Skip to content

Update tool cargo:wasm-pack to 0.15.0#8749

Open
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/cargo-wasm-pack-0.x
Open

Update tool cargo:wasm-pack to 0.15.0#8749
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/cargo-wasm-pack-0.x

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot commented May 23, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
cargo:wasm-pack minor 0.13.10.15.0

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

wasm-bindgen/wasm-pack (cargo:wasm-pack)

v0.15.0

Compare Source

  • ✨ Features

    • Add wasm64-unknown-unknown target support - audreyt, pull/1553

      Parameterizes the target triple in cargo_build_wasm() and cargo_build_wasm_tests(), extracts --target from extra options, adds --enable-memory64 to wasm-opt args for wasm64 targets, and dynamically constructs the CARGO_TARGET_*_RUNNER env var from the target triple.

    • Add --panic-unwind flag to build and test commands - guybedford, pull/1572

    • Move wasm-pack-template into the repo - guybedford, pull/1573

      Vendors the project template directly into this repository so wasm-pack new no longer depends on a separate external template repo.

  • 🤕 Fixes

    • Replace deprecated binary-install and add release auto-publish - guybedford, pull/1579

      The 0.14.0 npm package shipped with the old drager/wasm-pack release URL and was never republished after the repository moved, so npm install -g wasm-pack failed with a 404. This inlines the install/run logic into npm/binary.js, drops the deprecated binary-install dependency (which pulled in unmaintained rimraf@3, glob@7, inflight, and tar@6), promotes tar to a real dependency, and adds release workflow automation so the npm package no longer requires a manual npm publish.

    • Make init.sh POSIX-compatible and stop mangling $VERSION - guybedford, pull/1578

    • Add trailing newline in package.json - joaofreires, pull/1162

    • Fix dragerwasm-bindgen in URLs - akesling, pull/1571

  • 🛠️ Maintenance

    • Bump follow-redirects from 1.15.11 to 1.16.0 in /npm - [dependabot], pull/1565

    • Bump rustls-webpki from 0.103.9 to 0.103.13 - [dependabot], pull/1570

    • Bump brace-expansion from 1.1.12 to 1.1.14 in /npm - [dependabot], pull/1574

    • Bump tar from 0.4.44 to 0.4.45 - [dependabot], pull/1559

    • Bump time from 0.3.45 to 0.3.47 - [dependabot], pull/1549

    • Bump minimatch from 3.1.2 to 3.1.5 in /npm - [dependabot], pull/1555

  • 📖 Documentation

    • Update documentation and references to the new GitHub repo - [qinyuhang], pull/1567

    • Fix typo in prerequisites documentation - pRizz, pull/1545

v0.14.0

Compare Source

  • ✨ Features

    • Support arbitrary wasm targets (WASI support) - RReverser, pull/1524

      Allows building for targets other than wasm32-unknown-unknown, enabling WASI and other custom wasm targets.

    • macOS ARM (aarch64-apple-darwin) build support - kaleidawave, pull/1529

      Adds native Apple Silicon support in release builds and NPM package.

    • Allow --split-linked-modules flag for wasm-bindgen - codeart1st, pull/1443

    • Custom build profile support - rafaelbeckel, pull/1428

      Allows using custom cargo profiles via --profile.

  • 🤕 Fixes

  • 🛠️ Maintenance

    • Update dependencies to latest versions - [drager], pull/1536

    • Security workflow permissions fixes - [drager]

    • Bump ring from 0.17.8 to 0.17.14 - dependabot, pull/1516

    • Bump brace-expansion from 1.1.11 to 1.1.12 in /npm - dependabot, pull/1515

    • Bump rustls from 0.23.16 to 0.23.18 - dependabot, pull/1451

    • Fix tar vulnerability (CVE-2026-23745) in npm package

      Override tar dependency to ^7.5.3 to fix arbitrary file overwrite and symlink poisoning vulnerability (GHSA-8qq5-rm4j-mr97).

    • Fix axios vulnerabilities in npm package

      Override axios dependency to ^0.30.0 to fix SSRF/credential leakage via absolute URL and XSRF-TOKEN leakage (CSRF) vulnerabilities.

  • 📖 Documentation


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge May 23, 2026 12:37
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented May 23, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 29, 2026 9:39am
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 29, 2026 9:39am
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview, Comment May 29, 2026 9:39am

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label May 23, 2026
@augmentcode
Copy link
Copy Markdown

augmentcode Bot commented May 23, 2026

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the mise-managed tool version for cargo:wasm-pack from 0.13.1 to 0.14.0.
Why: Keeps the repository’s WASM build tooling current, incorporating upstream fixes and new capabilities (e.g., broader target support and packaging updates).

🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@augmentcode augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 23, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.09%. Comparing base (7808510) to head (0734d11).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8749      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.04%   59.09%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files        1341     1343       +2     
  Lines      129368   129632     +264     
  Branches     5835     5858      +23     
==========================================
+ Hits        76380    76601     +221     
- Misses      52088    52124      +36     
- Partials      900      907       +7     
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 2.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower 67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 26.74% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 28.26% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 79.28% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 75.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 86.77% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.06% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 23, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks


Comparing deps/tool/cargo-wasm-pack-0.x (0734d11) with main (7808510)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (e3c93dc) during the generation of this report, so 7808510 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/tool/cargo-wasm-pack-0.x branch from 15197a4 to 0734d11 Compare May 29, 2026 09:27
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot changed the title Update tool cargo:wasm-pack to 0.14.0 Update tool cargo:wasm-pack to 0.15.0 May 29, 2026
@cursor
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cursor Bot commented May 29, 2026

PR Summary

Low Risk
Single version pin in developer tooling config with no application or runtime code changes.

Overview
Bumps the mise-managed cargo:wasm-pack toolchain from 0.13.1 to 0.15.0 in .config/mise/config.toml, so local/CI environments that install compile tools via mise pick up the newer wasm-pack release (including wasm64 support, --panic-unwind, and npm install fixes noted in upstream 0.14–0.15 changelogs).

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 0734d11. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$27.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.306 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$44.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}16.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$25.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$4.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.814 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.844 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$4.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.912 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.203 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.789 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.147 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.509 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.573 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.417 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.321 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.491 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.845 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.202 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.887 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$47.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$52.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$46.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$65.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 411 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$62.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.322 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$58.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 438 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.714 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 553 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$47.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 253 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.704 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$302 \mathrm{ms} \pm 924 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.464 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.218 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 131 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$21.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.747 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$26.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 139 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.905 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.968 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 134 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.609 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.602 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.715 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$38.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.582 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 319 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.885 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$36.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.299 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$37.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 346 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.587 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$35.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.903 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$37.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$36.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 387 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.520 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$98.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 573 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.930 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$155 \mathrm{ms} \pm 887 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 535 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.825 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 584 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 692 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.640 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$131 \mathrm{ms} \pm 849 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 538 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 587 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.470 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 577 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 721 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$129 \mathrm{ms} \pm 566 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 552 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.698 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$153 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.14 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-18.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$152 \mathrm{ms} \pm 642 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$41.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$574 \mathrm{ms} \pm 838 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants