Skip to content

Conversation

@nanotaboada
Copy link
Owner

@nanotaboada nanotaboada commented Jan 24, 2026

This change is Reviewable

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added Python Continuous Deployment status badge to the README.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Walkthrough

A Python CD (Continuous Deployment) badge was added to the Status section of README.md, positioned between the existing Python CI badge and other status badges in the documentation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
README Status Section
README.md
Added Python CD badge line to Status section, positioned after Python CI badge

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Possibly related PRs

  • chore: remove Codebeat badge #408: Modifies README.md badges section—removes Codebeat badge while this PR adds Python CD badge, both documentation updates to the same file.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title follows Conventional Commits format with 'docs:' prefix, is descriptive and specific about adding a Python CD workflow badge, and is well under the 80 character limit at 34 characters.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/add-python-cd-badge

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (20740ba) 131 119 90.84%
Head commit (110ba85) 131 (+0) 119 (+0) 90.84% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#470) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.65%. Comparing base (20740ba) to head (110ba85).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #470   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.65%   89.65%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         116      116           
=======================================
  Hits          104      104           
  Misses         12       12           
Components Coverage Δ
Services 79.31% <ø> (ø)
Routes 100.00% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nanotaboada nanotaboada merged commit bce5022 into master Jan 24, 2026
18 checks passed
@nanotaboada nanotaboada deleted the docs/add-python-cd-badge branch January 24, 2026 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants