Skip to content

alter settings runtime ( JavaVersion: '17' ) on a 9.x model prints Unchanged model settings #1438

Closed
ako/mxcli
#1148

Description

@MendixMau

Environment

  • mxcli: v0.26.0 (release binary, 2026-10-11)
  • Mendix app seen on: Siemens FSM template (Marketplace) 9.24.2; 10.24 / 11.13.0 converted copies
  • OS: Linux x86_64 cloud container (no Studio Pro; mx/mxbuild only)

Summary

alter settings runtime ( JavaVersion: '17' ) on a 9.x model prints Unchanged model settings. Command / document type: alter settings. Seen on: FSM template 9.24.2. — occurrences: 1

Reproduction

alter settings runtime ( JavaVersion: '17' );

OData/REST authoring

Expected

"property not available in Mendix 9.24.2".

Actual

Unchanged model settings (no hint the property does not exist in that version)

looks like a no-op success.

Impact

usability, 1 occurrence(s) in the 2026-10-12 round-trip runs.

Activity

  1. github-actions commented on Oct 12, 2026

    @github-actions

    Issue Triage

    Summary:
    The user reports that running alter settings runtime ( JavaVersion: '17' ) on a Mendix 9.x model incorrectly reports “Unchanged model settings” instead of indicating that the JavaVersion property isn’t available in that version.

    Checklist of required bug‑report information

    Required info Present? Details
    mxcli version ✅ v0.26.0 (release binary, 2026‑10‑11)
    Mendix version ✅ 9.24.2 (9.x)
    Scenario (what was tried) ✅ MDL script: alter settings runtime ( JavaVersion: '17' );
    Expected output ✅ “property not available in Mendix 9.24.2”
    Experienced output ✅ Unchanged model settings (no hint the property is missing)
    AI bug report (mxcli diag --bundle or session log) ❌ Not included

    Missing information:
    Please provide the diagnostic bundle or at least the session log from running mxcli diag --bundle (or the relevant log output) so we can investigate the internal behavior of the command.

    Thank you for reporting this issue! Once we have the diagnostic information, we’ll be able to look into why the command is being treated as a no‑op.


    Automated triage via OpenRouter — workflow source

  2. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Oct 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions