dev-util/elf-dissector: new package, add 9999 #1066
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
parona-source
force-pushed
the
elf-dissector
branch
from
bab64f1 to
e990d9f
Compare
Signed-off-by: Alfred Wingate <parona@protonmail.com>
parona-source
force-pushed
the
elf-dissector
branch
from
e990d9f to
1378107
Compare
a17r
requested changes
Aug 16, 2025
Comment on lines
+7
to
+8
| KFMIN=6.0 | ||
| QTMIN=6.7 |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We do not depend on KFMIN <6.9.0 for quite some time to migrate everything away from ecm.eclass handled xdg to manual inherit.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@thesamesam I looked at my worktrees and noticed I had a very unfinished ebuild and apparently got confused at libiberty and stopped (its just a static library in binutils-libs that gets installed even with USE="-static-libs"). Decided to finish and it was quite straightforward :D
Edit: I think the test failures are maybe from libdwarf. Upstream tests against 0.11.1 while gentoo packages 2.1.0
Edit: Edit: its not libwarf, downgraded to 0.11.1 and the same test failures persist.