Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 21796125793Details
💛 - Coveralls |
aaqilniz
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 19, 2026 16:11
aaqilniz
force-pushed
the
feat/custom-reference-keys
branch
from
September 19, 2026 16:14
463cd85 to
52b4437
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Hi, @dhmlau. Can you please have a look at this PR? |
aaqilniz
marked this pull request as draft
September 19, 2026 17:13
aaqilniz
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 19, 2026 17:23
8 tasks
…for hasManyThrough Signed-off-by: Muhammad Aaqil <aaqilcs102@gmail.com>
aaqilniz
force-pushed
the
feat/custom-reference-keys
branch
from
September 22, 2026 11:09
f3e515f to
42411b5
Compare
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Loopback offers the hasManyThrough relation with
keysFrom&keysTousing primary keys only.You can also define a hasManyThrough relation using non-primary but unique keys.
Like in the following example:
The product and customers are connected with Order not through primary keys but through unique keys.
This is how it looks:
Please note that this is backward compatible. There is no breaking change in the PR.
Checklist
npm testpasses on your machinepackages/cliwere updatedexamples/*were updated👉 Check out how to submit a PR 👈