Skip to content

Conversation

@avivkeller
Copy link
Member

cc @nodejs/test_runner @ovflowd

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 24, 2025 19:35
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds meeting infrastructure templates for the Node.js Test Runner team, enabling automated meeting management similar to other Node.js working groups and teams.

Key Changes:

  • Adds three template files following the established pattern used by other Node.js teams
  • Configures meeting settings including calendar integration, repository details, and joining instructions
  • Sets up the invitee list for the @nodejs/test_runner team

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
templates/observers_test_runner Empty observers file following the standard pattern for teams without designated observers
templates/meeting_base_test_runner Meeting configuration including calendar filter, Zoom link, and repository settings for the Test Runner team
templates/invited_test_runner Invitee list specifying the @nodejs/test_runner team

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copy link
Member

@JakobJingleheimer JakobJingleheimer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like gobbledegook to me, but it seems to be working, so sure 😆

@avivkeller
Copy link
Member Author

@nodejs/test_runner With your approval, the meeting bot will create an issue 7 days prior to your first meeting, January 12.

As a reminder, this meeting is set to occur "on Monday every 2 week(s)"

@avivkeller avivkeller merged commit 97ba1fb into main Dec 24, 2025
11 checks passed
@avivkeller avivkeller deleted the test-runner branch December 24, 2025 19:39
@avivkeller
Copy link
Member Author

This looks like gobbledegook to me, but it seems to be working, so sure 😆

Yes, we are working to simplify it, because quite honestly, I think @ovflowd, Michael, and I are the only ones who understand this format at the moment...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants