Skip to content

docs: reflect real-world hub cost estimate ranges - #2285

Open
Michael Flanakin (flanakin) wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
flanakin/2229-hub-cost-estimate-docs
Open

docs: reflect real-world hub cost estimate ranges#2285
Michael Flanakin (flanakin) wants to merge 2 commits into
devfrom
flanakin/2229-hub-cost-estimate-docs

Conversation

@flanakin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Test plan

  • Docs-only change — no build/deploy impact
  • Review the updated cost estimate note for accuracy

Fixes #2229

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

ADX and Fabric costs vary significantly by region; the flat $120/$300
baseline understated actual spend for some users (#2229, prior report #1719).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed the old figures were understated — thanks for picking up #2229. Two things before this lands.

This is one of four surfaces carrying these numbers, and the other three still say $120/$300/$5. Notably including the portal deploy UI, which is where most customers actually encounter the estimate:

  • src/templates/finops-hub/createUiDefinition.json — line 97 ($120/mo for ADX), line 117 ($300/mo for F2), line 244 (~$5/mo per million), line 289, and the worked example on line 577 ($250/mo). None are in this diff.
  • docs-mslearn/toolkit/power-bi/help-me-choose.md:52 — comparison table still reads Starts at $120 + ~$10 per $1M, Starts at $300, and ~$3-5 per $1M.
  • docs/deploy/finops-hub-latest.ui.json — generated, so it follows once createUiDefinition.json is updated.

As it stands the docs and the deployment experience would quote different headline costs for the same thing.

The $15 figure contradicts the $10 in the same sentence — inline below.

Also worth confirming the calculator behind https://aka.ms/finops/hubs/calculator was refreshed, since the note sends people there for the detail.

> Estimated cost: Starts at $160/mo + $10/mo per $1M in cost being monitored.
>
> Estimated monthly cost includes $120 for a single-node Azure Data Explorer cluster or $300 for F2 Fabric capacity, plus $10 in Azure storage and processing cost per $1M being monitored. Exact cost will vary based on discounts, data size (we estimate ~20GB per $1M), and Fabric or Power BI license requirements. Cost without Data Explorer or Fabric is $5 per $1M. For details, refer to the [FinOps hub cost estimate](https://aka.ms/finops/hubs/calculator) in the Azure Pricing Calculator.
> Estimated monthly cost includes $160+ for a single-node Azure Data Explorer cluster or $310 for F2 Fabric capacity, plus $10 in Azure storage and processing cost per $1M being monitored. Exact cost will vary based on discounts, region, data size, and Fabric or Power BI license requirements. Cost without Data Explorer or Fabric is $15 per $1M. For details, refer to the [FinOps hub cost estimate](https://aka.ms/finops/hubs/calculator) in the Azure Pricing Calculator.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These two numbers can't both be right:

...plus $10 in Azure storage and processing cost per $1M being monitored. ... Cost without Data Explorer or Fabric is $15 per $1M.

The old pairing ($10 with Data Explorer, $5 without) was coherent — drop ADX, drop the ingestion-side cost. The new pairing has the no-ADX deployment costing more per $1M than the ADX deployment's incremental, which inverts that. One of the two has been updated and the other hasn't.

If $15 is the corrected storage + Data Factory figure, then the $10 here and in the headline on line 28 both need to move with it. Worth double-checking the number itself too — it's a 3-5x jump from the ~$3-5 per $1M quoted in help-me-choose.md:52.

Nit: dropping "(we estimate ~20GB per $1M)" removes the only handle a reader has for sanity-checking against their own data volume. Could it stay alongside the new "region" caveat rather than being swapped out for it?

<!-- prettier-ignore-start -->
> [!NOTE]
> Estimated cost: Starts at $120/mo + $10/mo per $1M in cost being monitored.
> Estimated cost: Starts at $160/mo + $10/mo per $1M in cost being monitored.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the per-$1M figure is being revised (see the note on line 30 — the body now says $15 without Data Explorer while this line and the next still say $10), this headline needs to move in step. Right now a reader gets $10 here, $10 in the first half of the note, and $15 in the second half.

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service Bot added Needs: Attention 👋 Issue or PR needs to be reviewed by the author or it will be closed due to no activity and removed Needs: Review 👀 PR that is ready to be reviewed labels Aug 28, 2026
@microsoft-github-policy-service

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Michael Flanakin (@flanakin): you have some new feedback!

Please review and resolve all comments and I'll let reviewers know by removing the Needs: Attention label. If I miss anything, just reply with #needs-review and I'll update the status.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs: Attention 👋 Issue or PR needs to be reviewed by the author or it will be closed due to no activity

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Documentation] Update FinOps hub cost estimation

4 participants