docs: remove unsupported cjs polyfills

[danielroe]

🔗 Linked issue

❓ Type of change

• 📖 Documentation (updates to the documentation or readme)
• 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
• 👌 Enhancement (improving an existing functionality like performance)
• ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

📚 Description

spotted this remnant of cjs utils (which aren't present in esm) still here - only working because we load nuxt config files with jiti, but this isn't guaranteed in future.

📝 Checklist

• I have linked an issue or discussion.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
content	Ready	Preview	Aug 14, 2026 8:10pm

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: c4d9bdcf-57be-41ce-91ce-62c066083e64

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc90e96 and 21cfb5f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• docs/nuxt.config.ts
• docs/package.json

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The documentation package is configured as an ES module. The Nuxt configuration now resolves the _redirects file relative to import.meta.dirname instead of __dirname.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~5 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 21cfb

This is a localized configuration cleanup with no actionable merge-blocking risk remaining after normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes the removal of unsupported CommonJS polyfill usage implemented by the changes.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description directly explains the CommonJS compatibility issue and the ESM-related fix in the changeset.

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

⚔️ Resolve merge conflicts 💡

• Resolve merge conflict in branch fix/dirname

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/dirname

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}