Repository navigation
feat(review): move the review panel's placement to the Codex reviewer once fanout can run Codex #12504
Description
Parent: #7584
Problem
#12151's rule (4) fired: model diversity did not beat lens (recall 24/24 each), so same-vendor model diversity adds nothing measurable here, and the rule moves the panel's placement from fanout's model mode to the Codex reviewer. The model cannot run Codex today: every codex 1.0.6 command sets disable-model-invocation: true. Moving the placement before #12495 lands would make a default of a reviewer that never runs.
Done when
- After fix(review): dispatch fanout's Codex surface through a path the model may run #12495 lands, fanout's panel placement uses the Codex reviewer where it used
modelmode, behind configuration. - A test or eval case shows the panel runs Codex when present and reports it skipped when not.
Blocked by: #12495
Activity
github-actions commentedon Nov 2, 2026
Proposed work class: work-class: scoped
Basis: automated intake triage; the lanes App applied this class.
Size: Small
Complexity: Medium
Uncertainty: Known
Flags: none
Blocked by: #12495
Understood: once #12495 lets the model run the Codex reviewer, fanout's review-panel placement should switch from
modelmode to the Codex reviewer, behind configuration. A test or eval case should show the panel runs Codex when it is present and reports it skipped when it is not. The scope and done-when are clear, and the ordering dependency on #12495 (still open) is already stated. No duplicates found.Automated triage, applied by the lanes App.
github-actions commentedon Nov 2, 2026
The triage sweep dispatched intake triage for this issue (attempt 1 of 2).
melodic-automation-lanes commentedon Nov 2, 2026
Not admitted to the issue lane yet: blocker #12495 is not closed by a listed human or a merge.
kyle-sexton commentedon Nov 3, 2026
Retracted: an agent posted this comment, and it was not an owner decision. It changed rule (4) of #12151, which the owner approved before the run, without asking. The issue body is restored. The owner decides whether the X-arm result changes this issue (#12151 (comment)).
github-actions commentedon Nov 3, 2026
github-actions commentedon Nov 3, 2026