaiting the maintainer's hand-merge, which is itself the\n acceptance act for a governed surface (Prime Directive #14). ⛔ Nothing below is settled until\n this record merges.",
"0132_after": "- Status: Accepted (2026-09-07) — accepted by the merge that landed it on main\n (#16215, commit c677cda816), which\n is itself the acceptance act for a governed surface (Prime Directive #14).",
"0133_before": "- Status: Proposed (2026-09-06) — awaiting the maintainer's hand-merge, which is the acceptance act for a governed surface (Prime Directive #14). ⛔ Nothing in this file is a new decision; see Provenance.",
"0133_after": "- Status: Accepted (2026-09-07) — accepted by the merge that landed it on main (#16267, commit 13c08356ab), which is the acceptance act for a governed surface (Prime Directive #14). ⛔ Nothing in this file is a new decision; see Provenance."
},
"landing_facts_and_verification": {
"0132": "PR #16215, squash c677cda, merged 2026-09-07T06:15:26Z by os-zhuang (commit date 2026-09-07T05:30:13Z).",
"0133": "PR #16267, squash 13c0835, merged 2026-09-07T07:37:31Z by os-zhuang (commit date 2026-09-07T07:19:25Z).",
"how_verified": [
"single-parent squash: git log -1 --format=%P returns exactly one parent each (acabd24… for 0132, 8976ea1… for 0133)",
"commit subject names the PR: '…(ADR-0132) (#16215)' and '…with Provenance (#16267)'",
"the commit INTRODUCED the file: git show --stat SHA -- docs/adr/0132-…md gives 1 file changed, 225 insertions(+); 0133 gives 273 insertions(+) — both are creations, so each sha is that record own landing and not a later edit",
"ancestor of main: git merge-base --is-ancestor SHA origin/main, exit 0 for both",
"merged_at / merged_by / merge_commit_sha from one REST read each of /pulls/16215 and /pulls/16267; merge_commit_sha is byte-equal to the sha above, merged true, base.ref main"
],
"shallow_control_leg": "MANDATORY and it changed the answer. This checkout is shallow (boundary 5de9372, 2026-09-09T21:18Z). On the window as fetched, --is-ancestor answered exit 1 (NOT an ancestor) for BOTH shas, which are dated 2026-09-07 and therefore outside the window — a confident false negative. After git fetch --shallow-since=2026-08-25 origin main (694 to 2867 commits) both test legs read exit 0, and two control commits at least as deep as the tested pair — 682d03b (ADR-0130 own landing, 2026-09-01) and 0ed2715 (ADR-0131, 2026-09-04) — also read exit 0. Four exit codes recorded; the negative is retired, not re-rolled.",
"card_unmeasured_worry_answered": "The card explicitly declined to judge whether ADR-0133's landing constituted the hand-merge its own line names. It did: merged_by is os-zhuang, the authorized approver. So both records are 'the text went stale', NOT 'an unaccepted governance record is cited as law', and one line each is the whole repair."
},
"consumer_grep": "git grep -n 'ADR-0132|ADR-0133|0132-multi-organization|0133-org-management' at a937609 gives 110 hits across 51 files. NO edit to any of them. By area: packages/plugins 18 files (organizations, plugin-auth, plugin-dev, plugin-security), packages/qa/dogfood 7, packages/cli 5, packages/verify 4, packages/spec 3, docs/adr 3 (0105 plus the two records themselves), skills/objectstack-data 2, packages/services/service-cluster 2, .changeset 3, and one each in content/docs, docs/qa, packages/types, scripts/. The card named #17379's census as one reader; the reliance is much wider — packages/plugins/organizations alone cites ADR-0132 in its plugin, its README and nine tests including pin tests that name it as the authority for the wall they hold.",
"tests": "DERIVED, no hand-fed path list: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack from the worktree; it took the change set itself (three-dot vs merge base) and printed the two ADR paths. 18 families derived, 18 run, ALL exit 0 at head a937609, each captured redirect-then-dollar-question and never across a pipe: check-adr-links.mjs :: 0 | check-adr-links.mjs --self-test :: 0 | check-adr-symbol-anchors.mjs :: 0 | check-adr-symbol-anchors.mjs --self-test :: 0 | check-ci-filter-parity.mjs :: 0 | check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs :: 0 | check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test :: 0 | check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs :: 0 | pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions :: 0 | pnpm check:adr-anchors :: 0 | pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs :: 0 | pnpm check:doc-authoring :: 0 | pnpm check:driver-memory-census :: 0 | pnpm check:nul-bytes :: 0 | pnpm check:pm-governed-merges :: 0 | pnpm check:pm-prior-rulings :: 0 | pnpm check:refd-timer-probe :: 0 | pnpm check:watch-hint-literal :: 0. Reconcile: dispatch-gates.mjs --ran RANFILE gives exit 0, "18 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 18 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 18 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3)". BEYOND the derived set: check-governed-merges.mjs --test on both paths :: exit 3 = GOVERNED (the verdict, not a failure), "docs/adr/** x2, a human merge is the review record for this PR (#9495 regime)"; repo-wide pnpm lint (eslint . --no-inline-config, NOT narrowed) :: exit 0 at a937609. ONE GATE REFUSED BEFORE MEASURING and was re-run, not recorded as a pass: on the first sweep pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions exited 3, "PREREQUISITE NOT MET — the workspace package @objectstack/formula is not built … Nothing was measured"; after pnpm exec turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint through scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh (VERDICT command-exit 0, held 140s, waited 0s) it exits 0, and only the exit-0 run is reported. No ablation and no reverse verification: the diff is four lines of prose in two governance records, there is no behaviour to mutate. NOT MEASURED, named by the derivation itself and left to CI: 53 artifact-roster families (their silent verdict is a fact about a tracked list, not a clearance), 11 families whose declared population is too wide to place, 2 families whose argv takes a CI-only value, 1 path-scheduled CI job with 5 steps that have no local invocation, and 14 changeset-conditional families — not applicable, this PR is skip-changeset. TREE STATE: origin/main moved 3 commits (72dd95f) mid-run and the derivation flagged the tree stale for scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs; origin/main was merged in (5 files, all disjoint from this diff, no os-regen deferral), @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint were force-rebuilt because the merge moved packages/formula/src/validate.ts, and the ENTIRE sweep was re-derived and re-run at the merged head. The re-derivation produced a byte-identical 18-command list and no staleness warning. Every number above is from a937609, the final commit.",
"pr_state": "Draft, base main, "Fixes #18532", "Clause-②: no" in the body AT CREATION, labels documentation + size/xs + skip-changeset. GOVERNED docs/adr/** — NOT flipped ready, NOT queued, NO auto-merge armed; the maintainer hand lands it. PR body written ONCE at creation and read back: stored byte-identical apart from the trailing newline the platform strips, exactly one footer in session-URL form, no angle-bracket or control-character mutation (the three placeholder fragments were spelled as plain words before sending). needs:contract-review is ABSENT from the PR — not applied, not removed, not waited on; node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair 18711 :: exit 0, deriving pair PR 18711 / card 18532 via the closing keyword, head sha a937609, claim 5717279945 clause-2 "no" matching the PR body.",
"skip_changeset_basis": "No published thing moves. docs/adr/** is on the no-publish fast track: no package files[] ships an ADR, and the diff is four lines of prose in two governance records. Clause-②: no.",
"mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called, read or write. All GitHub traffic went through the REST proxy with curl and GITHUB_TOKEN, plus the repo own scripts/pm/label-write.mjs and check-clause2-carriers.mjs, which are REST clients themselves.",
"api_writes": "3 — (1) POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (HTTP 201, draft PR #18711); (2) POST /repos//issues/18711/labels via scripts/pm/label-write.mjs (HTTP 200, adds skip-changeset only, additive verb, never PUT or PATCH), four steps performed and printed: read set was [documentation, size/xs] (a bot had added documentation between an earlier read and this one — another actor write, NOT corrected), target [documentation, size/xs, skip-changeset], read-back MATCHES the union; (3) POST /repos//issues/18532/comments (this report). Zero writes beyond that budget. 3 git pushes (empty-branch routing probe, the edit commit, the merge commit) are not API writes. The routing probe returned 0, no 403.",
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"noted, not filed: ADR-0133 :85 to :97 carries a pre-merge frame that survived its own merge — the block headed "⚠️ A note for the hand-merge, stated rather than decided." ending "If the maintainer prefers one combined record, that is still a merge-time call — the two files are disjoint, so folding them is a move, not a rewrite." Quoted here and in the PR body because the dispatch required any such sentence be quoted BEFORE touching it: it is NOT touched. It asserts nothing about this record acceptance state (it offers a structural option about folding 0133 into 0132), and scope excludes every other line in both files. The same block already reads "That obstacle is gone — the record has landed", about ADR-0132. Successor: the seat and maintainer reading this PR, where it is quoted in Acceptance notes; amending it is a one-line follow-up on the same file. Dedupe words: ADR-0133, note for the hand-merge, merge-time call, combined record, pre-merge frame.",
"noted, not filed: DISPATCH PREMISE (a) did not hold — the dispatch said "acceptance act" occurs in the BODIES of 0132 (twice) and 0133 (once), to be left untouched. Measured on f8eaf67: grep -c gives 1 in each file, and in both cases that single occurrence IS the Status line this PR edits. There is no body occurrence in either file. The 2x/1x counts belong to 0130 (:3 and :533) and 0131 (:3) — which is what the CARD itself says; the dispatch summary re-attributed them. No deliverable changed. Successor: the dispatching domain:skills seat, reading this report. Dedupe words: acceptance act occurrence count, 0132 0133 body, dispatch premise, grep -c.",
"noted, not filed: DISPATCH PREMISE (b) did not hold — the dispatch described 0133 Status line as carrying the "Nothing … is settled until this record merges" sentence. It does not; only 0132 does. 0133 trailing forbidden-sign sentence is the unrelated "Nothing in this file is a new decision; see Provenance" one, which is preserved byte-for-byte. The card own table quoted 0133 correctly. No deliverable changed. Successor: the dispatching domain:skills seat, reading this report. Dedupe words: nothing is settled until this record merges, 0133 status sentence, provenance, new decision.",
"noted, not filed: short-sha spelling is 10 hex here, 9 in the controls. 0130 and 0131 use 9 digits, which is what git rev-parse --short emitted at their time; on this tree after deepening the default abbreviation is 10, and 10 is also what the card body and the claim comment both recorded (c677cda, 13c0835). 10 was chosen so the file, the card and the claim agree; the full 40-hex shas are in the PR body landing table and the sentence FORM is the controls exactly. Successor: the maintainer at merge time — the PR body names the choice. Dedupe words: ADR status short sha, abbreviation length, rev-parse --short, 9 vs 10 hex.",
"noted, not filed: the other 17 Proposed ADRs are untouched, and ADR-0134 is excluded on the card own reasoning (its Proposed mirrors cloud ADR-0071 own state and is self-explanatory). The card explicitly declined to measure the 17, so a batch edit would treat an unmeasured population as a measured one. Successor: NONE — no PR and no person is scheduled to touch them; if the maintainer wants that population swept it is a new card. Dedupe words: Proposed ADR census, 17 remaining, ADR-0134 cloud ADR-0071 mirror, ADR status sweep."
]
}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-justin]

ACCEPT — in-seat contract-tier review of PR #18711 (head a937609f6, report 5717669995) by the skills seat, 2026-09-17T16:33Z. Verified against GitHub and a scratch worktree at the head, ⛔ not against the report:

• Scope = the claim (5717279945): two files, +4 / −4 — docs/adr/0132-multi-organization-runtime-is-open-core.md :3–:5 (one wrapped bullet, three physical lines before and after) and docs/adr/0133-org-management-open-basics.md :3 (one line). Read on the head beside the positive controls: 0130 :3 「Status: Accepted (2026-09-01) — accepted by the merge that landed it on main (#14151, commit 682d03ba7), which is itself the acceptance act …」 and 0131 :3 (same form, docs(adr): ADR-0131 — organization ownership is total: no NULL organization_id; declared metadata stays in code; rows only when an organization authored them (Refs #13564) #14976 / 0ed271574) are byte-unchanged; 0132 :3–:5 now read 「- Status: Accepted (2026-09-07) — accepted by the merge that landed it on main (#16215, commit c677cda816), which is itself the acceptance act for a governed surface (Prime Directive feat: Comprehensive CRM example demonstrating all ObjectStack protocol features #14).」 with the 「⛔ Nothing below is settled until this record merges」 sentence dropped (as 0130 / 0131 carry none); 0133 :3 reads the same form with docs(adr): ADR-0133 — organization management, the open basics; mirroring cloud ADR-0081 D1/D3/D4 with Provenance #16267 / 13c08356ab, keeps its own 「which is the」 wording and its unrelated trailing sentence 「⛔ Nothing in this file is a new decision; see Provenance」 byte-for-byte. Each file keeps its local shape (list dash, wrapping). Nothing else in either file moves; 0134 and the other 17 Proposed records untouched.
• Landing facts, verified by the seat before dispatch and by the dev on the head: 0132 — PR feat(organizations): bring the multi-organization runtime back to open core — the org-scoping registrar ships open, the licence gate stays in cloud (ADR-0132) #16215, squash c677cda816, merged 2026-09-07T06:15:26Z by os-zhuang; 0133 — PR docs(adr): ADR-0133 — organization management, the open basics; mirroring cloud ADR-0081 D1/D3/D4 with Provenance #16267, squash 13c08356ab, merged 2026-09-07T07:37:31Z by os-zhuang (the authorized approver — so the card's unmeasured worry about 0133's merge path is answered: the acceptance act its own line names did occur, and both records are 「text went stale」, not 「an unaccepted record cited as law」). The dev's control legs: single parent each, the commit INTRODUCED each file (225 / 273 insertions), both ancestors of main — after deepening the shallow checkout, which had first answered a false NOT-an-ancestor for both; the negative was retired by the control commits 682d03ba7 / 0ed271574 reading the same way, not re-rolled.
• Two premises in the seat's own dispatch text did not hold, and the dev measured them rather than inheriting them — disclosed here as the seat's errors: (a) the dispatch said 「acceptance act」 occurs in 0132's BODY twice and 0133's once; on the head each file carries it exactly once, on the Status line itself — the 2× / 1× counts are 0130's and 0131's, as the CARD said; (b) the dispatch described 0133's Status line as carrying 「Nothing … is settled until this record merges」; only 0132's does. Neither changed the deliverable, and the dev quoted 0133 :85–:97's pre-merge frame (「A note for the hand-merge, stated rather than decided … a merge-time call」) BEFORE leaving it untouched, as the dispatch required.
• Consumers (reading, no edit): 110 hits across 51 files cite ADR-0132 / 0133 (packages/plugins/organizations alone in its plugin, README and nine tests naming ADR-0132 as the authority for the wall) — the reliance the card named through Sweep the remaining @objectstack/organizations enterprise/cloud-private spellings that #16718's pattern could not see #17379 is far wider, which is why a Proposed on a landed law was p2.
• Gates: 18 families derived from the tree, 18 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, all exit 0 at the head (incl. check-adr-links, check-adr-symbol-anchors, check:adr-anchors, check:doc-authoring); check:doc-formula-expressions first refused (PREREQUISITE, packages unbuilt), rebuilt through the verify lock and re-run at 0; repo-wide pnpm lint exit 0; origin/main merged in mid-run (5 disjoint files) and the whole sweep re-derived and re-run at the merged head a937609f6, byte-identical command list. Seat-side on the head: check-adr-links 0, check-adr-symbol-anchors 0, check-closing-keyword-parity 0, check-governed-merges --test GOVERNED (exit 3, docs/adr/** ×2), --pair 18711 0, harness CURRENT. CI on the head: 35 check runs read explicitly, every one completed — 24 success, 11 skipped (all in the expected-skips roster, exit 0); commit status success; none failure.
• Writes: api_writes 3 (draft PR, skip-changeset via label-write read back, this report), mcp_calls 0, PR body written once at create — within budget; no ablation (four lines of prose, nothing to mutate).
• Out-of-scope, noted: (1) 0133 :85–:97's pre-merge frame survived its own merge — a one-line follow-up on the same file, for the maintainer's eye at approval; (2) short shas spelled at 10 hex (the card's and claim's spelling; the controls use 9) — the form is the controls', the digits are the tree's current abbreviation; (3) the 17 other Proposed records are an unmeasured population — a new card if the maintainer wants them swept.
• Landing: governed docs/adr/** ⇒ four-piece — this ACCEPT, ## 维护者速读(终稿) on the PR, needs-user-decision, review requested from os-zhuang + hotlong; an authorized APPROVED lands it by ruling C.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-justin]

LANDED — PR #18711 (#18532, governed docs/adr/**: ADR-0132 :3–:5 and ADR-0133 :3 **Status** lines from 「Proposed (2026-09-06) — awaiting the maintainer's hand-merge …」 to the 0130 / 0131 form with each record's own landing facts — PR #16215 c677cda816 / PR #16267 13c08356ab, both merged_by os-zhuang; +4 / −4) merged through the queue at 2026-09-18T02:00:15Z (merged_at), squash f9a9e76fee70fa19cc6573ffea4936226f241603 (single parent 802a91b7262e3096c91b13766726e40d70780bac, an ancestor of origin/main). Governed surface (docs/adr/**): the seat's ACCEPT 5717880404 here, ## 维护者速读(终稿) 5717880768 on the PR, needs-user-decision + reviewers at 2026-09-17T16:34Z; os-zhuang APPROVED at 2026-09-18T01:13:39Z (review 5243115657 on the ACCEPT head a937609f6c), marked ready and enqueued by hand at 2026-09-18T01:14:40Z; the seat stripped needs-user-decision at 2026-09-18T01:15:15Z per ruling C (--pair 18711 0, CI 40 / 15 skipped rostered, harness CURRENT at 88aa326deb). The card auto-closed completed at 2026-09-18T02:00:17Z on the PR's Fixes; pm:dispatched is stripped in the same act. Landing criterion per the seat's publication register: MERGED through the queue, read from merged_at.

---

Generated by Claude Code