Add Analytics demo data module#28860
Conversation
  Test container: http://bcdev2.fenwicksoftware.com.au:10260/BC/?company=Demo%20Data%206 Related work items: microsoft#27654
|
We've been receiving some push back on the demo data PRs. Will ask for a review by the team behind the demo data tool before processing. |
Apps/W1/ContosoCoffeeDemoDataset/app/DemoData/Analytics/AnalyticsModuleSetup.Table.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/W1/ContosoCoffeeDemoDataset/app/DemoData/Analytics/AnalyticsModuleSetup.Table.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...feeDemoDataset/app/DemoData/Analytics/3.Transactions/CreateExtendedPurchDocument.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...oCoffeeDemoDataset/app/DemoData/Analytics/4.Historical/CreatePostedAnalyticsData.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Apps/W1/ContosoCoffeeDemoDataset/app/DemoTool/ContosoCoffeeDemoDataSetup.Table.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...feeDemoDataset/app/DemoData/Analytics/3.Transactions/CreateExtendedPurchDocument.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@haoranpb Just checking in to see whether you have any more feedback on this PR? Thank you |
|
Processing this PR. The branch is now locked 🔒 Please don't push updates unless otherwise agreed. |
Apps/W1/ContosoCoffeeDemoDataset/app/DemoTool/ContosoDemoDataModule.Enum.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@ayrtonmassey Could you review this PR please? Thank you |
|
@tuan-nguyen-fenwick I'm not sure why I was added to this PR, I have removed myself. Looks like you have some comments from @JesperSchulz to resolve? |
|
Please disregard the random assignment of code reviewers. Not sure why GitHub does that. @WaelAbuSeada, we need your review of this one. |
...feeDemoDataset/app/DemoData/Analytics/3.Transactions/CreateExtendedPurchDocument.Codeunit.al
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@WaelAbuSeada I have addressed build issues in IT:
|
|
@Aleyenda Just confirming, aside from resolving the merge conflicts, is there anything else needed on this PR? From what I understand, this change is already released in v27.2, so can we go ahead and close it? |
Update: I have resolved merge conflicts. |
|
@attilatoury I have checked and this PR seems to be released in v27 already. Should I be closing this PR or what will be the next step? |
|
@tuan-nguyen-fenwick We usually merge the new changes both in main and in the relevant release branches (main should not be behind). |
|
The changes are actually in the main branch but not in the 27.x one. I will backport them and then close this PR. |
JesperSchulz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes have been merged internally already and synced. This PR now hence appears empty.

Summary
Work Item(s)
Fixes #28859
Fixes: AB#580998