Repository navigation
fix(benchmark): 对齐官方 Judge 与 LongMemEval con 回答流程 - #24
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
现有自运行 Answer/Eval 使用自行缩写的 Judge 规则和统一的简短回答提示词,与公开 benchmark 的评分和回答流程不一致,可能改变同一系统的答案与判分。本 PR 使用固定版本的官方完整提示词、请求参数及判分语义,并为 LongMemEval 接入官方 con 阅读方式。
最终行为
固定来源
887091190789e8d6760e70b9edd696539923dc4f。9e0b455f4ef0e2ab8f2e582289761153549043fc。复现边界
此 PR 修改 benchmark 客户端,不改部署中的 Add/Search 服务,无需构建服务镜像。Memoria 继续作为被测记忆系统,top_k 仍按 adapter 返回记录计数,而非原生检索器的完整 session。未知来源保留原文、附加完整请求预算检查、HTTP 超时和有界重试均明确记录为集成差异;非 OpenAI 回答模型仍需核对其原生 tokenizer,配置的 Judge 模型也需与所选官方配置核实。
native_evaluator_equivalent保持 false;不宣称已复制 AML 未公开的评测细节。验证