fix: race condition when assigning device kit a random port#204
fix: race condition when assigning device kit a random port#204
Conversation
WalkthroughThe 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
utils/port-manager.go (1)
26-33:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 MinorAdd input validation for invalid port range.
The function will panic with a negative or zero
rangeSizeifstartPort > endPort. Add a validation check at the start ofFindAvailablePortInRangeto return an error for invalid input ranges:func FindAvailablePortInRange(startPort, endPort int) (int, error) { + if startPort > endPort { + return 0, fmt.Errorf("invalid port range: startPort %d > endPort %d", startPort, endPort) + } rangeSize := endPort - startPort + 1🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@utils/port-manager.go` around lines 26 - 33, The function FindAvailablePortInRange can panic when startPort > endPort because rangeSize becomes non-positive; add an early input validation at the start of FindAvailablePortInRange that checks that startPort <= endPort (and optionally that both are within 1..65535) and return a clear error (e.g., fmt.Errorf("invalid port range: %d-%d", startPort, endPort)) instead of proceeding to compute rangeSize and call rand.Intn; keep the existing loop and IsPortAvailable("localhost", port) logic unchanged.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Outside diff comments:
In `@utils/port-manager.go`:
- Around line 26-33: The function FindAvailablePortInRange can panic when
startPort > endPort because rangeSize becomes non-positive; add an early input
validation at the start of FindAvailablePortInRange that checks that startPort
<= endPort (and optionally that both are within 1..65535) and return a clear
error (e.g., fmt.Errorf("invalid port range: %d-%d", startPort, endPort))
instead of proceeding to compute rangeSize and call rand.Intn; keep the existing
loop and IsPortAvailable("localhost", port) logic unchanged.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: a3cc1d65-f0ea-4241-96e9-bebd54fc0b79
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
utils/port-manager.go
No description provided.