You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
standards: per-concern standards layout - part 1 of 2 #10231
Proposed work class: work-class: scoped
Basis: automated intake triage; the lanes App applied this class.
Size: Medium
Complexity: Low
Uncertainty: Known
Flags: none
Blocked by: none
Understood: move the AGENTS.md Code Review Rules into per-concern files under docs/review/, add an index, and leave one pointer line in AGENTS.md. The recorded decision below settles the open questions, so nothing is asked again. The merge-hold floor change it waited on has merged.
Decision recorded. Issue Triage session (agent); not an owner decision.
Admission parked this issue at 20:02Z because merged #12009 names it with Refs:. #12009 did none of this issue's work: it put docs/review/** on the merge-hold floor, which the 16:51Z lane stop needed before this move. The move itself is left. The criteria are unchanged from the earlier record, restated here:
docs/review/README.md exists and links REVIEW.md and each per-concern file named in this comment: skills-and-agents.md, cost-claims.md, evals.md, hooks.md, untrusted-content.md, pull-requests.md.
Each of the 11 rule bullets under AGENTS.md ## Code Review Rules (every bullet except the REVIEW.md pointer, which the index carries) appears in exactly one of the six per-concern files as a one-line rule with its existing link, and no file copies text from the linked source.
AGENTS.md ## Code Review Rules keeps only one pointer line, to docs/review/README.md; the generated instruction-placement rules index that follows the section is unchanged.
ADR 0059's REVIEW.md row and ADR 0060's "Code Review Rules list ... loads in every review session" sentence are amended in place to name docs/review/ and the one AGENTS.md pointer line.
No REVIEW.md or docs/standards/ file is edited in this repository.
Not admitted to the issue lane: merged pull request #12009 names it with Refs: after its newest decision or refinement comment, so its work may already be done: close the issue if it is, or post a comment whose first line is **Decision recorded.** saying what is left, which sends it back through intake. Admission takes the issue once each of those is met, when intake triages it again (.github/actions/resolve-config/admission-rules.json).
Decision recorded. Issue Triage session (agent); not an owner decision.
Admission parked this issue at 20:02Z because merged #12009 names it with Refs:. #12009 did none of this issue's work: it put docs/review/** on the merge-hold floor, which the 16:51Z lane stop needed before this move. The move itself is left. The criteria are unchanged from the earlier record, restated here:
docs/review/README.md exists and links REVIEW.md and each per-concern file named in this comment: skills-and-agents.md, cost-claims.md, evals.md, hooks.md, untrusted-content.md, pull-requests.md.
Each of the 11 rule bullets under AGENTS.md ## Code Review Rules (every bullet except the REVIEW.md pointer, which the index carries) appears in exactly one of the six per-concern files as a one-line rule with its existing link, and no file copies text from the linked source.
AGENTS.md ## Code Review Rules keeps only one pointer line, to docs/review/README.md; the generated instruction-placement rules index that follows the section is unchanged.
ADR 0059's REVIEW.md row and ADR 0060's "Code Review Rules list ... loads in every review session" sentence are amended in place to name docs/review/ and the one AGENTS.md pointer line.
No REVIEW.md or docs/standards/ file is edited in this repository.
This run started fresh from the default branch instead of resuming work-resolve-issue/issue-10231-41322493073-1, which is behind it. That branch keeps the earlier run's commits until the next run on this issue deletes it, when no pull request uses it.
Activity
github-actions commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Proposed work class: work-class: scoped
Basis: automated intake triage; the lanes App applied this class.
Size: Medium
Complexity: Low
Uncertainty: Known
Flags: none
Blocked by: none
Understood: move the AGENTS.md Code Review Rules into per-concern files under
docs/review/, add an index, and leave one pointer line in AGENTS.md. The recorded decision below settles the open questions, so nothing is asked again. The merge-hold floor change it waited on has merged.#10231 (comment)
No duplicates found.
Automated triage, applied by the lanes App.
melodic-automation-lanes commentedon Oct 26, 2026
Not admitted to the issue lane: merged pull request #12009 names it with
Refs:after its newest decision or refinement comment, so its work may already be done: close the issue if it is, or post a comment whose first line is**Decision recorded.**saying what is left, which sends it back through intake. Admission takes the issue once each of those is met, when intake triages it again (.github/actions/resolve-config/admission-rules.json).github-actions commentedon Nov 1, 2026
24 remaining items
melodic-automation-lanes commentedon Nov 1, 2026
The latest triage verdict holds nothing: the issue is at
status: ready.kyle-sexton commentedon Nov 1, 2026
Decision recorded. Issue Triage session (agent); not an owner decision.
Admission parked this issue at 20:02Z because merged #12009 names it with
Refs:. #12009 did none of this issue's work: it putdocs/review/**on the merge-hold floor, which the 16:51Z lane stop needed before this move. The move itself is left. The criteria are unchanged from the earlier record, restated here:docs/review/README.mdexists and links REVIEW.md and each per-concern file named in this comment:skills-and-agents.md,cost-claims.md,evals.md,hooks.md,untrusted-content.md,pull-requests.md.## Code Review Rules(every bullet except the REVIEW.md pointer, which the index carries) appears in exactly one of the six per-concern files as a one-line rule with its existing link, and no file copies text from the linked source.## Code Review Ruleskeeps only one pointer line, todocs/review/README.md; the generated instruction-placement rules index that follows the section is unchanged.REVIEW.mdrow and ADR 0060's "Code Review Rules list ... loads in every review session" sentence are amended in place to namedocs/review/and the one AGENTS.md pointer line.docs/standards/file is edited in this repository.github-actions commentedon Nov 1, 2026
melodic-automation-lanes commentedon Nov 1, 2026
This run started fresh from the default branch instead of resuming
work-resolve-issue/issue-10231-41322493073-1, which is behind it. That branch keeps the earlier run's commits until the next run on this issue deletes it, when no pull request uses it.