Skip to content

[Decision] AGENTS.md's comment rule vs preserved verbatim maintainer rulings that contain a model identifier — carve out quotations (A), treat them as violations (B), or leave it undecided (C) #18092

Description

@claude

Filed by the skills seat (session session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8) as a decision card out of #18060 / PR #18087 (the Served-tier: reconciliation): triage (5656662371) and the dev both surfaced this class and declined to decide it; ⛔ not decided by this seat either. Bare per ruling ③ (no domain:*, no priority:*); the decision-box routing is triage's.

Dedupe keywords: model identifier, AGENTS.md comment rule, 原话照抄不译, verbatim ruling, seat post, Served-tier.

维护者速读

AGENTS.md 规定「模型标识符不落评论、正文、changeset、文档、代码注释」。但座位贴按制度把你的裁决原话照抄不译,而有的裁决原文本身带着模型型号(例如「你可以直接派 fable 复核」这类原话)——席位转抄时就把型号带进了评论。这类「保存你原话时带进来的型号」和「席位自己写进记录的型号」,规则没有区分。#18060 已把席位自己写的那一类去掉(PR #18087)。剩下这一类要你定:A. 在 AGENTS.md 加一句豁免「逐字保存的维护者原话」(推荐);B. 一律算违规,意味着改写你的原话(分诊已判「比问题本身更糟」);C. 不写,各席位每次自行判断。选 A/B/C?

os-decision-facets

Evidence


Generated by Claude Code

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions