Skip to content

docs(arrival-pack): drop Opus from rule 16's cheaper-model list - #7

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/rule-16-drop-opus
Nov 12, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/rule-16-drop-opus

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

@hyperpolymath hyperpolymath commented Nov 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Follows hyperpolymath/rsr-template-repo#330 (merged). Rule 16 bars top-tier models from upkeep work, but its parenthetical listed Opus among the cheaper models. Owner ruling: drop Opus. The list now reads "(Sonnet and Haiku)".

Changes

  • .machine_readable/arrival-pack/arrival-pack.ncl: rule 16 wording, matching the template.
  • CLAUDE.md: regenerated. The generated region was not hand-edited.
  • No licence files touched.

RSR Quality Checklist

Required

  • Tests pass: not run. Only generated documentation text changed, and just validate-claude-md passes.
  • Code is formatted: not applicable. No source code changed.
  • Linter is clean: not applicable. No source code changed.
  • No banned language patterns
  • No unsafe blocks without // SAFETY: comments (none added)
  • No banned functions (none added)
  • SPDX license headers present on all new/modified source files: not applicable. No source files changed, and licence headers were not touched.
  • No secrets, credentials, or .env files included

As Applicable

Not applicable. This changes doctrine wording only: no project state, integrations, architecture, roadmap, dependencies or ABI/FFI change, and no CHANGELOG entry is needed.

Testing

  • just claude-md
  • just validate-claude-md (passes)

Screenshots

Not applicable. One-line text change.

The owner merges. Not merged by the bot.


Generated by Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated model-selection guidance for upkeep work to list Sonnet and Haiku as lower-cost options when the work requires meaningful effort.

Follow rsr-template-repo#330: rule 16 now lists only Sonnet and Haiku.
Regenerated CLAUDE.md with just claude-md; just validate-claude-md passes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Explain Change →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Walkthrough

The upkeep-model guidance in the arrival-pack doctrine and CLAUDE.md now names Sonnet and Haiku, with Opus removed from the list.

Changes: Upkeep model guidance

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update upkeep-model guidance
.machine_readable/arrival-pack/arrival-pack.ncl, CLAUDE.md
Both documents list Sonnet and Haiku as the models for upkeep work. Opus is no longer listed.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Change: Other

Possibly related PRs

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to a0b10

This is a documentation-only wording change to the upkeep-model guidance. It carries no runtime or user-facing risk and is ready to merge.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 4

Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title names the main change: rule 16 in the arrival-pack doctrine no longer lists Opus among the cheaper models. It matches the raw summary and the objectives, which both describe dropping Opus fr…
Description check Passed The description follows the repository template. It has a Summary that explains the change and links the related rsr-template-repo#330 work, and a Changes list naming both touched files. The RSR check…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Title check

Explanation

The title names the main change: rule 16 in the arrival-pack doctrine no longer lists Opus among the cheaper models. It matches the raw summary and the objectives, which both describe dropping Opus from the list. The title uses a conventional docs(scope) prefix and is 63 characters long.

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description follows the repository template. It has a Summary that explains the change and links the related rsr-template-repo#330 work, and a Changes list naming both touched files. The RSR checklist is filled in, and unchecked items carry reasons (tests not run, formatting and linter not applicable). The Testing section lists the commands run and their results. The Screenshots section is marked not applicable with a reason. Items that were not run are stated openly, but the Testing section gives no test output and the template's Required items remain unchecked, so the author should confirm the required checks before merge.

Finishing Touches

Generate unit tests (beta)

  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

Recent review info

Run configuration

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between de8b3fa and a0b1086.

Files selected for processing: 2

  • .machine_readable/arrival-pack/arrival-pack.ncl
  • CLAUDE.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2026 04:10
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ❌ Failed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ❌ Failed 2026-11-12T04:10:10.925034Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
a0b1086 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit f9c40ed into main Nov 12, 2026
42 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the docs/rule-16-drop-opus branch November 12, 2026 04:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants