Skip to content

export testresults as inlined ocm-resource#361

Merged
hebelsan merged 1 commit intogardener:masterfrom
heldkat:I750371-test-results-rendering
Feb 10, 2026
Merged

export testresults as inlined ocm-resource#361
hebelsan merged 1 commit intogardener:masterfrom
heldkat:I750371-test-results-rendering

Conversation

@heldkat
Copy link
Contributor

@heldkat heldkat commented Feb 6, 2026

How to categorize this PR?

/area compliance
/kind enhancement
/platform openstack

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

export testresults as inlined ocm-resource

@heldkat heldkat requested review from a team as code owners February 6, 2026 16:33
@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added area/compliance Compliance related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the cla-assistant.io CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 6, 2026
@gardener-github-actions gardener-github-actions bot added the ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. label Feb 6, 2026
@heldkat
Copy link
Contributor Author

heldkat commented Feb 6, 2026

Should replace #343

@heldkat heldkat force-pushed the I750371-test-results-rendering branch from bdecc6a to 390b7b9 Compare February 6, 2026 16:46
with:
blobs-directory: /tmp/blobs.d
ocm-resources: |
- name: gosec-report
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the pipeline fails because this is being handled as a list, but our provider extensions are not list-based:
https://github.com/gardener/gardener-extension-provider-openstack/blob/21c32a1f896ee14030567d753bfaff18f5fb7e18/.github/workflows/build.yaml#L137

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, I am not so sure this is what causes the problem. This is to my knowledge the standard implementation for the component descriptor when adding more than one ocm-resource...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, but now I see that the provider extension does not have an addition of test-build-logs at all yet. I will try to fix this first and see whether it resolves the issue...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am confused. How come this change is not in the master branch although it was merged? https://github.com/gardener/gardener-extension-provider-openstack/pull/1107/changes

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am confused. How come this change is not in the master branch although it was merged? https://github.com/gardener/gardener-extension-provider-openstack/pull/1107/changes

Was apparently reverted by https://github.com/gardener/gardener-extension-provider-openstack/pull/1159/changes

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, I will create a new PR.

@hebelsan hebelsan added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. labels Feb 10, 2026
@heldkat heldkat force-pushed the I750371-test-results-rendering branch from 6e314c3 to 8b4c38f Compare February 10, 2026 12:08
@heldkat heldkat force-pushed the I750371-test-results-rendering branch from 8b4c38f to d305263 Compare February 10, 2026 13:44
Copy link
Contributor

@hebelsan hebelsan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 10, 2026
@gardener-prow
Copy link

gardener-prow bot commented Feb 10, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hebelsan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@gardener-prow
Copy link

gardener-prow bot commented Feb 10, 2026

LGTM label has been added.

DetailsGit tree hash: c1c981ba946aa60df9703752c885cf8163485fb6

@gardener-prow gardener-prow bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 10, 2026
@hebelsan hebelsan merged commit 2e935b5 into gardener:master Feb 10, 2026
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/compliance Compliance related cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the cla-assistant.io CLA. kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants