Skip to content

Revert "Replace log package with fully slog-based system"#8853

Merged
aarongable merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
revert-slog
Jul 6, 2026
Merged

Revert "Replace log package with fully slog-based system"#8853
aarongable merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
revert-slog

Conversation

@aarongable

@aarongable aarongable commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This reverts PR #8606, which was merged as commit abfceb5. The revert is clean with the exception of one line in cmd/shell.go, as a result of the function signature change in #8833.

We are reverting because automated analysis found several issues (mostly, but not all, minor) with the sweeping changes made in the slog PR. We will reland when the identified issues have been fixed.

Part of #8557

@aarongable aarongable changed the title Revert "Replace log package with fully slog-based system (#8606)" Revert "Replace log package with fully slog-based system" Jul 6, 2026
@aarongable aarongable marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2026 21:03
@aarongable aarongable requested a review from a team as a code owner July 6, 2026 21:03
@aarongable aarongable requested review from ezekiel and jsha July 6, 2026 21:03

@jsha jsha left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did a local git revert abfceb5f05ed9a3bac07762467d30ef43c37ead4 and got the same result (had to resolve a one-line merge conflict in func StatsAndLogging).

I'm surprised the revert was so clean - didn't we land some stuff that depended on the original PR?

@aarongable

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I thought we had, but I was mistaken: the diff I was thinking of is in #8828, which hasn't landed yet.

@aarongable aarongable merged commit 4f9cc84 into main Jul 6, 2026
18 checks passed
@aarongable aarongable deleted the revert-slog branch July 6, 2026 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants