Skip to content

kmilo89/Applied-ML-Course

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

9 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Course Repository ST1613 - ST1631 Applied Machine Learning — Universidad EAFIT

Project Guidelines and Evaluation Rubric

General Description

Students must develop two Machine Learning projects during the course.
The final deliverables are:

  1. Research Article (7–10 pages) following an academic paper style (IEEE).
  2. Final Presentation (Week 8) with live Q&A.

The project will be graded in stages, each with a defined weight.


Part I: Written Report (Research Article) – 70%

The document must include the following:

  • (20%) Literature Review & State of the Art
    Synthesize high-quality sources (recent 5–10 years + seminal works). Compare and contrast methods and findings, identify convergences, contradictions, and explicit research gaps your work will address. Use consistent academic citations.

  • (15%) Research Question & Objectives
    Clearly state the research question and motivation grounded in the identified gap. Define SMART objectives (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound) aligned with the project scope.

  • (15%) Data & Preliminary Analysis
    Describe datasets, features (X), target (y), sampling, size, and data provenance. Include basic EDA (distributions, correlations), target balance, leakage checks, and justify the evaluation metric with respect to the objective.

  • (15%) Materials & Methods
    Detail preprocessing steps, feature engineering, model(s) and baselines, train/validation/test strategy, hyperparameter search and validation protocol (e.g., cross-validation), and reproducibility elements (random seeds, environment). Justify design choices.

  • (15%) Results
    Report quantitative results with appropriate metrics, tables/figures, and (when applicable) variability estimates (e.g., std/CI). Include ablations or comparisons against baselines to show incremental value.

  • (10%) Discussion
    Interpret results in context of the literature and objectives. Provide error analysis, limitations, threats to validity, and implications for deployment or future research.

  • (10%) Conclusions
    Concise takeaways that answer the research question, reflect on objective fulfillment, and outline concrete future work.


Part II: Final Presentation – 30%

Each team will present their project in the last class (10 minutes + 3 minutes Q&A).

  • (20%) Time Management
    Deliver the presentation within the assigned time, focusing on the most relevant aspects.

  • (20%) Language and Precision
    Use clear and technically accurate language when describing ML methods and results.

  • (20%) Methodology Explanation
    Present the workflow and reasoning in a structured, logical order.

  • (20%) Supporting Material
    Slides must support the talk (not replace it), highlighting results with appropriate visuals.

  • (20%) Handling Questions
    Respond with confidence, technical rigor, and respect to the audience’s questions.


Final Grade Distribution

  • Written Report (Research Article): 70%
  • Final Presentation: 30%

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages