Skip to content

Adding Multi Record example in NI-SCOPE - #2247

Open
NI-velmurugan wants to merge 11 commits into
ni:masterfrom
NI-velmurugan:users/velmurugan/add-niscope-multi-record
Open

NI-velmurugan wants to merge 11 commits into
ni:masterfrom
NI-velmurugan:users/velmurugan/add-niscope-multi-record

Conversation

@NI-velmurugan

@NI-velmurugan NI-velmurugan commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.
    - [ ] I've added tests applicable for this pull request

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

This PR adds niscope_multi_record.py, a Python adaptation of the LabVIEW niScope EX Multi Record.vi

What testing has been done?

Manually tested the example using simulated hardware and the real hardware.

The additional trigger type since this example is independent of the trigger type and the LV as well documented that it is avoided to simplify the VI, but adding this will let the user aware that they can configure any type of trigger instead of just the edge trigger
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.12%. Comparing base (8e495b6) to head (9d0efce).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2247      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.97%   88.12%   -0.86%     
==========================================
  Files          82       88       +6     
  Lines       20306    22830    +2524     
==========================================
+ Hits        18068    20119    +2051     
- Misses       2238     2711     +473     
Flag Coverage Δ
codegenunittests 84.78% <ø> (ø)
nidcpowersystemtests 94.40% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
nidcpowerunittests 89.53% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalsystemtests 92.04% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalunittests 68.43% <ø> (ø)
nidmmsystemtests 92.33% <ø> (ø)
nifakeunittests 86.08% <ø> (ø)
nifgensystemtests 94.34% <ø> (ø)
nimodinstsystemtests 73.85% <ø> (ø)
nimodinstunittests 94.20% <ø> (ø)
nirfsasystemtests 82.71% <ø> (ø)
nirfsaunittests 63.37% <ø> (ø)
nirfsgsystemtests 81.22% <ø> (?)
niscopesystemtests 89.99% <ø> (ø)
niscopeunittests 43.20% <ø> (ø)
nisesystemtests 91.50% <ø> (ø)
niswitchsystemtests 81.66% <ø> (ø)
nitclksystemtests 94.87% <ø> (ø)
nitclkunittests 98.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@NI-velmurugan NI-velmurugan changed the title Adding Multi Record example in NI-Scope Adding Multi Record example in NI-SCOPE Nov 2, 2026
@NI-velmurugan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jarnoldNI, the PR is ready for your review.

@NI-velmurugan
NI-velmurugan marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2026 12:09
@azure-pipelines

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Azure Pipelines:
There may be pipelines that require an authorized user to comment /azp run to run.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants