[cinder-csi-plugin] Add mkfsOptions StorageClass parameter

[rybnico]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add support for a new mkfsOptions StorageClass parameter that allows cluster admins to pass custom mkfs flags when formatting volumes. This is particularly useful for Ceph-backed storage where passing -E nodiscard to mkfs.ext4 can dramatically speed up provisioning (e.g. from ~7 minutes to seconds for a 100 GB volume).

The parameter value is comma-separated, with each token further split on whitespace to produce individual mkfs command-line arguments. Example: mkfsOptions: "-E nodiscard,-O ^metadata_csum"

Implementation:

• Extract mkfsOptions from StorageClass params in CreateVolume and pass via VolumeContext (both new-volume and idempotent early-return paths)
• Parse mkfsOptions in NodeStageVolume using parseMkfsOptions() helper
• Use FormatAndMountSensitiveWithFormatOptions() from k8s.io/mount-utils to pass format options separately from mount options
• No behavior change when mkfsOptions is not set

Which issue this PR fixes(if applicable):
fixes #3068

Special notes for reviewers:
Inspired by the Ceph CSI implementation (ceph/ceph-csi#621).

Release note:

NONE

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: rybnico / name: Nico (d7fa2d8)

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @rybnico. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign stephenfin for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment