Skip to content

docs: state repo scope in README (minimal, one app per mechanism) - #38

Open
rickstaa wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
rs/readme-align-description
Open

docs: state repo scope in README (minimal, one app per mechanism)#38
rickstaa wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
rs/readme-align-description

Conversation

@rickstaa

@rickstaa rickstaa commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What

  • The README header now says what this repo is: minimal example apps, one small app per transport, registration, and pricing mode — mirroring the repo description, with the payment loop spelled out ("payment flows directly on the network").
  • New scope statement under the examples table: the repo stays minimal on purpose (smallest possible app per mechanism, readable in minutes); bigger, full-featured apps belong under External examples.
  • Renamed the Communication schemas section to Transports — the term the repo description, the examples table, and the section body already use.
  • Swept the 8 remaining links still pointing at the pre-rename live-runner-example-apps name to app-examples (root README, CONTRIBUTING, hello-world/tiles/vllm READMEs).

Why

The repo description was rewritten to lead with coverage and the payment loop, but the README never stated the curation policy — a reader couldn't tell whether this repo intends to collect every app ever built or stay small. Stating the scope draws a clear boundary: this repo teaches each mechanism in the smallest possible app; complete, full-featured apps are linked under External examples.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 28, 2026 12:09

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Aligns the repository documentation with the updated repo description and removes stale references to the old GitHub repository name by updating links across the project READMEs.

Changes:

  • Updates the root README intro to mention that payment flows directly on the network and clarifies how each example differs (transport/registration/pricing).
  • Replaces remaining live-runner-example-apps GitHub links with app-examples links across docs.
  • Updates per-example READMEs (hello-world, tiles, vllm) to point issue references at the renamed repository.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
README.md Updates intro wording and fixes issue/compare links to the renamed repo.
CONTRIBUTING.md Updates the “Open an issue” link to livepeer/app-examples.
hello-world/README.md Updates issue link in the NOTE block to the renamed repo.
tiles/README.md Updates issue link in the NOTE block to the renamed repo.
vllm/README.md Updates issue link in the NOTE block to the renamed repo.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Say what the repo is upfront: minimal example apps, one small app per
transport, registration, and pricing mode, with payment flowing directly
on the network — mirroring the GitHub repo description. Rename the
Communication schemas section to Transports (the term the rest of the
README and the description already use), state explicitly that the repo
stays minimal and full-featured apps belong under External examples, and
sweep the remaining pre-rename live-runner-example-apps links to
app-examples.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@rickstaa
rickstaa force-pushed the rs/readme-align-description branch from 1c5d2d5 to 6afe695 Compare July 28, 2026 12:26
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 28, 2026 12:26
@rickstaa rickstaa changed the title docs: align README with repo description + fix stale repo links docs: state repo scope in README (minimal, one app per mechanism) Jul 28, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants