Cleanup Java README.md by removing outdated sections

[brunoborges]

Removed sections on CI/CD workflows, contributing, agentic reference implementation sync, support, code of conduct, and security from README.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Note

Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.

This PR trims the Java SDK README by removing several repository-wide informational sections (workflows, contributing, support, code of conduct, security) and a note about how tests depend on the upstream copilot-sdk test harness.

Changes:

• Removed “CI/CD Workflows” section and related pointers (WORKFLOWS.md, contributing guidance, reference implementation sync details).
• Removed “Support”, “Code of Conduct”, and “Security” sections from the README.
• Removed the note describing the requirement/behavior of the upstream test harness clone during build.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
java/README.md	Removes multiple contributor/operator-facing documentation sections, leaving only development setup and license content.

Copilot's findings

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

java/README.md:1

• Removing the CI/CD and Contributing/reference-sync sections makes the README much less discoverable for common entry points (how to contribute, where workflows are documented, how the Java port stays in sync with the reference implementation). If the intent is to simplify the README, consider keeping short one-paragraph sections that at least link to WORKFLOWS.md/CONTRIBUTING.md and briefly mention the reference-impl sync workflow/prompt; otherwise contributors lose the primary pointer to those processes.

# GitHub Copilot SDK for Java

• Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
• Comments generated: 1