BE-576: Upgrade @napi-rs/cli and napi crates to v3

[indietyp]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

This upgrades the napi-rs ecosystem to its latest major versions — bumping @napi-rs/cli from 2.18.4 to 3.6.2 and the corresponding Rust crates (napi, napi-derive, napi-build, napi-sys) from v2 to v3. This brings in breaking changes to the NAPI build tooling, requiring updates to how build targets are declared and how the CLI output directory is specified.

🔗 Related links

• https://napi.rs/

🔍 What does this change?

• Upgrades @napi-rs/cli from 2.18.4 to 3.6.2 in the mise config.
• Upgrades napi to 3.9.0, napi-derive to 3.5.6, napi-build to 2.3.2, and napi-sys to 3.2.1 in Cargo.toml.
• Enables the type-def feature on napi-derive to support TypeScript type definition generation.
• Updates the effect-dns-hickory build scripts to use the new CLI flag syntax (-o dist instead of positional dist argument).
• Migrates the napi config in effect-dns-hickory/package.json from the old name/triples format to the new buildName/targets format, explicitly listing all supported targets including x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, x86_64-pc-windows-msvc, and x86_64-apple-darwin.
• Removes the now-unused convert_case 0.6.0 and ctor 0.2.9 transitive dependencies, replacing them with convert_case 0.11.0 and ctor 1.0.6.
• Updates libloading from 0.8.9 to 0.9.0.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

• Existing build and integration tests for effect-dns-hickory.

❓ How to test this?

1. Checkout the branch.
2. Run yarn build in libs/@local/effect-dns/hickory.
3. Confirm the native module builds successfully and the generated impl.js and impl.d.ts files are emitted to dist.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 26, 2026 8:12am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 26, 2026 8:12am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	May 26, 2026 8:12am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Touches the native Node addon build and cross-platform target matrix for effect-dns-hickory; no app auth or data-path changes, but a broken build blocks that package.

Overview
Upgrades the napi-rs toolchain to v3: @napi-rs/cli in mise, workspace napi / napi-derive / napi-build / napi-sys in Cargo.toml, and Cargo.lock refresh (including newer libloading and ctor).

For @local/effect-dns-hickory, build scripts now pass -o dist instead of a positional output path, regenerate-packages uses napi create-npm-dirs, and the napi block switches from name/triples to binaryName / targets with an explicit list of seven triples (including x86_64 Linux/macOS/Windows). Workspace napi-derive enables the type-def feature for TS generation.

.gitignore adds libs/@local/effect-dns/hickory/npm for v3-generated npm layout artifacts.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 243bc3a. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[indietyp]

• BE-576: Upgrade @napi-rs/cli and napi crates to v3 #8752 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Upgrades the repo’s NAPI-RS toolchain to the v3 ecosystem to match the latest breaking changes in build/config conventions.

Changes:

• Bumps @napi-rs/cli from 2.18.4 → 3.6.2 in mise
• Updates Rust dependencies (napi, napi-derive, napi-build) to the v3-compatible versions and enables TS type-def generation
• Adjusts effect-dns-hickory build scripts to use -o dist instead of positional output args
• Migrates the package’s NAPI config from triples to an explicit targets list

Technical Notes: This aligns the native build + binding generation with the v3 CLI option/config schema to keep cross-platform builds working.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 1 suggestion posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 2 potential issues.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9194f71. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.97%. Comparing base (cb459a8) to head (243bc3a).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8752      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.81%   58.97%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files        1328     1340      +12     
  Lines      126811   129010    +2199     
  Branches     5790     5832      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits        74580    76079    +1499     
- Misses      51350    52033     +683     
- Partials      881      898      +17     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	2.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.21% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.74% <ø> (-0.07%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-store	37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.26% <ø> (-1.38%)	⬇️
rust.hashql-core	79.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	75.88% <ø> (-1.66%)	⬇️
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	86.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.06% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing bm/be-576-update-napi-to-v3 (243bc3a) with main (ae5c317)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (cb459a8) during the generation of this report, so ae5c317 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}23.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$47.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.845 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$33.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}15.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$4.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 107 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}17.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$4.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}20.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}18.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$4.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}20.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$6.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}21.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$4.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}19.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$5.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}20.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$5.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}24.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$4.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}22.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$5.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}20.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}14.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}14.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}15.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}15.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$50.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$94.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 538 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$54.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 322 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$57.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 422 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$69.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 384 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$51.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$450 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.30 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$99.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 622 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.910 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 431 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$340 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.36 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$20.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.642 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$21.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$21.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 100.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.371 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$21.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.692 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.716 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.618 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.111 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.392 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.255 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$37.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.741 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$35.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.267 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$36.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.627 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$37.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.600 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$35.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.443 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$37.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.788 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$34.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.317 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.962 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$98.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 534 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.519 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$163 \mathrm{ms} \pm 984 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 648 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.355 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 631 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.224 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 658 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.989 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 588 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 500 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.187 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 828 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.489 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 485 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.696 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 663 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.759 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 578 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 967 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 710 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$162 \mathrm{ms} \pm 725 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 652 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$559 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.24 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.041 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph