Skip to content

doc: move available assertions chapter from readme to own file - #105

Merged
haraldmaida merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
doc/move-available-assertions-chapter-from-readme-to-own-file
Oct 17, 2026
Merged

haraldmaida merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
doc/move-available-assertions-chapter-from-readme-to-own-file

Conversation

@haraldmaida

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As the README has become a little long, we moved the "Available Assertions" chapter into a separate document in docs/available-assertions.md

@haraldmaida haraldmaida self-assigned this Oct 17, 2026
@haraldmaida haraldmaida added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Oct 17, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 17, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.44%. Comparing base (bea2088) to head (f93bbd6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #105   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.44%   86.44%           
=======================================
  Files          48       48           
  Lines        8346     8346           
  Branches     8346     8346           
=======================================
  Hits         7215     7215           
  Misses       1047     1047           
  Partials       84       84           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@haraldmaida
haraldmaida merged commit 8888791 into main Oct 17, 2026
20 checks passed
@haraldmaida
haraldmaida deleted the doc/move-available-assertions-chapter-from-readme-to-own-file branch October 17, 2026 12:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant