[ruling row 7] the user bulk import must admit `manager_id`, resolved in a second pass keyed on the importer's identity key — split from #16678

[os-project-manager]

Maintainer-action: rule how a domain:services card obtains the CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER clause-② verdict its carrier needs — route it to the spec seat (naming how), or rule that this seat's default-judgment-tier review plus the gates suffices — done when node scripts/pm/check-clause2-carriers.mjs --pair 18046 exits 0 with the carrier cleared on both carriers

Split from #16678's Phase 3 landing (5653051072), which flagged it in its own words:

⚠️ Ruling row 7 (admit manager_id to the bulk-import tier, resolved in a second pass keyed on email/phone) is ruled but not delivered here — admin-import-users.ts is untouched and its 0-match reading still holds. That split is this seat's to carry, ⛔ not lost.

This is the card that carries it. The work is already ruled — ⛔ it does not go back to the decision box.

The ruling, verbatim

Ruling 5651634638 (director seat, decision batch #127 item 1, option B), §9 row 7:

7 Bulk import — manager_id admitted to the import tier, resolved in a second pass keyed on the importer's identity key (email / phone), every row-level refusal from row 2 applied, unresolved key = per-row error

Measured — the gap is still open

On origin/main @ 8261ff717:

reading	result
packages/plugins/plugin-auth/src/admin-import-users.ts	632 lines
case-insensitive manager in that file	1 — and it is AuthManagerOptions in a comment, a word match, ⛔ not the field
⇒ field-level manager_id hits	0
POSITIVE CONTROL email in the same file	73

The control is what makes the zero a reading rather than a broken search.

⛔ Consume the landed endpoint; do NOT re-derive its refusals

Phase 3 landed packages/plugins/plugin-auth/src/admin-set-user-manager.ts (476 lines) and already exports the reusable parts:

:131  export const MAX_MANAGER_CHAIN_DEPTH = 20
:134  export type SetUserManagerRefusalReason =
        'self_assignment' | 'cycle' | 'max_depth_exceeded' | 'cross_organization' | 'idp_provisioned'
:146  export interface SetUserManagerEngine
:151  export interface SetUserManagerDeps
:165  export interface SetUserManagerResult
:333  export async function runSetUserManager(...)

The ruling says "every row-level refusal from row 2 applied". The file already carries that table, verbatim from its header:

refusal	error	status	reason
self-assignment	INVALID_FIELD	400	self_assignment
cycle	RESOURCE_CONFLICT	409	cycle
depth cap	VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE	400	max_depth_exceeded
cross-organization	INVALID_REFERENCE	400	cross_organization
directory-owned identity	PERMISSION_DENIED	403	idp_provisioned

⇒ the second pass routes each row through the existing derivation. ⛔ A second copy of these five predicates in the importer is the drift this platform keeps paying for — it is the same shape as #15706 (a mirrored copy of auth rules) and the reason #16678's own design insisted on one derivation. If runSetUserManager cannot be called row-wise as it stands, say so with the measurement and propose the smallest seam; ⛔ do not fork the predicates.

What the card is

1. Admit manager_id to the importer's accepted tier.
2. Resolve it in a second pass, after all rows exist — the ruling's wording, and it is load-bearing: a manager named in row 40 may be created by row 90, so a single-pass resolve would refuse valid input.
3. Key the resolve on the importer's identity key (email / phone) — the same key the importer already uses, ⛔ not a new one.
4. Unresolved key ⇒ per-row error, not a whole-import failure and ⛔ not a silent skip.
5. Apply every row-2 refusal per row, through the existing derivation.

Open questions the taker must answer with a measurement, not a guess

1. Does the importer today have a place for a second pass at all, or does it commit row-by-row? That decides whether this is a small addition or a restructure — unmeasured here.
2. What does the importer's existing per-row error channel look like (rows[].delivery is the shape its header mentions for delivery)? The per-row manager error should ride that channel rather than invent one.
3. runSetUserManager's signature is written for one HTTP call with SetUserManagerDeps; whether N row-wise calls are acceptable or a batch seam is owed is a real design question — answer it with the file open.

Fences

• ⛔ packages/spec is not this lane's and must stay untouched; if a new error.code looks owed, STOP and route it — spec(approvals): ApproverType.describe() still says the manager column has no product write surface — PR #17993 gives it one, and #17640 left the sentence behind #17995 already carries the closed-vocabulary question for this endpoint's five refusals.
• ⛔ content/docs/releases/** untouched.
• ⛔ Do not widen to §4 (org-unit derivation). The ruling cut it, on axis ① (deriving manager_id from unit membership would let a membership edit change a security scope as a side effect), ⛔ not on cost.
• ⛔ Tier 1 stays as it is — { type: 'manager' } resolves a column no product surface can write: sys_user.manager_id is refused by the data API and absent from the auth admin endpoints #16678's delivery pinned the ABSENCE of a SYS_USER_PROFILE_EDIT_FIELDS change with a test. The importer reaches the column by system context, the same way the endpoint does.

Grading

Inherited from the parent: priority:p2, domain:services (landing site packages/plugins/plugin-auth). ⚠️ Triage may re-rank — the parent's p2 was set against the whole card, and this is its last row.

Refs

#16678 (parent, closed) · 5651634638 (the ruling) · 5653051072 (Phase 3 landing, which flagged this row) · #17995 (domain:spec, the error-vocabulary question for the same five refusals) · objectui#9361 (the Console affordance)

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Claim: PM loop round 1
Session: session_01URLHobLUJB9K1ABV6ofdjj
Branch: claude/issue-18028-import-manager-id
Worktree: objectstack-issue-18028
Domain: domain:services
File surface: packages/plugins/plugin-auth/src/ (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: M, mode:subagent, model: opus — no path-derived mandate. Derived this round, ⛔ not recalled: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --tier packages/plugins/plugin-auth/src/admin-import-users.ts at f52bfa90f → "no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 3 declared glob(s) … The tier stays the PM's per-card judgment call (floor sonnet · default opus · ceiling fable)." Opus taken because this is ruling implementation carrying a real design judgment (the second-pass seam), which is what the default judgment tier is for.
Clause-②: yes
Thread-read: none
Serial constraints cleared: packages/plugins/plugin-auth has two in-flight items and NEITHER touches this file — PR #17982 (claude/issue-17897-permission-set-refused-reads, 2 files, both *.test.ts: account-issuer-upgrade-path.test.ts, signup-existing-address-refusal.test.ts) and card #17985 (dispatched; its sweep is scoped to harnesses OUTSIDE plugin-auth by construction). scripts/check-single-claim-paths.mjs declares exactly one path (.objectui-sha) and admin-import-users appears in it 0 times.

Why Clause-②: yes — derived, not assumed

⛔ Not because a payload is involved and ⛔ not because the word export will appear in the diff. The floor is reachability from the published entry, and it is met by construction here:

packages/plugins/plugin-auth/src/index.ts:26   export * from './admin-import-users.js';

⇒ everything admin-import-users.ts exports is already reachable from the package entry — today that is IMPORT_USERS_MAX_ROWS, IdentityImportEngine, IdentityImportDeps, ImportPasswordPolicy, runAdminImportUsers. Admitting manager_id to the accepted row tier lands a new key on that published shape, and any new exported symbol it needs rides the same export *.

⚠️ export * carries what a module exports, ⛔ never what it imports — so this reading turns on the five symbols above, not on the file's import list.

⇒ needs:contract-review is hung on this card in the same stroke. It is re-derived from the delivered diff at review time; this line is a prediction, and a wrong one is repaired by a correction comment, ⛔ never by editing this one.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

os-dev-report

{
"issue": 18028,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-18028-import-manager-id",
"pr": "#18046",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "The bulk import now admits a manager_id column holding the manager's identity key (email or phone, the same key the importer already keys rows by), stripped from the row before the identity write and resolved in a SECOND pass after runImport returns, so a manager created by a later row resolves. The five ruled refusals are NOT re-derived: runSetUserManager's core was extracted into an exported applyUserManagerLink(deps, userId, managerId) seam that returns a SetUserManagerRefusal or null, runSetUserManager is now that seam plus body parsing and an HTTP envelope, and the importer calls it once per row. A manager problem is per-row and never costs the row its identity: rows[].manager carries the outcome in rows[].delivery's shape, rows[].error the sentence, and summary.manager is {linked, unresolved, refused}. The card's three premise readings were re-checked on origin/main and all held (632 lines; 1 case-insensitive manager hit, which is AuthManagerOptions in a comment; email positive control 73).",
"tests": "PACKAGE SUITE: pnpm --filter @objectstack/plugin-auth test -> 111 files, 2360 tests, all passed. TYPECHECK: pnpm --filter @objectstack/plugin-auth typecheck -> exit 0 (includes check:test-typecheck vs tsconfig.test.json). LINT: pnpm lint (whole repo, eslint . --no-inline-config) -> exit 0 in 2m59s; a FULL scan, not a narrowed one. GATE FAMILIES: derived with node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --commands and reconciled with --ran after a fresh git fetch origin main: 69 derived, 68 run green, 1 NOT MEASURED, 0 unrun, plus 2 run beyond the union. NOT MEASURED: pnpm check:type-check-debt exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET. Its first exit 3 named 4 unbuilt workspace dependencies; the closure was then built (turbo run build --filter=./packages/* --filter=./packages/*/* --concurrency=2, exit 0) and that prerequisite is satisfied. It now dies differently: its own pinned tsc --max-old-space-size=6144 re-measure is OOM-killed on this shared container (FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit), reproduced 3x including once holding the verify lock with no NODE_OPTIONS cap. Not a pass and not a finding. Its sibling pnpm check:type-check-coverage is exit 0. FALSE RED, recorded so it is not re-diagnosed: plugin-auth typecheck reported 25 errors in admin-import-users.ts while the closure build was mid-flight rewriting dist/; re-run against the finished closure it is exit 0. ABLATIONS (3 legs, each: exact-string mutation, on-disk occurrence-count proof that it landed, run, git checkout HEAD -- path, blob-hash + git diff HEAD restore proof; trap on EXIT INT TERM with absolute paths; tree ended clean). C, withhold the second pass itself: 14 of 20 RED, the 6 green being exactly the ones that should be (empty-cell, Tier-1 pin, source-fence pin, upsert-patch pin, dryRun pin, fixture-premise control). B, neutralize the DELEGATE's self_assignment predicate: 2 RED, one in EACH suite (importer + set-user-manager) from ONE mutation, which demonstrates the single derivation rather than asserting it. A, withhold the batch-wide in-batch index: GREEN, 20 passed, reported as MEASURED rather than as expected. Correct and informative: a created row is in sys_user by the time the pass runs, so the directory lookup resolves it anyway. The index is an optimization; the MECHANISM is the pass's position, which is what C and the two ordering controls measure. Control run on the unmutated tree: both suites, 47 passed. DISCRIMINATING CASE: fixture is deliberately out of dependency order (row 1 names a manager row 2 creates) with two controls a single-pass implementation cannot satisfy - the harness snapshots sys_user at each createUser and the manager is absent from row 1's snapshot, and the link's update invocationCallOrder is asserted greater than the LAST createUser's. PER-ROW ERROR pinned BOTH directions: the offending row reports AND summary.created is 2, summary.errors 0, the other row carries no code, the unlinked user exists with manager_id null. REFUSAL FENCE: 4 of 5 refusals driven end-to-end through the importer (self_assignment, cycle, idp_provisioned, cross_organization) plus a source pin asserting 0 occurrences of each reason literal, of MAX_MANAGER_CHAIN_DEPTH and of sys_member in the importer, with a positive control (applyUserManagerLink + the module specifier present) so the absence is a reading.",
"mcp_calls": "1 - one issue_read on #18028 at the start; every other GitHub read and write went through repo-scoped REST (probed 200) or git.",
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"noted, not filed: a row-level error.code for the manager outcome (MANAGER_UNRESOLVED / MANAGER_REFUSED) needs registering in packages/spec/src/api/error-code-ledger.zod.ts under @objectstack/plugin-auth, where the sibling row codes INVITE_EMAIL_FAILED / NO_IDENTITY / CREATE_FAILED already sit. It was written that way first and check:dispatcher-error-vocabulary refused it as an unregistered code inside the published face; the code half was REMOVED rather than registered (packages/spec is fenced) or faked with a mismatched registered code, the absence is pinned by a test, and the gate is green. Successor named: #17995 item 2, already queued to decide dedicated codes for these same refusals in the same file - one visit to one package. Not filed because it is none of the three filing categories: no repro, no violated declared contract, no metadata-authoring trap.",
"noted, not filed: .changeset/16678-admin-set-user-manager.md (the parent card's own changeset, still unreleased at HEAD) grades @objectstack/plugin-auth as patch while #16678 declared Clause-②: yes, which AGENTS.md and check-changeset-no-major's enforce verdict both say takes at least minor. Consequence already neutralized: this PR's minor on the same package governs the next release of the fixed group. Successor named: the release seat reading grades at version time.",
"noted, not filed: the platform APPENDED a second, bare attribution footer to PR #18046's body on the REST PATCH that added the acceptance notes, so the body now carries the session-URL footer I sent plus a bare one. Left as-is per AGENTS.md (never re-send a body that already carries an appended footer); durable attribution is in the body prose."
]
}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

pm:dispatched → pm:awaiting-maintainer

⚠️ Correcting this seat's own board defect. PR #18046 has been parked since ~16:3xZ on a question put to the maintainer in chat only — and 「交接即标签:只写交接评论而不同笔挂标 = 空交接,收件箱只认标签」. The board was claiming pm:dispatched, which asserts a dev is working this card. No dev is, and none should be: the work is delivered and the PR is green.

The blocker is that clearing needs:contract-review requires a verdict whose Served-tier: is exactly CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (claude-fable-5-1), which this seat is neither served at nor permitted to commission (SKILL.md 〈模型分档〉; dispatch-gates.mjs --tier names the spec seat). See PR #18046's status comment and seat-post correction 175.

Maintainer-action: is now on the body, line-anchored and dual-channel. ⚠️ This state has no machine exit: once the maintainer acts, the director seat verifies and strips the label with an evidence comment in the same stroke — ⛔ this seat does not self-clear it.

⛔ needs:contract-review stays hung on both carriers — it is a carrier, not a state, and it is genuinely pending.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Maintainer has ruled — the Maintainer-action: on this card is answered

Ruling, verbatim (2026-09-13T22:2xZ): 「你可以直接派fable复核」 — this seat may commission the CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER clause-② review directly.

Acted on immediately: a claude-fable-5-1 session (session_01SausTaCtH292F1JAAtCCS7) is commissioned to render the verdict for PR #18046 and post the record itself, because this seat cannot relay a Served-tier: line it did not read from a transcript.

⚠️ The mechanism constraint measured earlier is unchanged and was respected: an in-session subagent does not lift the tier — model: fable is a dispatch parameter, exactly what gate row C7 refuses, and get_session stamps the session rather than the subagent thread. Only a separate session stamps last_served_model: claude-fable-5-1.

⛔ This seat is not stripping pm:awaiting-maintainer itself — 「本态无机器出口:维护者完成后由总监席核验摘标 + 证据评论同笔」. This comment is that evidence, for the director seat to act on.

Next, once the record lands: re-run check-clause2-carriers --pair 18046, strip the carrier from BOTH carriers citing the record, re-run --pair again (correction 174), un-draft, arm auto-merge.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-project-manager]

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 18028,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-18028-import-manager-id",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/18046",
  "new_head_sha": "6ff3e0b783a78b35ed3a02d53d5eebc344007440",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Serial-relay sync lap only — no implementation change. Merged origin/main (c54d8d67b, the #18022 landing) into the branch; the merge was clean (exit 0) and auto-committed as 6ff3e0b78, and the ONLY contended path was scripts/engine-double-contract.pinned.json (the branch's 5 paths vs main's set overlap in exactly that one file). That ledger carries no merge=os-regen driver, so it took an ordinary text merge; per the dispatch the clean exit was NOT accepted as evidence. The merge was committed FIRST, then the gate's own remedy path `node scripts/check-engine-double-contract.mjs --write` was run on the committed tree. Regeneration reproduced the committed bytes exactly and reported 0 lost. Both intents superposed: #18022's row and this branch's row are both present, count 1493. Nothing was pushed but the merge commit — the regeneration produced a zero-byte delta, so there was no second commit to make and no os-regen deferral was outstanding.",
  "merge": {
    "command": "git merge --no-edit origin/main",
    "exit": 0,
    "conflicts": "none",
    "merge_commit": "6ff3e0b783a78b35ed3a02d53d5eebc344007440",
    "merge_base_before_merge": "1e20f816ea81f2ba02e9ab2dd6a60bd183150e0a",
    "ledger_base_blob": "68b8a906d930eb145ac382a15f2965c16001c230",
    "only_contended_path": "scripts/engine-double-contract.pinned.json",
    "merge_driver_on_that_path": "NONE (no .gitattributes entry) — ordinary text merge, which is why the regeneration proof is owed"
  },
  "proof_numbers": {
    "write_reports_0_lost": "PASS — run 1: `check-engine-double-contract --write: 800 (file, verb) row(s), 0 added or grown, 0 lost.` plus `6 seam row(s), 0 added or grown, 0 lost.` Run 2 printed the identical two lines. Both runs exited 0.",
    "byte_identical_across_two_write_runs": "PASS — sha256 ccfafdb4625392d752ed39ed3b4f4f70a6caba9e8dd5dfdc90ffe82e7f9dd919 after run 1 and after run 2; `cmp` of the two captures is byte-identical, and `git status --porcelain` was empty after each (the regeneration also equals the merge commit's committed bytes, so --write changed nothing on disk).",
    "ledger_count": "1493 — by exactly the prescribed command (git show HEAD:scripts/engine-double-contract.pinned.json piped to the python3 sum-of-list-lengths one-liner). NOT the 800-row (file, verb) census metric the gate prints, and NOT the earlier baton's 799 figure; those are a different population and are reported separately above.",
    "18022_entry_survived": "1 hit — grep -c 'permission-set-name-collision.test.ts' scripts/engine-double-contract.pinned.json. Row at line 2895: file packages/plugins/plugin-security/src/permission-set-name-collision.test.ts, verb update, pinned 1.",
    "own_entry_present": "1 hit — grep -c 'admin-import-users-manager-pass.test.ts'. Row at line 2380: file packages/plugins/plugin-auth/src/admin-import-users-manager-pass.test.ts, verb update, pinned 2."
  },
  "superposition_control_readings": {
    "merge_base_1e20f816e": "count 1491 · 18022 row 0 · own row 0",
    "origin_main_c54d8d67b": "count 1492 · 18022 row 1 · own row 0 (matches the reference reading in the dispatch)",
    "branch_before_merge_2be67d2d4": "count 1492 · 18022 row 0 · own row 1",
    "after_merge_6ff3e0b78": "count 1493 · 18022 row 1 · own row 1 — both appends present, neither side swallowed"
  },
  "ablation_regeneration_is_load_bearing": "Run because 'the clean merge exited 0' is not evidence and 'the regeneration changed nothing' would otherwise be indistinguishable from a no-op regenerator. From the COMMITTED state: recorded the HEAD blob hash of the ledger (5f8d55bf37468933d5347340619156d00de9fbc6); deleted #18022's row with a python rewrite; proved the mutation reached disk by hash change (e610b0b0832f81bfa780a1d157895bff9aba4a79, differs from HEAD blob) AND by the two observations moving together — grep count 1 to 0 and ledger count 1493 to 1492, i.e. exactly the 1492 swallow signature the dispatch names. Then ran --write: it reported `1 added or grown, 0 lost` and restored the file to hash 5f8d55bf3746..., byte-identical to HEAD. Restore leg: trap on EXIT/INT/TERM doing `git checkout HEAD -- scripts/engine-double-contract.pinned.json` with an absolute REPO_ROOT path, verified by hash equality against the HEAD blob, and the tree ended with `git status --porcelain` empty and `git diff HEAD --stat` empty. Conclusion: --write really re-derives this ledger from the source tree, so its `0 lost / 0 added` on the real merged tree is a measurement that the text merge lost nothing, not a tautology.",
  "gates": {
    "derived": 69,
    "run": 2,
    "not_measured": 0,
    "unrun": 67,
    "tool_line": "Run reconciliation — 69 derived, 2 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 67 UNRUN. (node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --ran ran.list; exit 1, which is the tool's designed code when any family is unrun)",
    "derivation_banner": "derived from the tree of objectstack-ai/objectstack at commit 6ff3e0b78; change set 5 path(s) vs merge base c54d8d67b, three-dot semantics (committed 5, working tree 0, untracked 0)",
    "run_with_exit_codes": [
      "pnpm check:engine-double-contract :: exit 0 — its own verdict line: `check-engine-double-contract: OK — 875 pinned, 133 in the DEBT ledger, 3 exempt.`",
      "pnpm check:nul-bytes :: exit 0 — `check-nul-bytes: OK (scanned 8631 text file(s) ... no raw ASCII control bytes).` plus 75 self-test assertions"
    ],
    "why_67_unrun": "They are the Lint and Repo Gates job's check:* steps. The standing os-dev contract forbids enumerating that job locally, and the dispatch restated the prohibition. UNRUN, not passed and not NOT MEASURED — CI owns them.",
    "outside_the_69_denominator": "The tool itself names four populations that are NOT in the 69 and whose silence is not a clearance: 50 artifact-roster families (11 of them keep their roster in a directory one of my paths is in, check:engine-double-contract among them — which is the one I ran), 11 declared-wide-population families, 5 path-matched families whose argv takes a value only CI supplies (printed by the tool as NOT MEASURED), and 5 path-scheduled CI jobs running 28 steps with no local invocation (Test Core, Temporal Conformance, Dogfood Regression Gate, Dogfood Verify CLI, Build Core). None of those is claimed here."
  },
  "tests": "All readings taken in worktree /home/user/objectstack-issue-18028 on commit 6ff3e0b78, after `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` (exit 0) per the post-merge stale-artefact rule. (1) Dependency-closure build, under the shared verify lock: `pnpm --workspace-concurrency=2 --filter '@objectstack/plugin-auth^...' build` — VERDICT command-exit 0 (held 382s, waited 477s). (2) `pnpm --filter @objectstack/plugin-auth exec vitest run --maxWorkers=2` — Test Files 111 passed (111), Tests 2360 passed (2360), recorded exit 0. (3) Typecheck needed two passes and the first was a TREE-STATE prerequisite, not a red: the first attempt exited 2 on `examples/basic-usage.ts(13,28): error TS2307: Cannot find module '@objectstack/plugin-auth'` because the package's own dist had never been built in this fresh worktree (confirmed: packages/plugins/plugin-auth/dist/index.d.ts did not exist). Built the package and re-ran to a real verdict: `pnpm --filter @objectstack/plugin-auth build && pnpm --filter @objectstack/plugin-auth typecheck` — VERDICT command-exit 0, with check:test-typecheck printing `OK — @objectstack/plugin-auth's test layer compiles ...; 10 file(s) / 94 error(s) / 23 pinned signature(s)` (unchanged shrink-only ledger). (4) `pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec check:generated` — exit 0, `All 15 generated artifacts are up to date`, which is the AGENTS.md post-merge requirement since packages/spec moved on main's side; notably check:authorable-surface is green, so the merge-state anchor rollback trap did not fire (the merge was committed before anything was regenerated). (5) Manual control-character scan `grep -naP` over all 5 changed paths — no hits. Exit codes were captured by redirecting to a file first and reading the status before any pipe, never through a pipeline.",
  "mcp_calls": "1 — this report comment. Every read in this lap went through git and local scripts.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed: the contract-review record bound to the old head 2be67d2d4 is invalidated by this merge; the new head is 6ff3e0b78. Re-commissioning it is the PM's, per the dispatch. Successor: the PM, this lap.",
    "noted, not filed: dispatch-gates places check:engine-double-contract in its 50-family artifact-roster block with the marker 'roster under scripts, which one of your paths is in' — i.e. for this very card the tool scores that family silent and says the silence is evidence in neither direction. It was run anyway and is green. Not filed: it is an observation about a derivation tool's placement rule, not a reproducible defect, a contract violation, or a metadata-authoring trap. Successor: whoever next extends dispatch-gates' scan-surface declarations."
  ]
}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-elon-musk]

pm:awaiting-maintainer → pm:dispatched — the Maintainer-action is discharged; the landing chain is back with the domain:services seat

Director seat (objectstack #12708, summon #23, session_01WCEaPsmKY4UyoivKkkaUHt), 2026-09-14T00:37Z. Duty-three exit: the human action this state waited on has happened and is evidenced on this card — verified, ⛔ not assumed.

Maintainer-action as written: 「rule how a domain:services card obtains the CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER clause-② verdict its carrier needs」.
Evidence it happened: 5656619922 records the maintainer's ruling verbatim — 「你可以直接派fable复核」 (2026-09-13T22:2xZ) — and the seat acted on it: an independent claude-fable-5-1 session rendered the record on the then-head (5656683558, 2be67d2d4, PASS), and after the serial-relay sync lap a second at-tier record now binds the CURRENT head: PR #18046 comment 5657354956 — Served-tier: claude-fable-5-1, Reviewed-by: session_016X5iS7xCzauPZfMwh4VtcT, Implemented-by: claude/issue-18028-import-manager-id, head 6ff3e0b783a78b35ed3a02d53d5eebc344007440 = the PR head read at 2026-09-14T00:37Z (6ff3e0b783a78b35ed3a02d53d5eebc344007440), Verdict: PASS.

The exit condition's second half (--pair 18046 exit 0 with both carriers cleared) is the seat's landing chain, not a maintainer action, so it does not hold this state open: pm:awaiting-maintainer is 「决定已做,只剩一次 GitHub 之外的人工动作」 and that action is done.

State

pm:awaiting-maintainer → pm:dispatched (assignee and open PR unchanged — the honest in-flight state). needs:contract-review stays on both carriers until the seat clears them citing 5657354956 (--pair first, then strip both, then --pair again, then ready + auto-merge — the seat's own plan in 5656619922). ⛔ This seat clears no carrier and flips no PR.

---

Generated by Claude Code