Skip to content

Conversation

@joshlf
Copy link
Member

@joshlf joshlf commented Jan 2, 2026

Previously, we allowed for Src: Read<A, R> and Dst: Read<A, S> for
different R and S "reason" parameters. This is an unnecessary degree
of freedom (two types are only ever Read<A> for a particular A for
the same reason – either because A = Exclusive or because both types
implement Immutable). This degree of freedom required more verbose
type annotations by callers.


Latest Update: v9 — Compare vs v8

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v5 v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v4 v3 v2 v1 Base
v3 v2 v1 Base
v2 v1 Base
v1 Base

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @joshlf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request streamlines the type system within the zerocopy library by simplifying the MutationCompatible trait's implementation for BecauseRead. By eliminating an redundant type parameter, the change reduces the complexity of type annotations required by callers and enhances the overall clarity and consistency of the library's internal type logic. This ultimately makes the library more ergonomic and easier to work with.

Highlights

  • Type System Simplification: The MutationCompatible trait implementation for BecauseRead has been simplified by removing an unnecessary S type parameter, reducing the "degree of freedom" in type annotations.
  • Reduced Type Verbosity: Calls to recall_validity and transmute methods now require less verbose type annotations, improving code readability and maintainability.
  • Trait Bound Consistency: Added [u8]: Read<A, R> trait bounds to Ptr methods (as_bytes and try_cast_into_no_leftover) to ensure consistent Read trait implementation across types after the simplification.
  • Test Updates: Existing test cases in zerocopy-derive were updated to reflect the new, simplified type signatures, ensuring correctness.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 2, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 92.03%. Comparing base (a6e9a9b) to head (27689d2).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/util/macros.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                            Coverage Diff                             @@
##           G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9    #2867   +/-   ##
==========================================================================
  Coverage                                      92.03%   92.03%           
==========================================================================
  Files                                             20       20           
  Lines                                           5874     5874           
==========================================================================
  Hits                                            5406     5406           
  Misses                                           468      468           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request simplifies the MutationCompatible trait implementations by removing an unnecessary degree of freedom in the "reason" parameters. This change is propagated across the codebase, simplifying type annotations at various call sites. The changes are sound and improve the maintainability of the code. I have no major concerns.

@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 branch from 3e60851 to 5db7a0c Compare January 5, 2026 20:08
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gdeb4f5a282b778a82175703218739a93074d0cc4 branch from 6414d5d to 48e9c89 Compare January 5, 2026 20:08
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 branch from 5db7a0c to 155e82d Compare January 6, 2026 16:21
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gdeb4f5a282b778a82175703218739a93074d0cc4 branch 2 times, most recently from 13498ff to 933a877 Compare January 6, 2026 16:35
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 branch 2 times, most recently from 52ce959 to 2dd1cbd Compare January 6, 2026 16:42
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gdeb4f5a282b778a82175703218739a93074d0cc4 branch from 933a877 to 5dd32ad Compare January 6, 2026 16:42
Base automatically changed from Gdeb4f5a282b778a82175703218739a93074d0cc4 to main January 6, 2026 17:28
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 branch from 2dd1cbd to e933a0e Compare January 7, 2026 18:08
Previously, we allowed for `Src: Read<A, R>` and `Dst: Read<A, S>` for
different `R` and `S` "reason" parameters. This is an unnecessary degree
of freedom (two types are only ever `Read<A>` for a particular `A` for
the same reason – either because `A = Exclusive` or because both types
implement `Immutable`). This degree of freedom required more verbose
type annotations by callers.

gherrit-pr-id: Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the Gbec926233303ce55c894f8ba65c939dd42690530 branch from e933a0e to 27689d2 Compare January 7, 2026 21:28
@joshlf joshlf changed the base branch from main to G57ec07c3841271440bbaf40cab04b942cbdbddb9 January 7, 2026 21:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants